Skip to main content

Addressing equity issue in multi-actor policymaking via a system-of-systems approach: Aviation emissions reduction case study

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering volume 20, pages 1–24 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Finding equitable policy solutions is critical for developing sustainable energy use. This paper presents a system-of-systems (SoS) formalism for addressing the equity issue in multi-actor policymaking. In a SoS, the control of the overall system performance is shared among a network of actors. In contrast to a single optimal solution that aggregates objectives of actors, the solution concept of iso-performance is formulated and employed to illuminate multiple solutions and hence the ‘space’ for actors to compromise. By specifically accounting for the equity issue, the level of sacrifice each actor makes for each iso-performance solution is computed. To demonstrate the approach, a case study is presented about policymaking to reduce fuel life cycle aviation emissions in the United States based on the year 2020 reduction target, involving government, airlines, jet fuel refinery companies, and aircraft and engine manufacturers. A resource allocation mixed integer programming model is employed to calculate carbon emissions resulting from airlines’ deployment of aircraft fleet to meet changing air transport demand. The paper discusses three iso-performance solutions; each of them requires a different level of sacrifice from each actor. Such an insight can inform policymaking in determining the magnitude of compensation required when a particular solution is pursued.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

£ 29.95

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

References

  1. Agusdinata, D.B. (2008). Exploratory modeling and analysis: a method to deal with deep uncertainty. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology

  2. Agusdinata, D.B. & DeLaurentis, D.A. (2009). System-of-systems methodology for designing overall policies to tackle aviation environmental impacts. In: The TRB 88th Annual Meeting, Washington DC

  3. Agusdinata, D.B. & Dittmar, L. (2009). Adaptive policy design to reduce carbon emissions: a system-of-systems perspective. IEEE Systems Journal, 3(4): 509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, C.J. & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Monterey, Wadsworth

  5. Costanza, R. & Patten, B.C. (1995). Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics, 15(3): 193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crossley, W.A. & DeLaurentis, D.A. (2007). System-of-systems approach for assessing new technologies in NGATS. Purdue University

  7. DeLaurentis, D.A., Kang, T. & Lim, S. (2004). Solution space modeling and characterization for conceptual air vehicles. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 41(1): 73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng, X. & Papadimitriou, C. (1994). On the complexity of cooperative solution concepts. Mathematics of Operations Research, 19(2): 257–266

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Duke, R.D. & Geurts, J.L.A. (2004). Policy Games for Strategic Management: Pathways into the Unknown. Amsterdam, Dutch University Press

    Google Scholar 

  10. Energy Information Administration. (2006). Issues in focus: annual energy outlook 2006 with projections to 2030. Available via DIALOG. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo06/special_topics.html. Cited March 15, 2009

  11. European Commission. (2006). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community. COM(2006) 818 final, Brussel

  12. Haimes, Y.Y. (2008). Models for risk management of systems of systems. Int. J. System of Systems Engineering, 1(1/2): 222–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hileman, J.I., Wong, H.M., Ortiz, D., Brown, N., Maurice, L. & Rumizen, M. (2008). The feasibility and potential environmental benefits of alternative fuels for commercial aviation. In: 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), Anchorage, USA

  14. Hipel, K.W., Fang, L.P. & Heng, M. (2010). System of systems approach to policy development for global food security. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 19(1): 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hipel, K.W., Jamshidi, M.M., Tiem, J.M. & White, C.C. (2007). The future of systems, man, and cybernetics: application domains and research methods. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C-Applications and Reviews, 37(5): 726–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. IPPC. (1999). IPCC Special Report: Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

  17. Jamin, S., Schafer, A., Ben-Akiva, M.E. & Waitz, I.A. (2004). Aviation emissions and abatement policies in the United States: a city-pair analysis. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 9(4): 295–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, B.Y., Fleming, G.G., Lee, J.J., Waitz, I.A., Clarke, J.P., Balasubramanian, S., Malwitz, A., Klima, K., Locke, M., Holsclaw, C.A., Maurice, L.Q. & Gupta, M.L. (2007). System for assessing aviation’s global emissions (SAGE), part 1: model description and inventory results. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 12(5): 325–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, J., Lukachko, S., Waitz, I. & Schafer, A. (2001). Historical and future trends in aircraft performance, cost, and emissions. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 26: 167–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, S., Song, B. & Zhang, H. (2007). Method for multivariate analysis with small sample in aircraft cost estimation. Journal of Aircraft, 44(3): 1042–1045

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Maier, M.W. (1998). Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. Systems Engineering, 1(4): 267–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marais, K. & Weigel, A. (2006). A framework to encourage successful technology transition in civil aviation. In: IEEE/AIAA 25th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Portsmouth, OR

  23. McCullers, L.A. (1984). Aircraft configuration optimization including optimized flight profiles, multidisciplinary analysis and optimization — Part 1. NASA CP-2327

  24. McKay, M.D., Beckman, R.J. & Conover, W.J. (1979). Comparison of 3 methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21(2): 239–245

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Mozdzanowska, A. & Hansman, R.J. (2008). System transition: dynamics of change in the US air transportation system. MIT

  26. Rao, J., Badhrinath, K., Pakala, R. & Mistree, F. (1997). A study of optimal design under conflict using models of multi-player games. Engineering Optimization, 28(1–2): 63–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sage, A.P. (2008). Risk in system of systems engineering and management. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 4(3): 477–487

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Scheelhaase, J. & Grimme, W. (2007). Emissions trading for international aviation — an estimation of the economic impact on selected European airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(5): 253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sherry, L., Shortle, J. & Kumar, V. (2009). Why equity is elusive: dynamical properties of overscheduled national airspace system resources. In: 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO), Hilton Head, South Carolina

  30. Simon, H. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In: McGuire and Radner (eds.): Decision and Organization. North-Holland, NY

  31. Simon, H.A. (1973). The Organizations of complex systems. In: Pattee, HH (ed.) Hierarchy Theory — The Challenge of Complex System. George Braziller, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. The Economist. (March 2009). The budget and the environment: whom the cap fits

  33. Tirovolis, N. & Serghides, V. (2005). Unit cost estimation methodology for commercial aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 42(6): 1377–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vaillancourt, K. & Waaub, J.P. (2004). Equity in international greenhouse gases abatement scenarios: a multi-criteria approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 153: 489–505

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, L.Z., Fang, L.P. & Hipel, K.W. (2008). Basin-wide cooperative water resources allocation. European Journal of Operational Research, 190(3): 798–817

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang, C., McCollum, D., McCarthy, R. & Leighty, W. (2009). Meeting an 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from transportation by 2050: a case study in California. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 14(3): 147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. System-of-Systems Laboratory (SoSL), College of Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA

    D. Buyung Agusdinata

  2. School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA

    Daniel A. Delaurentis

Authors
  1. D. Buyung Agusdinata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel A. Delaurentis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Buyung Agusdinata.

Additional information

Portions of this work have been supported through a Cooperative Agreement with the NASA Glenn Research Center (NNX07013A).

D. Buyung Agusdinata received a B.S. degree in Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering in 1991 from the Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia, a M.S. degree in Aerospace Industrial Engineering (Cum Laude) in 1999 and a Ph.D. degree in Systems Engineering and Policy Analysis in 2008, both from the Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. Dr. Agusdinata is currently a Postdoctoral Fellow at the System-of-Systems Laboratory, College of Engineering, and Purdue University. He was previously a Research Engineer in the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology. He previously also worked for the KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and the Aircraft Design and Systems Engineering (ADSE) Company. His main research interests cover system modeling and analysis to support sustainable transportation and energy policy. He is a member of AIAA, INFORMS, and IEEE.

Daniel A. DeLaurentis is an Associate Professor in Purdue’s School of Aeronautics & Astronautics in West Lafayette, IN. Dr. DeLaurentis leads the System-of-Systems Laboratory (SoSL) which includes graduate and undergraduate students as well as professional research staff. His primary research interests are in the areas of problem formulation, modeling and system analysis methods for aerospace systems and systems-of-systems (SoS), with particular focus on air transportation. His research is conducted under grants from NASA, FAA, Navy, and the Missile Defense Agency. Dr. DeLaurentis is an Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, served as Chairman of the AIAA’s Air Transportation Systems (ATS) Technical Committee from 2008–2010, and is Associated Editor for the IEEE Systems Journal. He earned a PhD in Aerospace Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology (Atlanta, GA) in 1998.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agusdinata, D.B., Delaurentis, D.A. Addressing equity issue in multi-actor policymaking via a system-of-systems approach: Aviation emissions reduction case study. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 20, 1–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-011-5156-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-011-5156-z

Keywords

  • System-of-systems
  • equity
  • multi-actor policymaking
  • iso-performance solutions
  • aviation emissions