Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 95–101 | Cite as

The Challenge of Understanding Mortality Changes among Street Youth

  • Élise RoyEmail author
  • Nancy Haley
  • Jean-François Boudreau
  • Pascale Leclerc
  • Jean-François Boivin
Article

Abstract

According to a cohort study conducted in Montréal, Québec from 1995 to 2000, the mortality rate among street youth was 921/100,000 person-years. Several new community initiatives aiming to increase access to housing and to social and health services for the homeless were implemented in the city between 2000 and 2003. This study aims to update the mortality rate estimate for the period 2001–2006 and to examine factors that could explain a difference between rates, if any. A second cohort study was conducted between 2001 and 2006. The Cohort 2 mortality rate was computed and compared with the Cohort 1 rate. Several analyses were then carried out: (1) mortality rates in the general population were compared with street youth rates using standardized mortality ratios (SMR); (2) Cohorts 1 and 2 distributions of risk factors for mortality were examined, and their effects were assessed using multivariate proportional hazards regression analyses carried out on a combined Cohorts 1 and 2 dataset. Mortality rate among street youth decreased by 79% while it declined by only 19% in the general population; the SMR for Cohort 1 was higher than for Cohort 2 (11.6 versus 3.0). Multivariate proportional hazards regression analyses yielded estimates that were close to the model's estimates based on Cohort 1 data only, and participation in Cohort 1 was an independent predictor of mortality, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 9.0. The mortality decline cannot be completely explained by a similar decrease among the general population or by a difference in distribution of risk factors for mortality between the two cohorts. Field workers suggested that the decrease in heroin consumption they had observed in the streets might have contributed to the mortality decline. We then performed additional analyses which showed that even though the proportion of street youth currently using heroin decreased significantly between 1995 and 2005, the association between heroin use and mortality was not significant (adjusted hazard ratio of 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.3). It seems that various factors could have contributed to the decline in mortality rates among street youth, one plausible factor being the implementation of new services for the homeless. This study underscores the importance of monitoring risky behaviors among vulnerable populations to ensure that morbidity and mortality data among these populations is correctly interpreted. Setting up a system to monitor the drug market could improve the quality of information collected.

Keywords

Mortality Incidence Predictors Street youth Cohort study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Project funding: This study was financially supported through unconditional grants received from the following sources: Medical Research Council of Canada, Health Canada, Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec, Human Resources Development Canada: Supporting Communities Partnership Initiative, Direction de santé publique de Montréal-centre, and Fonds de recherche en santé du Québec.

We wish to thank the youth who participated in this study as well as all collaborating street youth community organizations. This study was made possible through the dedicated contribution of all members of the research team: the coordinator, interviewers, secretaries, and data entry clerk.

References

  1. 1.
    Boivin J-F, Roy É, Haley N, Galbaud du Fort G. The health of street youth: a Canadian perspective. Can J Public Health. 2005;96:432-437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nordentoft M, Wandall-Holm N. 10 year follow up study of mortality among users of hostels for homeless people in Copenhagen. Br Med J. 2003;327:81-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hwang SW. Mortality among men using homeless shelters in Toronto, Ontario. JAMA. 2000;283:2152-2157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hwang SW, Orav EJ, O’Connell JJ, Lebow JM, Brennan TA. Causes of death in homeless adults in Boston. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:625-628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrow SM, Herman DB, Córdova P, Struening EL. Mortality among homeless shelter residents in New York City. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:529-534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roy É, Boivin JF, Haley N, Lemire N. Mortality among street youth. Lancet. 1998;352:32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roy É, Haley N, Leclerc P, Sochanski B, Boudreau J-F, Boivin J-F. Mortality in a cohort of street youth in Montreal. JAMA. 2004;292:569-574.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roy É, Haley N, Leclerc P, Cédras L, Blais L, Boivin J-F. Drug injection among street youths in Montreal: predictors of initiation. J Urban Health. 2003;80:92-105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haley N, Roy É, Leclerc P, Boudreau J-F, Boivin J-F. HIV risk profile of male street youth involved in survival sex. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80:526-530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oleinick A, Mantel N. Family studies in systemic lupus erythematosus—II: mortality among siblings and offspring of index cases with a statistical appendix concerning life table analysis. J Chronic Dis. 1970;22:617-625.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Volume II: The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies. Lyon: IARC; 1987.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    SPSS. SPSS for Windows, Rel 130. Chicago: SPSS; 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Direction de la santé publique. Le Défi de l’accès pour les jeunes de la rue. Avis du directeur de la santé publique sur la mortalité chez les jeunes de la rue à Montréal. Montréal: RRSSSMC; 1998. ISBN 2-89494-172-2.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roy É, Boudreau J-F, Leclerc P, Haley N, Boivin J-F, Godin G. Trends in injection drug use behaviours over 10 years among street youth. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;89:170-175.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fournier L, Chevalier S, Ostoj M, Caulet M, Courtemanche R, Plante N. Dénombrement de la clientèle itinérante dans les centres d’hébergement, les soupes populaires et les centres de jour des villes de Montréal et Québec 1996–97, 2-Montréal: premiers Résultats. Montréal: Santé-Québec; 1998.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Day C, Degenhardt L, Hall W. Documenting the heroin shortage in New South Wales. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006;25:297-305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    de la Fuente L, Saavedra P, Barrio G, Royuela L, Vicente J. Temporal and geographic variations in the characteristics of heroin seized in Spain and their relation with the route of administration. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996;40:185-194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roy É, Morissette C, Haley N, Gutiérrez N, Rousseau L, Denis V. Pourquoi commencer? L’initiation à l'injection de drogues selon les jeunes de la rue. Drogues, Santé et Société. 2006;5:45-76.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Available at http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/themes/key-indicators. Accessed on February 2nd, 2009.

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Élise Roy
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nancy Haley
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jean-François Boudreau
    • 1
  • Pascale Leclerc
    • 2
  • Jean-François Boivin
    • 4
  1. 1.Université de SherbrookeLongueuilCanada
  2. 2.Direction de Santé PubliqueMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Université de MontréalMontréalCanada
  4. 4.McGill UniversityMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations