Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 436–453 | Cite as

Sense of Place among Atlanta Public Housing Residents

  • Griff Tester
  • Erin Ruel
  • Angela Anderson
  • Donald C. Reitzes
  • Deirdre Oakley
Article

Abstract

For almost two decades now, cities around the country have been demolishing traditional public housing and relocating residents to subsidized private market rental housing. In this paper, we examine sense of place, consisting of both community and place attachment, among a sample of Atlanta public housing residents prior to relocation (N = 290). We find that 41% of the residents express place attachment, and a large percentage express some level of community attachment, though residents of senior public housing are far more attached than residents of family public housing. Positive neighborhood characteristics, such as collective efficacy and social support, are associated with community attachment, and social support is also associated with place attachment. Negative neighborhood characteristics, such as social disorder and fear of crime, are not consistently associated with sense of place. We argue that embodied in current public housing relocation initiatives is a real sense of loss among the residents. Policy makers may also want to consider the possibilities of drawing upon residents’ sense of place as a resource for renovating and revitalizing public housing communities rather than continuing to demolish them and relocating residents to other neighborhoods.

Keywords

Sense of place Place and community attachment Public housing transformation 

References

  1. 1.
    Greenbaum S. Social capital and deconcentration: theoretical and policy paradoxes of the Hope VI program. N Am Dialogue. 2002; 5(1): 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jargowsky PA. Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Massey DS. American apartheid: segregation and the making of the underclass. Am J Sociol. 1990; 96: 329–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Massey DS, Denton NA. The dimensions of residential segregation. Soc Forces. 1988; 60: 281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilson WJ. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson WJ. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York, NY: Knopf; 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oakley D, Burchfield K. Out of the projects, still in the hood: the spatial constraints on public housing residents’ relocation in Chicago. J Urban Aff. 2009; 31(5): 589–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Popkin S, Cunningham M. CHA Relocation Counseling Assessment Final Report. Metropolitan Housing and Communities Center, The Urban Institute. http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/CHArelocation.pdf. Accessed June 15, 2010
  9. 9.
    Goetz E. Testimony to the United States Housing of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity, Washington, DC, Hearing on Academic perspectives on the future of public housing. http://www.house.gov/apps/list/hearing/financialsvcs_dem/goetz.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2009
  10. 10.
    Soloman R. Public Housing Reform and Voucher Success: Progress and Challenges. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program. http://www.brookings.edu/metro/pubs/20050124_solomon.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2010
  11. 11.
    Fullilove MT. Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America, and What We Can Do About It. New York, NY: Ballantine Books; 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manzo LC, Kleit RG, Couch D. Moving three times is like having your house on fire once: the experience of place and impending displacement among public housing residents. Urban Stud. 2008; 45: 1855–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York, NY: Random House; 1961.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fried M. Grieving for a lost home. In: Duhl LJ, ed. The Urban Condition: People and Policy in the Metropolis. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1963: 151–171.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gans HJ. People and Plans: Essays on Urban Problems and Solutions. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1968.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Proshansky HM. The city and self-identity. Environ Behav. 1978; 10: 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Trentelman CK. Place attachment and community attachment: a primer grounded in the lived experience of a community sociologist. Soc Nat Resour. 2009; 22: 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hidalgo MC, Hernandez B. Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. J Environ Psychol. 2001; 21: 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beckley TM. The relative importance of sociocultural and ecological factors in attachment to place. In: Kruger LE, ed. Understanding Community–Forest Relations. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station; 2003: 105.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patterson ME, Williams DR. Maintaining research traditions on place: diversity of thought and scientific progress. J Environ Psychol. 2005; 25: 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Twigger-Ross CL, Uzzell DL. Place and identity processes. J Environ Psychol Psychology. 1996; 16: 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manzo LC. Beyond house and haven: toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with place. J Environ Psychol. 2003; 23: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jorgensen BS, Stedman RC. Sense of place as an attitude: lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. J Environ Psychol. 2001; 21: 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cuba L, Hummon DM. A place to call home: identification with dwelling, community and region. Sociol Q. 1993; 34(1): 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moore RL, Graefe AR. Attachment to recreation settings: the case of rail-trail users. Leis Sci. 1994; 16: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manzo LC, Perkins DD. Finding common ground: the importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. J Plan Lit. 2006; 20(4): 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reitzes DC. Urban identification and downtown activities: a social psychological approach. Soc Psychol Q. 1986; 49: 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Altman I, Low SM. Place Attachment. New York, NY: Plenum; 1992.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tuan Y. Place: an experiential perspective. Geog Rev. 1975; 65(2): 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tuan Y. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1977.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hummon D. Community attachment: local sentiment and sense of place. In: Altman I, Low SM, eds. Place Attachment. New York, NY: Plenum; 1992: 253–278.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brown BB, Perkins DD. Disruptions in place attachment. In: Altman I, Low SM, eds. Place Attachment. New York, NY: Plenum; 1992: 279–304.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Riger S, Lavrakas JP. Community ties: patterns of attachment and social interactions in urban neighborhoods. Am J Community Psychol. 1981; 9(1): 55–66. Cited by: Manzo LC, Perkins DD. Finding common ground: the importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. J Planning Literature. 2006; 20(4): 335 -350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brown BB. Territoriality. In: Stokols D, Atlman I, eds. Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York, NY: Wiley; 1987: 505–531.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chawla L. Childhood place attachments. In: Altman I, Low S, eds. Place Attachment. New York, NY: Plenum; 1992: 63–86.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kasarda JD, Janowitz M. Community attachment in mass society. Am Sociol Rev. 1974; 39: 328–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guest AM, Lee BA. Sentiment and evaluation as ecological variables. Sociol Perspect. 1983; 26(2): 159–184.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lalli M. Urban-related identity. J Environ Psychol. 1992; 12: 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stokols D, Shumaker SA. People in places: a transactional view of settings. In: Harvey J, ed. Cognitive, Social Behavior and Environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1981.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    McAuley WJ. History, race and attachment to place among elders in the rural all-black towns of Oklahoma. J Gerontol. 1998; 53: 35–45.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Imrie R. Disability, embodiment and the meaning of home. Hous Stud. 2004; 19(5): 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Low SM, Altman I. Place attachment: a conceptual inquiry. In: Altman I, Low SM, eds. Place Attachment. New York, NY: Plenum; 1992.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Low SM. On the Plaza: The Politics of Public Space and Culture. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pellow D. Spaces that teach: attachment to the African compound. In: Altman I, Low SM, eds. Place Attachment. New York, NY: Plenum; 1992.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Frederickson LM, Anderson DH. A qualitative exploration of the wilderness experience as a source of spiritual inspiration. J Environ Psychol. 1999; 19(1): 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wickham TD. Attachments to Places and Activities: The Relationship of Psychological Constructs to Customer Satisfaction [dissertation]. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University; 2000.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hester R. Sacred structures and everyday life: a return to Manteo, North Carolina. In: Seamon D, ed. Dwelling, Seeing and Designing: Toward a Phenomenological Ecology. New York, NY: State University of New York Press; 1993: 271–298.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Brown B, Perkins DD, Brown G. Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: individual and block levels of analysis. J Environ Psychol. 2003; 23(3): 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Giuliani M. Towards an analysis of mental representation of attachment to the home. J Archit Plann Res. 1991; 8(2): 133–146.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rowles GD. Place and personal identity in old age. J Environ Psychol. 1983; 3: 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cresswell T. In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology and Transgression. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Fried M. Continuities and discontinuities of place. J Environ Psychol. 2000; 20: 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gustafson P. Roots and routes: exploring the relationship between place attachment and mobility. Environ Behav. 2001; 33(5): 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Galliano SJ, Loeffler GM. Place assessment: how people define ecosystems. In: Quigley TM, ed. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-462. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station; 1999.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sampson RJ. Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: a multilevel systemic model. Am Sociol Rev. 1989; 53: 766–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Taylor RB. Neighborhood responses to disorder and local attachments: the systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighborhood use value. Sociol Forum. 1996; 11: 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lawton MP. Knowledge resources and gaps in housing the aged. In: Tilson D, ed. Aging in Place: Supporting the Frail Elderly in Residential Environments. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co.; 1990: 287–309.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fuhrer U, Kaiser FG, Hartig T. Place attachment and mobility during leisure time. J Environ Psychol. 1993; 13(4): 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lawton MP, Yaffe S. Victimization and fear of crime in elderly public housing tenants. J Gerontol. 1980; 35: 768–779.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Carp FM. Neighborhood quality perception and measurement. In: Newcomer RJ, Lawton MP, Byerts TO, eds. Housing an Aging Society: Issues, Alternatives and Policy. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1986: 127–140.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ward R, LaGlory M, Sherman S. The Environment and Aging. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    LaGlory M, Fitzpatrick K. The effects of environmental context on elderly depression. J Aging Health. 1993; 4: 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Backlund EA, Williams DR. A quantitative synthesis of place attachment research: Investigating past experience and place attachment. In: Murdy J, ed. Proceeding of the 2003 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. Newton Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station; 2004: 320–325.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    McGuire KB. The reliability and validity of a questionnaire describing neighborhood characteristics relevant to families and young children living in urban areas. J Community Psychol. 1997; 25: 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    LaGrange RL, Ferraro KF, Supancic M. Perceived risk and fear of crime: role of social and physical incivilities. J Res Crime Delinq. 1992; 29: 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls FJ. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multi-level study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997; 277: 918–924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Taylor RB, Shumaker SA, Gottfredson SD. Neighborhood-level links between physical features and local sentiments: deterioration, fear of crime, and confidence. J Archit Plann Res. 1985; 2: 261–275.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder and health. J Health Soc Behav. 2001; 42: 358–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hill TD, Ross CE, Angel RJ. Neighborhood disorder, psychophysiological distress, and health. J Health Soc Behav. 2005; 46: 170–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Clampet-Lundquist S. HOPE VI relocation: moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties. Hous Policy Debate. 2004; 15(2): 415–447.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Vale LJ. From the Puritans to the Projects: Public Housing and Public Neighbors. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Venkatesh S. The Robert Taylor Homes Relocation Study: A Research Report from the Center for Urban Research and Policy. New York, NY: Columbia University; 2002.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Venkatesh S, Celimli I. Tearing down the community. Shelter Force. 2004; 138: 1–9.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Edin K, Lein L. Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Publications; 1997.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Edin K, Lein L. Work, welfare, and single mothers’ economic survival strategies. Amer Rev of Sociol. 1997; 62: 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Pashup J, Edin K, Duncan G, Burke K. Participation in a residential mobility program from the client’s perspective: findings from Gautreaux Two. Hous Policy Debate. 2005; 16(3/4): 361–391.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Greenbaum S. Poverty and the willful destruction of social capital: displacement and dispossession in African American communities. Rethinking Marxism. 2008; 20(1): 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Kleit RG. Neighborhood relations in suburban scattered-site and clustered public housing. J Urban Aff. 2001; 23(3–4): 409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Buron L, Popkin SJ, Levy D, Harris LE, Khadduri J. The HOPE VI Resident Tracking Study: A Snapshot of the Current Living Situation of Original Residents from Eight Sites. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2002.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Holin MJ, Buron L, Locke G, Cortes A. Interim Assessment of the HOPE VI Program Cross-Site Report. Washington, DC: Prepared by Abt Associates for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2003.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Vale LJ. Empathological places: residents’ ambivalence toward remaining in public housing. J Planning Education and Res. 1997; 16(3): 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Crump J. Deconcentration by demolition: public housing, poverty, and urban policy. Environ Plan D. 2002; 20(5): 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Rosenberg M. Perceptual obstacles to class consciousness. Soc Forces. 1953; 32(1): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gecas V. The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annu Rev Sociology. 1989; 15: 291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Lopez ML, Stack C. Social capital and the culture of power: lessons from the field. In: Saegert S, Thompson JP, Warren MR, eds. In Social Capital and Poor Communities. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2001: 31–60.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kling J, Liebman J, Katz L, Sanbonmatsu L. Moving to Opportunity and Tranquility: Neighborhood Effects on Adult Economic Self-sufficiency and Health from a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research and Harvard University; 2004.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Manjarrez CA, Popkin SJ, Guernsey E. Poor Health: Adding Insult to Injury. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2007.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rubinowitz LS, Rosenbaum JE. Crossing the Class and Color Lines: From Public Housing to White Suburbia. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Griff Tester
    • 1
  • Erin Ruel
    • 1
  • Angela Anderson
    • 1
  • Donald C. Reitzes
    • 1
  • Deirdre Oakley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations