Built Environment and Physical Activity for Transportation in Adults from Curitiba, Brazil


The goal of this study was to assess the association between features of the built environment and levels of walking and cycling as forms of transportation in the city of Curitiba, Brazil. Data collection was conducted through a telephone survey in 2008. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to identify walking or cycling as forms of transportation. The built environment characteristics were obtained through the Geographic Information System for 1,206 adults. Density indicators were computed, considering a radius of 500 m around each individual's household. For the accessibility measures, the shortest distance to selected built environment features (e.g., bus stop, bike path) was used. The association between characteristics of the environment and the practice of walking or cycling was assessed through logistic regressions. After considering individual characteristics, higher-income areas (OR = 0.56, 95 % CI = 0.41–0.76), higher density of Bus Rapid Transit stations (OR = 1.50, 95 % CI = 1.22–1.84), and the proportion of residential (OR = 1.25, 95 % CI = 1.02–1.53) and commercial (OR = 1.47, 95 % CI = 1.13–1.91) areas were associated with any walking prevalence (≥10 min/week). Higher access to bike paths (OR = 0.80, 95 % CI = 0.64–1.00) was inversely associated with walking at recommended levels (≥150 min/week). Higher-income areas (OR = 0.26, 95 % CI = 0.08–0.81), greater number of traffic lights (OR = 0.27, 95 % CI = 0.09–0.88), and higher land use mix (OR = 0.52, 95 % CI = 0.31–0.88) were inversely associated with cycling. The neighborhood built environment may affect active commuting among adults living in urban centers in middle-income countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    Hamer M, Chida Y. Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2008; 46(1): 9–13.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Boone-Heinonen J, Evenson KR, Taber DR, Gordon-Larsen P. Walking for prevention of cardiovascular disease in men and women: a systematic review of observational studies. Obes Rev. 2009; 10(2): 204–217.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Giles-Corti B, Foster S, Shilton T, Falconer R. The co-benefits for health of investing in active transportation. NSW Public Health Bull. 2010; 21(5–6): 122–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ogilvie D, Egan M, Hamilton V, Petticrew M. Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. BMJ. 2004; 329(7469): 763.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lee C, Moudon AV. Physical activity and environment research in the health field: implications for urban and transportation planning practice and research. J Plan Lit. 2004; 19(2): 147–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 25(2): 80–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dannenberg AL, Jackson RJ, Frumkin H, et al. The impact of community design and land-use choices on public health: a scientific research agenda. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(9): 1500–1508.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF. Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(1): 67–76.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wendel-Vos W, Droomers M, Kremers S, Brug J, van Lenthe F. Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2007; 8(5): 425–440.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Saelens BE, Handy SL. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40(7S): S550–S566.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    McCormack GR, Shiell A. In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8(1): 125.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012; 380(9838): 258–271.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cervero R, Sarmiento OL, Jacoby E, Gomez LF, Neiman A. Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: lessons from Bogotá. Int J Sust Transp. 2009; 3(4): 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gomez LF, Parra DC, Buchner D, et al. Built environment attributes and walking patterns among the elderly population in Bogota. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38(6): 592–599.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Parra DC, Hoehner CM, Hallal PC, et al. Perceived environmental correlates of physical activity for leisure and transportation in Curitiba, Brazil. Prev Med. 2011;53:234–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Salvador EP, Reis RS, Florindo AA. A prática de caminhada como forma de deslocamento e sua associação com a percepção do ambiente em idosos. Rev bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2009; 14(3): 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Salvador EP, Reis RS, Florindo AA. Practice of walking and its association with perceived environment among elderly Brazilians living in a region of low socioeconomic level. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 67.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hoehner CM, Brennan Ramirez LK, Elliott MB, Handy SL, Brownson RC. Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28(2 Suppl 2): 105–116.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Reis RS, Hallal PC, Parra DC, et al. Promoting physical activity through community-wide policies and planning: findings from Curitiba, Brazil. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(Suppl 2): S137–S145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hino AA, Reis RS, Sarmiento OL, Parra DC, Brownson RC. The built environment and recreational physical activity among adults in Curitiba. Braz Prev Med. 2011; 52(6): 419–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Reis RS, Hino AA, Parra DC, Hallal PC, Brownson RC. Bicycling and walking for transportation in three Brazilian cities. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 44(2): e9–e17.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(8): 1381–1395.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gomes GA, Reis RS, Parra DC, et al. Walking for leisure among adults from three Brazilian cities and its association with perceived environment attributes and personal factors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 111.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hallal PC, Gomez LF, Parra DC, et al. Lessons learned after 10 years of IPAQ use in Brazil and Colombia. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(Suppl 2): S259–S264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wener RE, Evans GW. A morning stroll levels of physical activity in car and mass transit commuting. Environ Behav. 2007; 39(1): 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lachapelle U, Frank LD. Transit and health: mode of transport, employer-sponsored public transit pass programs, and physical activity. J Public Health Pol. 2009; 30(Suppl 1): S73–S94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dalton AM, Jones AP, Panter JR, Ogilvie D. Neighbourhood, route and workplace-related environmental characteristics predict adults' mode of travel to work. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6): e67575.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sallis JF, Conway TL, Dillon LI, et al. Environmental and demographic correlates of bicycling. Prev Med. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.014

  30. 30.

    Beenackers MA, Foster S, Kamphuis CB, et al. Taking up cycling after residential relocation: built environment factors. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(6): 610–615.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Winters M, Brauer M, Setton EM, Teschke K. Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: bicycling versus driving. J Urban Health. 2010; 87(6): 969–993.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Thornton LE, Pearce JR, Kavanagh AM. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to assess the role of the built environment in influencing obesity: a glossary. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 71.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Oliver LN, Schuurman N, Hall AW. Comparing circular and network buffers to examine the influence of land use on walking for leisure and errands. Int J Health Geogr. 2007; 6: 41.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Leslie E, Coffee N, Frank L, Owen N, Bauman A, Hugo G. Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health Place. 2007; 13(1): 111–122.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    ESRI. Surface creation and analysis. http://resources.esri.com/help/9.3/arcgisdesktop/com/gp_toolref/geoprocessing/surface_creation_and_analysis.htm (2010). Accessed 1 April 2010.

  36. 36.

    Christian HE, Bull FC, Middleton NJ, et al. How important is the land use mix measure in understanding walking behaviour? Results from the RESIDE study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 55.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Owen N, Cerin E, Leslie E, et al. Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(5): 387–395.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Reis RS, Hino AAF, Rech CR, Kerr J, Hallal PC. Walkability and physical activity: findings from Curitiba, Brazil. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45(3): 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Van Dyck D, Cerin E, Conway TL, et al. Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with adults' leisure-time physical activity: findings from Belgium, Australia and the USA. Health Place. 2013; 19: 59–68.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sallis JF, Bowles HR, Bauman A, et al. Neighborhood environments and physical activity among adults in 11 countries. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(6): 484–490.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gomez LF, Sarmiento OL, Parra DC, et al. Characteristics of the built environment associated with leisure-time physical activity among adults in Bogota, Colombia: a multilevel study. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(Suppl 2): S196–S203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Villanueva K, Giles-Corti B, McCormack G. Achieving 10,000 steps: a comparison of public transport users and drivers in a university setting. Prev Med. 2008; 47(3): 338–341.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    MacDonald JM, Stokes RJ, Cohen DA, Kofner A, Ridgeway GK. The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39(2): 105–112.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hidalgo D, Gutiérrez L. BRT and BHLS around the world: explosive growth, large positive impacts and many issues outstanding. Res Transp Econ. 2013; 39(1): 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Maas J, Verheij RA, Spreeuwenberg P, Groenewegen PP. Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8: 206.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Garrard J, Rose G, Lo SK. Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. Prev Med. 2008; 46(1): 55–59.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fraser SD, Lock K. Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling. Eur J Public Health. 2011; 21(6): 738–743.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bacchieri G, Barros AJ. Traffic accidents in Brazil from 1998 to 2010: many changes and few effects. Rev Saude Publica. 2011; 45(5): 949–963.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Chandran A, Kahn G, Sousa T, Pechansky F, Bishai DM, Hyder AA. Impact of road traffic deaths on expected years of life lost and reduction in life expectancy in Brazil. Demography. 2013;50:229–36.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety: time for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Mascarenhas MDM, Silva MMA, Malta DC, et al. Atendimentos de emergência por acidentes na Rede de Vigilância de Violências e Acidentes—Brasil, 2006. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2009; 14(5): 1657–1668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rech CR, Reis RS, Hino AA, et al. Neighborhood safety and physical inactivity in adults from Curitiba, Brazil. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9(1): 72.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hallal PC, Reis RS, Parra DC, Hoehner CM. Association between perceived environmental attributes and physical activity among adults in Recife, Brazil. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(Suppl 2):S213–22.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Oyeyemi AL, Adegoke BO, Sallis JF, Oyeyemi AY, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Perceived crime and traffic safety is related to physical activity among adults in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 294.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Oyeyemi AL, Adegoke BO, Oyeyemi AY, Sallis JF. Perceived environmental correlates of physical activity and walking in African young adults. Am J Health Promot. 2011; 25(5): e10–e19.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was funded through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contract U48/DP000060-01 (Prevention Research Centers Program). Adriano Akira F. Hino had a fellowship from CAPES (DS—PROGRAMA DE DEMANDA SOCIAL). The authors are thankful for the contribution of the Institute of Urban Planning and Research of Curitiba (IPPUC).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriano A. F. Hino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hino, A.A.F., Reis, R.S., Sarmiento, O.L. et al. Built Environment and Physical Activity for Transportation in Adults from Curitiba, Brazil. J Urban Health 91, 446–462 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9831-x

Download citation


  • Motor activity
  • Transportation
  • Environment and public health
  • Adult
  • Brazil