The Sputnik of servgoods: Autonomous vehicles

  • James M. Tien


In an earlier paper (Tien 2015), the author defined the concept of a servgood, which can be thought of as a physical good or product enveloped by a services-oriented layer that makes the good smarter or more adaptable and customizable for a particular use. Adding another layer of physical sensors could then enhance its smartness and intelligence, especially if it were to be connected with each other or with other servgoods through the Internet of Things. Such sensed servgoods are becoming the products of the future. Indeed, autonomous vehicles can be considered the exemplar servgoods of the future; it is about decision informatics and embraces the advanced technologies of sensing (i.e., Big Data), processing (i.e., real-time analytics), reacting (i.e., real-time decision-making), and learning (i.e., deep learning). Since autonomous vehicles constitute a huge quality-of-life disruption, it is also critical to consider its policy impact on privacy and security, regulations and standards, and liability and insurance. Finally, just as the Soviet Union inaugurated the space age on October 4, 1957, with the launch of Sputnik, the first man-made object to orbit the Earth, the U. S. has inaugurated an age of automata or autonomous vehicles that can be considered to be the U. S. Sputnik of servgoods, with the full support of the U. S. government, the U. S. auto industry, the U. S. electronic industry, and the U.S. higher educational enterprise.


Autonomous vehicles goods services servgoods sensors Internet of Things decision informatics Big Data real-time analytics cloud computing deep learning privacy security regulations standards liability insurance Sputnik 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Anderson, J. M., Kalra, N., Stanley, K. D., Sorenson, P., Samaras, C. & Oluwatola, O. A. (2014). Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers. The RAND Corporation Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Andrews, J. G., Buzzi, S., Choi, W., Hanly, S., Lozano, A., Soong, A.C.K. & Zhang, J. (2014). What will 5G be?. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6): 1065–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bifet, A. (2013). Mining big data in real time. Informatica, 37: 15–20.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Buehler, M., Iagnemma, K. & Singh, S. (2010). The DARPA urban challenge: autonomous vehicles in city traffic. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics Series, Vol. 56.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Burns, L. D. (2013). Sustainable mobility: a vision of our transport future. Nature, 497: 181–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. Norton, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Federal Communications Commission (FCC 1999). FCC allocates spectrum in 5.9 GHz range for intelligent transportation systems uses. Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Fernandez, P. & Nunes, U. (2012). Platooning with IVC-enabled autonomous vehicles: strategies to mitigate communication delays, improve safety and traffic flow. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    General Motors (1939). Futurama: Highways and Horizons. New York’s World Fair, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hattori, H., Nakajima, Y. & Ishida, T. (2011). Learning from humans: agent modeling with individual human behaviors. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics–Part A, 41(1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Joint Program Office (2013). Connected vehicle research in the United States. Washington, D. C., August 23.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Lavalle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M.S. & Kruschwitz, N. (2011). Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2): 21–31.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Brown, B., Dobbs, R., Roxbury, C. & Byers, A. H. (2011). Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Marchant, G. E. & Lindor, R. A. (2012). The coming collision between autonomous vehicles and the liability system. Santa Clara Law Review, 52: 1321–1340.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    MIT (2014). The 50 smartest companies in 2014. MIT Technology Review, 117(2): 27–46.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    MIT (2016). 10 breakthrough technologies in 2016. MIT Technology Review, 119(2): 34–67.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Miller, J. M. (2015). Autonomous vehicles: implications for employment demand. The Bridge, 45(4): 5–11.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Mlodinow, L. (2012). Subliminal: How Your Unconscious Mind Rules Your Behavior. Pantheon Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2013). U. S. Department of Transportation Releases Policy on Automated Vehicle Development: Policy 14-13. Washington, DC: NHTSA.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Perry, T. (2015). Temporary tattoos can replace today’s biomedical sensors. IEEE Spectrum: 34-39; 84–85.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Porter, M. E. & Heppelmann (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 102(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Rappaport, T. S., Heath, R. W., Daniels, R.C. & Murdock, J. N. (2014). Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications. Prentice Hall: Prentice Hall Communication.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Roesner, F. (2015). Computer security and privacy: where human factors meet engineering. The Bridge: 43(4): 5–10.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Ross, P. E. (2015). Diabetes has a new enemy: robo-pancreas. IEEE Spectrum: 40-43; 87.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Siegel, E. (2013). Predictive Analytics: The Power to Predict Who Will Click, Buy, Lie, or Die. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., Van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T. & Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529: 484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Taleb, N.N. (2010). The Black Swan: Second Edition. Random House, Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Tien, J.M. (2003). Toward a decision informatics paradigm: a real-time information based approach to decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C–Special Issue, 33(1): 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Tien, J.M. (2005). Viewing urban disruptions from a decision informatics perspective. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14(3): 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Tien, J.M. (2011). Manufacturing and services: from mass production to mass customization. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 20(2): 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Tien, J.M. (2012). The next industrial revolution: integrated services and goods. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 21(3): 257–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Tien, J.M. (2014). Overview of big data: a US perspective. The Bridge, 44(4): 12–19.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Tien, J. M. (2015). Internet of connected servgoods: considerations, consequences and concerns. Journal of Systems Engineering, 24(2): 130–167.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Tien, J.M. & Berg, D. (2003). A case for service systems engineering. Journal of Systems Engineering, 12(1): 13–39.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Tien, J.M. & Cahn, M.F. (1981). An Evaluation of the Wilmington Management of Demand Program. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Zikopoulos, P.C., Eaton, C., DeRoos, D., Deutsch, T. & Lapis, G. (2012). Understanding Big Data: Analytics for Enterprise Class Hadoop and Streaming Data. The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Zmud, J., Ecola, L., Phleps, P., & Feige, I. (2013). The future of mobility: scenarios for the United States in 2030. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EngineeringUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations