Abstract
Optimal Construction Morphology (OCM) is a new construction-based theory of morphology that selects the optimal combination of lexical constructions to best achieve a target meaning. OCM combines elements of realizational and item-based morphological theories. It is realizational, in that words are constructed in response to a given meaning target. It is incremental in that words are built from lexical structures, one layer at a time. It is optimizing in that, in response to a meaning target, the morphological grammar dips into the lexicon, building and assessing morphological constituents incrementally until the word being built optimally matches the target meaning. In this paper OCM is shown to illuminate a vexing optimization puzzle confronted by all theories of morphology: why is redundancy in morphology rejected as ungrammatical in some situations (“blocking”), but absolutely required in others (“multiple/extended exponence”)? The OCM analysis incorporates two notions of morphological strength that have been proposed in the literature: stem type, on a scale from root (weakest) to word (strongest), and exponence strength, related to productivity and parsability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, F., & Stump, G. (2004). Paradigms and periphrastic expression: a study in realization-based lexicalism. In A. Spencer & L. Sadler (Eds.), Projecting morphology (pp. 111–157). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, S. R. (2001). On some issues in morphological exponence. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2000 (pp. 1–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Andrews, A. (1990). Unification and morphological blocking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 8(4), 507–557.
Anttila, A. (1997). Deriving variation from grammar. In F. Hinskens, R. Van Hout, & W. L. Wetzels (Eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory (pp. 35–68). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Anttila, A. (2002). Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 20(1), 1–42.
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ashton, E. O. (1947). Swahili grammar including intonation. London: Longmans. Second edition published in 1966.
Bastin, Y. (1986). Les suffixes causatifs dans les langues bantoues. Africana Linguistica X. Série IN-8. Sciences Humaines. N. 121.55–145.
Bergen, B. K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 80, 290–311.
Bermudez-Otero, R., & McMahon, A. (2006). English phonology and morphology. In B. Aarts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 382–410). Oxford: Blackwell.
Blevins, J. (2003). Stems and paradigms. Language, 79, 737–767.
Bobaljik, J. (2000). The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In K. K. Grohmann & C. Struijke (Eds.), University of Maryland working papers in linguistics (Vol. 10, pp. 35–71).
Bobaljik, J. (2005). Itelmen plural diminutives: a belated reply to Perlmutter 1988. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004 (pp. 317–319). Berlin: Springer.
Booij, G. (2007). Construction morphology and the lexicon. In F. Montermini, G. Boyé, & N. Hathout (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th décembrettes: morphology in Tolouse (pp. 34–44). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burani, C., & Thornton, A. M. (2003). The interplay of root, suffix and whole-word frequency in processing derived words. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 157–208). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Caballero, G. (2008). Choguita Rarámuri Tarahumara phonology and morphology. University of California, Berkeley dissertation.
Caballero, G., & Harris, A. C. (2010). A Working typology of multiple exponence: cross-linguistic variation and theoretical implications. Paper presented at the XIV international morphology meeting, Budapest.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dimmendaal, G.J. (1983). The Turkana language. Dordrecht: Foris.
Donohue, M. (2003). Agreement in the Skou language: a historical account. Oceanic Linguistics, 42, 479–498.
Downing, L. (2001). Ungeneralizable minimality in Ndebele. Studies in African Linguistics, 30, 33–58.
Downing, L. (2005). Jita causative doubling provides optimal paradigms. In L. Downing, T. Hall, & R. Raffelsiefen (Eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory (pp. 122–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dressler, W. (2004). Hypercharacterization and productivity in inflectional morphology. In U. M. T. Krisch & T. Lindner (Eds.), Analecta Homimi Universali Dicata: Festschrift für Oswald Panagl zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 515–524). Stuttgart: Heinz.
Embick, D., & Halle, M. (2005). On the status of stems in morphological theory. In T. Geerts & H. Jacobs (Eds.), Proceedings of Going Romance 2003, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fabb, N. (1988). English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 64, 527–539.
Gnanadesikan, A. (1997). Phonology with ternary scales. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Linguistics.
Good, J. (2005). Reconstructing morpheme order in Bantu: the case of causativization and applicativization. Diachronica, 22, 55–109.
Gurevich, O. (2006). Constructional morphology: the Georgian version. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hankamer, J., & Mikkelsen, L. (2005). When movement must be blocked: a reply to Embick and Noyer. Linguistic Inquiry, 361, 85–125.
Hargus, S. (1988). Outstanding dissertations in linguistics series. The lexical phonology of sekani. New York: Garland Publishing. 1988.
Harris, A. (2008). Explaining exuberant agreement. In T. Eythorsson (Ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: the rosendal papers (pp. 265–283). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hay, J. (2002). From speech perception to morphology: affix ordering revisited. Language, 78(3), 527–555.
Hay, J., & Baayen, H. (2002). Parsing and productivity. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2001 (pp. 203–235). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hay, J., & Baayen, H. (2005). Trends in cognitive sciences: Vol. 9. Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology (pp. 342–348).
Hay, J., & Plag, I. (2004). What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 22, 565–596.
Hippisley, A. (1997). Declarative derivation: a network morphology account of Russian word formation with reference to nouns denoting ‘person’. PhD thesis, University of Surrey.
Hippisley, A. (2001). Word formation rules in a default inheritance framework: a network account of Russian personal nouns. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1999 (pp. 221–261). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hyman, L. M. (2003a). Sound change, misanalysis and analogy in the Bantu causative. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 24, 55–90.
Hyman, L. M. (2003b). Suffix ordering in Bantu: a morphocentric approach. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2002 (pp. 245–281). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hyman, L. M., Inkelas, S., & Galen, S. (2009). A subtree correspondence theory of reduplication in Ndebele. In K. Hanson & S. Inkelas (Eds.), The nature of the word: essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky (pp. 273–310). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hyman, L., & Mchombo, S. (1992). Morphotactic constraints in the Chichewa verb stem. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (Vol. 18, pp. 350–364).
Inkelas, S. (1989). Prosodic constituency in the lexicon. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Inkelas, S. (1993). Nimboran position class morphology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 11, 559–624.
Inkelas, S. (1998). The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: a case study from dominance. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1997 (pp. 121–155). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Inkelas, S., & Orgun, O.C. (1995). Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish. Language, 71, 763–793.
Inkelas, S., & Orgun, O.C. (1998). Level nonordering in recursive morphology: evidence from Turkish. In S. Lapointe, D. Brentari, & P. Farrell (Eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax (pp. 360–405). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2007). Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics, 45, 133–171.
Kibrik, A. (1991). Organising principles for nominal paradigms in Daghestan languages: comparative and typological observations. In F. Plank (Ed.), Paradigms (pp. 255–274). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kiparsky, P. (1982a). Word-formation and the lexicon. In F. Ingemann (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 mid-America linguistics conference (pp. 3–29). Lawrence: Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas
Kiparsky, P. (1982b). Lexical morphology and phonology. In I.-S. Yang (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 3–91). Seoul: Hanshin.
Kiparsky, P. (1984). On the lexical phonology of Icelandic. In C.-C. Elert, I. Johnson, & E. Stangert (Eds.), Umeå studies in the humanities: Vol. 59. Nordic prosody III (pp. 135–164). Stockholm: Almqvist och Wiksell.
Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 2, 85–138.
Kiparsky, P. (2000). Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review, 17, 351–367.
Kiparsky, P. (2005). Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004 (pp. 113–135). Berlin: Springer.
Kiparsky, P. (2008). Fenno-swedish quantity: contrast in stratal OT. In B. Vaux & A. Nevins (Eds.), Rules, constraints and phonological phenomena (pp. 185–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirchner, R. (1996). Synchronic chain shifts in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 341–351.
Laudanna, A., & Burani, C. (1995). Distributional properties of derivational affixes: implications for processing. In L. F. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 345–364). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Lehmann, C. (2005). Pleonasm and hypercharacterisation. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2005 (pp. 119–154). Berlin: Springer.
Lieber, R. (1980). On the organization of the lexicon. PhD thesis, Masachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Matthews, P. H. (1974). Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Second edition published in 1991.
McCarthy, J. (2002). A thematic guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, J. (2005). Optimal paradigms. In L. Downing, T. A. Hall, & R. Raffelsiefen (Eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory (pp. 170–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCarthy, J. (2008). The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology.
McFarland, T. (2009). The phonology and morphology of Filomeno Mata Totonac. PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Michael, L. (2008). Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
Mohanan, K. P. (1986). Lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mortensen, D. (2006). Formal and substantive scales in phonology. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Müller, G. (2006). Extended exponence by enrichment: argument encoding in German, Archi and Timucua. Unpublished manuscript, University of Leipzig.
Nash, D. (1986). Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland.
Ngunga, A. (1997). Lexical phonology and morphology of the Ciyao verb stem. PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Noyer, R. (1992). Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. PhD thesis, MIT.
Noyer, R. (1993). Optimal Words: towards a declarative theory of word formation. Paper presented at Rutgers Optimality Workshop-1, Rutgers University. Downloadable from ftp://babel.ling.upenn.edu/facpapers/rolf_noyer/optimal_words.ps.
Orgun, C. O. (1996). Sign-based morphology and phonology: with special attention to Optimality Theory. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Orgun, C. O., & Inkelas, S. (2002). Reconsidering bracket erasure. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2001 (pp. 115–146). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Paster, M. (2006). Phonological conditions on affixation. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Paster, M. (2007). Aspects of Maay phonology and morphology. Studies in African Linguistics, 35, 73–120.
Peterson, D. (1993). Multiple exponence and morphosyntactic redundancy. In E. Duncan & P. S. Donka Farkas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th West coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 83–100). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Poser, W. J. (1992). Blocking of phrasal constructions by lexical items. In I. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp. 111–130). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pulleyblank, D. (1986). Tone in lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Pycha, A. (2008). Morphological sources of phonological length. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Reid, A. A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2003). Lexical representation of morphologically complex words: evidence from Polish. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 287–336). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Reid, A. A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). A constructional approach to idioms and word formation. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Riehemann, S. (2001). A constructional approach to idioms and word formation. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Ryan, K. (2010). Variable affix order: grammar and learning. Language, 86, 758–791.
Seidenberg, M. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: access units or orthographic redundancy. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 245–264). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Selkirk, E. (1982). The syntax of words. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sibanda, G. (2004). Verbal phonology and morphology of Ndebele. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Stump, G. (1991). A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language, 67, 675–725.
Stump, G. (2001). Inflectional morphology: a theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taft, M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 289–297.
Wolf, M. (2008). Optimal interleaving: serial phonology-morphology interaction in a constraint-based model. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Wurm, L. H. (1997). Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 438–446.
Xu, Z., & Aronoff, M. (2011). A realization Optimality Theory approach to blocking and extended morphological exponence. Journal of Linguistics, 47, 673–707.
Yu, A. C. L. (2007). A natural history of infixation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yu, A. C. L. (2000). Stress assignment in Tohono O’odham. Phonology, 17, 117–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caballero, G., Inkelas, S. Word construction: tracing an optimal path through the lexicon. Morphology 23, 103–143 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-013-9220-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-013-9220-x