Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 92, Issue 6, pp 1065–1080 | Cite as

Trends in Inequalities in the Use of Condom by Urban Teenagers in Spain

  • Laia Alvarez-Bruned
  • Xavier Garcia-Continente
  • Mercè Gotsens
  • Anna Pérez
  • Gloria PérezEmail author
Article

Abstract

Social and economic inequalities in condom use by adolescents have been reported previously. Also, condom use has declined during the last decade. The aim of the study was to describe trends in the use of condoms in our setting, and how these trends may differ between socioeconomic groups in boys, and separately in girls, aged 17-19 years attending school in Barcelona between 2004 and 2012. We analyzed data from three annual surveys on risk factors in secondary students, which included a representative sample of the city’s population; individuals who had previously had sexual intercourse (n = 1570) were included in the study. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and their confidence intervals (95 % CI) using robust Poisson regression models. The prevalence of condom use among boys was 87.0 % in 2004 and 76.2 % in 2012, and 76.7 and 64.7 % among girls, respectively. This decrease was greater in adolescents with a low socioeconomic level, both in boys (aPR = 0.80) and girls (aPR = 0.84). The observed increase of socioeconomic inequalities in condom use in adolescents highlights a possible deterioration in good sexual practices and policies during the studied period.

Keywords

Condoms Adolescent Socioeconomic factors Sexual behavior Contraception Trends 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the work done by the members of the SAMI service of the Barcelona Agency of Public Health and the education professionals in the schools of the city of Barcelona who take part in the surveys FRESC as well as all boys and girls who agreed to be interviewed.

We also thank Gail Craigie and Gavin Lucas for their help in editing the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially funded by the Barcelona Agency of Public Health, Barcelona, Spain.

This study was used by Laia Alvarez-Bruned to obtain title of Master’s of Public Health by of the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences at the Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (WHO). WHO discussion papers on adolescence. Issues in Adolescent Health and Development: Contraception. Geneva. 2004. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241591447_eng.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2015.
  2. 2.
    Clark T, Fleming T, Bullen P, et al. Health and well-being of secondary school students in New Zealand: trends between 2001, 2007 and 2012. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013; 49(11): 925–34. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kann L, Lowry R, Eaton D, Wechsler H. Trends in HIV-related risk behaviors among high school students—United States, 1991–2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61(29): 556–60.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moreno A, Rodríguez E. Informe de la juventud en España 2012. Madrid: Instituto de la Juventud (INJUVE). Gobierno de España. Observatorio de la Juventud en España; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holmes KK, Levine R, Weaver M. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Bull World Health Organ. 2004; 82(6): 454–61.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gómez MA, Sola A, Cortés MJ, Mira JJ. Sexual behavior and contraception in people under the age of 20 in Alicante, Spain. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007; 12(2): 125–30. doi: 10.1080/13625180701330555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poulin C, Graham L. The association between substance use, unplanned sexual intercourse and other sexual behaviors among adolescent students. Addiction. 2001; 96: 607–21. doi: 10.1080/09652140020031656.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beadnell B, Morrison DM, Wilsdon A, et al. Condom use, frequency of sex, and number of partners: multidimensional characterization of adolescent sexual risk-taking. J Sex Res. 2005; 42(3): 192–202. doi: 10.1080/00224490509552274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bimbela JL, Jiménez JM, Alfaro N, Gutiérrez P, March JC. Uso del profiláctico entre la juventud en sus relaciones de coito vaginal. Gac Sanit. 2002; 16(4): 298–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bermúdez MP, Castro A, Buela-Casal G. Psychosocial correlates of condom use and their relationship with worry about STI and HIV in native and immigrant adolescents in Spain. Span J Psychol. 2011; 14(2): 746–54. doi: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n2.22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Halpern CT, Hallfors D, Bauer DJ, Iritani B, Waller MW, Cho H. Implications of racial and gender differences in patterns of adolescent risk behavior for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004; 36(6): 239–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papaharitou S, Nakopoulou E, Hatzichristou D, Moraitou M. The experience of first sexual intercourse: an exploratory study in Greek women. Int J Caring Sci. 2011; 4: 164–9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stone N, Ingham R. Factors affecting British teenagers’ contraceptive use at first intercourse: the importance of partner communication. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002; 34(4): 191–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Avery L, Lazdane G. What do we know about sexual and reproductive health of adolescents in Europe? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010; 15(Suppl 2): S54–66. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2010.533007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    López-Amorós M, Schiaffino A, Moncada A, Pérez G. Factores asociados al uso autodeclarado de la anticoncepción de emergencia en la población escolarizada de 14 a 18 años de edad. Gac Sanit. 2010;24(5):404–409. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2010.05.010.
  16. 16.
    Teva I, Bermúdez MP, Buela-Casal G. Characteristics of sexual behavior in Spanish adolescents. Span J Psychol. 2009; 12(2): 471–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Puente D, Zabaleta E, Rodríguez-Blanco T, et al. Gender differences in sexual risk behavior among adolescents in Catalonia, Spain. Gac Sanit. 2011; 25(1): 13–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2010.07.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ingham R. The importance of context in understanding and seeking to promote sexual health. In: Ingham R, Aggleton P, eds. Promoting young people’s sexual health: international perspectives. London: Routledge; 2006: 41–60.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoyos RC, Sierra AV. El estrato socioeconómico como factor predictor del uso constante de condón en adolescentes. Rev Saude Publica. 2001; 35(6): 531–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fernández M. Escuela pública y privada en España: la segregación rampante. Rev Asoc Sociol Educ. 2008; 1. Available at: http://www.ase.es/rase/index.php/RASE/article/view/47. Accessed March 1, 2015.
  21. 21.
    Fernández R, Muñiz M. Colegios concertados y selección de escuela en España: un círculo vicioso. Presupuesto Gasto Público. 2012; 67: 97–118.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Valois R, Thatcher W, Drane D, Reininger B. Comparison of selected health risk behaviors between adolescents in public and private high schools in South Carolina. J Sch Health. 1997; 67: 434–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hidalgo I, Garrido G, Hernandez M. Health status and risk behavior of adolescents in the north of Madrid, Spain. J Adolesc Health. 2000; 27(5): 351–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ruiz-Muñoz D, Pérez G, Garcia-Subirats I, Díez E. Social and economic inequalities in the use of contraception among women in Spain. J Womens Health. 2011; 20(3): 403–11. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Besharov DJ, Gardiner KN. Trends in teen sexual behavior. Child Youth Serv Rev. 1997; 19(5–6): 341–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lindh I, Blohm F, Andersson-Ellström A, Milsom I. Contraceptive use and pregnancy outcome in three generations of Swedish female teenagers from the same urban population. Contraception. 2009; 80(2): 163–9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.01.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pérez A, Garcia-Continente X, Grup col·laborador enquesta FRESC 2012. Informe FRESC 2012: 25 anys d’enquestes a adolescents escolaritzats de Barcelona. Barcelona: Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, 2013. Available at: http://www.aspb.cat/quefem/docs/Informe_FRESC_2012.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2015.
  28. 28.
    Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona 2014. [Technical publications of public health. Health surveys]. Available at: http://www.aspb.cat/quefem/documents_enquestes.htm. Accessed March 2, 2015.
  29. 29.
    Barros AJD, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:21. This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/3/21.
  30. 30.
    Rotermann M. Sexual behavior and condom use of 15- to 24-year-olds in 2003 and 2009/2010. Health Rep. 2012; 23(1): 41–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nettleman MD, Chung H, Brewer J, Ayoola A, Reed PL. Reasons for unprotected intercourse: analysis of the PRAMS survey. Contraception. 2007; 75(5): 361–6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Álvarez Nieto C, Pastor Moreno G, Linares Abad M, Serrano Martos J, Rodríguez OL. Motivaciones para el embarazo adolescente. Gac Sanit. 2012; 26(6): 497–503. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.12.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Seoane L, Diezma JC, García P. Las concepciones de salud de los jóvenes. v. 2. Prácticas y comportamientos relativos a los hábitos saludables. Madrid (Comunidad Autónoma), Servicio de Documentación y Publicaciones; 2005. 282 p.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Samartzis EP, Merki-Feld GS, Seifert B, Kut E, Imthurn B. Six years after deregulation of emergency contraception in Switzerland: has free access induced changes in the profile of clients attending an emergency pharmacy in Zürich? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012; 17(3): 197–204. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2012.661108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arai L. Low expectations, sexual attitudes and knowledge: explaining teenage pregnancy and fertility in English communities. Insights from qualitative research. Sociol Rev. 2003; 51(2): 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wellings K, Parker R. Sexuality education in Europe. International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) European Network. 2006. Available at: http://www.ippfen.org/resources/sexuality-education-europe-reference-guide-policies-and-practices. Accessed March 1, 2015.
  37. 37.
    Ifanti AA, Argyriou AA, Kalofonou FH, Kalofonos HP. Financial crisis and austerity measures in Greece: their impact on health promotion policies and public health care. Health Policy. 2013; 113(1–2): 8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Conrad D. Deprivation-based inequalities in under-18 conception rates and the proportion of under-18 conceptions leading to abortion in England, 1998-2010. J Public Health Oxf Engl. 2012; 34(4): 609–14. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Manlove J, Ikramullah E, Mincieli L, Holcombe E, Danish S. Trends in sexual experience, contraceptive use, and teenage childbearing: 1992-2002. J Adolesc Health. 2009; 44(5): 413–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.09.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Browning CR, Burrington LA, Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Neighborhood structural inequality, collective efficacy, and sexual risk behavior among urban youth. J Health Soc Behav. 2008;49:269–285. Available at: http://jstor.org/stable/27638756.
  41. 41.
    Akers AY, Muhammad MR, Corbie-Smith G. “When you got nothing to do, you do somebody”: a community’s perceptions of neighborhood effects on adolescent sexual behaviors. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72(1): 91–9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.035.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moreau C, Trussell J, Bajos N. Religiosity, religious affiliation, and patterns of sexual activity and contraceptive use in France. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013; 18(3): 168–80. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2013.777829.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reina M-F, Ciaravino H, Llovera N, Castelo-Branco C. Contraception knowledge and sexual behavior in secondary school students. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010; 26(7): 479–83. doi: 10.3109/09513591003649856.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Krieger N. Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections—and why does it matter? Int J Epidemiol. 2003; 32(4): 652–7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Megías I, Rodríguez E, Méndez S, Pallarés J. Jóvenes y sexo. El estereotipo que obliga y el rito que identifica. Madrid: Fundación de Ayuda contra la Drogadicción (FAD), Instituto de la Juventud (INJUVE); 2005.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Faílde Garrido JM, Lameiras Fernández M, Bimbela Pedrola JL. Prácticas sexuales de chicos y chicas españoles de 14-24 años de edad. Gac Sanit. 2008; 22(6): 511–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Van Empelen P, Kok G. Condom use in steady and casual sexual relationships: planning, preparation and willingness to take risks among adolescents. Psychol Health. 2006; 21(2): 165–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vives N, Lugo R, López E, et al. Increase in gonorrhoea among very young adolescents, Catalonia, Spain, January 2012 to June 2013. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2013; 18(33): 20560.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pérez G, Llimona P, Borrell C. La salut reproductiva a la ciutat de Barcelona. Any 2012. Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona. Barcelona. 2013. Available at: http://www.aspb.cat/quefem/docs/Natalitat_BCN_2012.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2015.
  50. 50.
    Ruiz-Muñoz D, Pérez G, Gotsens M, Rodríguez-Sanz M. Regional inequalities in the use of contraception in Spain: a multilevel approach. Health Place. 2012; 18(2): 408–14. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.12.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Henderson M, Butcher I, Wight D, Williamson L, Raab G. What explains between-school differences in rates of sexual experience? BMC Public Health. 2008; 8(1): 53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-53.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Diputació de Barcelona. Observatori de polítiques educatives locals. L’educació en xifres. Dades i indicadors educatius a la demarcació de Barcelona. Curs 2012–2013. Barcelona. 2014. Available at: http://www.diba.cat/documents/113226/127467/Educacio+Xifres+2012-13.pdf/f057f0f9-447b-4dbf-95f3-bf51b17d39a5. Accessed March 3, 2015.
  53. 53.
    Brener ND, Billy JOG, Grady WR. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolesc Health. 2003; 33(6): 436–57. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00052-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rose E, Diclemente RJ, Wingood GM, et al. The validity of teens’ and young adults’ self-reported condom use. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163(1): 61–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ley orgánica 2/2010, de 3 de marzo, de salud sexual y reproductiva y de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo (Boletín Oficial del Estado, número 55, de 4-03-2010).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laia Alvarez-Bruned
    • 1
  • Xavier Garcia-Continente
    • 2
    • 4
  • Mercè Gotsens
    • 2
    • 3
  • Anna Pérez
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Gloria Pérez
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Health Information System Service, Barcelona Agency of Public HealthBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.CIBER in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
  4. 4.Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau) (Institute of Biomedical Research)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations