Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Why the Wait? Delayed HIV Diagnosis among Men Who Have Sex with Men

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We sought to identify factors associated with delayed diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; testing HIV-seropositive 6 months or more after HIV seroconversion), by comparing delayed testers to non-delayed testers (persons who were diagnosed within 6 months of HIV seroconversion), in King County, Washington among men who have sex with men (MSM). Participants were recruited from HIV testing sites in the Seattle area. Delayed testing status was determined by the Serologic Testing Algorithm for Recent HIV Seroconversion or a self-reported previous HIV-negative test. Quantitative data on sociodemographic characteristics, health history, and drug-use and sexual behaviors were collected via computer-assisted self-interviews. Qualitative semi-structured interviews regarding testing and risk behaviors were also conducted. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with delayed diagnosis. Content analysis was used to establish themes in the qualitative data. Out of the 77 HIV-seropositive MSM in this sample, 39 (51%) had evidence of delayed diagnosis. Factors associated with delayed testing included being African-American, homeless, “out” to 50% or less people about male-male sex, and having only one sex partner in the past 6 months. Delayed testers often cited HIV-related sickness as their reason for testing and fear and wanting to be in denial of their HIV status as reasons for not testing. Delayed testers frequently did not identify as part of the MSM community, did not recognize that they were at risk for HIV acquisition, and did not feel a responsibility to themselves or others to disclose their HIV status. This study illustrates the need to further explore circumstances around delayed diagnosis in MSM and develop outreach methods and prevention messages targeted specifically to this potentially highly marginalized population in order to detect HIV infections earlier, provide HIV care, and prevent new infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV prevalence estimates—United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008; 57(39): 1073–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hall H, Song R, Rhodes P, et al. Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA. 2008; 300(5): 520–529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanchez T, Finlayson T, Drake A, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, prevention, and testing behaviors—United States, National HIV behavioral surveillance system: men who have sex with men, November 2003-April 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006; 55(6): 1–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinhardt L, Carey M, Johnson B, Bickham N. Effects of HIV counseling and testing on sexual risk behavior: a meta-analytic review of published research, 1985-1997. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(9): 1397–1405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt J, Janssen R. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005; 39(4): 446–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorbach P, Drumright L, Daar E, Little S. Transmission behaviors of recently HIV-infected men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006; 42(1): 80–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV prevalence, unrecognized infection, and HIV testing among men who have sex with men—five U.S. cities, June 2004-April 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005; 54(24): 597–601.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carr J, Turner N. Characterizing populations that receive late diagnosis of HIV to target prevention efforts. Presented in the HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Unit, Public Health-Seattle and King County and the Infectious Disease and Reproductive Health Assessment Unit, Washington State Department of Health HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Report. 2006; 68: 19–26.

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Late versus early testing of HIV—16 sites, United States, 2000-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003; 52(25): 581–586.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mayben J, Kramer J, Kallen M, Franzini L, Lairson D, Giordano T. Predictors of delayed HIV diagnosis in a recently diagnosed cohort. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007; 21(3): 195–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mugavero M, Castellano C, Edelman D, Hicks C. Late diagnosis of HIV infection: the role of age and sex. Am J Med. 2007; 120(4): 370–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwarcz S, Hsu L, Dilley J, Loeb L, Nelson K, Boyd S. Late diagnosis of HIV infection: trends, prevalence, and characteristics of persons whose HIV diagnosis occurred within 12 months of developing AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006; 43(4): 491–494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Late HIV testing—34 states, 1996-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 58(24): 661–665.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacKellar D, Valleroy L, Secura G, et al. Unrecognized HIV infection, risk behaviors, and perceptions of risk among young men who have sex with men: opportunities for advancing HIV prevention in the third decade of HIV/AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005; 38(5): 603–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. MacKellar D, Valleroy L, Behel S, et al. Unintentional HIV exposures from young men who have sex with men who disclose being HIV-negative. AIDS. 2006; 20(12): 1637–1644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in HIV/AIDS diagnoses among men who have sex with men—33 states, 2001-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008; 57(25): 681–686.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thiede H, Jenkins R, Carey J, et al. Determinants of recent HIV infection among Seattle-area men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(Suppl 1): S157–S164.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kothe D, Byers R, Caudill S, et al. Performance characteristics of a new less sensitive HIV-1 enzyme immunoassay for use in estimating HIV seroincidence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003; 33(5): 625–634.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spradley J. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  20. CDC EZ-Text: software for collection, management and analysis of semi-structured qualitative databases [computer program]. Version 4.04. Atlanta: developed by Manila Consulting Group, Inc. for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.

  21. Hruschka D, Schwartz D, St. John DC, Picone-DeCaro E, Jenkins RA, Carey JW. Reliability in coding open-ended data: lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods. 2004; 16(3): 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith R, Rossetto K, Peterson B. A meta-analysis of disclosure of one’s HIV-positive status, stigma and social support. AIDS Care. Jun 2008; 1–10.

  23. Des Jarlais D, Paone D, Milliken J, et al. Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: a quasi-randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 353(9165): 1657–1661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Perlis T, Des Jarlais D, Friedman S, Arasteh K, Turner C. Audio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs. Addiction. 2004; 99(7): 885–896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Metzger D, Koblin B, Turner C, et al. Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152(2): 99–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Williams M, Freeman R, Bowen A, et al. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000; 12(3): 199–213.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Golden M, Gift T, Brewer D, et al. Peer referral for HIV case-finding among men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2006; 20(15): 1961–1968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusion in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly M. Nelson MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, K.M., Thiede, H., Hawes, S.E. et al. Why the Wait? Delayed HIV Diagnosis among Men Who Have Sex with Men. J Urban Health 87, 642–655 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9434-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9434-8

Keywords

Navigation