Skip to main content

Phonological and morphological conditions on affix order in Huave

Abstract

Huave, a language isolate of Mexico, has “mobile” affixes, which surface as prefixes or suffixes depending on morphophonological properties of the base to which they attach. This paper shows that despite affix mobility, the hierarchical structure of affixes is morphologically fixed. Meanwhile, the linearization algorithm for individual mobile affixes is analyzed with an Optimality-Theoretic P >> M ranking schema, where phonological well-formedness constraints outrank morphological alignment constraints. The proposed model is a revision of previous P >> M models in that morphological constraints are argued to be of the idiosyncratic, language-specific type previously used in subcategorization approaches to the morphology–phonology interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Anderson, S. (1996). How to put your clitics in their place. The Linguistic Review, 13, 165–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel B., Banjade G., Gaenszle M., Lieven E., Paudyal N.P., Rai I.P. et al (2007) Free prefix ordering in Chintang. Language 83(1): 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonet E., Lloret M.-R., Mascarò J. (2007) Allomorph selection and lexical preferences: Two case studies. Lingua 117: 903–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall C.J. (1988) Integrating diachronic and processing principles in explaining the suffixing preference. In: Hawkins J.A. (eds) Explaining language universals. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 321–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern A., Zwicky A. (1996) Approaching second: Second-position clitics and related phenomena. Stanford, CSLI

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargus S., Tuttle S. (1997) Augmentation as affixation in Athabaskan languages. Phonology 14(2): 177–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins J.A., Gilligan G. (1988) Prefixing and suffixing universals in relation to basic word order. Lingua 74: 219–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman L. (1994) Cyclic phonology and morphology in Cibemba. In: Cole J., Kisseberth C. (eds) Perspectives in phonology. Stanford, CSLI, pp 81–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman L. (2003) Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2002. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 245–281

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, L., Inkelas, S., & Sibanda, G. (1998). Morphosyntactic correspondence in Bantu reduplication. Ms., University of California at Berkeley.

  • Inkelas S. (1990) Prosodic constituency in the lexicon. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas S., Zoll C. (2005) Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas S., Zoll C. (2007) Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics 45: 133–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2008). Topics in the phonology and morphology of San Francisco del Mar Huave. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.

  • Lydall J. (1976) Hamar. In: Bender M.L. (eds) The non-semitic languages of Ethiopia. East Lansing, MI, African Studies Center, pp 393–438

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J. (2003) OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20: 75–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1993a). Prosodic morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms., University of Massachusetts at Amherst and Rutgers.

  • McCarthy J., Prince A. (1993) Generalized alignment. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1993. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 79–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyer R. (1993) Mobile affixes in Huave: Optimality and morphological well-formedness. In: Duncan E., Farkas D., Spaelti P. (eds) Proceedings of the twelfth west coast conference on formal linguistics. Stanford, CSLI, pp 67–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyer R. (1997) Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paster M. (2005) Pulaar verbal extensions and phonologically driven affix order. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2005.. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 155–199

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paster, M. (2006a). Phonological conditions on affixation. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.

  • Paster M. (2006b) A survey of phonological affix order with special attention to Pulaar. In: Bateman L., Ussery C. (eds) Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the north eastern linguistic society: Volume 2. University of Massachusetts Graduate Linguistics Student Association, Amherst, pp 491–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Stairs, E., & Hollenbach, B. (1981). Gramática huave. In G. Stairs & E. Stairs (Eds.), Diccionario huave de San Mateo del Mar (pp. 283–391). Vocabularios indígenas 24. SIL Mexico.

  • Stump G. (1993) Position classes and morphological theory. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1992. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 129–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. (2007). Inflectional morphology in optimality theory. PhD dissertation, SUNY Stony Brook.

  • Yu A. (2007) A natural history of infixation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zoll C. (1998) Parsing below the segment in a constraint-based framework. Stanford, CSLI

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuni Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Y. Phonological and morphological conditions on affix order in Huave. Morphology 20, 133–163 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9149-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9149-2

Keywords

  • Phonologically conditioned morphology
  • Affix order
  • Mobile affixes
  • Huave