Emission abatement for production system across locations with heterogeneous emission profiles

Special issue “systems science & cybernetic” (Vol.26 No.3) continued
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates a production system in which the desired system state is a reduction of emissions and the controlling action plan is altering carbon price. From the operations perspective, we develop a model to study how increasing carbon emission costs may affect the joint production and location decisions for a manufacturer across different locations. Specifically, our model incorporates economies of scale and explicitly links product demand, production costs and carbon emission levels to location decisions. The firm's decisions in production batch size and locations are then optimised. The system state of emission are analysed under different carbon prices. Finally we check the alignment of objectives in costs and emissions for the system. The results show that for a production system with economies of scale, the production allocation is transformed to a location choice problem after optimising the costs. Raising the carbon price reduces the carbon emissions but may not be able to induce the production to be placed in an emission efficient place. We propose a hybrid policy combining carbon price and free emission allowance to fully align the cost efficiency and emission efficiency and characterise the link between the emission target and the carbon price.

Keywords

Carbon emissions Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model carbon price emission allowance and location choice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 71401117, No 71340007). The authors thank the editor and the anonymous referees whose comments and suggestions have significantly improved the quality of the paper.

References

  1. [1]
    Baldwin, R. & Venables, A.J. (2013). Spiders and snakes: offshoring and agglomeration in the global economy. Journal of International Economics, 90(2): 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Böhringer, C. & Rutherford, T.F. (1997). Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy: a general equilibrium analysis of the german tax initiative. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(2): 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bonney, M. & Jaber, M.Y. (2011). Environmentally responsible inventory models: non-classical models for a non-classical era. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1): 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cachon, G.P. & Harker, P.T. (2002). Competition and outsourcing with scale economies. Management Science, 48(10): 1314–1333.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Chen, X., Benjaafar, S. & Elomri, A. (2013). The carbon-constrained EOQ. Operations Research Letters, 41(2): 172–179.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Conant, R.C. & Ashby, R.W. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science, 1(2): 89–97.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Desmet, K. & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2015). On the spatial economic impact of global warming. Journal of Urban Economics, 88: 16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Economist. (2013). Carbon copy: some firms are preparing for a carbon price that would make a big difference. Available via Economist URL. http://www.economist.com/news/business/22159160-some-firms-are-preparing-carbon-price-would-make-big-difference-carbon-ccop.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Economist. (2015). Local policies can combat emissions where international ones fall short. Available via Economist URL. http://www.economist.com/news/international/21679695-mayors-turn-local-policies-can-combat-emissions-where-international-ones-fall-short.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Gaussin, M., Hu G.P., Abolghasem, S.P., Basu, S., Shankar. M.R. & Bidanda, B. (2013). Assessing the environmental footprint of manufactured products: a survey of current literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2): 515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Gong, X.T. & Zhou, S.X. (2013). Optimal production planning with emissions trading. Operations Research, 61(4): 908–924.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Grossman, G.M. & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008). Trading tasks: a simple theory of offshoring. The American Economic Review, 98(5): 1978–1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hua, G.W., Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, S.Y. (2011). Managing carbon footprints in inventory management. International Journal of Production Economics, 132(2): 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kim, T., Hong, Y. & Lee, J. (2005). Joint economic production allocation and ordering policies in a supply chain consisting of multiple plants and a single retailer. International Journal of Production Research, 43(17): 3619–3632.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Krass, D., Nedorezov, T. & Ovchinnikov, A. (2013). Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production and Operations Management, 22(5): 1035–1055.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and Trade. MIT press.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Li, S.D. & Gu, M.D. (2012). The effect of emission permit trading with banking on firm’s production–inventory strategies. International Journal of Production Economics, 137(2): 304–308.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    McCann, P. (1996). Logistics costs and the location of the firm: a one-dimensional comparatives static approach. Location Science, 4(1): 101–116.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C.K. & Rangaswami, M.R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9): 56–64.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Owen, S.H. & Daskin, M.S. (1998). Strategic facility location: a review. European Journal of Operational Research, 111(3): 423–447.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Pacala, S.W. & Socolow, R.H. (2004). Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 305(5686): 968–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Plambeck, E.L. (2012). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management. Energy Economics, 34: S64–S74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Stern, P.C., Sovacool, B.K. & Dietz, T. (2016). Towards a science of climate and energy choices. Nature Climate Change, 6(6): 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Umpleby, S.A. & Dent, E.B. (1999). The origins and purposes of several traditions in systems theory and cybernetics. Cybernetics & Systems, 30(2): 79–103.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Victor, D.G. & Kennel, C.F. (2014). Climate policy: ditch the 2°C warming goal. Nature, 514(7520): 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Wahab, M.I.M. & Mamun, S.M.H., Ongkunaruk, P. (2011). EOQ models for a coordinated two-level international supply chain considering imperfect items and environmental impact. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1): 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Engineering Research Center of Low Carbon Technology and EconomySichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations