Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the Impact of Urban Environments on Mental Health and Perception Using Deep Learning: A Review and Text Mining Analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding how outdoor environments affect mental health outcomes is vital in today’s fast-paced and urbanized society. Recently, advancements in data-gathering technologies and deep learning have facilitated the study of the relationship between the outdoor environment and human perception. In a systematic review, we investigate how deep learning techniques can shed light on a better understanding of the influence of outdoor environments on human perceptions and emotions, with an emphasis on mental health outcomes. We have systematically reviewed 40 articles published in SCOPUS and the Web of Science databases which were the published papers between 2016 and 2023. The study presents and utilizes a novel topic modeling method to identify coherent keywords. By extracting the top words of each research topic, and identifying the current topics, we indicate that current studies are classified into three areas. The first topic was “Urban Perception and Environmental Factors” where the studies aimed to evaluate perceptions and mental health outcomes. Within this topic, the studies were divided based on human emotions, mood, stress, and urban features impacts. The second topic was titled “Data Analysis and Urban Imagery in Modeling” which focused on refining deep learning techniques, data collection methods, and participants’ variability to understand human perceptions more accurately. The last topic was named “Greenery and visual exposure in urban spaces” which focused on the impact of the amount and the exposure of green features on mental health and perceptions. Upon reviewing the papers, this study provides a guide for subsequent research to enhance the view of using deep learning techniques to understand how urban environments influence mental health. It also provides various suggestions that should be taken into account when planning outdoor spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peen J, et al. The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010;121(2):84–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Galea Sandro. The urban brain: New directions in research exploring the relation between cities and mood–anxiety disorders. Depression and anxiety 2011;28(10): 857–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20868

  3. Xu W, et al. Does bird diversity affect public mental health in urban mountain parks?—a case study in Fuzhou City, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(12):7029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yao W, et al. Usage behavior and health benefit perception of youth in urban parks: a case study from Qingdao, China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:923671.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gascon M, et al. Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(4):4354–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang R, et al. Using street view data and machine learning to assess how perception of neighborhood safety influences urban residents’ mental health. Health Place. 2019;59:102186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Jesus M, et al. Associations between perceived social environment and neighborhood safety: health implications. Health Place. 2010;16(5):1007–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ball K, et al. Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Prev Med. 2001;33(5):434–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cleary A, et al. Changes in perceptions of urban green space are related to changes in psychological well-being: cross-sectional and longitudinal study of mid-aged urban residents. Health Place. 2019;59:102201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao M, Ahern J, Koshland CP. Perceived built environment and health-related quality of life in four types of neighborhoods in Xi’an, China. Health Place. 2016;39:110–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leslie E, Cerin E. Are perceptions of the local environment related to neighbourhood satisfaction and mental health in adults? Prev Med. 2008;47(3):273–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nordbø ECA, et al. GIS-derived measures of the built environment determinants of mental health and activity participation in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;177:19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Golder SA, Macy MW. Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science. 2011;333(6051):1878–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seresinhe CI, Preis T, Moat HS. Quantifying the impact of scenic environments on health. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):16899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rathore MM, et al. Urban planning and building smart cities based on the internet of things using big data analytics. Comput Netw. 2016;101:63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Janowicz K, et al. Using semantic signatures for social sensing in urban environments. In: Mobility patterns, big data and transport analytics. Elsevier; 2019. p. 31–54.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagata S, et al. Objective scoring of streetscape walkability related to leisure walking: statistical modeling approach with semantic segmentation of Google Street View images. Health Place. 2020;66:102428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hasan MM, Kwigizile V, Oh J-S. Automated measurement of walkability applying artificial intelligence (AI) and spatial analysis techniques. J Transp Health. 2021;22:101180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maharana A, Nsoesie EO. Use of deep learning to examine the association of the built environment with prevalence of neighborhood adult obesity. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(4):e181535–e181535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen QC, et al. Neighbourhood looking glass: 360º automated characterisation of the built environment for neighbourhood effects research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(3):260–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dubey A, Naik N, Parikh D, Raskar R, Hidalgo CA. Deep learning the city: Quantifying urban perception at a global scale. InComputer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14 2016. pp. 196–212. Springer International Publishing.

  22. Liu L, et al. A machine learning-based method for the large-scale evaluation of the qualities of the urban environment. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2017;65:113–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rossetti T, et al. Explaining subjective perceptions of public spaces as a function of the built environment: a massive data approach. Landsc Urban Plan. 2019;181:169–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao Y, et al. Discovering the homogeneous geographic domain of human perceptions from street view images. Landsc Urban Plan. 2021;212:104125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou H, et al. Social inequalities in neighborhood visual walkability: using street view imagery and deep learning technologies to facilitate healthy city planning. Sustain Cities Soc. 2019;50:101605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blečić I, Cecchini A, Trunfio GA. Towards automatic assessment of perceived walkability. In Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2018: 18th International Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, July 2–5, 2018, Proceedings, Part III 18 2018. pp. 351–65. Springer International Publishing.

  27. Callaghan A, et al. The impact of green spaces on mental health in urban settings: a scoping review. J Ment Health. 2021;30(2):179–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jimenez MP, et al. Associations between nature exposure and health: a review of the evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Núñez M-BF, et al. Gender and sex differences in urban greenness’ mental health benefits: a systematic review. Health Place. 2022;76:102864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tillmann S, et al. Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(10):958–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rajoo KS, Karam DS, Abdullah MZ. The physiological and psychosocial effects of forest therapy: a systematic review. Urban For Urban Green. 2020;54:126744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meredith Genevive R, et al. Minimum time dose in nature to positively impact the mental health of college-aged students, and how to measure it: A scoping review. Front Psychol. 2020;2942.

  33. Buttazzoni A, Parker A, Minaker L. Investigating the mental health implications of urban environments with neuroscientific methods and mobile technologies: a systematic literature review. Health Place. 2021;70:102597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Browning MH, et al. The role of methodological choices in the effects of experimental exposure to simulated natural landscapes on human health and cognitive performance: a systematic review. Environ Behav. 2021;53(7):687–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Koning M, et al. The role of the campus outdoor environment on university student mental health. J People Plants Environ. 2022;25(3):263–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kang Y, et al. A review of urban physical environment sensing using street view imagery in public health studies. Ann GIS. 2020;26(3):261–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Steyvers M, Griffiths T. Probabilistic topic models. Handb Latent Semant Anal. 2007;427(7):424–40.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jallan Y, et al. Application of natural language processing and text mining to identify patterns in construction-defect litigation cases. J Leg Aff Disput Resolut Eng Constr. 2019;11(4):04519024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xue J, et al. Dynamic stakeholder-associated topic modeling on public concerns in megainfrastructure projects: case of Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao bridge. J Manag Eng. 2020;36(6):04020078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sun L, Yin Y. Discovering themes and trends in transportation research using topic modeling. Trans Res Part C: Emerg Technol. 2017;77:49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Amado A, et al. Research trends on big data in marketing: a text mining and topic modeling based literature analysis. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ. 2018;24(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen X, et al. Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: a retrospective of all volumes of Computers & Education. Comput Educ. 2020;151:103855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Saheb T, Dehghani M, Saheb T. Artificial intelligence for sustainable energy: a contextual topic modeling and content analysis. Sustain Comput: inform Syst. 2022;35:100699.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Saheb T, Saheb T, Carpenter DO. Mapping research strands of ethics of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a bibliometric and content analysis. Comput Biol Med. 2021;135:104660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Choi HS, Lee WS, Sohn SY. Analyzing research trends in personal information privacy using topic modeling. Comput Secur. 2017;67:244–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jiang H, Qiang M, Lin P. A topic modeling based bibliometric exploration of hydropower research. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;57:226–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Carnot ML, et al. Applying text analytics for studying research trends in dependability. Entropy. 2020;22(11):1303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Allahyari M, Pouriyeh S, Assefi M, Safaei S, Trippe ED, Gutierrez JB, Kochut K. A brief survey of text mining: Classification, clustering and extraction techniques. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.02919. 2017.

  49. Shahapure KR, Nicholas C. Cluster quality analysis using silhouette score. In 2020 IEEE 7th international conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA) 2020. (pp. 747–48). IEEE.

  50. Xiang L, et al. Modeling pedestrian emotion in high-density cities using visual exposure and machine learning: tracking real-time physiology and psychology in Hong Kong. Build Environ. 2021;205:108273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kong L, et al. How do different types and landscape attributes of urban parks affect visitors’ positive emotions? Landsc Urban Plan. 2022;226:104482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Benita F, Tunçer B. Exploring the effect of urban features and immediate environment on body responses. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;43:126365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ojha VK, et al. Machine learning approaches to understand the influence of urban environments on human’s physiological response. Inf Sci. 2019;474:154–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen C, et al. Predicting the effect of street environment on residents’ mood states in large urban areas using machine learning and street view images. Sci Total Environ. 2022;816:151605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nguyen QC, et al. Using Google Street View to examine associations between built environment characteristics and US health outcomes. Prev Med Rep. 2019;14:100859.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang R, et al. Perceptions of built environment and health outcomes for older Chinese in Beijing: a big data approach with street view images and deep learning technique. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2019;78:101386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang Y, et al. Quantifying physical and psychological perceptions of urban scenes using deep learning. Land Use Policy. 2021;111:105762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Han X, et al. Restorative perception of urban streets: interpretation using deep learning and MGWR models. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1141630.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Johnson T, Kanjo E, Woodward K. DigitalExposome: Quantifying the Urban Environment Influence on Wellbeing based on Real-Time Multi-Sensor Fusion and Deep Belief Network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.12615. 2021.

  60. Kang Y, et al. Extracting human emotions at different places based on facial expressions and spatial clustering analysis. Trans GIS. 2019;23(3):450–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sun P, Lu W, Jin L. How the natural environment in downtown neighborhood affects physical activity and sentiment: using social media data and machine learning. Health Place. 2023;79:102968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Han X, et al. Measuring perceived psychological stress in urban built environments using Google Street View and deep learning. Front Public Health. 2022;10:891736.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang A, Song L, Zhang F. Perception of pleasure in the urban running environment with street view images and running routes. J Geog Sci. 2022;32(12):2624–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang R, et al. The relationship between visual enclosure for neighbourhood street walkability and elders’ mental health in China: using street view images. J Transp Health. 2019;13:90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Luo J, et al. Water view imagery: perception and evaluation of urban waterscapes worldwide. Ecol Ind. 2022;145:109615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang L, et al. Measuring residents’ perceptions of city streets to inform better street planning through deep learning and space syntax. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2022;190:215–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang F, et al. Measuring human perceptions of a large-scale urban region using machine learning. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;180:148–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Jahani A, Kalantary S, Alitavoli A. An application of artificial intelligence techniques in prediction of birds soundscape impact on tourists’ mental restoration in natural urban areas. Urban For Urban Green. 2021;61:127088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhao T, et al. Sensing urban soundscapes from street view imagery. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2023;99:101915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wijnands JS, et al. Streetscape augmentation using generative adversarial networks: insights related to health and wellbeing. Sustain Cities Soc. 2019;49:101602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Kanjo E, Younis EM, Ang CS. Deep learning analysis of mobile physiological, environmental and location sensor data for emotion detection. Inf Fusion. 2019;49:46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhang X, et al. Emotional-health-oriented urban design: a novel collaborative deep learning framework for real-time landscape assessment by integrating facial expression recognition and pixel-level semantic segmentation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Newton DW. Identifying correlations between depression and urban morphology through generative deep learning. Int J Archit Comput. 2023;21(1):136–57.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Yao Y, et al. A human-machine adversarial scoring framework for urban perception assessment using street-view images. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2019;33(12):2363–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Liu Y, et al. An interpretable machine learning framework for measuring urban perceptions from panoramic street view images. Iscience. 2023;26(3):106132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Verma D, Jana A, Ramamritham K. Predicting human perception of the urban environment in a spatiotemporal urban setting using locally acquired street view images and audio clips. Build Environ. 2020;186:107340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ramírez T, et al. Measuring heterogeneous perception of urban space with massive data and machine learning: an application to safety. Landsc Urban Plan. 2021;208:104002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Larkin A, et al. Measuring and modelling perceptions of the built environment for epidemiological research using crowd-sourcing and image-based deep learning models. J Eposure Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2022;32(6):892–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Wang R, et al. Urban greenery and mental wellbeing in adults: cross-sectional mediation analyses on multiple pathways across different greenery measures. Environ Res. 2019;176:108535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Helbich M, et al. Can’t see the wood for the trees? An assessment of street view-and satellite-derived greenness measures in relation to mental health. Landsc Urban Plan. 2021;214:104181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Wang R, et al. Dynamic greenspace exposure and residents’ mental health in Guangzhou, China: from over-head to eye-level perspective, from quantity to quality. Landsc Urban Plan. 2021;215:104230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Dai L, et al. Analyzing the correlation between visual space and residents’ psychology in Wuhan, China using street-view images and deep-learning technique. City Environ Interact. 2021;11:100069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Helbich M, et al. Using deep learning to examine street view green and blue spaces and their associations with geriatric depression in Beijing, China. Environ Int. 2019;126:107–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Zhang Z, et al. Assessing personal exposure to urban greenery using wearable cameras and machine learning. Cities. 2021;109:103006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Svoray T, et al. Demonstrating the effect of exposure to nature on happy facial expressions via Flickr data: advantages of non-intrusive social network data analyses and geoinformatics methodologies. J Environ Psychol. 2018;58:93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Shenassa ED, Liebhaber A, Ezeamama A. Perceived safety of area of residence and exercise: a pan-European study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(11):1012–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Wallace D, Chamberlain AW, Fahmy C. Changes in neighborhood social control and disorder and their relationship to exercise behavior. Environ Behav. 2019;51(6):717–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. De Vries S, et al. Streetscape greenery and health: stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Soc Sci Med. 2013;94:26–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Ulrich RS, et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 1991;11(3):201–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Wang R, et al. Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;41:6–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Chen J, Jin Y, Jin H. Effects of visual landscape on subjective environmental evaluations in the open spaces of a severe cold city. Front Psychol. 2022;13:954402.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Cheng Y, et al. Effects of urban parks on residents’ expressed happiness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Landsc Urban Plan. 2021;212:104118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Bonaiuto M, et al. Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in the urban environment. J Environ Psychol. 1999;19(4):331–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Hong JY, Jeon JY. Influence of urban contexts on soundscape perceptions: a structural equation modeling approach. Landsc Urban Plan. 2015;141:78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Gunnarsson B, et al. Effects of biodiversity and environment-related attitude on perception of urban green space. Urban Ecosyst. 2017;20:37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Sun D, et al. On the relation between visual quality and landscape characteristics: a case study application to the waterfront linear parks in Shenyang, China. Environ Res Commun. 2021;3(11):115013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Wu AN, Stouffs R, Biljecki F. Generative Adversarial Networks in the built environment: A comprehensive review of the application of GANs across data types and scales. Building and Environment. 2022;109477.

  98. Wu AN, Biljecki F. GANmapper: geographical data translation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2022;36(7):1394–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Mitchell R, Popham F. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1655–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Van Dillen SM, et al. Greenspace in urban neighbourhoods and residents’ health: adding quality to quantity. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(6):e8–e8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, 1989.

  102. Roberts H, Helbich M. Multiple environmental exposures along daily mobility paths and depressive symptoms: a smartphone-based tracking study. Environ Int. 2021;156:106635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Helbich M. Toward dynamic urban environmental exposure assessments in mental health research. Environ Res. 2018;161:129–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. He H, et al. Association of street greenery and physical activity in older adults: a novel study using pedestrian-centered photographs. Urban For Urban Green. 2020;55:126789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Verma D, Jana A, Ramamritham K. Machine-based understanding of manually collected visual and auditory datasets for urban perception studies. Landsc Urban Plan. 2019;190:103604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Barnes MR, et al. Characterizing nature and participant experience in studies of nature exposure for positive mental health: an integrative review. Front Psychol. 2019;9:2617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Tang J, Long Y. Measuring visual quality of street space and its temporal variation: methodology and its application in the Hutong area in Beijing. Landsc Urban Plan. 2019;191:103436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This review has greatly benefited from collaborative discussions with members of the HealthScape Lab at Michigan State University. We wish to express our gratitude to Michigan State University for providing the necessary infrastructure and resources to conduct this study. Our thanks also extend to the editorial team and the anonymous referees who reviewed the first draft of this paper.

Funding

The authors declare that no external funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Planning, Design and Construction, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Musab Wedyan & Fatemeh Saeidi-Rizi

Authors
  1. Musab Wedyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatemeh Saeidi-Rizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Saeidi-Rizi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wedyan, M., Saeidi-Rizi, F. Assessing the Impact of Urban Environments on Mental Health and Perception Using Deep Learning: A Review and Text Mining Analysis. J Urban Health 101, 327–343 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-024-00830-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-024-00830-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation