Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Built Environment and Physical Activity for Transportation in Adults from Curitiba, Brazil


The goal of this study was to assess the association between features of the built environment and levels of walking and cycling as forms of transportation in the city of Curitiba, Brazil. Data collection was conducted through a telephone survey in 2008. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to identify walking or cycling as forms of transportation. The built environment characteristics were obtained through the Geographic Information System for 1,206 adults. Density indicators were computed, considering a radius of 500 m around each individual's household. For the accessibility measures, the shortest distance to selected built environment features (e.g., bus stop, bike path) was used. The association between characteristics of the environment and the practice of walking or cycling was assessed through logistic regressions. After considering individual characteristics, higher-income areas (OR = 0.56, 95 % CI = 0.41–0.76), higher density of Bus Rapid Transit stations (OR = 1.50, 95 % CI = 1.22–1.84), and the proportion of residential (OR = 1.25, 95 % CI = 1.02–1.53) and commercial (OR = 1.47, 95 % CI = 1.13–1.91) areas were associated with any walking prevalence (≥10 min/week). Higher access to bike paths (OR = 0.80, 95 % CI = 0.64–1.00) was inversely associated with walking at recommended levels (≥150 min/week). Higher-income areas (OR = 0.26, 95 % CI = 0.08–0.81), greater number of traffic lights (OR = 0.27, 95 % CI = 0.09–0.88), and higher land use mix (OR = 0.52, 95 % CI = 0.31–0.88) were inversely associated with cycling. The neighborhood built environment may affect active commuting among adults living in urban centers in middle-income countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Hamer M, Chida Y. Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2008; 46(1): 9–13.

  2. 2.

    Boone-Heinonen J, Evenson KR, Taber DR, Gordon-Larsen P. Walking for prevention of cardiovascular disease in men and women: a systematic review of observational studies. Obes Rev. 2009; 10(2): 204–217.

  3. 3.

    Giles-Corti B, Foster S, Shilton T, Falconer R. The co-benefits for health of investing in active transportation. NSW Public Health Bull. 2010; 21(5–6): 122–127.

  4. 4.

    Ogilvie D, Egan M, Hamilton V, Petticrew M. Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. BMJ. 2004; 329(7469): 763.

  5. 5.

    Lee C, Moudon AV. Physical activity and environment research in the health field: implications for urban and transportation planning practice and research. J Plan Lit. 2004; 19(2): 147–181.

  6. 6.

    Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 25(2): 80–91.

  7. 7.

    Dannenberg AL, Jackson RJ, Frumkin H, et al. The impact of community design and land-use choices on public health: a scientific research agenda. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(9): 1500–1508.

  8. 8.

    Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF. Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(1): 67–76.

  9. 9.

    Wendel-Vos W, Droomers M, Kremers S, Brug J, van Lenthe F. Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2007; 8(5): 425–440.

  10. 10.

    Saelens BE, Handy SL. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40(7S): S550–S566.

  11. 11.

    McCormack GR, Shiell A. In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8(1): 125.

  12. 12.

    Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012; 380(9838): 258–271.

  13. 13.

    Cervero R, Sarmiento OL, Jacoby E, Gomez LF, Neiman A. Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: lessons from Bogotá. Int J Sust Transp. 2009; 3(4): 37–41.

  14. 14.

    Gomez LF, Parra DC, Buchner D, et al. Built environment attributes and walking patterns among the elderly population in Bogota. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38(6): 592–599.

  15. 15.

    Parra DC, Hoehner CM, Hallal PC, et al. Perceived environmental correlates of physical activity for leisure and transportation in Curitiba, Brazil. Prev Med. 2011;53:234–8.

  16. 16.

    Salvador EP, Reis RS, Florindo AA. A prática de caminhada como forma de deslocamento e sua associação com a percepção do ambiente em idosos. Rev bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2009; 14(3): 195–205.

  17. 17.

    Salvador EP, Reis RS, Florindo AA. Practice of walking and its association with perceived environment among elderly Brazilians living in a region of low socioeconomic level. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 67.

  18. 18.

    Hoehner CM, Brennan Ramirez LK, Elliott MB, Handy SL, Brownson RC. Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28(2 Suppl 2): 105–116.

  19. 19.

    Reis RS, Hallal PC, Parra DC, et al. Promoting physical activity through community-wide policies and planning: findings from Curitiba, Brazil. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(Suppl 2): S137–S145.

  20. 20.

    Hino AA, Reis RS, Sarmiento OL, Parra DC, Brownson RC. The built environment and recreational physical activity among adults in Curitiba. Braz Prev Med. 2011; 52(6): 419–422.

  21. 21.

    Reis RS, Hino AA, Parra DC, Hallal PC, Brownson RC. Bicycling and walking for transportation in three Brazilian cities. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 44(2): e9–e17.

  22. 22.

    Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(8): 1381–1395.

  23. 23.

    Gomes GA, Reis RS, Parra DC, et al. Walking for leisure among adults from three Brazilian cities and its association with perceived environment attributes and personal factors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 111.

  24. 24.

    Hallal PC, Gomez LF, Parra DC, et al. Lessons learned after 10 years of IPAQ use in Brazil and Colombia. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(Suppl 2): S259–S264.

  25. 25.

    Wener RE, Evans GW. A morning stroll levels of physical activity in car and mass transit commuting. Environ Behav. 2007; 39(1): 62–74.

  26. 26.

    Lachapelle U, Frank LD. Transit and health: mode of transport, employer-sponsored public transit pass programs, and physical activity. J Public Health Pol. 2009; 30(Suppl 1): S73–S94.

  27. 27.

    World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

  28. 28.

    Dalton AM, Jones AP, Panter JR, Ogilvie D. Neighbourhood, route and workplace-related environmental characteristics predict adults' mode of travel to work. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6): e67575.

  29. 29.

    Sallis JF, Conway TL, Dillon LI, et al. Environmental and demographic correlates of bicycling. Prev Med. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.014

  30. 30.

    Beenackers MA, Foster S, Kamphuis CB, et al. Taking up cycling after residential relocation: built environment factors. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(6): 610–615.

  31. 31.

    Winters M, Brauer M, Setton EM, Teschke K. Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: bicycling versus driving. J Urban Health. 2010; 87(6): 969–993.

  32. 32.

    Thornton LE, Pearce JR, Kavanagh AM. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to assess the role of the built environment in influencing obesity: a glossary. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 71.

  33. 33.

    Oliver LN, Schuurman N, Hall AW. Comparing circular and network buffers to examine the influence of land use on walking for leisure and errands. Int J Health Geogr. 2007; 6: 41.

  34. 34.

    Leslie E, Coffee N, Frank L, Owen N, Bauman A, Hugo G. Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health Place. 2007; 13(1): 111–122.

  35. 35.

    ESRI. Surface creation and analysis. (2010). Accessed 1 April 2010.

  36. 36.

    Christian HE, Bull FC, Middleton NJ, et al. How important is the land use mix measure in understanding walking behaviour? Results from the RESIDE study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 55.

  37. 37.

    Owen N, Cerin E, Leslie E, et al. Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(5): 387–395.

  38. 38.

    Reis RS, Hino AAF, Rech CR, Kerr J, Hallal PC. Walkability and physical activity: findings from Curitiba, Brazil. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45(3): 269–275.

  39. 39.

    Van Dyck D, Cerin E, Conway TL, et al. Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with adults' leisure-time physical activity: findings from Belgium, Australia and the USA. Health Place. 2013; 19: 59–68.

  40. 40.

    Sallis JF, Bowles HR, Bauman A, et al. Neighborhood environments and physical activity among adults in 11 countries. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(6): 484–490.

  41. 41.

    Gomez LF, Sarmiento OL, Parra DC, et al. Characteristics of the built environment associated with leisure-time physical activity among adults in Bogota, Colombia: a multilevel study. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(Suppl 2): S196–S203.

  42. 42.

    Villanueva K, Giles-Corti B, McCormack G. Achieving 10,000 steps: a comparison of public transport users and drivers in a university setting. Prev Med. 2008; 47(3): 338–341.

  43. 43.

    MacDonald JM, Stokes RJ, Cohen DA, Kofner A, Ridgeway GK. The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39(2): 105–112.

  44. 44.

    Hidalgo D, Gutiérrez L. BRT and BHLS around the world: explosive growth, large positive impacts and many issues outstanding. Res Transp Econ. 2013; 39(1): 8–13.

  45. 45.

    Maas J, Verheij RA, Spreeuwenberg P, Groenewegen PP. Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8: 206.

  46. 46.

    Garrard J, Rose G, Lo SK. Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. Prev Med. 2008; 46(1): 55–59.

  47. 47.

    Fraser SD, Lock K. Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling. Eur J Public Health. 2011; 21(6): 738–743.

  48. 48.

    Bacchieri G, Barros AJ. Traffic accidents in Brazil from 1998 to 2010: many changes and few effects. Rev Saude Publica. 2011; 45(5): 949–963.

  49. 49.

    Chandran A, Kahn G, Sousa T, Pechansky F, Bishai DM, Hyder AA. Impact of road traffic deaths on expected years of life lost and reduction in life expectancy in Brazil. Demography. 2013;50:229–36.

  50. 50.

    World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety: time for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

  51. 51.

    Mascarenhas MDM, Silva MMA, Malta DC, et al. Atendimentos de emergência por acidentes na Rede de Vigilância de Violências e Acidentes—Brasil, 2006. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2009; 14(5): 1657–1668.

  52. 52.

    Rech CR, Reis RS, Hino AA, et al. Neighborhood safety and physical inactivity in adults from Curitiba, Brazil. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9(1): 72.

  53. 53.

    Hallal PC, Reis RS, Parra DC, Hoehner CM. Association between perceived environmental attributes and physical activity among adults in Recife, Brazil. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(Suppl 2):S213–22.

  54. 54.

    Oyeyemi AL, Adegoke BO, Sallis JF, Oyeyemi AY, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Perceived crime and traffic safety is related to physical activity among adults in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 294.

  55. 55.

    Oyeyemi AL, Adegoke BO, Oyeyemi AY, Sallis JF. Perceived environmental correlates of physical activity and walking in African young adults. Am J Health Promot. 2011; 25(5): e10–e19.

Download references


This study was funded through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contract U48/DP000060-01 (Prevention Research Centers Program). Adriano Akira F. Hino had a fellowship from CAPES (DS—PROGRAMA DE DEMANDA SOCIAL). The authors are thankful for the contribution of the Institute of Urban Planning and Research of Curitiba (IPPUC).

Author information

Correspondence to Adriano A. F. Hino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hino, A.A.F., Reis, R.S., Sarmiento, O.L. et al. Built Environment and Physical Activity for Transportation in Adults from Curitiba, Brazil. J Urban Health 91, 446–462 (2014).

Download citation


  • Motor activity
  • Transportation
  • Environment and public health
  • Adult
  • Brazil