Perceptions of Prominent Neighborhood Individuals Regarding Neighborhood Factors and Intimate Partner Violence
- 213 Downloads
Research addressing the impact of neighborhood factors on intimate partner violence (IPV) often lacks discussion of how and why such factors impact IPV. In order to address this gap, 16 prominent neighborhood individuals (PNI) from 4 low-income urban neighborhoods were asked to share through in-depth interviews their insights and perceptions of IPV as an issue in their neighborhoods, and the relationship between social and structural neighborhood-level factors and IPV. PNIs most often associated IPV with only physical violence. Several did not feel IPV was a significant issue in their neighborhood, confirming a lack of awareness and underreporting of IPV. However, other PNIs were able to speak of the relationship between IPV and neighborhood factors, including lack of opportunities for employment, vacant housing, trash management, lack of community awareness, and social capacity to act to address IPV. Results provide unique insights regarding the mechanisms linking neighborhood factors to IPV outcomes. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of contextual influences upon IPV, the development of tailored quantitative research and to the design of local multi-level public health IPV intervention and prevention efforts.
KeywordsIntimate partner violence Neighborhood factors Community perceptions
- 1.Osattin A, Short LM. Intimate partner violence and sexual assault: a guide to training materials and programs for health care providers. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 1998.Google Scholar
- 2.Saltzman LE, Fanslow JL, McMahon PM, Shelley GA. Intimate partner violence surveillance: uniform definitions and recommended data elements, Version 1.0. 1999;NCJ 186248.Google Scholar
- 3.Tjaden PG, Thoennes N. Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: findings from the national violence against women survey. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice, US Dept of Justice; 2000. NCJ 181867.Google Scholar
- 4.Fox JA, Zawitz MW. Homicide trends in the United States web site. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/homtrnd.cfm. Accessed April 2, 2009.
- 6.Dutton MA. Battered women’s strategic response to violence: the role of context. In: Edleson JL, Eisikovits ZC, eds. Future interventions with battered women and their families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1996: 105-124.Google Scholar
- 7.O’Campo P, Gielen AC, Faden RR, Xue X, Kass N, Mei-Cheng Wang. Violence by male partners against women during the childbearing year: a contextual analysis. Am J Public Health. 1995; 85(8): 1092-1097.Google Scholar
- 8.Miles-Doan R. Violence between spouses and intimates: does neighborhood context matter? Soc Forces. 1998; 77(2): 623-646.Google Scholar
- 11.Li Q, Kirby RS, Sigler RT, Hwang S, LaGory ME, Goldenberg RL. A multilevel analysis of individual, household, and neighborhood correlates of intimate partner violence among low-income pregnant women in Jefferson County, Alabama. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(3): 531-539.Google Scholar
- 13.O’Campo P, Burke J, Peak GL, McDonnell KA, Gielen AC. Uncovering neighbourhood influences on intimate partner violence using concept mapping. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 59(7): 603-608.Google Scholar
- 14.Jain S, Buka SL, Subramanian SV, Molnar BE. Neighborhood predictors of dating violence victimization and perpetration in young adulthood: a multilevel study. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(9): 1737-1744.Google Scholar
- 15.Sampson RJ. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997; 277: p918(7).Google Scholar
- 17.Emery CR, Jolley JM, Wu S. Desistance from intimate partner violence: the role of legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and social disorganization in chicago neighborhoods. Journal of Community Psychology. 2010. In press.Google Scholar
- 20.Iceland J, Steinmetz E. The effects of using census block groups instead of using census tracts when examining residential housing patterns website. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/resseg/pdf/unit_of_analysis.pdf. Updated 2003. Accessed December 26, 2003.
- 22.Maryland Department of Planning. web site. http://www.mdp.state.md.us/. Updated 2010. Accessed Nov 23, 2010.
- 24.Fraser D. QSR NVivo NUD*IST Vivo Reference Guide. 2000.Google Scholar
- 25.Spradley JP. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston; 1979.Google Scholar
- 26.Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence. Domestic Violence in Maryland Website. http://www.mnadv.org/ucr%20stats.htm. Accessed Feb 20, 2004.
- 28.Dobash RE. Violence against wives: a case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press; 1979.Google Scholar
- 29.Campbell JC. “If I can’t have you, no one can”: power and control in homicide of female partners. In: Radford J, Russell DEH, eds. Femicide: the politics of woman killing. New York: Twayne; 1992: 99-113.Google Scholar
- 31.Yick AG. Feminist theory and status inconsistency theory. Violence Against Women; 7(5): 545-562.Google Scholar
- 33.Sleutel MR. Women’s experiences of abuse: a review of qualitative research. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1998;19(6):525–539. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=4041355&site=ehost-live. 10.1080/016128498248827.
- 34.Israel BA, Eng E, Schulz AJ, Parker EA. Methods in community-based participatory research for health/San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005.Google Scholar