Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 83, Issue 4, pp 575–585 | Cite as

Masculine Gender Roles Associated with Increased Sexual Risk and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration among Young Adult Men

  • M. Christina Santana
  • Anita Raj
  • Michele R. Decker
  • Ana La Marche
  • Jay G. Silverman
Article

Abstract

This study sought to assess the association between traditional masculine gender role ideologies and sexual risk and intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration behaviors in young men's heterosexual relationships. Sexually active men age 18–35 years attending an urban community health center in Boston were invited to join a study on men's sexual risk; participants (N=307) completed a brief self-administered survey on sexual risk (unprotected sex, forced unprotected sex, multiple sex partners) and IPV perpetration (physical, sexual and injury from/need for medical services due to IPV) behaviors, as well as demographics. Current analyses included men reporting sex with a main female partner in the past 3 months (n=283). Logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographics were used to assess significant associations between male gender role ideologies and the sexual risk and IPV perpetration behaviors. Participants were predominantly Hispanic (74.9%) and Black (21.9%); 55.5% were not born in the continental U.S.; 65% had been in the relationship for more than 1 year. Men reporting more traditional ideologies were significantly more likely to report unprotected vaginal sex in the past 3 months (ORadj = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.2–4.6) and IPV perpetration in the past year (ORadj = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.2–3.6). Findings indicate that masculine gender role ideologies are linked with young men's unprotected vaginal sex and IPV perpetration in relationships, suggesting that such ideologies may be a useful point of sexual risk reduction and IPV prevention intervention with this population.

Keywords

Sexual risk behaviors Partner violence Masculine ideology 

References

  1. 1.
    Center for Disease Prevention. Leading causes of death by age group, all races, males—U.S. 2002. Office of the director. Men's health. 2005. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod/02all.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Center for Disease Center. Cases of HIV infection and aids in the United States, 2003. HIV/AIDS surveillance report. 2005c;15.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, et al. Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. Lancet. 2004;363(9419):1415–1421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    El-Bassel N, Fontdevila J, Gilbert L, et al. HIV risks of men in methadone maintenance programs who abuse their intimate partners: a forgotten issue. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001;12(1–2):29–43.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Raj A, Santana MC, La Marche AM, et al. Perpetration of partner violence associated with sexual risk behaviors among young adult men. In Press: Am J Pub Health.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sabo D. Men's health studies: origins and trends. J Am Coll Health Assoc. 2000; 49(3):133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams DR. The health of men: structured inequalities and opportunities. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 2003;93(5):724–731.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Life-time and annual incidence of intimate partner violence and resulting injuries—Georgia, 1995. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1998;47(40):849–853.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Intimate partner violence among men and women—South Carolina, 1998. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000a;49(30):691–694.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of intimate partner violence and injuries—Washington, 1998. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000b;49:849–853.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Plichta SB. Violence, health and use of health services. In: Falik MM, Collins KS, eds.Women's Health and Care Seeking Behavior: The Commonwealth Fund Survey. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University; 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schafer J, Caetano R, Cook CL. Rates of intimate partner violence in the United States. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1998;88:1702–1704.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Straus MA, Gelles RJ. Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. J Marriage Fam. 1986;48:465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington: National Institute of Justice; 2000. Report NCJ 183781.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amaro H, Raj A. Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of women's relational power in HIV risk reduction. Sex Roles. 2000;42(7/8):723–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heise L, Ellsberg M. Ending violence against women. population reports. Volume Xxvii, Number 4. Issues in World Health. December, 1999. Available at: http://www.infoforhealth.org/pr/l11edsum.shtml.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schmuel E, Schenker JG. Violence against women: the physician's role. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;80(2):239–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bauer HM, Gibson P, Hernandez M, et al. Intimate partner violence and high-risk sexual behaviors among female patients with sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(7):411–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Decker MK, Silverman JG, Raj A. Dating violence and STD/HIV testing and diagnosis among adolescent females. Pediatrics. 2005;116:e272–e276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    He H, McCoy HV, Stevens SJ, et al. Violence and HIV sexual risk behaviors among female sex partners of male drug users. Women Health. 1998;27(1–2):161–175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rickert VI, Wiemann CM, Harrykissoon SD, et al. The relationship among demographics, reproductive characteristics, and intimate partner violence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(4):1002–1007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roberts TA, Auinger P, Klein JD. Intimate partner abuse and the reproductive health of sexually active female adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2005;36(5):380–385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Silverman JG, Raj A, Mucci LA, et al. Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;286(5):572–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silverman JG, Raj A, Clements K. Dating violence and sexual risk in a representative sample of high school students. Pediatrics. 2004:114(2):e220–e225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Consequences of having a physically abusive partner on the condom use and sexual negotiation practices of young adult African-American women. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1997;87(6):1016–1018.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Partner influences and gender-related factors associated with noncondom use among young adult African–American women. J Community Psychol. 1998;26:29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hathaway JE, Willis G, Zimmer B, et al. Impact of partner abuse on women's reproductive lives. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2005;60(1):42–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Raj A, Liu R, McCleary-Sills J, et al. South Asian victims of intimate partner violence more likely than non-victims to report sexual health concerns. J Immigr Health. 2005;7(2):85–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Andersen B, Cyranowski JM, Espindle, D. Men's sexual self-schema. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;76:645–661.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Anderson VN, Simpson-Taylor D, Hermann DJ. Gender, age and rape-supportive rules. Sex Roles. 2004;50(1–2):77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Byers ES. How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. J Psychol Human Sex. 1996;8(1):7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chiroro P, Bohner G, Viki GT, et al. Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity: expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations. J Interpers Violence. 2004;19(4):427–441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Greendlinger V, Byrne D. Coercive sexual fantasies of college men as predictors of self-reported likelihood to rape and overt sexual aggression. J Sex Res. 1987;23(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Krahe B. Sexual scripts and sexual aggression. In: Eckes T, Trautner HM, eds. The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum; 2000.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Malamuth NM, Scokloski RJ, Koss MP, et al. Characteristics of aggressors against women: testing a model using a national sample of college students. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59:670–681.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Murnen SK, Wright C, Kaluzny G. If “Boys Will Be Boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles. 2002;17:359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ryan K. Further evidence for a cognitive component of rape. Aggress Violent Behav. 2004;9:579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Doss BD, Hopkins JR. The multicultural masculinity ideology scale: validation from three cultural perspectives. Sex Roles. 1998;38(9–10):719–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bowleg L, Lucas KJ, Tschann JM. “The Ball Was Always in His Court”: an exploratory analysis of relationship scripts, sexual scripts and condom use among African American women. Psychol Women Q. 2004;28(1):70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    DeLamater J. Females, males and sexuality. In: Kelley K, ed. Gender Differences in Sexual Scenarios. Albany, New York: State University of New York; 1987:127–139.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Noar SM, Morokoff PJ. The relationship between masculinity ideology, condom attitudes, and condom use stage of change: a structural equation modeling approach. Int J Mens Health. 2002;1(1):43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL, Ku LC. Masculinity ideology: its impact on adolescent males' heterosexual relationships. J Soc Issues. 1993;49(3):11–29.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pleck JH, O'Donnell LN. Gender attitudes and health risk behaviors in African-American and Latino early adolescents. Matern Child Health J. 2001;5:265–272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Seal DW, Ehrhardt AA. HIV-prevention-related sexual health promotion for heterosexual men in the United States: pitfalls and recommendations. Arch Sex Behav. 2004;33(3):211–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shearer CL, Hosterman SJ, Gillen MM, et al. Are traditional gender role attitudes associated with risky sexual behavior and condom-related beliefs. Sex Roles. 2005;52(5/6):311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schoeneberger M, Logan T, Leukefeld, C. Gender roles, HIV risk behaviors, and perceptions of using female condoms among college students. Popul Res Policy Rev. 1999;18(1–2):119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Spencer M, Fegley S, Harpalani V, et al. Understanding hypermasculinity in context: a theory-driven analysis of urban adolescent males' coping responses. Res Hum Dev. 2004;1(4):229–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sugarman DB, Frankel SL. Patriarchal ideology and wife assault: a meta-analytic review. J Fam Violence. 1996;11:13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Forste R, Haas DW. The transition of adolescent males to first intercourse: anticipated or delayed. Perspect Sex & Repro Health. 2001;34(4), 2002 http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3418402.html.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, et al. The revised conflict tactics scales (Cts2). J Fam Issues. 1996:17(3):283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hill MS, Fischer AR. Does entitlement mediate the link between masculinity and rape-related variables? J Consult Psychol. 2001;48:39–50.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Malamuth NM, Brown LM. Sexually aggressive men's perceptions of women's communications: testing three explanations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:699–712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mosher DL, Anderson RD. Macho personality, sexual aggression and reactions to guided imagery of realistic rape. J Res Pers. 1986;20:77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mosher DL, Sirkin M. Measuring a macho personality constellation. J Res Pers. 1984;18:153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Christina Santana
    • 1
  • Anita Raj
  • Michele R. Decker
  • Ana La Marche
  • Jay G. Silverman
  1. 1.Boston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations