Skip to main content
Log in

Semantics of case

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a framework which connects case assignment with the semantics of argument realization. Broad notions of agency and affectedness are decomposed into more fine-grained semantic properties, loosely based on Dowty’s Proto-Role theory, but conceived in terms of privative opposition and organized into a lattice. This lattice provides a semantic space of participant properties and supports defining hierarchical relations among participant types, interpreted as semantic prominence, as well as topological relations such as ‘closeness’, interpreted as semantic similarity between participant types. Cases are defined as connected regions of this space, relating a given case to a structured set of semantic properties. A case system is represented as a semantic system, which embodies oppositions and contrasts, and operates against the backdrop of the general semantics of argument realization, where one can define notions such as maximal agents and maximal patients and represent generalizations from the research on transitivity. Core case markers (e.g. ergative, accusative) are represented as subspaces of the lattice spreading outwards from the maximal agent and maximal patient nodes of the lattice. Case alternations arise when the subspace of the lattice delimited by a predicate’s entailments for an argument is partitioned by different cases, exemplified with the genitive/accusative alternation in Russian occurring with direct objects of certain intensional predicates. This method also provides a treatment of case polysemy, viz. a single case subsuming multiple uses, by relating the diverse uses at the more abstract semantic level of the case’s region on the lattice, demonstrated with non-canonical uses of the dative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aissen J. (2003) Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkadiev, P. (2009). Differential argument marking in two-term case systems and its implications for the general theory of case marking. In Differential subject marking. New York: Springer.

  • Babby L. (1980) Existential sentences and negation in Russian. Ann Arbor, MI, Karoma Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. (2009). Clause structure and argument realization in Tongan. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.

  • Blake B. (2001) Case (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume K. (1998) A contrastive analysis of interaction verbs with dative complements. Linguistics 36(2): 253–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossong G. (2006) Le marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues d’Europe. In: Feuillet J. (eds) Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 193–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt M. (2006) The dative/ergative connection. In: Bonami O., Hofherr P.C. (eds) Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 6. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie B. (1989) Language universals and linguistic typology (2nd edn). University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse D. (1973) Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics 9: 11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A.R. (2001) Linking by types in the hierarchical lexicon. CSLI Publications, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis A., Koenig J.P. (2000) Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon. Language 76: 56–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty D. (1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore C. (1968) The case for case. In: Bach E., Harms R.T. (eds) Universals in linguistic theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganenkov D. (2007) Experiencer coding in Nakh-Daghestanian. In: Kulikov A., Malchukov L., de Swart P. (eds) Case, valency and transitivity. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, S. (2005). The lattice of case and agentivity. Master’s thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

  • Grimm, S. (2007). The bounds of subjecthood: Evidence from instruments. In Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistics Society 33. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

  • Haspelmath, M. (2003). The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (Vol. 2, pp. 211–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Haspelmath M. (2005) Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3: 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper P.J., Thompson S.A. (1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioup G. (1977) Specificity and the interpretation of quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 233–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson R. (1936) Contribution to the general theory of case: General meanings of the Russian cases. In: Waugh L.R. (eds) Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981. Mouton, Berlin, pp 59–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, O. (2007). Property-denoting NPs and non-canonical genitive case. In Proceedings of Semantic and Linguistic Theory 17. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Karttunen L. (1976) Discourse referents. In: McCawley J. (eds) Syntax and semantics 7: Notes from the linguistic underground. Academic Press, New York, pp 363–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns K. (2000) Semantics. Macmillan Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittilä, S. (2002). Transitivity: Towards a comprehensive typology. Ph.D. thesis, University of Turku.

  • Levin B., Rappaport Hovav M. (2005) Argument realization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahootian S. (1997) Persian. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malchukov A.L. (2005) Case pattern splits, verb types, and construction competition. In: Amberber M., de Hoop H. (eds) Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 73–117

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maling J. (2001) Dative: The heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case, grammatical functions, and thematic roles. Lingua 111: 419–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, T. (2004). The position of morphological case in the derivation: A study on the syntaxmorphology interface. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Næss Å. (2007) Prototypical transitivity. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidle C. (1988) The role of case in Russian syntax. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Partee B.H., Borschev V. (2002) Genitive of negation and scope of negation in Russian existential sentences. In: Toman J. (eds) Annual workshop on formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The second Ann Arbor meeting 2001 (FASL 10). Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D. (1982). Paths and categories. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.

  • Pinker S. (1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Piñon C. (2007) Verbs of creation. In: Dölling J., Heyde-Zybatow T., Schäfer M. (eds) Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Primus B. (1999) Cases and thematic roles: Ergative, accusative and active. Tübingen, Niemeyer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay A. (1992) Presuppositions and wh-clauses. Journal of Semantics 9: 251–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport Hovav M., Levin B. (2008) The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 44: 129–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozwadowska B. (1988) Thematic restrictions on derived nominals. In: Wlikins W. (eds) Syntax and semantics 21: Thematic relations. Academic Press, New York, pp 147–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger I. M. (1989) Instruments as agents: On the nature of semantic relations. Journal of Linguistics 25: 189–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth H.W. (1920) Greek grammar. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Testelec Y.G. (2007) On two parameters of transitivity. In: Kulikov L., Vater H. (eds) Typology of verbal categories. Tübingen, Niemeyer, pp 29–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake A. (2004) A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsunoda T. (1981) Split case-marking in verb types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19: 389–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsunoda T. (1985) Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21: 385–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuite K., Agha A., Gracyck R. (1985) Agentivity, transitivity and the question of active typology. In: Eilfort W., Kroeber P., Peterson K. (eds) Papers from the parasession on causitives and agentivity at the 21st regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, pp 252–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valin R.D. Jr., Wilkins D.P. (1996) The case for “effector”: Case roles, agents, and agency revisited. In: Shibatani M., Thompson S.A. (eds) Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • von Heusinger K. (2008) Verbal semantics and the diachronic development of differential object marking in Spanish. Probus 20: 1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow A. (1999) Temporally opaque arguments in verbs of creation. In: Cecchetto B., Chierchia G. (eds) Festschrift per Andrea Bonomi. CSLI Publication, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka A. (1981) Case marking and human nature. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 43–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann T.E. (1993) On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics 2(1): 149–179

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Grimm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grimm, S. Semantics of case. Morphology 21, 515–544 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9176-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9176-z

Keywords

Navigation