Abstract
Residents of areas with lower socioeconomic status (SES) are known to be less physically active during leisure time. Neighborhood walkability has been shown to be related to recreational walking equally in low and high SES areas. This cross-sectional study tested whether associations of specific environmental attributes, measured objectively and subjectively, with walking for recreation were moderated by area-level SES. The data of the North West Adelaide Health Study collected in 2007 (n = 1500, mean age 57) were used. Self-reported walking frequency was the outcome of the study. Environmental exposure measures included objectively measured walkability components (residential density, intersection density, land use mix, and net retail area ratio) and perceived attributes (access to destinations, neighborhood esthetics, walking infrastructure, traffic/barriers, and crime safety). Participants’ suburbs were categorized into low and high SES areas using an indicator of socioeconomic disadvantage. Low SES areas had lower scores in residential density, neighborhood esthetics, walking infrastructure, traffic/barriers, and crime safety. Recreational walking was associated with residential density, access to destinations, esthetics, traffic/barriers, and crime safety. Effect modification was observed for two attributes (out of nine): residential density was associated with walking only in low SES areas, while walking infrastructure was associated with walking only in high SES areas. The associations of neighborhood environmental attributes with recreational walking were largely consistent across SES groups. However, low SES areas were disadvantaged in most perceived environmental attributes related to recreational walking. Improving such attributes in low SES neighborhoods may help close socioeconomic disparities in leisure time physical activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kavanagh AM, Goller JL, King T, Jolley D, Crawford D, Turrell G. Urban area disadvantage and physical activity: a multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 59: 934–940.
Turrell G, Haynes M, Burton NW, et al. Neighborhood disadvantage and physical activity: baseline results from the HABITAT multilevel longitudinal study. Ann Epidemiol. 2010; 20: 171–181.
van Lenthe FJ, Brug J, Mackenbach JP. Neighbourhood inequalities in physical inactivity: the role of neighbourhood attractiveness, proximity to local facilities and safety in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60: 763–775.
Janssen E, Sugiyama T, Winkler E, de Vries H, te Poel F, Owen N. Psychosocial correlates of leisure-time walking among Australian adults of lower and higher socio-economic status. Health Educ Res. 2010; 25: 316–324.
National Preventative Health Taskforce. Australia: the healthiest country by 2020—National Preventative Health Strategy—the roadmap for action. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.
Lee IM, Buchner DM. The importance of walking to public health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40: S512–S518.
Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD, et al. Neighborhood built environment and income: examining multiple health outcomes. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68: 1285–1293.
Sundquist K, Eriksson U, Kawakami N, Skog L, Ohlsson H, Arvidsson D. Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: the Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72: 1266–1273.
Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behavior in Belgian adults. Prev Med. 2010; 50: S74–S79.
Blacksher E, Lovasi GS. Place-focused physical activity research, human agency, and social justice in public health: taking agency seriously in studies of the built environment. Health Place. 2012; 18: 172–179.
Inoue S, Ohya Y, Odagiri Y, et al. Association between perceived neighborhood environment and walking among adults in 4 cities in Japan. J Epidemiol. 2010; 20: 277–286.
Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD, et al. Neighborhood environment and psychosocial correlates of adults’ physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44: 637–646.
Sugiyama T, Leslie E, Giles-Corti B, Owen N. Physical activity for recreation or exercise on neighbourhood streets: associations with perceived environmental attributes. Health Place. 2009; 15: 1058–1063.
Evenson KR, Block R, Roux AVD, McGinn AP, Wen F, Rodriguez DA. Associations of adult physical activity with perceived safety and police-recorded crime: the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9: 146.
Foster S, Giles-Corti B. Does fear of crime discourage walkers? A social-ecological exploration of fear as a deterrent to walking. Environ Behav. 2014; 46: 698–717.
Arvidsson D, Kawakami N, Ohlsson H, Sundquist K. Physical activity and concordance between objective and perceived walkability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44: 280–287.
Ball K, Jeffery RW, Crawford DA, Roberts RJ, Salmon J, Timperio AF. Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments. Prev Med. 2008; 47: 294–298.
Gebel K, Bauman A, Owen N. Correlates of non-concordance between perceived and objective measures of walkability. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 37: 228–238.
Grant JF, Taylor AW, Ruffin RE, et al. Cohort profile: the North West Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS). Int J Epidemiol. 2009; 38: 1479–1486.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Health Survey: users’ guide—electronic publication, 2004–05. Canberra: ABS; 2006.
Rzewnicki R, Vanden Auweele Y, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutr. 2003; 6: 299–305.
Gauvin L, Richard L, Kestens Y, et al. Living in a well-serviced urban area is associated with maintenance of frequent walking among seniors in the VoisiNuAge study. J Gerontol B-Psychol. 2012; 67: 76–88.
Mason P, Kearns A, Livingston M. “Safe Going”: the influence of crime rates and perceived crime and safety on walking in deprived neighbourhoods. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 91: 15–24.
Frank LD, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, et al. The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. Br J Sports Med. 2010; 44: 924–933.
Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 1552–1558.
Baldock K, Paquet C, Howard N, et al. Associations between resident perceptions of the local residential environment and metabolic syndrome. J Environ Publ Health. 2012; 2012: 589409.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA)—technical paper 2006. Canberra: ABS; 2008.
Whisman MA, McClelland GH. Designing, testing, and interpreting interactions and moderator effects in family research. J Fam Psychol. 2005; 19: 111–120.
Saelens BE, Handy SL. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40: S550–S566.
Franzini L, Taylor W, Elliott MN, et al. Neighborhood characteristics favorable to outdoor physical activity: disparities by socioeconomic and racial/ethnic composition. Health Place. 2010; 16: 267–274.
Sallis JF, Slymen DJ, Conway TL, et al. Income disparities in perceived neighborhood built and social environment attributes. Health Place. 2011; 17: 1274–1283.
Duncan MJ, Winkler E, Sugiyama T, et al. Relationships of land use mix with walking for transport: do land uses and geographical scale matter? J Urban Health. 2010; 87: 782–795.
Marshall WE, Garrick NW. Effect of street network design on walking and biking. Transp Res Rec. 2010; 2198: 103–115.
Turrell G, Haynes M, Wilson L, Giles-Corti B. Can the built environment reduce health inequalities? A study of neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and walking for transport. Health Place. 2013; 19: 89–98.
Cerin E, Sit CHP, Barnett A, Cheung M-C, Chan W-M. Walking for recreation and perceptions of the neighborhood environment in older Chinese urban dwellers. J Urban Health. 2013; 90: 56–66.
Starnes HA, Troped PJ, Klenosky DB, Doehring AM. Trails and physical activity: a review. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8: 1160–1174.
Sugiyama T, Francis J, Middleton NJ, Owen N, Giles-Corti B. Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 1752–1757.
Crawford D, Timperio A, Giles-Corti B, et al. Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio-economic status? Health Place. 2008; 14: 889–893.
Acknowledgments
The Spatial Epidemiology and Evaluation Research Group at the University of South Australia in collaboration with the South Australian Department of Health and Ageing conducted the Place and Metabolic Syndrome (PAMS) project under National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Project Grants (#631917, #570150). Catherine Paquet was funded by NHMRC Post-doctoral Training Research Fellowship (#570139). This manuscript has been reviewed for scientific content and consistency of data interpretation by Chief Investigators of the North West Adelaide Health Study. The authors are grateful for the interest and commitment of cohort participants, as well as the contributions of research support staff involved in recruitment and data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sugiyama, T., Howard, N.J., Paquet, C. et al. Do Relationships Between Environmental Attributes and Recreational Walking Vary According to Area-Level Socioeconomic Status?. J Urban Health 92, 253–264 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9932-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9932-1