Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge synthesis in technology development

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a knowledge construction model called the i-System for knowledge integration and creation and its relation to the new concept of the Creative Space. The five ontological elements of the i-System are Intelligence, Involvement, Imagination, Intervention, and Integration corresponding to five diverse dimensions of the Creative Space. The paper discusses the meanings and functions of these dimensions in knowledge integration and creation, and presents applications of the i-System to technology roadmapping and archiving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackoff, R.L. (1974). Redesigning the Future. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boland, R.J. & Tenkasi, R.V. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organisation Science, 6: 350–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Checkland, P.B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gu, J.F. & Tang, X.J. (2005)a. Meta-synthesis approach to complex system modeling. European Journal of Operational Research, 166 (3): 597–614

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson, M.C. (2000). Systems Approaches to Management. Kluwer Academic — Plenum Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kant, I. (1788). Kritik der Praktischen Vernunft (1911, E.Wende & Co, Warsaw)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kostoff, R.N., Boylan, R. & Simons, G.R. (2004). Disruptive technology roadmaps. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71: 141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, T., Liu, S. & Nakamori, Y. (2005). Roadmapping as a way of knowledge management for supporting scientific research in academia. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 22: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Motycka, A. (1998). Science and Unconscious. Leopoldinum, Wroclaw (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamori, Y. (2000). Knowledge management system toward sustainable society. In: The 1st International Symposium on Knowledge and System Sciences, 57–64, Ishikawa, Japan, September 25–27, 2000

  11. Nakamori, Y. (2003). Systems methodology and mathematical models for knowledge management. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 12 (1): 49–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamori, Y. & Zhu, Z.C. (2004). Exploring a sociologist understanding for the i-System. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Sciences, 1 (1): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nonaka I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. & Probert, D. (2001). T-plan: Fast Start to Technology Roadmapping Planning Your Route to Success. Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge

  15. Popper, K.R. (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill

  17. Sawaragi, Y. & Nakamori, Y. (1992). Shinayakana systems approach in modeling and decision support. In: The 10th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 1: 77–86, Taipei, Taiwan, July 19–24, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wierzbicki, A.P. & Nakamori, Y. (2005). Knowledge creation and integration: Creative space and creative environments. In: Proc. of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38), IEEE Computer Society, Hawaii, January 3–6, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wierzbicki, A.P. & Nakamori, Y. (2006). Creative Space: Models of Creative Processes for the Knowledge Civilization Age. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Cambridge

  21. Zhu, Z.C. (1998). Conscious mind, forgetting mind: two approaches in multimethodology. Systems Practice and Action Research, 11 (6): 669–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu, Z.C. (1999). The practice of multimodal approaches: the challenge of cross-cultural communication, and the search for responses. Human Relations, 52 (5): 579–607

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu, Z.C. (2000). Dealing with a differentiated whole: the philosophy of the WSR approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13 (1): 21–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukihiro Yamashita.

Additional information

This research was partly supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan under a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research number 18046005. Part of the paper was presented in the conference of IEEE SMC 2008

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamashita, Y., Nakamori, Y. & Wierzbicki, A.P. Knowledge synthesis in technology development. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 18, 184–202 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-009-5103-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-009-5103-4

Keywords

Navigation