Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 90, Issue 4, pp 602–617 | Cite as

Aging and the Use of Pedestrian Facilities in Winter—The Need for Improved Design and Better Technology

  • Yue LiEmail author
  • Jennifer Anna Hsu
  • Geoff Fernie
Article

Abstract

Walking outdoors is often difficult or impossible for many seniors and people with disabilities during winter. We present a novel approach for conducting winter accessibility evaluations of commonly used pedestrian facilities, including sidewalks, street crossings, curb ramps (curb cuts and dropped curbs), outdoor stairs and ramps, building and transit entrances, bus stops, and driveways. A total of 183 individuals, aged 18–85 completed our survey. The results show that cold weather itself had little impact on the frequency of outdoor excursions among middle-aged and older adults while the presence of snow and/or ice on the ground noticeably kept people, especially older adults at home. The survey found that the key elements decreasing winter accessibility were icy sidewalks and puddles at street crossings and curb ramps. While communities have recognized the need to improve snow and ice removal, little attention has been paid to curb ramp design which is especially ineffective in winter when the bottom of the ramps pool with rain, snow, and ice, making it hazardous and inaccessible to nearly all users. We conclude that investigations of alternative designs of curb ramp are needed.

Keywords

Winter Accessibility Pedestrian facilities Participation Physical activity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) through the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Universal Design and the Built Environment (grant #H133E050004-08A), a partnership with the Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access (IDEA). We also acknowledge the support of Toronto Rehabilitation Institute who receives funding under the Provincial Rehabilitation Research Program from the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in Ontario. Equipment and space have been funded, in part, with grants from the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Province of Ontario. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of these organizations. The authors wish to express their gratitude to Leslie Beard, Michael D. Grimble, and Dylan Reid for their invaluable assistance during data collection.

References

  1. 1.
    Wennberg H, Stahl A, Hyden C. Older pedestrians’ perceptions of the outdoor environment in a year-round perspective. Eur J Ageing. 2009; 6(4): 277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muraleetharan T, Meguro K, Adachi T, Hagiwara T, Kagaya S. Influence of winter road conditions and signal delay on pedestrian route choice in Japan’s snowiest metropolis. Transp Res Rec. 2005; 1939: 145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li W, Keegan THM, Sternfeld B, Sidney S, Quesenberry CP Jr, Kelsey JL. Outdoor falls among middle-aged and older adults: a neglected public health problem. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(7): 1192–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berg WP, Alessio HM, Mills EM, Tong C. Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults. Age Ageing. 1997; 26(4): 261–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Talbot LA, Musiol RJ, Witham EK, Metter EJ. Falls in young, middle-aged and older community dwelling adults: perceived cause, environmental factors and injury. BMC Publ Health. 2005; 5: 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Humpel N, Marshall AL, Leslie E, Bauman A, Owen N. Changes in neighborhood walking are related to changes in perceptions of environmental attributes. AnnBehav Med. 2004; 27(1): 60–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salmon J, Crawford D, Owen N, Bauman A, Sallis JF. Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a population-based study of barriers, enjoyment, and preference. Heal Psychol. 2003; 22(2): 178–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dasgupta K, Joseph L, Pilote L, Strachan I, Sigal RJ, Chan C. Daily steps are low year-round and dip lower in fall/winter: findings from a longitudinal diabetes cohort. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010; 66(5): 474–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klenk J, Büchele G, Rapp K, Franke S, Peter R. Walking on sunshine: effect of weather conditions on physical activity in older people. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011; 66(5): 474–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCormack GR, Friedenreich C, Shiell A, Giles-Corti B, Doyle-Baker PK. Sex- and age-specific seasonal variations in physical activity among adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010; 64(11): 1010–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan CB, Ryan DAJ, Tudor-Locke C. Relationship between objective measures of physical activity and weather: a longitudinal study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006; 3: 21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Togo F, Watanabe E, Park H, Shephard RJ, Aoyagi Y. Meteorology and the physical activity of the elderly: The Nakanojo Study. Int J Biometeorol. 2005; 50(2): 83–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dewar RE. Pedestrians and bicyclists. In: Dewar RE, Olson PL, eds. Human factors in traffic safety. Tucson: Lawyers & Judges; 2002: 557–612.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nabors D, Gibbs M, Sandt L, Rocchi S, Wilson E, Lipinski M. Pedestrian road safety audit guidelines and prompt lists. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety; 2007.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ryser L, Halseth G. Institutional barriers to incorporating climate responsive design in commercial redevelopment. Environ Plan B: Plan Des. 2008; 35(1): 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iwarsson S, Stahl A. Accessibility, usability and universal design—positioning and definition of concepts describing person–environment relationships. Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25(2): 57–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity. A review. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22(3): 188–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moudon AV, Lee C. Walking and bicycling: an evaluation of environmental audit instruments. Am J Heal Promot. 2003; 18(1): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sugiyama T, Thompson CW. Outdoor environments, activity and the well-being of older people: conceptualising environmental support. Environ Plan A. 2007; 39(8): 1943–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reinhardt JD, Miller J, Stucki G, Sykes C, Gray DB. Measuring impact of environmental factors on human functioning and disability: a review of various scientific approaches. Disabil Rehabil. 2011; 33(23–24): 2151–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alexander M, Matthews D. Pediatric Rehabilitation: P & P, 4th Edition: Principles & Practices: Fourth Edition. Demos Medical; 2009.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boschen KA, Tonack M, Gargaro J. The impact of being a support provider to a person living in the community with a spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2005; 50(4): 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Boucher N, Dumas FB, Maltais D, Richards CL. The influence of selected personal and environmental factors on leisure activities in adults with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32(16): 1328–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steinfeld E. Access to the built environment: a review of literature. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1979.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Danford GS, Grimble MD, Maisel J, editors. Benchmarking the Effectiveness of Universal Design. Annual Research Conference of the Architectural Research Centers Consortium : leadership in architectural research, between academica and the profession 2009; San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Axelson PW, Chesney DA, Galvan DV, Kirschbaum JB, Longmuir PE, Lyons C, et al. Designing sidewalks and trails for access, part I of II: review of existing guidelines and practices: US Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; 1999.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dawson D. Designing accessible facilities in the public right-of-way. ITE J (Inst Transp Eng). 2004; 74(9): 46–8.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kirschbaum JB, Administration FH, States U. Designing sidewalks and trails for access part II of II: best practices design guide: US Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suminski RR, Petosa RL, Stevens E. A method for observing physical activity on residential sidewalks and streets. J Urban Health. 2006; 83(3): 434–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Matthews CE, Freedson PS, Hebert JR, Stanek Iii EJ, Merriam PA, Rosal MC, et al. Seasonal variation in household, occupational, and leisure time physical activity: longitudinal analyses from the seasonal variation of blood cholesterol study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 153(2): 172–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pivarnik JM, Reeves MJ, Rafferty AP. Seasonal variation in adult leisure-time physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(6): 1004–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tucker P, Gilliland J. The effect of season and weather on physical activity: a systematic review. Public Health. 2007; 121(12): 909–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    King AC, Castro C, Wilcox S, Eyler AA, Sallis JF, Brownson RC. Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racial—ethnic groups of U.S. middle-aged and older-aged women. Heal Psychol. 2000; 19(4): 354–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eyler AA, Brownson RC, Bacak SJ, Housemann RA. The epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(9): 1529–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huston SL, Evenson KR, Bors P, Gizlice Z. Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population. Am J Heal Promot. 2003; 18(1): 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hsu J, Li Y, Fernie G, Saundercook B. How current pedestrian crossings fail in winter weather and the need for experimental intersections to design for safety. 8th Annual International Conference on Walking and Liveable Communities; New York City, 2009.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Altman B, Bernstein A. Disability and health in the United States, 2001–2005. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Statistics Canada. Participation and Activity Limitation Survey 2006: analytical report. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2006.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Berra S, Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Tebé C, Bisegger C, Duer W, et al. Methods and representativeness of a European survey in children and adolescents: the KIDSCREEN study. BMC Public Health. 2007. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-182.

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technology R&D TeamToronto Rehabilitation InstituteTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations