Drug Pricing Pattern in China: Dilemma and Countermeasure

  • Mingxi Wang
  • Yi HuEmail author
  • Han Qiao
  • Chuangyin Dang


Maybe it is the most important medical reform for current China to adopt the bid-and-procurement scheme to correct the distortion of pharmaceutical resources allocation. Nevertheless, overpriced drugs often happen. This article aims to identify potential factors leading to the overpriced. Based on the mechanism rules of the scheme, it is found that unethical doctors are crucial to high price markup in the pricing pattern of drugs. Under China's actual conditions, asymmetric ownership is identified to be another cause of the overpriced by developing an asymmetric bidding model. How are the impacts of these two factors to be alleviated? Upon examination, several reform measures cannot effectively avoid the occurrence of the overpriced. Yet, the issue is very urgent for China because it is facing with the problem of population aging. Therefore, alternative options - a regulation-penalty tool and an investment subsidy policy - are proposed to improve China's health care.


The bid-and-procurement scheme overpriced drug asymmetry health-care reform 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



We are indebted to two anonymous referees for their help to improve the quality of the paper and Prof. Shouyang Wang for encouragement and detailed comments on an earlier draft. During this research, we have benefited from the financial support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71471039) and CityU 11301014 of the Government of Hong Kong SAR.


  1. [1]
    Arozamena, L. & Cantillon, E. (2004). Investment incentives inprocurement auctions. The Review of Economic Studies, 71(1): 1–18.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Asker, J. & Cantillon, E. (2008). Properties of scoring auctions. RandJournal of Economics, 39(1): 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Asker, J. & Cantillon, E. (2010). Procurement when price and qualitymatter. Rand Journal of Economics, 41(1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Branco, F. (1997). The design of multidimensional auctions. RandJournal of Economics, 28(1): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Che, Y.K. (1993). Design competition through multidimensionalauctions. Rand Journal of Economics, 24(4): 668–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    David, E., Azoulay-Schwartzb, R. & Kraus, S. (2006). Bidding insealed-bid and English multi-attribute auctions. Decision SupportSystems, 42(2): 527–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dong, H.J., Bogg, L., Rehnberg, C. & Diwan, V. (1999). Drug policyin China: pharmaceutical distribution in rural. Social Science& Medicine, 48(6): 777–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Dong, B. & Ding, Q. (2009). Aging in China: a challenge or an opportunity? Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 10(7): 456–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Eggleston, K., Li, L., Meng, Q.Y., Lindelow, M. & Wagstaff, A. (2008). Health service delivery in china: a literature review. Health Economics, 17(2): 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Gong, J., Li, J.P. & McAfee, R.P. (2012). Split-award contracts withinvestment. Journal of Public Economics, 96(1): 188–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Han, F. (2011). Corruption generates riches for drug industry. Behind theGreat Wall, December 3rd, 2011. Available at Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hanazonoy, M., Nakabayashi, J. & Tsuruoka, M. (2012). A theory ofmultidimensional auctions with non-quasi-linear scoring rules. Paper presented atthe39th Annual Conference of European Association for Research inIndustrial Economics, 2-4 September, 2012, Rome.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kaplan, T.R. & Zamir, S. (2012). Asymmetric first-price auctions withuniform distributions: analytic solutions to the general case. Economic Theory, 50(2): 269–302.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Lebrun, B. (1999). First price auction in the asymmetric N biddercase. International Economic Review, 40(1): 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Lebrun, B. (2006). Uniqueness of the equilibrium in first-priceauctions. Games and Economic Behavior, 55(1): 131–151.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Li, H. & Riley, J.G. (2007). Auction choice. International Journal ofIndustrial Organization, 25(6): 1269–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Liu, X.Z. & Hsiao, W.C.L. (1995). The cost escalation of social healthinsurance plans in China: its implication for public policy. SocialScience & Medicine, 41(8): 1095–1101.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Liu, X.Z., Liu, Y.L. & Chen, N.S. (2000). The Chinese experience of hospitalprice regulation. Health Policy and Planning, 15(2): 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Mares, V. & Swinkels, J.M. (2014). On the analysis of asymmetric firstprice auctions. Journal of Economic Theory, 152: 1–40.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Maskin, E. & Riley, J.G. (1996). Uniqueness in sealed high-bid auctions. Mimeo, UCLA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Maskin, E. & Riley, J.G. (2000a). Equilibrium in sealed high-bid auctions. Review of Economic Studies, 67(3): 413–438.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Maskin, E. & Riley, J.G. (2000b). Asymmetric auctions. Review ofEconomic Studies, 67(3): 439–454.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    McAfee, R.P. & McMillan, J. (1987). Auction and bidding. Journal ofEconomic Literature, 25(2): 99–738.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Nash, J.F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2): 155–162.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Nishinura, T. (2012). Optimal design of scoring auction withmultidimensional quality. Available at SSRN: Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Piccione, M. & Tan, G. (1996). Cost-reducing investment, optimalprocurement and implementation by auctions. International EconomicReview, 37(3): 663–685.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Thiel, S.E. (1988). Multidimensional auctions. Economics Letters, 28(1): 37–40.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Wang, M. & Liu, S. (2014). Equilibrium bids in practical multi-attributeauctions. Economics Letters, 123(3): 352–355.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Wang, M., Liu, S., Wang, S. & Lai K.K. (2010). A weighted product method for bidding strategies in multi-attribute auctions. Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 23(1): 194–208.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Yan, J. & Shao R. (2012). Influence analysis of “Double envelope”system on the quality of essential drugs. Qilu Pharmaceutical Affairs, 31(1): 51–53. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Yang, J. (2012). Price: people unbearable weight. Guangdong Party, 2: 28–29.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Yip, W.C-M., Hsiao, W., Meng, Q.Y., Chen, W. & Sun, X.M. (2010). Realignment of incentives for health-care providers in China. Lancet, 375(20): 1120–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Yoon, K.P. & Hwang, C.L. (1995). Multiple attribute decision making:an introduction. Sage University Paper Series on QuantitativeApplications in the Social Science, 07-104, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Yu, B.Y., Meng, Q.Y., Collins, C., Tolhurst, R., Tang, S.L., Yan, F., Bogg, L. & Liu, X.Y. (2010). How does the new cooperative medical schemeinfluence health service utilization? A study in two provinces inrural China. BMC Health Services Research, 10(116): 1–9.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Yu, X. & Tang, S. (2015). Study on correlation between quality and price in bidding procurement for essential drugs. China Medical Herald, 12(8): 105–108. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International Trade and EconomicsUniversity of International Business and EconomicsBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering ManagementCity University of Hong KongKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations