Skip to main content

Preface

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aissen, J. (1999). Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17(4), 673–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23(3), 435–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, S. R. (1982). Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 571–612.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Arbaoui, N. (2010). Les dix formes de l’arabe classique à l’interface phonologie- syntaxe- pour une déconstruction du gabarit. PhD thesis, Université Paris 7.

  6. Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Linguistic Inquiry monographs: Vol. 22. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arregi, K., & Nevins, A. (2012). Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Baerman, M. (2005). Directionality and (un)natural classes in syncretism. Language, 80(4), 807–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baerman, M. (2007). Syncretism. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 539–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baerman, M., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. (2005). The syntax-morphology interface: a study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Bendjaballah, S. (2001). The negative preterite in Kabyle Berber. Folia Linguistica, 34, 185–223.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bendjaballah, S., & Haiden, M. (2003). Templatic architecture. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 32, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bendjaballah, S., & Haiden, M. (2008). A typology of emptiness in templates. In J. Hartmann, V. Hegedüs, & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Sounds of silence (pp. 21–57). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2012). The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In J. Trommer (Ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence (pp. 8–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Bermúdez-Otero, R. Stratal Optimality Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In preparation.

  17. Bloch, B. (1947). English verb inflection. Language, 23, 399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bobaljik, J. D. (2000). The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 35–71.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bobaljik, J. D. (2008). Paradigms, optimal and otherwise: a case for skepticism. In A. Bachrach & A. I. Nevins (Eds.), Inflectional Identity (pp. 29–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after syntax: pronominal clitics in Romance. PhD thesis, MIT.

  21. Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brown, D., & Hippisley, A. (2012). Network morphology a defaults-based theory of word structure. Cambridge studies in linguistics.: Vol. 133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cysouw, M. (2003). The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Downing, L. J. (2006). Canonical forms in prosodic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Embick, D. (2010). Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge: MIT.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Embick, D., & Marantz, A. (2008). Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Faust, N. (2011). Forme et fonction dans la morphologie nominale de l’hébreu moderne: études en morpho-syntaxe. PhD thesis, Université Denis Diderot (Paris 7).

  30. Faust, N. (2012). Non-concatenative realization in the verbal inflection of Modern Hebrew. Morphology, 22(4), 453–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Frampton, J. (2010). Distributed reduplication. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Goldsmith, J. A. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. PhD thesis, MIT.

  33. Guerssel, M., & Lowenstamm, J. (1990). The derivational morphology of the Classical Arabic verbal system. Université du Québec à Montréal and Université Paris 7.

  34. Guerssel, M., & Lowenstamm, J. (1996). Ablaut in classical Arabic measure I active verbal forms. In J. Lecarme, J. Lowenstamm, & U. Shlonsky (Eds.), Studies in Afroasiatic grammar (pp. 123–134). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gurevich, O. (2006). Constructional morphology: the Georgian version. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

  36. Halle, M. (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(1), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Halle, M. (1997). Distributed morphology: impoverishment and fission. In Y. K. Benjamin Bruening & M. McGinnis (Eds.), Papers at the interface. MIT working papers in linguistics: Vol. 30 (pp. 425–449). Cambridge MA: MITWPL.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Halle, M., & Vaux, B. (1998). Theoretical aspects of Indo-European nominal morphology: the nominal declensions of Latin and Armenian. In J. Jasanoff, H. C. Melchert, & L. Olivier (Eds.), Mi’r Curad: Studies in honor of Clavert Watkins (pp. 223–240). Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beitraege zur Sprachwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Harley, H., & Ritter, E. (2002). A feature-geometric analysis of person and number. Language, 78(3), 482–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Harris, Z. S. (1942). Morpheme alternants in linguistic theory. Language, 18(3), 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hay, J., & Plag, I. (2004). What constrains possible suffix combinations? on the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 565–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hay, J. B. (2000). Causes and consequences of word structure. PhD thesis, Northwestern University. available under. http://www.ling.canterbury.ac.nz/jen/pubs.html.

  44. Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10, 210–231.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Jackendoff, R. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language, 5(3), 639–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Keine, S. (2012). How complex are complex words? Evidence from linearization. Lingua, 122, 1268–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kiparsky, P. (1983). Word-formation and the lexicon. In F. Ingemann (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 mid-America linguistics conference (pp. 3–32). University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kiparsky, P. (2000). Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review, 17, 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kiparsky, P. (2010). Reduplication in Stratal OT. In L. Uyechi & L. H. Wee (Eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: pattern interaction in language & life. (Festschrift for K.P. Mohanan) (pp. 125–142). Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lowenstamm, J. (2003). À propos de gabarits. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 32, 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Luís, A. R. & Bermúdez-Otero, R. (Eds.) The morphome debate: diagnosing and analysing morphomic patterns. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In preparation

  53. MacBride, A. (2004). A constraint-based approach to morphology. PhD thesis, UCLA.

  54. Maiden, M. (2005). Morphological autonomy and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology, 2004, 137–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Marantz, A. (1982). Re reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 483–545.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional morphology: a theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  57. McCarthy, J. (1979). Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. PhD thesis, MIT.

  58. McCarthy, J. (2007). Hidden generalizations: phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  59. McCarthy, J. (2008). The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology, 25, 271–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. McCarthy, J. (2010). An introduction to harmonic serialism. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(10), 1001–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. McCarthy, J., Kimper, W., & Mullin, K. (2012). Reduplication in harmonic serialism. Morphology, 22, 173–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. In NELS, Amherst (Vol. 24, pp. 333–379).

    Google Scholar 

  63. McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics, 249–384.

  64. Neef, M. (1996). Wortdesign: Eine deklarative Analyse der deutschen Verbflexion. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Neeleman, A., & Szendröi, K. (2007). Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4), 671–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Nevins, A. I. (2003). Do person/number syncretisms refer to negative values? Handout of a talk at the LSA meeting. Atlanta.

  67. Noyer, R. R. (1992). Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. PhD thesis, MIT.

  68. Rucart, P. (2001). The vocalism of strong verbs in Afar. In A. Simpson (Ed.), Proceedings of BLS 27—special session on Afroasiatic languages. University of California, Berkeley, March 22-25 2001. (pp. 99–108). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Rucart, P. (2006). Morphologie gabaritique et interface phonosyntaxique. PhD thesis, Paris 7, Sciences du Langage.

  70. Russel, K. (1999). MOT: Sketch of an OT approach to morphology. Ms., University of Manitoba, ROA-352-1099.

  71. Saffran, J. R., Newport, E., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: the role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Steele, S. (1995). Towards a theory of morphological information. Language, 71(2), 260–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Stump, G. T. (1993). On rules of referral. Language, 69, 449–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  75. Stump, G. T. (2012). The formal and functional architecture of inflectional morphology. In A. Ralli, G. Booij, S. Scalise, & A. Karasimos (Eds.), Morphology and the architecture of grammar: online proceedings of the eighth Mediterranean morphology meeting (MMM8), Cagliari, Italy, 14–17 September 2011 (pp. 254–270). See http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Stump, G. T., & Stewart, T. (2007). Paradigm function morphology and the morphology/syntax interface. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 383–421). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Trommer, J. (2003). Feature (non-)insertion in a minimalist approach to spellout. In Proceedings of CLS 39 (pp. 469–480).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wunderlich, D. (1996). A minimalist model of inflectional morphology. In C. Wilder, M. Bierwisch, & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.), The role of economy principles in linguistic theory (pp. 267–298). Berlin: Akademie.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wunderlich, D. (2003). A minimalist view on inflectional paradigms: the expression of person and number in subjects and objects. Available under http://web.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/~wdl/min-view2.pdf.

  80. Wunderlich, D., & Fabri, R. (1994). Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 20, 236–294.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Xu, Z., & Aronoff, M. (2011). A realization Optimality Theory approach to blocking and extended morphological exponence. Journal of Linguistics, 47(3), 673–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Trommer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trommer, J. Preface. Morphology 23, 95–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-013-9222-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Linguistic Theory
  • Linguistic Inquiry
  • Correspondence Theory
  • Derivational Morphology
  • Vocabulary Insertion