Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intimate Partner Sexual Violence: A Comparison of Foreign- Versus US-Born Physically Abused Latinas

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Men’s violence against women—particularly intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV)—is associated with the transmission of HIV. Men who physically abuse their female intimate partners often also sexually abuse them. Latinas are one of the fastest growing populations in the USA and at high-risk for contracting HIV, though little is known about IPSV against physically abused Latinas, including whether there is an association between nativity of the victim and the likelihood of sexual violence by intimate partners. This study examined the (1) prevalence of recent (past 6 months) IPSV against 555 physically abused, help-seeking Latinas and (2) relationship of nativity to recent IPSV. This study used data collected in 2002–2003 from participants in one major city on the East Coast and one West Coast county, who were involved in the Risk Assessment Validation (RAVE) Study. The RAVE Study assessed the accuracy of four different methods for predicting risk of future intimate partner violence. IPSV was defined as an abusive male partner physically forcing sex (rape) or making the woman have sex without a condom. Recent IPSV was reported by 38 % of the sample. Among those reporting recent IPSV, multiple assaults were common: 30 % of women were raped and 51 % were made to have unprotected sex six or more times during the past 6 months. IPSV was significantly associated with nativity. Physically abused Latinas who were foreign born had two times greater odds of reporting recent IPSV than physically abused Latinas born in the USA, after controlling for other demographic covariates. Exploratory post hoc analyses examining all pairwise comparisons of IPSV against Latinas born in the USA, Mexico, Central America, South America, and the Caribbean also revealed some significant differences that warrant further study with larger samples. HIV prevention efforts aimed at reducing IPSV in this population are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Addressing violence against women and HIV/AIDS: what works? 2010. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/9789241599863/en/index.html

  2. CDC. WISQARS Leading Causes of Death Reports, 1999–2007. 2010 [cited 2013 February 1]; Available from: http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/leadcaus10.html

  3. CDC. HIV among Women. 2011. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/women/index.htm. Accessed 1 February 2013

  4. El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Rajah V, Foleno A, Frye V. Fear and violence: raising the HIV stakes. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000; 12: 154–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maman S, Campbell J, Sweat MD, Gielen AC. The intersections of HIV and violence: directions for future research and interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 50: 459–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McFarlane J, Malecha A, Watson K, Gist J, Batten E, Hall I, et al. Intimate partner sexual assault against women: frequency, health consequences, and treatment outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 99–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell JC. Women's responses to sexual abuse in intimate relationships. Health Care Women Int. 1989; 10: 335–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Finkelhor D, Yllo K. License to rape: sexual abuse of wives. New York, NY: US Free Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frye V, Ompad D, Chan C, Koblin B, Galea S, Vlahov D. Intimate partner violence perpetration and condom use-related factors: associations with heterosexual men's consistent condom use. AIDS Behav. 2011; 15: 153–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Bassel N, Fontdevila J, Gilbert L, Voisin D, Richman BL, Pitchell P. HIV risks of men in methadone maintenance treatment programs who abuse their intimate partners: a forgotten issue. J Subst Abus. 2001; 13: 29–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coker AL, Smith PH, McKeown RE, King MJ. Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: physical, sexual, and psychological battering. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 553–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eby KK, Campbell JC, Sullivan CM, Davidson WS. Health effects of experiences of sexual violence for women with abusive partners. Health Care Women Int. 1995; 16: 563–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell JC, Soeken KL. Forced sex and intimate partner violence: effects on women's risk and women's health. Violence Against Women. 1999; 5: 1017–35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cavanaugh CE, Hansen NB, Sullivan TP. HIV sexual risk behavior among low-income women experiencing intimate partner violence: the role of posttraumatic stress disorder. AIDS Behav. 2010; 14: 318–27.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey. 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Humes KR, Jones NA, Ramirez RR. Overview of race and Hispanic origin: 2010. In: 2010 Census Briefs: United States Census Bureau; 2011.

  17. Passel JS, Cohn D. U.S. population projections: 2005–2050. In: Pew Research Center; 2008.

  18. Bauer HM, Rodriguez MA, Quiroga SS, Flores-Ortiz YG. Barriers to health care for abused Latina and Asian immigrant women. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2000; 11: 33–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Denham AC, Frasier PY, Hooten EG, Belton L, Newton W, Gonzalez P, et al. Intimate partner violence among Latinas in Eastern North Carolina. Violence Against Women. 2007; 13: 123–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Raj A, Silverman J. Violence against immigrant women: the roles of culture, context, and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women. 2002; 8: 367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Firestone JM, Harris RJ, Vega WA. The impact of gender role ideology, male expectancies, and acculturation on wife abuse. Int J Law Psych. 2003; 26: 549–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moreno CL. The relationship between culture, gender, structural factors, abuse, trauma, and HIV/AIDS for Latinas. Qual Heal Res. 2007; 17: 340–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Amanor-Boadu Y, Messing JT, Stith SM, Anderson JR, O'Sullivan C, Campbell JC. Immigrant and non-immigrant women: factors that predict leaving an abusive relationship. Violence Against Women. 2012; 18: 611–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hazen AL, Soriano FI. Experiences with intimate partner violence among Latina women. Violence Against Women. 2007; 13: 562–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lown EA, Vega WA. Prevalence and predictors of physical partner abuse among Mexican American women. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 441–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kantor GK, Jasinski JL, Aldarondo E. Sociocultural status and incidence of marital violence in Hispanic families. Violence and Victims. 1994; 9: 207–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sorenson SB, Telles CA. Self-reports of spousal violence in a Mexican-American and non-Hispanic White population. Violence and Victims. 1991; 6: 3–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Firestone JM, Lambert LC, Vega WA. Intimate violence among women of Mexican origin: correlates of abuse. J Gend Cult Heal. 1999; 4: 119–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Caetano R, Cunradi CB, Schafer J, Clark CL. Intimate Partner Violence and Drinking Patterns Among White, Black, and Hispanic Couples in the U.S. J Subst Abus. 2000; 11: 123–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Clinton-Sherrod AM, Walters JH. Marital rape and sexual violation by intimate partners. In: Bryant-Davis T, ed. Surviving sexual violence: a guide to recovery and empowerment. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2011: 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Campbell JC, O'Sullivan C, Roehl J, Webster DW. Intimate partner violence Risk Assessment Validation Study: the RAVE study. Final report to the National Institute of Justice (NCJ 209731–209732). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Campbell JC, Webster D, Koziol-McLain J, Block C, Campbell D, Curry MA, et al. Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a Multisite Case Control Study. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 1089–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Williams KR, Houghton AB. Assessing the risk of domestic violence reoffending: a validation study. Law Hum Behav. 2004; 28: 437–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Becker d. The gift of fear and other survival signals that protect us from violence. New York: Dell; 1999.

  35. Gelles R. Lethality and risk assessment for family violence cases. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Children Exposed to Family Violence, San Diego, CA; 1998.

  36. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues. 1996; 17: 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith PH, Earp JA, DeVellis R. Measuring battering: development of the Women's Experience with Battering (WEB) Scale. Womens Health. 1995; 1: 273–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sheridan DJ. Measuring harassment of abused women: a nursing concern. Doctoral dissertation, Oregon Health Sciences University School of Nursing; 1998.

  39. Johson H. Assessing the prevalence of violence against women in Canada. Stat J U N Econ Comm Eur. 2005; 22: 225–38.

    Google Scholar 

  40. SPSS. IBM SPSS Statistics Version 20. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 2012.

  41. Smith PH, Thornton GE, DeVellis R, Earp J, Coker AL. A population-based study of the prevalence and distinctiveness of battering, physical assault, and sexual assault in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women. 2002; 8: 1208–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bott S, Guedes A, Goodwin M, Mendoza JA. Violence against women in Latin America and the Caribbean: a comparative analysis of population-based data from 12 countries. In. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH, Health WHOM-cSoWs, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. Lancet. 2006; 368: 1260–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Torres S, Campbell J, Campbell DW, Ryan J, King C, Price P, et al. Abuse during and before pregnancy: prevalence and cultural correlates. Violence and Victims. 2000; 15: 303–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Barrett BJ, Pierre MS. Variations in women's help seeking in response to intimate partner violence: findings from a Canadian population-based study. Violence Against Women. 2011; 17: 47–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Messing JT, Campbell JC, Brown S, Patchell B, Wilson JS. The association between help seeking and homicide risk: findings from the Oklahoma Lethality Assessment Study. Violence & Victims 2013; (in press).

  47. Macy RJ, Nurius PS, Kernic MA, Holt VL. Battered Women's Profiles Associated with Service Help-Seeking Efforts: illuminating Opportunities for Intervention. Soc Work Res. 2005; 29: 137–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Henning KR, Klesges LM. Utilization of counseling and supportive services by female victims of domestic abuse. Violence and Victims. 2002; 17: 623–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kasturirangan A, Krishnan S, Riger S. The impact of culture and minority status on women's experience of domestic violence. Trauma, Violence, Abuse. 2004; 5: 318–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Menjívar C, Salcido O. Immigrant women and domestic violence: common experiences in different countries. Gend Soc. 2002; 16: 898–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Frye V, Galea S, Tracy M, Bucciarelli A, Putnam S, Wilt S. The role of neighborhood environment and risk of intimate partner femicide in a large urban area. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1473–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Frye V, Hosein V, Waltermaurer E, Blaney S, Wilt S. Femicide in New York City: 1990 to 1999. Homicide Studies: an Interdisciplinary & Int J. 2005; 9: 204–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Camarota SA. Immigrants in the United States, 2007: a profile of America's foreign-born population. Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Studies; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Josephs LL, Abel EM. Investigating the relationship between intimate partner violence and HIV risk-propensity in Black/African-American women. J Family Violence. 2009; 24: 221–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rountree MA, Mulraney M. HIV/AIDS risk reduction intervention for women who have experienced intimate partner violence. Clin Soc Work J. 2010; 38: 207–16.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lichtenstein B. Domestic violence, sexual ownership, and HIV risk in women in the American deep south. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60: 701–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Wu E, Go H, Hill J. HIV and intimate partner violence among methadone-maintained women in New York City. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61: 171–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stockman JK, Lucea MB, Draughon JE, Sabri B, Anderson JC, Bertrand D, et al. Intimate partner violence and HIV risk factors among African-American and African-Caribbean women in clinic-based settings. AIDS Care 2013;25:472–480

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jasinski JL. The role of acculturation in wife assault. Hisp J Behav Sci. 1998; 20: 175–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Parkhill MR, Abbey A, Jacques-Tiura AJ. How do sexual assault characteristics vary as a function of perpetrators' level of intoxication? Addict Behav. 2009; 34: 331–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Campbell JC, Baty ML, Ghandour RM, Stockman JK, Francisco L, Wagman J. The intersection of intimate partner violence against women and HIV/AIDS: a review. Int J Inj Control Saf Promot. 2008; 15: 221–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Coker AL. Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health? A systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007; 8: 149–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Logan TK, Cole J, Leukefeld C. Women, sex, and HIV: social and contextual factors, meta-analysis of published interventions, and implications for practice and research. Psychol Bull. 2002; 128: 851–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Monson CM, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Taft CT. Sexual aggression in intimate relationships. In: Psychological and physical aggression in couples: causes and interventions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009: 37–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Frye V, El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Rajah V, Christie N. Intimate partner sexual abuse among women on methadone. Violence Vict. 2001; 16: 553–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Messing JT, Thaller J, Bagwell M. Factors related to sexual abuse and forced sex in a sample of women experiencing police involved intimate partner violence. Health and Social Work 2013;(in press).

  67. CDC. Listing of all risk reduction interventions, by characteristics. 2011. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/research/prs/subset-best-evidence-interventions.htm. Accessed 16 January 2012

  68. UNAIDS. Global Report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2010. 2010. Available from: http://www.unaids.org/globalreport/documents/20101123_GlobalReport_full_en.pdf. Accessed 2 February2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grant NIJ 2000WTVX0011 from the National Institute of Justice and grant T32007292 from the National Institute of Drug Abuse.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA

    Courtenay E. Cavanaugh

  2. Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    Jill T. Messing

  3. Andrews and Associates, Manhattan, KS, USA

    Yvonne Amanor-Boadu

  4. VCS, Inc., New City, NY, USA

    Chris S. O’Sullivan

  5. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Daniel Webster

  6. School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Jacquelyn Campbell

Authors
  1. Courtenay E. Cavanaugh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jill T. Messing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yvonne Amanor-Boadu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chris S. O’Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniel Webster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jacquelyn Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtenay E. Cavanaugh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cavanaugh, C.E., Messing, J.T., Amanor-Boadu, Y. et al. Intimate Partner Sexual Violence: A Comparison of Foreign- Versus US-Born Physically Abused Latinas. J Urban Health 91, 122–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9817-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9817-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation