Skip to main content
Log in

Actual and Virtual Parks Benefit Quality of Life and Physical Activity: A Cluster Trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban parks provide connectedness to nature as a health resilience environment for promoting health. Virtual reality can provide opportunities for urban citizens to be exposed to natural elements with health benefits. The purpose was to explore the effects of actual and virtual parks on the quality of life and physical activity of urban residents. The study design was a cluster trial. Participants were healthy adults aged 20–50 years, recruited from three college campuses, and randomly assigned to two experimental groups (n = 30, 32) and one control group (n = 30). The intervention with virtual or actual parks was conducted for 30 min a session once a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes were measured using self-reported questionnaires, including the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale-BREF and International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. In total, 84 participants completed the interventions and post-intervention measures. Results showed that participants who experienced actual parks had significant increases in the social quality of life and light-intensity physical activity and had decreased body weight. Participants who experienced the virtual parks experienced a significant increase in their mental quality of life. Participants in the experimental groups of both kinds of parks had significant improvements in their self-rated health, physical and environmental quality of life, and sedentary time after the intervention. Urban parks are an important natural resource for citizens’ health and physical activity promotion. Virtual parks can simulate actual parks and have similar health benefits and are thus are recommended for citizens who lack opportunities and motivation to go to actual parks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Foley R, Kistemann T. Blue space geographies: enabling health in place. Health Place. 2015;35:157–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bornioli A, Parkhurst G, Morgan PL. Psychological wellbeing benefits of simulated exposure to five urban settings: an experimental study from the pedestrian’s perspective. J Transp Health. 2018;9:105–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Völker S, Kistemann T. Reprint of: “I’m always entirely happy when I’m here!” Urban blue enhancing human health and well-being in Cologne and Düsseldorf, Germany. Soc Sci Med. 2013;91:141–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lundstedt R, Vassiljev P, Albin M, Yeo N, White MP, Wallergård M, et al. A prescription for “nature” – the potential of using virtual nature in therapeutics. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:3001–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nutsford D, Pearson AL, Kingham S, Reitsma F. Residential exposure to visible blue space (but not green space) associated with lower psychological distress in a capital city. Health Place. 2016;39:70–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu CP, Lee HY, Luo XY. The effect of virtual reality forest and urban environments on physiological and psychological responses. Urban For Urban Green. 2018;35:106–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization. Urban green spaces: a brief for action. Regional office for Europe. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132004000200018.

  8. Reid CE, Kubzansky LD, Li J, Shmool JL, Clougherty JE. It’s not easy assessing greenness: a comparison of NDVI datasets and neighborhood types and their associations with self-rated health in New York City. Health Place. 2018;54:92–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Psychol Perspect. 1989. https://doi.org/10.1037/030621.

  10. Gao, Zhang, Zhu, Gao, Qiu. Exploring psychophysiological restoration and individual preference in the different environments based on virtual reality. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:3102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Palanica A, Lyons A, Cooper M, Lee A, Fossat Y. A comparison of nature and urban environments on creative thinking across different levels of reality. J Environ Psychol. 2019;63:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Markevych I, Schoierer J, Hartig T, Chudnovsky A, Hystad P, Dzhambov AM, et al. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: theoretical and methodological guidance. Environ Res. 2017;158:301–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sobko T, Jia Z, Brown G. Measuring connectedness to nature in preschool children in an urban setting and its relation to psychological functioning. PLoS One. 2018;13:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Franěk M, Petružálek J, Šefara D. Eye movements in viewing urban images and natural images in diverse vegetation periods. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126477.

  15. Tabrizian P, Baran PK, Smith WR, Meentemeyer RK. Exploring perceived restoration potential of urban green enclosure through immersive virtual environments. J Environ Psychol. 2018;55:99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Repke MA, Berry MS, Conway LG, Metcalf A, Hensen RM, Phelan C. How does nature exposure make people healthier? Evidence for the role of impulsivity and expanded space perception. PLoS One. 2018;13:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li J, Burroughs K, Halim MF, Penbrooke TL, Seekamp E, Smith JW. Assessing soundscape preferences and the impact of specific sounds on outdoor recreation activities using qualitative data analysis and immersive virtual environment technology. J Outdoor Recreat Tour. 2018;24:66–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bruun-Pedersen JR, Serafin S, Kofoed LB. Restorative virtual environment design for augmenting nursing home rehabilitation. J Virtual Worlds Res. 2016;9:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Uijtdewilligen L, Waters CNH, Aw S, Wong ML, Sia A, Ramiah A, et al. The park prescription study: development of a community-based physical activity intervention for a multi-ethnic Asian population. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218247.

  20. Ng YL, Ma F, Ho FK, Ip P, Fu K-w. Effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality-enhanced exercise on physical activity, psychological outcomes, and physical performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Comput Human Behav. 2019;99:278–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yen HY, Chiu HL, Huang HY. Green and blue physical activity for quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Landsc Urban Plan. Elsevier B.V.; 2021;212:104093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104093.

  22. Yao G, Chung CW, Yu CF, Wang J Der. Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. J Formosan Med Assoc. 2002:101(5):342–51.

  23. Guthold R, Ono T, Strong KL, Chatterji S, Morabia A. Worldwide variability in physical inactivity. A 51-Country Survey. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34:486–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Müller-Riemenschneider F, Petrunoff N, Yao J, Ng A, Sia A, Ramiah A, et al. Effectiveness of prescribing physical activity in parks to improve health and wellbeing-the park prescription randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-00941-8.

  25. Hunter RF, Adlakha D, Cardwell C, Cupples ME, Donnelly M, Ellis G, Gough A, Hutchinson G, Kearney T, Longo A, Prior L, McAneney H, Ferguson S, Johnston B, Stevenson M, Kee F, Tully MA. Investigating the physical activity, health, wellbeing, social and environmental effects of a new urban greenway: a natural experiment (the PARC study). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01213-9.

  26. Petrunoff N, Yao J, Sia A, Ng A, Ramiah A, Wong M, Han J, Tai BC, Uijtdewilligen L, Müller-Riemenschneider F. Activity in nature mediates a park prescription intervention’s effects on physical activity, park use and quality of life: a mixed-methods process evaluation. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10177-1.

  27. Luo S, Shi J, Lu T, Furuya K. Sit down and rest: use of virtual reality to evaluate preferences and mental restoration in urban park pavilions. Landsc Urban Plan. 2022;220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104336.

  28. Benton JS, Cotterill S, Anderson J, Macintyre VG, Gittins M, Dennis M, French DP. A natural experimental study of improvements along an urban canal: impact on canal usage, physical activity and other wellbeing behaviours. Int J Beh Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01088-w.

  29. Boffi M, Pola LG, Fermani E, Senes G, Inghilleri P, Piga BEA, Stancato G, Fumagalli N. Visual post-occupancy evaluation of a restorative garden using virtual reality photography: restoration, emotions, and behavior in older and younger people. Front Psychol. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927688.

  30. Song R, Chen Q, Zhang Y, Jia Q, He H, Gao T, Qiu L. Psychophysiological restorative potential in cancer patients by virtual reality (VR)-based perception of natural environment. Front Psychol. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1003497.

  31. Shin JH, Bog Park S, Ho JS. Effects of game-based virtual reality on health-related quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomized, controlled study. Comput Biol Med. 2015;63:92–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tatnell P, Atorkey P, Tzelepis F. The effectiveness of virtual reality interventions on smoking, nutrition, alcohol, physical activity and/or obesity risk factors: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. MDPI; 2022;19(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710821.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan under grant MOST 109-2314-B-038-077-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsin-Yen Yen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 241 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yen, HY., Huang, HY. Actual and Virtual Parks Benefit Quality of Life and Physical Activity: A Cluster Trial. J Urban Health (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-024-00863-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-024-00863-x

Keywords

Navigation