Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lexical vs. structural case: a false dichotomy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article takes issue with the two dichotomies of structural vs. lexical case and thematic vs. idiosyncratic case, on the basis of their predictions on: (a) synchronic productivity, (b) language change, and (c) language acquisition. It is shown here that these predictions are not borne out in Icelandic. In fact, productivity data from Icelandic suggest that accusative objects to new verbs are assigned lexically and not structurally. Another problem is presented by different changes in case marking in the history of the Germanic languages, changes that can only be captured by two complementary approaches to structural case, which in turn severely undermines the general explanatory power of this concept. It turns out, moreover, that the case preservation property of lexical case, as opposed to structural case, in passives and raising-to-object constructions, is a construction-specific property, not generalizable to the language as a whole. An alternative approach is sketched in terms of a usage-based Construction Grammar where all case marking of core arguments in Icelandic is regarded as lexical, i.e. word-bound, and modeled in terms of lexicality–schematicity hierarchies which capture verb-specific idiosyncrasies, higher-level generalizations, as well as the default status effect found for the Nom-Acc Construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen C. (1995) Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Modern English. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews A.D. (1976) The VP complement analysis in Modern Icelandic. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 6: 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Babby L.H. (1985) Noun phrase internal case agreement in Russian. Russian Linguistics 9: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bader M., Bayer J. (2006) Case and linking in language comprehension: Evidence from German. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Barðdal, J. (1993). Accusative and dative case of objects of some transitive verbs in Icelandic and the semantic distinction between them. In Flyktförsök: Kalasbok till Christer Platzack på femtioårsdagen 18 november 1993, från doktorander och dylika (pp. 1–13). Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages.

  • Barðdal, J. (2001a). Case in Icelandic: A synchronic, diachronic and comparative approach. [Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A57]. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages.

  • Barðdal J. (2001b) The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barðdal, J. (2001c). The role of thematic roles in constructions? Evidence from the Icelandic inchoative. In A. Holmer, J.-O. Svantesson, & Å . Viberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics 2000 (pp. 127–137). Lund: Department of Linguistics.

  • Barðdal J. (2004) The semantics of the impersonal construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: Beyond thematic roles. In: Abraham W. (eds) Studies in Germanic typology. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp 101–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Barðdal J. (2006a) Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17(1): 39–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barðdal, J. (2006b). Predicting the productivity of argument structure constructions. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 32 (to appear).

  • Barðdal J. (2007) The semantic and lexical range of the ditransitive construction in the history of (North) Germanic. Functions of Language 14(1): 9–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barðdal J. (2008) Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Barðdal J. (2009) The development of case in Germanic. In: Barðdal J., Chelliah S.L. (eds) The role of semantic, pragmatic, and discourse factors in the development of case. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 123–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Barðdal, J. (2010). The rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic. Lingua (to appear).

  • Barðdal J., Eythórsson T. (2003) Icelandic vs. German: Oblique subjects, agreement and expletives. Chicago Linguistic Society 39(1): 755–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Barðdal J., Eythórsson T. (2006) Control infinitives and case in Germanic: ‘Performance error’ or marginally acceptable constructions. In: Kulikov L., Malchukov A., Swart P. (eds) Case, valency and transitivity. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 147–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, K. E., & Sveen, A. (2011). West Scandinavian ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V-REFL-NP Construction. Linguistics, 49 (to appear).

  • Barðdal J., Molnár V. (2003) The passive in Icelandic: Compared to mainland Scandinavian. In: Hetland J., Molnár V. (eds) Structures of focus and grammatical relations. Tübingen, Niemeyer, pp 231–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes M. (1986) Subject, nominative and oblique case in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 37: 13–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt M. (2006) Theories of case. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Çetinoğlu Ö., Butt M. (2008) Turkish non-canonical objects. In: Butt M., Holloway King T. (eds) Proceedings of the LFG08 conference. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 214–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins C., Thráinsson H. (1996) VP-internal structure and object shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft W. (2001) Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft W. (2003) Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In: Cuyckens H., Dirven R., Panther K.-U. (eds) Motivation in Language. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbeiss S., Bartke S., Clahsen H. (2005–2006) Structural and lexical case in child German: Evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Language Acquisition 13(1): 3–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eythórsson T., Barðdal J. (2005) Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language 81(4): 824–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk C. (1997) Fornsvenska upplevarverb [Experiencer verbs in Old Swedish]. Lund University Press, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Fóstbræðra saga. (1987). In B. Halldórsson, J. Torfason, S. Tómasson & Ö . Thorsson (Eds.), ’Íslendinga sögur [Sagas of Icelanders] (pp. 775–851). Reykjavík: Svart á hvítu.

  • Franks S. (1995) Parameters of Slavic morphosyntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider H. (1985) The case of German. In: Toman J. (eds) Studies in German grammar. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 65–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz W., Matiasek , J. (1994) Argument structure and case assignment in German. In: Nerbonne J., Netter K., Pollard C. (eds) German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 199–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf J.-M., Bayer J., Bader M., Meng M. (1998) Event-related brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10(2): 264–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jónsson, J. G. (1997-1998). Sagnir með aukafallsfrumlagi [Verbs with oblique subjects]. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfrœði, 19-20, 11-43.

  • Jónsson J.G. (2005) Merkingarhlutverk, rökliðir og fallmörkun [Thematic roles, arguments and case marking]. In: Thráinsson H. (eds) Setningar: Handbók um íslenska setningafrœði. Reykjavík, Almenna bókafélagið, pp 350–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Jónsson J.G., Eythórsson T. (2005) Variation in subject case marking in Insular Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 223–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuryłowicz J. (1964) The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Winter, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling J. (1993) Of nominative and accusative: The hierarchical assignment of grammatical cases in Finnish. In: Holmberg A. Nikkane U. (eds) Case and other functional categories in Finnish syntax. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 49–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, J. (2002). Það rignir Þagufalli á Íslandi [It’s raining dative in Iceland]: Verbs with dative objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfrœði, 24, 31-105 [also published in a slightly different English version in Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 70, 1-60, 2002].

  • Manninen S. (2003) A study of Finnish manner adverbials. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S. (1999) Words and rules: The ingredients of language. Phoenix, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson K. (2007) Case and aspect in Slavic. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurðardóttir, H. (2002). Fallmörkun í barnamáli: Hvernig lœra íslensk börn að nota föll? [Case marking in child language: How do Icelandic children learn to use cases?]. University of Iceland M.A. thesis, Reykjavík.

  • Sigurðsson, H. Á . (1989). Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic. Lund University dissertation, Lund. [Reprinted 1992 by the Linguistic Institute, University of Iceland].

  • Sigurðsson H.Á. (2003) Case: Abstract vs. morphological. In: Brandner E., Zinsmeister H. (eds) New perspectives on case theory. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 223–268

    Google Scholar 

  • SigurDsson, H. Á . (2008). Externalization: The case of C/case. http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000736.

  • Svenonius, P. (2006). Case alternations in the Icelandic passive. Ms, University of Tromsø

  • Thráinsson H. (1979) On complementation in Icelandic. Garland Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thráinsson H. (2005). Nafnháttarsetningar og önnur nafnháttarsambönd [Infinitive clauses and other infinitival structures]. In H. Thráinsson (Ed.), Setningar: Handbók um íslenska setningafrœði (pp. 409-433). Reykjavík: Almenna bókafélagið.

  • Toft, E. H. (2009). Adnominal and adverbal genitive constructions in Old Norse: A cognitive Construction grammar account. University of Oslo dissertation, Oslo.

  • Woolford E. (2006) Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 111–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip M., Maling J., Jackendoff R. (1987) Case in tiers. Language 63(2): 217–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaenen A., Maling J., Thráinsson H. (1985) Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts J. (2006) Case marking direction: The accusative in German PPs. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 42(2): 93–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistic, Literary and Aesthetic Studies, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7805, 5020, Bergen, Norway

    Jóhanna Barðdal

Authors
  1. Jóhanna Barðdal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jóhanna Barðdal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barðdal, J. Lexical vs. structural case: a false dichotomy. Morphology 21, 619–654 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9174-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9174-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation