Abstract
Highly mobile students experience schools and learning in different ways than their more stable peers. Repeated transfers result in discontinuity of instruction and relationships with teachers and peers. Interviews with transient urban students in grades 9–12 reveal the issues they face upon their arrival and afterward. Mobile students give insight into perceptions of teacher practice, peer-group induction, receptivity to classroom instruction, and classroom and administrative practices. Findings include fear, loneliness, embarrassment, and anxiety in new settings or when faced with another school change. While students expressed achievement concerns, peer social and emotional concerns were primary immediately following enrollment in a new school. Students found themselves unable to focus on academic studies until they could secure a peer group with which to interact. Implications for high-mobility schools include the need for structures providing transitional services and community-building environments to counteract the negative academic and developmental effects of frequent mobility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcoser, M., & Shoho, A. (2001). Student mobility in a low SES elementary school: Effects on academic achievement. Paper presented at the AERA, Seattle, Washington.
Daughtry, S. L., Greene, S., & James, E. (1961). Factors associated with school mobility. Journal of Educational Sociology, 35(1), 35–40.
Felner, R. D., Primavera, J., & Cauce, A. M. (1981). The impact of school transitions: A focus for preventive efforts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(4), 449–459.
Kerbow, D. (1996). Patterns of urban student mobility and local school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1(2), 147–169.
Kirkpatrick, S. L., & Lash, A. A. (1990). A classroom perspective on student mobility. The Elementary School Journal, 91(2), 173.
Lash, A. A., & Kirkpatrick, S. L. (1994). Interrupted lessons: Teacher views of transfer student education. American Education Research Journal, 31(4), 813–843.
Minneapolis Family Housing Fund. (1998). Kids Mobility Project (Report). Minneapolis: Minneapolis Family Housing Fund.
Rhodes, V. L. (2004). Using de facto learning theory to understand student mobility, Academic Exchange Extra. Cincinnati, OH: Central Michigan University.
Rumberger, R., & Larsen, K. A. (1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107(1), 1–35.
Schafft, K. A. (2002). Low-income student transiency and its effects on schools and school districts in upstate New York: The perspective of school district administrators (Report). Ithaca: Cornell University.
Swanson, C. B., & Schneider, B. (1999). School changes and residential moves. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 54–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rhodes, V.L. Learning on the go: voices of highly mobile urban students. Learn Inq 2, 113–125 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-008-0029-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-008-0029-1