Inequalities in Noncommunicable Disease Mortality in the Ten Largest Japanese Cities
The burden of noncommunicable diseases and social inequalities in health among urban populations is becoming a common problem around the world. This phenomenon is further compounded by population aging. Japan faces the task of maintaining its high level of population health while dealing with these challenges. This study focused on the ten largest cities in Japan and, using publicly available administrative data, analyzed standardized mortality ratios to examine inequalities in relative mortality levels due to major noncommunicable disease at both city and subcity levels. On average, the ten major cities had excess mortality due to cancer and lower mortality due to heart disease and cerebrovascular disease compared to the country as a whole. Substantial inequalities in relative mortality were observed both between and within cities, especially for heart disease and cerebrovascular disease among men. Inequalities in relative mortality levels within cities appear to be increasing over time even while relative mortality levels are decreasing overall. The widely observed health inequalities signal the need for actions to ensure health equity while addressing the burden of noncommunicable diseases. Increasingly, more countries will have to deal with these challenges of inequity, urbanization, aging, and noncommunicable diseases. Local health governance informed by locally specific data on health determinants and outcomes is essential for developing contextualized interventions to improve health and health equity in major urban areas.
KeywordsJapan Urban health Noncommunicable disease Mortality Health equity
- 2.WHO. The World Health report 2004: changing history. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001.Google Scholar
- 3.Statistics Bureau of Japan. Chapter 15 Social security, health care and public hygiene. Statistical Handbook of Japan 2011. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau of Japan; 2011. Available at: www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/index.htm. Accessed February 1, 2012.
- 4.Global Agenda Council on Ageing. Global population ageing: peril or promise? Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland: World Econ Forum; 2012.Google Scholar
- 5.Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. The 2011 revision population database. 2012. Available at: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/unup/index.asp?panel=1. Accessed February 21, 2012.
- 9.WHO, UN-HABITAT. Hidden cities: unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2010.Google Scholar
- 10.OECD. Divided we stand: why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD; 2011. Available at: www.oecd.org/els/social/inequality. Accessed February 1, 2012.
- 14.WHO. WHA65.3 Strengthening noncommunicable disease policies. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2012. Available at: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA65/A65_R3-en.pdf. Accessed June 21, 2012.
- 15.WHO. Political declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2012. Available at: http://www.who.int/nmh/events/un_ncd_summit2011/political_declaration_en.pdf. Accessed June 21, 2012.
- 16.WHO. World Health Statistics 2011. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011.Google Scholar
- 17.Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare Japan. 1998–2002 Summary vital statistics by local public health center and municipality. Available at: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/tokusyu/hoken04/index.html. Accessed March 2, 2012.
- 23.WHO. Cancer control: knowledge into action: WHO guide for effective programmes (module 2: prevention). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2007.Google Scholar
- 32.Schulz A, House J, Israel B, et al. Relational pathways between socioeconomic position and cardiovascular risk in a multiethnic urban sample: complexities and their implications for improving health in economically disadvantaged populations. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008; 62: 638–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Whitehead M, Dahlgren G. Levelling up (part 1): Concepts and Principles for Tackling Social Inequities in Health. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006.Google Scholar
- 36.Welch V, Tugwell P, Petticrew M, et al. How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 (12):MR000028.Google Scholar
- 37.World Economic Forum, WHO. From burden to "best buys": reducing the economic impact of non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries. Cologny, Geneva: World Econ Forum; 2011.Google Scholar