Abstract
Background
Cardiovascular comorbidities are not contraindications of bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Objective
We aimed to evaluate the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities before bevacizumab treatment on overall survival and cardiovascular safety in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Methods
A 2009–2015 cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer aged ≥ 65 years administered first-line bevacizumab was extracted from the French healthcare reimbursement claims database. Baseline heart failure, hypertension, and venous/arterial thromboembolic events were identified. The 36-month overall survival rate was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on the 36-month overall survival using a time-dependent, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards model. The 36-month cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events, and the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on the likelihood of cardiovascular events were evaluated using the Fine and Gray model, with death as a competing risk.
Results
We included 9222 patients (56.4% male; median age 73 years). Two-thirds (66.7%) had baseline cardiovascular comorbidities. The median 36-month overall survival was 20.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.9–21.0] and 21.8 [95% CI 21.1–22.6] months in patients with and without cardiovascular comorbidities, respectively. Age ≥ 75 years, dependency in activities of daily living, radiotherapy, and another targeted therapy were identified as death risk factors, but not cardiovascular comorbidities. At 36 months, cardiovascular events had occurred in 60.2% [95% CI 58.9–61.4] and 44.1% [95% CI 42.3–45.9] of patients with and without cardiovascular comorbidities. Baseline venous thrombosis, female, three or more cardiovascular medications, another targeted therapy, and more than six bevacizumab injections were identified as risk factors for cardiovascular events.
Conclusions
In clinical practice, cardiovascular comorbidities before administering bevacizumab to older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer impacted the cardiovascular safety, but not overall survival. Unless they limit functional independency, older patients with cardiovascular comorbidities should be treated with bevacizumab under close monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.
Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2016, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Based on November 2018 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website, April 2019. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/sections.html. Accessed 19 Oct 2017.
INCa Les cancers en France, édition 2017. Collection les données, Institut National du Cancer; 2018. http://www.e-cancer.fr/ressources/cancers_en_france/index.html?page=052. Accessed 26 Aug 2023.
Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–422.
Phelip JM, Tougeron D, Léonard D, Benhaim L, Desolneux G, Dupré A, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR). Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51:1357–63.
Papamichael D, Audisio RA, Glimelius B, de Gramont A, Glynne-Jones R, Haller D, et al. Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) consensus recommendations 2013. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:463–76.
Aparicio T, Canouï-Poitrine F, Caillet P, François E, Cudennec T, Carola E, et al. Treatment guidelines of metastatic colorectal cancer in older patients from the French Society of Geriatric Oncology (SoFOG). Dig Liver Dis. 2020;52:493–505.
Gouverneur A, Salvo F, Berdaï D, Moore N, Fourrier-Réglat A, Noize P. Inclusion of elderly or frail patients in randomized controlled trials of targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol. 2018;9:15–23.
Canouï-Poitrine F, Lièvre A, Dayde F, Lopez-Trabada-Ataz D, Baumgaertner I, Dubreuil O, et al. Inclusion of older patients with cancer in clinical trials: the SAGE prospective multicenter cohort survey. Oncologist. 2019;24:e1351–9.
Piccirillo JF, Vlahiotis A, Barrett LB, Flood KL, Spitznagel EL, Steyerberg EW. The changing prevalence of comorbidity across the age spectrum. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;67:124–32.
Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2335–42.
Saltz LB, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E, Scheithauer W, Figer A, Wong R, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2013–9.
Cunningham D, Lang I, Marcuello E, Lorusso V, Ocvirk J, Shin DB, et al. Bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (AVEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1077–85.
Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Masi G, Lonardi S, Zagonel V, Salvatore L, et al. Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1609–18.
European Medicines Agency. Avastin: EPAR - product information (last updated 21/07/2017). http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000582/WC500029271.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2017.
Bezin J, Duong M, Lassalle R, Droz C, Pariente A, Blin P, et al. The national healthcare system claims databases in France, SNIIRAM and EGB: powerful tools for pharmacoepidemiology. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:954–62.
Gouverneur A, Bezin J, Jové J, Bosco-Lévy P, Fourrier-Réglat A, Noize P. Treatment modalities and survival in older adults with metastatic colorectal cancer in real life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67:913–9.
Thurin NH, Rouyer M, Gross-Goupil M, Rebillard X, Soulié M, Haaser T, et al. Epidemiology of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a first estimate of incidence and prevalence using the French nationwide healthcare database. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;69: 101833.
Scailteux L-M, Campillo-Gimenez B, Kerbrat S, Despas F, Mathieu R, Vincendeau S, et al. Overall survival among chemotherapy-naive patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer under abiraterone versus enzalutamide: a direct comparison based on a 2014–2018 French population study (the SPEAR cohort). Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190:413–22.
Weill A, Dalichampt M, Raguideau F, Ricordeau P, Blotière P-O, Rudant J, et al. Low dose oestrogen combined oral contraception and risk of pulmonary embolism, stroke, and myocardial infarction in five million French women: cohort study. BMJ. 2016;353: i2002.
Maumus-Robert S, Debette S, Bérard X, Mansiaux Y, Tubert-Bitter P, Pariente A. Risk of intracranial aneurysm and dissection and fluoroquinolone use: a case-time-control study. Stroke. 2020;51:994–7.
Gouverneur A, Dolatkhani D, Rouyer M, Grelaud A, Francis F, Gilleron V, et al. Agreement between hospital discharge diagnosis codes and medical records to identify metastatic colorectal cancer and associated comorbidities in elderly patients. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017;65:321–5.
Quantin C, Benzenine E, Hägi M, Auverlot B, Abrahamowicz M, Cottenet J, et al. Evaluation of medical information systems as a mean of identification of incident cases of colorectal cancer. Santé Publ. 2014;26:55–63.
Bousquet P-J, Caillet P, Coeuret-Pellicer M, Goulard H, Kudjawu YC, Le Bihan C, et al. Recherche d’algorithmes d’identification des cancers dans les bases médico-administratives: premiers résultats des travaux du groupe REDSIAM Tumeurs sur les cancers du sein, du côlon-rectum et du poumon. Rev Épidémiol Santé Publique. 2017;65:S236–42.
Étude des algorithmes de définition des pathologies dans le Sniiram - Partie 2. https://www.ameli.fr/l-assurance-maladie/statistiques-et-publications/etudes-en-sante-publique/cartographie-des-pathologies-et-des-depenses/methodologie.php. Accessed 25 Oct 2021.
Bezin J, Girodet P-O, Rambelomanana S, Touya M, Ferreira P, Gilleron V, et al. Choice of ICD-10 codes for the identification of acute coronary syndrome in the French hospitalization database. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2015;29:586–91.
Bouée S, Emery C, Samson A, Gourmelen J, Bailly C, Cotté F-E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in France: a retrospective analysis of a national insurance claims database. Thromb J. 2016;14:4.
Cosker K, Samson S, Fagot-Campagna A, Woimant F, Tuppin P. First hospitalization for transient ischemic attack in France: characteristics, treatments and 3-year outcomes. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2016;172:152–9.
Lorgis L, Cottenet J, Molins G, Benzenine E, Zeller M, Aube H, et al. Outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients: analysis of data from a French nationwide hospital medical information database. Circulation. 2013;127:1767–74.
Tuppin P, Rivière S, Rigault A, Tala S, Drouin J, Pestel L, et al. Prevalence and economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in France in 2013 according to the national health insurance scheme database. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;109:399–411.
Rey G, Jougla E, Fouillet A, Hémon D. Ecological association between a deprivation index and mortality in France over the period 1997–2001: variations with spatial scale, degree of urbanicity, age, gender and cause of death. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:33.
Hucteau E, Noize P, Pariente A, Helmer C, Pérès K. ADL-dependent older adults were identified in medico-administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;139:297–396.
Aparicio T, Bouché O, Taieb J, Maillard E, Kirscher S, Etienne P-L, et al. Bevacizumab+chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in elderly patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial-PRODIGE 20 study results. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:133–8.
Kozloff MF, Berlin J, Flynn PJ, Kabbinavar F, Ashby M, Dong W, et al. Clinical outcomes in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving bevacizumab and chemotherapy: results from the BRiTE observational cohort study. Oncology. 2010;78:329–39.
Rouyer M, Fourrier-Réglat A, Smith D, Becouarn Y, Guimbaud R, Tubiana-Mathieu N, et al. Effectiveness and safety of first-line bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the ETNA observational cohort. J Geriatr Oncol. 2016;7:187–94.
Hershman DL, Wright JD, Lim E, Buono DL, Tsai WY, Neugut AI. Contraindicated use of bevacizumab and toxicity in elderly patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3592–9.
Aparicio T, Lavau-Denes S, Phelip JM, Maillard E, Jouve JL, Gargot D, et al. Randomized phase III trial in elderly patients comparing LV5FU2 with or without irinotecan for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (FFCD 2001–02). Ann Oncol. 2016;27:121–7.
Aparicio T, Bouché O, Francois E, Retornaz F, Barbier E, Taieb J, et al. Geriatric analysis from PRODIGE 20 randomized phase II trial evaluating bevacizumab + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in older patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2018;97:16–24.
Faurot KR, Jonsson Funk M, Pate V, Brookhart MA, Patrick A, Hanson LC, et al. Using claims data to predict dependency in activities of daily living as a proxy for frailty. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24:59–66.
Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3227–337.
Untaru R, Chen D, Kelly C, May A, Collins NJ, Leitch J, et al. Suboptimal use of cardioprotective medications in patients with a history of cancer. JACC CardioOncology. 2020;2:312–5.
Brookhart MA, Patrick AR, Dormuth C, Avorn J, Shrank W, Cadarette SM, et al. Adherence to lipid-lowering therapy and the use of preventive health services: an investigation of the healthy user effect. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:348–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health and managed by the French National Cancer Institute, INCa (Grant number: INCa-DGOS_11409). The funding source had no role in the design, methods, subject recruitment, data collections, analysis, and preparation of the paper.
Conflicts of interest/competing interests
Elena Paillaud declares consulting fees or participation on advisory boards for GSK, MSD, Pfizer, and Sandoz. Thomas Aparicio declares payment or honoraria for conferences from Amgen, Pierre Fabre, and Servier, support for attending meetings from MSD, and participation on advisory boards for Sirtec, Pierre Fabre, and MSD. Amandine Gouverneur, Clélia Favary, Jérémy Jové, Magali Rouyer, Emmanuelle Bignon, Francesco Salvo, Achille Tchalla, and Pernelle Noize have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.
Ethics approval
The study protocol was approved by the ‘Comité d’expertise pour les recherches, les études et les évaluations dans le domaine de la santé’ and ‘Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés’.
Consent to participate
The requirement for informed consent was waived because the data were anonymous.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and material
According to the principles of data protection and French regulations, the authors cannot publicly release the data from the ‘Système National des Données de Santé’ (SNDS). However, any person or structure, public or private, for-profit or non-profit can access SNDS data upon authorization from the ‘Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés’ (i.e., the French Data Protection Office) to carry out a study, research, or an evaluation of public interest (https://www.snds.gouv.fr).
Code availability
Not applicable.
Authors’ contributions
AG, MR, FS, TA, and PN participated in the concept and design of the work; AG, MR, EB, and PN participated in the acquisition of data; CF and JJ participated in the analysis of the data and have directly accessed and verified the underlying data reported in the article; all authors participated in the interpretation of the data. AG and PN participated in drafting the work; all authors participated in revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors give final approval of the version to be published.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gouverneur, A., Favary, C., Jové, J. et al. Impact of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on the Effectiveness and Safety of Bevacizumab in Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Targ Oncol 18, 717–726 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-023-00986-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-023-00986-2