Aging and the Use of Pedestrian Facilities in Winter—The Need for Improved Design and Better Technology
- 714 Downloads
Walking outdoors is often difficult or impossible for many seniors and people with disabilities during winter. We present a novel approach for conducting winter accessibility evaluations of commonly used pedestrian facilities, including sidewalks, street crossings, curb ramps (curb cuts and dropped curbs), outdoor stairs and ramps, building and transit entrances, bus stops, and driveways. A total of 183 individuals, aged 18–85 completed our survey. The results show that cold weather itself had little impact on the frequency of outdoor excursions among middle-aged and older adults while the presence of snow and/or ice on the ground noticeably kept people, especially older adults at home. The survey found that the key elements decreasing winter accessibility were icy sidewalks and puddles at street crossings and curb ramps. While communities have recognized the need to improve snow and ice removal, little attention has been paid to curb ramp design which is especially ineffective in winter when the bottom of the ramps pool with rain, snow, and ice, making it hazardous and inaccessible to nearly all users. We conclude that investigations of alternative designs of curb ramp are needed.
KeywordsWinter Accessibility Pedestrian facilities Participation Physical activity
This research was funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) through the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Universal Design and the Built Environment (grant #H133E050004-08A), a partnership with the Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access (IDEA). We also acknowledge the support of Toronto Rehabilitation Institute who receives funding under the Provincial Rehabilitation Research Program from the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in Ontario. Equipment and space have been funded, in part, with grants from the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Province of Ontario. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of these organizations. The authors wish to express their gratitude to Leslie Beard, Michael D. Grimble, and Dylan Reid for their invaluable assistance during data collection.
- 6.Humpel N, Marshall AL, Leslie E, Bauman A, Owen N. Changes in neighborhood walking are related to changes in perceptions of environmental attributes. AnnBehav Med. 2004; 27(1): 60–7.Google Scholar
- 8.Dasgupta K, Joseph L, Pilote L, Strachan I, Sigal RJ, Chan C. Daily steps are low year-round and dip lower in fall/winter: findings from a longitudinal diabetes cohort. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010; 66(5): 474–6.Google Scholar
- 13.Dewar RE. Pedestrians and bicyclists. In: Dewar RE, Olson PL, eds. Human factors in traffic safety. Tucson: Lawyers & Judges; 2002: 557–612.Google Scholar
- 14.Nabors D, Gibbs M, Sandt L, Rocchi S, Wilson E, Lipinski M. Pedestrian road safety audit guidelines and prompt lists. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety; 2007.Google Scholar
- 21.Alexander M, Matthews D. Pediatric Rehabilitation: P & P, 4th Edition: Principles & Practices: Fourth Edition. Demos Medical; 2009.Google Scholar
- 24.Steinfeld E. Access to the built environment: a review of literature. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1979.Google Scholar
- 25.Danford GS, Grimble MD, Maisel J, editors. Benchmarking the Effectiveness of Universal Design. Annual Research Conference of the Architectural Research Centers Consortium : leadership in architectural research, between academica and the profession 2009; San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
- 26.Axelson PW, Chesney DA, Galvan DV, Kirschbaum JB, Longmuir PE, Lyons C, et al. Designing sidewalks and trails for access, part I of II: review of existing guidelines and practices: US Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; 1999.Google Scholar
- 27.Dawson D. Designing accessible facilities in the public right-of-way. ITE J (Inst Transp Eng). 2004; 74(9): 46–8.Google Scholar
- 28.Kirschbaum JB, Administration FH, States U. Designing sidewalks and trails for access part II of II: best practices design guide: US Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; 2001.Google Scholar
- 30.Matthews CE, Freedson PS, Hebert JR, Stanek Iii EJ, Merriam PA, Rosal MC, et al. Seasonal variation in household, occupational, and leisure time physical activity: longitudinal analyses from the seasonal variation of blood cholesterol study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 153(2): 172–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Hsu J, Li Y, Fernie G, Saundercook B. How current pedestrian crossings fail in winter weather and the need for experimental intersections to design for safety. 8th Annual International Conference on Walking and Liveable Communities; New York City, 2009.Google Scholar
- 37.Altman B, Bernstein A. Disability and health in the United States, 2001–2005. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.Google Scholar
- 38.Statistics Canada. Participation and Activity Limitation Survey 2006: analytical report. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2006.Google Scholar
- 39.Berra S, Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Tebé C, Bisegger C, Duer W, et al. Methods and representativeness of a European survey in children and adolescents: the KIDSCREEN study. BMC Public Health. 2007. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-182.