Skip to main content
Log in

Learning on the go: voices of highly mobile urban students

  • Published:
Learning Inquiry

Abstract

Highly mobile students experience schools and learning in different ways than their more stable peers. Repeated transfers result in discontinuity of instruction and relationships with teachers and peers. Interviews with transient urban students in grades 9–12 reveal the issues they face upon their arrival and afterward. Mobile students give insight into perceptions of teacher practice, peer-group induction, receptivity to classroom instruction, and classroom and administrative practices. Findings include fear, loneliness, embarrassment, and anxiety in new settings or when faced with another school change. While students expressed achievement concerns, peer social and emotional concerns were primary immediately following enrollment in a new school. Students found themselves unable to focus on academic studies until they could secure a peer group with which to interact. Implications for high-mobility schools include the need for structures providing transitional services and community-building environments to counteract the negative academic and developmental effects of frequent mobility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcoser, M., & Shoho, A. (2001). Student mobility in a low SES elementary school: Effects on academic achievement. Paper presented at the AERA, Seattle, Washington.

  • Daughtry, S. L., Greene, S., & James, E. (1961). Factors associated with school mobility. Journal of Educational Sociology, 35(1), 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felner, R. D., Primavera, J., & Cauce, A. M. (1981). The impact of school transitions: A focus for preventive efforts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(4), 449–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerbow, D. (1996). Patterns of urban student mobility and local school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1(2), 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. L., & Lash, A. A. (1990). A classroom perspective on student mobility. The Elementary School Journal, 91(2), 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, A. A., & Kirkpatrick, S. L. (1994). Interrupted lessons: Teacher views of transfer student education. American Education Research Journal, 31(4), 813–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minneapolis Family Housing Fund. (1998). Kids Mobility Project (Report). Minneapolis: Minneapolis Family Housing Fund.

  • Rhodes, V. L. (2004). Using de facto learning theory to understand student mobility, Academic Exchange Extra. Cincinnati, OH: Central Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, R., & Larsen, K. A. (1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafft, K. A. (2002). Low-income student transiency and its effects on schools and school districts in upstate New York: The perspective of school district administrators (Report). Ithaca: Cornell University.

  • Swanson, C. B., & Schneider, B. (1999). School changes and residential moves. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia L. Rhodes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rhodes, V.L. Learning on the go: voices of highly mobile urban students. Learn Inq 2, 113–125 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-008-0029-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-008-0029-1

Keywords

Navigation