Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 292–311 | Cite as

Hospitality Invites Sociability, Which Builds Cohesion: a Model for the Role of Main Streets in Population Mental Health

  • Jacob M. IzenbergEmail author
  • Mindy Thompson Fullilove
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of main streets to community social cohesion, a factor important to health. Prior work suggests that casual contact in public space, which we call “sociability,” facilitates more sustained social bonds in the community. We appropriate the term “hospitality” to describe a main street’s propensity to support a density of such social interactions. Hospitality is a result of the integrity and complex contents of the main street and surrounding area. We examine this using a typology we term “box-circle-line” to represent the streetscape (the box), the local neighborhood (the circle), and the relationship to the regional network of streets (the line). Through field visits to 50 main streets in New Jersey and elsewhere, and a systematic qualitative investigation of main streets in a densely interconnected urban region (Essex County, New Jersey), we observed significant variation in main street hospitality, which generally correlated closely with sociability. Physical elements such as street wall, neighborhood elements such as connectivity, inter-community elements such as access and perceived welcome, and socio-political elements such as investment and racial discrimination were identified as relevant to main street hospitality. We describe the box-circle-line as a theoretical model for main street hospitality that links these various factors and provides a viable framework for further research into main street hospitality, particularly with regard to geographic health disparities.

Keywords

Social integration Public space Social psychiatry Health disparities Main streets Built environment Social interaction Urban design Planning Geographic inequality Neighborhood effects Sociability Hospitality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge funding support from the Medical Student Research Fellowship Program at the Yale University School of Medicine.

References

  1. 1.
    Leighton AH. My Name Is Legion. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1960.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hughes CC, Leighton AH. People of Cove and Woodlot. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1960.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lin N, Ye X, Ensel WM. Social support and depressed mood: a structural analysis. J Health Soc Behav. 1999; 40(4): 344–359. doi: 10.2307/2676330?ref=no-x-route:be60af270601da9e9408fcf8c57a124c.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnett PA, Gotlib IH. Psychosocial functioning and depression: distinguishing among antecedents, concomitants, and consequences. Psychol Bull. 1988; 104(1): 97–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evans GW, Kutcher R. Loosening the link between childhood poverty and adolescent smoking and obesity: the protective effects of social capital. Psychol Sci. 2011; 22(1): 3–7. doi: 10.1177/0956797610390387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blazer DG. Social support and mortality in an elderly community population. Am J Epidemiol. 1982; 115(5): 684–694.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eng PM, Rimm EB, Fitzmaurice G, Kawachi I. Social ties and change in social ties in relation to subsequent total and cause-specific mortality and coronary heart disease incidence in men. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 155(8): 700–709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51: 843–857. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4.
  9. 9.
    Berkman LF, Syme SL. Social Networks, Host Resistance, and Mortality: A Nine-Year Follow-Up Study of Alameda County Residents. Am J Epidemiol. 1979; 109: 186–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.12.004.
  10. 10.
    Sampson RJ. The neighborhood context of well-being. Perspect Biol Med. 2003; 46(3x): S53–S64. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2003.0073.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sampson RJ. Great American City: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wallace R. Social disintegration and the spread of AIDS—II. Soc Sci Med. 1993; 37(7): 887–896. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90143-R.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Granovetter MS. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973; 78(6): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cattell V, Dines N, Gesler W, Curtis S. Mingling, observing, and lingering: everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health Place. 2008; 14(3): 544–561. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gehl J. A Changing Street Life in a Changing Society. Places Journal. 1989; 6(1): 7–17. Available from: https://placesjournal.org/article/a-changing-street-life-in-a-changing-society/
  16. 16.
    Forrest R, Kearns A. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Stud. 2001; 38(12): 2125–2143. doi: 10.1080/00420980120087081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobs J. The death and life of Great American Cities. New York, NY: Vintage; 1961.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gehl J. Life Between Buildings. Copenhagen, DK: Island Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Appleyard D. Livable streets: protected neighborhoods? Ann Am Acad Polit Social Sci. 1980; 451: 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whyte WH. The social life of small urban spaces. New York, NY: Project for Public Spaces, Inc; 1980.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wallace R, Fullilove MT. Collective consciousness and its discontents: Institutional distributed cognition, racial policy, and public health in the United States. New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clement RJG, Krause S, Engelhardt von N, Faria JJ, Krause J, Kurvers RHJM. Collective Cognition in Humans: Groups Outperform Their Best Members in a Sentence Reconstruction Task. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077943.
  23. 23.
    Cummins S, Curtis S, Diez-Roux AV, Macintyre S. Understanding and representing “place” in health research: a relational approach. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65(9): 1825–1838. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hanchett TW. Sorting Out the New South City. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Taggart HT, Smith KW. Redlining: an assessment of the evidence of disinvestment in Metropolitan Boston. Urban Aff Rev. 1981; 17(1): 91–107. doi: 10.1177/004208168101700106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Newman K. Newark, decline and avoidance, renaissance and desire: from disinvestment to reinvestment. Ann Am Acad Polit Social Sci. 2004; 594(1): 34–48. doi: 10.1177/0002716204264963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schulz A, Williams D, Israel B, et al. Unfair treatment, neighborhood effects, and mental health in the Detroit metropolitan area. J Health Soc Behav. 2000; 41(3): 314–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gee GC, Payne-Sturges DC. Environmental health disparities: a framework integrating psychosocial and environmental concepts. Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112(17): 1645–1653. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7074.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fullilove MT. Urban Alchemy. New York NY: New Village Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fullilove MT, Wallace R. Serial forced displacement in American cities, 1916–2010. J Urban Health. 2011; 88(3): 381–389. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9585-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fullilove M. Root Shock. New York, NY: Random House LLC; 2005.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Morenoff JD, Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW. Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence*. Criminology. 2001; 39(3): 517–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    White K, Haas JS, Williams DR. Elucidating the role of place in health care disparities: the example of racial/ethnic residential segregation. Health Serv Res. 2012; 47(3 Pt 2): 1278–1299. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01410.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kramer MR, Hogue CR. Is segregation Bad for your health? Epidemiol Rev. 2009; 31(1): 178–194. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxp001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Acevedo-Garcia D, Lochner KA, Osypuk TL, Subramanian SV. Future directions in residential segregation and health research: a multilevel approach. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(2): 215–221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilkinson RG, Pickett K. The Spirit Level. London: Allen Lane; 2009.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Frieden TR, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC health disparities and inequalities report - United States, 2013. Foreword. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013; 62(Suppl 3): 1–2.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oldenburg R, Brissett D. The third place. Qual Sociol. 1982; 5(4): 265–284. doi: 10.1007/BF00986754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ehret J, Ferdetta F. County Community Fact Book. New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development; 2013. http://lwd.dol.state.nj.us/labor/lpa/pub/factbook/essfct.pdf. Accessed Sep 15, 2015
  40. 40.
    Lee BA, Reardon SF, Firebaugh G, Farrell CR, Matthews SA, O’Sullivan D. Beyond the census tract: patterns and determinants of racial segregation at multiple geographic scales. Am Sociol Rev. 2008; 73(5): 766–791. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300504.
  41. 41.
    Kelbaugh DS. Toward an Integrated Paradigm: Further Thoughts on the Three Urbanisms. Places Journal. 2007; 19(2): 12–19. Available from: https://placesjournal.org/article/further-thoughts-on-the-three-urbanisms/.
  42. 42.
    Kelbaugh DS. Repairing the American metropolis. Forum Appl Res Public Policy. 2001; 1: 6–12.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Leyden KM. Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(9): 1546–1551.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mehta V. Lively streets: determining environmental characteristics to support social behavior. J Plan Educ Res. 2007; 27(2): 165–187. doi: 10.1177/0739456X07307947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mehta V, Bosson JK. Third places and the social life of streets. Environ Behav. 2010; 42(6): 779–805. doi: 10.1177/0013916509344677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fullilove MT. Psychiatric implications of displacement: contributions from the psychology of place. Am J Psychiatry. 1996; 153(12): 1516–1523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Orvell M. The Death and Life of Main Street. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mitchell D. The Right to the City. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rogers SH, Halstead JM, Gardner KH, Carlson CH. Examining walkability and social capital as indicators of quality of life at the Municipal and neighborhood scales. Appl Res Qual Life. 2011; 6(2): 201–213. doi: 10.1007/s11482-010-9132-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cain KL, Millstein RA, Sallis JF, et al. Contribution of streetscape audits to explanation of physical activity in four age groups based on the microscale audit of pedestrian streetscapes (MAPS). Soc Sci Med. 2014; 116: 82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jackson JB. Landscapes. Worcester, MA: Univeristy of Massachussetts Press; 1970.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Mailman School of Public HealthNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.UCSF Department of PsychiatrySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations