Skip to main content
Log in

A Simulation Method for Analyzing and Evaluating Rail System Performance Based on Speed Profile

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents and discusses a simulation method for analyzing and evaluating system performance on a rail line from the perspective of speed profile. Dynamic analysis for train motions is introduced, and a discrete time-operation graph is proposed to represent the relation between speed profile and energy consumption. Based on them, an analytical model is formulated to provide a quick insight into the system performance. The discrete-time simulation (DTS) method is then implemented to study the system in detail. Compared to the existing simulations, two innovations are included in the DTS: (1) the analytical lookup tables that can simplify the dynamic computation and, (2) the speed profile adjustment process that forecasts and avoids future conflicts based on practical constraints. The numerical results show that the DTS speed profile has advantages over existing methods. Finally, the DTS method is used to analyze and evaluate the system performance of the current timetable on Beijing Yizhuang Metro Line. The results suggest that the current timetable is not robust enough, and thus possible improvements are discussed at both scheduling and operating stages. The proposed method is verified to be effective and reliable for practical uses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbott, D. & Marinov, M. (2015). An event based simulation model to evaluate the design of a rail interchange yard, which provides service to high speed and conventional railways. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 52: 15–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Albrecht, A.R., Howlett, P.G., Pudney, P. & Vu, X. (2013). Energy-efficient train control: From local convexity to global optimization and uniqueness. Automatica, 49(10): 3072–3078.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Borndrfer, R. & Schlechte, T. (2007). Models for railway track allocation. 2005 Workshop on Algorithmic Methods & Models for Optimization of Railways.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burdett, R.L. & Kozan, E.A. (2010). A disjunctive graph model and framework for constructing new train schedules. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1): 85–98.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Calin, C. & Bianca, S. (2009). Performance evaluation of discrete event systems involving Henstock-Kurzweil integral. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 18(2): 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, C.S. & Sim, S.S. (2008). Optimising train movements through coast control using genetic algorithms. IEE Proceedings-Electric Power Applications, 144(1): 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, C. & He, D. (2005). Intelligent simulation for alternatives comparison and application to air traffic management. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14(1): 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Corman, F., D’Ariano, A., Pacciarelli, D. & Pranzo, M. (2012). Bi-objective conflict detection and resolution in railway traffic management. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 20(1): 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corman, F., D’Ariano, A., Pacciarelli, D. & Pranzo, M. (2009). Evaluation of green wave policy in real-time railway traffic management. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 17(6): 607–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Corman, F. & Meng, L. (2013). A review of online dynamic models and algorithms for railway traffic control. ICIRT, 128–133.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D’ariano, A., Pacciarelli, D. & Pranzo, M. (2007). A branch and bound algorithm for scheduling trains in a railway network. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2): 643–657.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. D’ariano, A., Pacciarelli, D. & Pranzo, M. (2008). Assessment of flexible timetables in real-time traffic management of a railway bottleneck. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 16(2): 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorfman, M.J. & Medanic, J. (2004). Scheduling trains on a railway network using a discrete event model of railway traffic. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(1): 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Howlett, P.G. (2000). The optimal control of a train. annals of operations research, 98(1): 65–87.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Howlett, P.G. & Pudney, P. (1995). Energy Efficient Train Control. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, H. & Li, K. (2017). Train timetable optimization for both a rail line and a network with graph-based approaches. Engineering Optimization, 49(12): 2133–2149.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, M., Schonfeld, P. & Kim, E. (2013). Comparison of vertical alignments for rail transit. Journal of Transportation Engineering-ASCE, 139(2): 230–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marinov, M., Mortimer, P., Zunder, T. & Islam, D. (2011). A steady state analysis for yard performances. Journal of Transport Literature, 5(1): 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marinov, M. & Viegas, J. (2011a). A mesoscopic simulation modelling methodology for analyzing and evaluating freight train operations in a rail network. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 19(1): 516–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marinov, M. & Viegas, J. (2011b). Analysis and evaluation of double ended flat-shunted yard performance employing two yard crews. Journal of Transportation Engineering-ASCE, 137(5): 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marinov, M. & Viegas, J. (2011c). Tactical management of rail freight transportation services: evaluation of yard performance. Transportation Planning and Technology, 34(4): 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marinov, M. & Viegas, J. (2009). A simulation modelling methodology for evaluating flat-shunted yard operations. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 17(6): 1106–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Martinis, V. & Weidmann, U. (2015). Definition of energy-efficient speed profiles within rail traffic by means of supply design models. Research in Transportation Economics, 54: 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Motraghi, A. & Marinov, M. (2012). Analysis of urban freight by rail using event based simulation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 25: 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nash, A. & Huerlimann, D. (2004). Railroad simulation using OpenTrack. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 74.

  26. Powell, J. & Palacin, R. (2015). Passenger stability within moving railway vehicles: limits on maximum longitudinal acceleration. Urban Rail Transit, 1(2): 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Quaglietta, E. & Punzo, V. (2013). Supporting the design of railway systems by means of a Sobol variance-based sensitivity analysis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 34: 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shakibayifar, M., Sheikholeslamib, A. & Corman, F. (2017). A simulation-based optimization approach to reschedule train traffic in uncertain conditions during disruptions. SCI IRAN, Available online.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Su, S., Li, X., Tang, T. & Gao, Z. (2013). A subway train timetable optimization approach based on energy-efficient operation strategy. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 14(2): 883–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tan, W., Chai, Y. & Liu, Y. (2011). A message-driving formalism for modeling and simulation of multi-agent supply chain systems. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 20(4): 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vuchic, V.R. (2007). Urban Transit Systems and Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Wales, J. & Marinov, M. (2015). Analysis of delays and delay mitigation on a metropolitan rail network using event based simulation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 52: 52–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Woroniuk, C. & Marinov, M. (2013). Simulation modelling to analyse the current level of utilisation of sections along a rail route. Journal of Transport Literature, 7(2): 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu, X., Li, K. & Yang, L. (2014). Discrete event model-based simulation for train movement on a single-line railway. Chinese Physics B, 23(8): 080205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang, L., Zhang, Y., Li, S. & Gao, Y. (2016). A two-stage stochastic optimization model for the transfer activity choice in metro networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 83: 271–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yin, J., Yang, L., Tang, T., Gao, Z. & Ran, B. (2017). Dynamic passenger demand oriented metro train scheduling with energy-efficiency and waiting time minimization: mixed-integer linear programming approaches. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 97: 182–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1434209,71621001), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB1201105), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2016JBM072), and Research Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Railway Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University (Grant No. RCS2016K001).

In addition, the authors thank the referees for their kind help in improving the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keping Li.

Additional information

Hangfei Huang is a Ph.D. candidate at State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University in China. He received his B.S. degree from Beijing Jiaotong University in 2013. His research interests include rail transit system analysis and optimization, transportation engineering, and operations research.

Keping Li received the Ph.D. degree in theoretical physics in 2002 from the Nankai University, Tianjin, China. He is a professor in Beijing Jiaotong University’s State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety. His current research interests include nonlinear dynamics, traffic flow and modeling and simulation in transportation problem and rail traffic control systems. He has published more than 90 papers in national conferences and premier journals.

Yanhui Wang received his Ph.D. degree in 2003 from University of Science & Technology Beijing, Beijing, China. He is now an associate professor in the State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University. His current research interests include transportation planning and management, traffic control and safety, and transportation engineering. He has published more than 40 papers and hosted more than 30 research projects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, H., Li, K. & Wang, Y. A Simulation Method for Analyzing and Evaluating Rail System Performance Based on Speed Profile. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 27, 810–834 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-017-5358-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-017-5358-0

Keywords

Navigation