References
Ackema, P. (1995). Syntax below zero. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: a general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany: SUNY Press.
Bobaljik, J. D. (2000). The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 35–71.
Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after syntax. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Carstairs, A. (1987). Allomorphy in inflection. London: Croom Helm.
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
den Besten, H. (1977). On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Ms., University of Amsterdam [Published in 1983, in W. Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of the West Germania (pp. 47–131). Amsterdam: Benjamins].
Embick, D. (2010). Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: the nature of generalizations in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10, 210–231.
Jackendoff, R. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language, 51, 639–671.
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kuryłowicz, J. (1949). La nature des procès dits analogiques. Acta Linguistica, 5, 121–138.
Marantz, A. (1993). Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar (pp. 113–150). Stanford: CSLI.
McCawley, J. (1968). Lexical insertion in a grammar without deep structure. In B. Darden, C. Bailey, & A. Davison (Eds.), CLS 4. Papers from the fourth meeting of the Chicago linguistic society (pp. 71–80). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Mel’cuk, I. (1994). Suppletion: toward a logical analysis of the concept. Studies in Language, 18, 339–410.
Myers, S. (1984). Zero derivation and inflection. In M. Speas & R. Sproat (Eds.), MIT working papers in linguistics (Vol. 7, pp. 53–69). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Newmeyer, F. (1992). Iconicity and generative grammar. Language, 68, 756–796.
Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In D. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing (pp. 216–271). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Starke, M. (2009). Nanosyntax: a short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd, 36(1), 1–6.
Trommer, J. (2008). A feature-geometric approach to Amharic verb classes. In A. Bachrach & A. Nevins (Eds.), Inflectional identity (pp. 206–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tuggy, D. (2005). Cognitive approach to word-formation. In P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 233–265). Dordrecht: Springer.
Wiese, R. (1996). Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 183–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fábregas, A. Notes on exponents. A review of Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence. Morphology 24, 71–82 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-014-9233-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-014-9233-0