Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Egocentric spatial orientation differences between Alzheimer’s disease at early stages and mild cognitive impairment: a diagnostic aid

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a growing global crisis. Egocentric spatial orientation deteriorates with age and more significantly with AD. A simple and quick virtual reality (VR) localization and target finding technique is presented as a diagnostic aid to screen mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from AD. Spatial orientation data from 93 individuals (65 AD at a mild stage, 20 MCI, and 8 other dementia types) based on VR localization of a target on a landmark-less cubic 3-story building were analyzed. We hypothesize AD and MCI groups’ performances are significantly different. AD and MCI spatial performances were statistically significantly (p < 0.001) different. These results plus the longitudinal tracking of three patients who developed AD over a period of 5 years suggest the proposed spatial tests may be used as a quick and simple clinical diagnostic aid to separate AD at early to mild stages from MCI.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nichols E, e. al, Murray C (2019) Global, regional and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 18(1):8

  2. DeTrue M, Dickson D (2019) The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 14(32)

  3. Ranjbar-Pooya O et al (2017) Introducing a new age-and-cognition-sensitive measurement for assessing spatial orientation using a landmark-less virtual reality navigational task. Q J Exp Psychol 70(7):15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moffat S et al (2007) Extrahippocampal contributions to age differences in human spatial navigation. Cereb Cortex 17:1274–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Leonibus E, Oliverio A, Mele A (2005) A study on the role of the dorsal striatum and the nucleus accumbens in allocentric and egocentric spatial memory consolidation. Learn Mem 12(5):491–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raz N et al (2003) Differential aging of the human striatum: longitudinal evidence. Am J Neuroradiol 24:1849–1856

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nasreddine ZS et al (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(4):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schrag A, Schott JM (2012) What is the clinically relevant change on the ADAS-Cog? Neurol Neurosurg Pscyhiatry 83:171–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cherrier MM, Mendez M, Perryman K (2001) Route learning performance in Alzheimer disease patients. Neuropsychiatr Neuropsychol Behav Neuro 14(3):159–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schiza E et al (2019) Virtual reality applications for neurological disease: a review. Front Robot AI 6(100)

  11. Aldaba C, Moussavi Z (2020) Effects of virtual reality technology locomotive multi-sensory motion stimuli on a user simulator sickness and controller intuitiveness during a navigation task. J Med Biol Eng Comput 58:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Borghi A, Cimatti F (2010) Embodied cognition and beyond. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 48(3):763–773

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glenberg AM et al (2005) Grounding language in bodily states: the case for emotion. In: Pecher D, Zwaan RA (eds) grounding cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 115–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kimura K et al (2017) Orientation in virtual reality does not fully measure up to the real-world. Sci Rep 7(1):18109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Byagowi A, Mohaddes D, Moussavi Z (2014) Design and application of a novel virtual reality navigational technology (VRNChair). J Exp Neurosci 8:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. White P, Byagowi A, Moussavi Z (2018) VRNChair shortened, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww5o67pJIXo

  17. Moussavi Z, et al (2021) Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving cognition in patients with Alzheimer disease: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc 10(1)

  18. Moussavi Z et al (2021) A novel program to improve cognitive function in individuals with dementia using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and tutored cognitive exercises. Front Aging 2(3)

  19. Moussavi Z (2012) The effect of rTMS treatment on Alzheimer’s and sleep quality. NIH: US National Library of Medicine: https://clinicaltrials.gov/

  20. Masoumzadeh S, Moussavi Z (2020) Does practicing with a virtual reality driving simulator improve spatial cognition in older adults? A pilot study. Neurosci Insights 15

  21. Tu S et al (2015) Lost in spatial translation - a novel tool to objectively assess spatial disorientation in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Cortex 67:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Puthusseryppady V et al (2020) Spatial disorientation in Alzheimer’s disease: the missing path from virtual reality to real world. Front Aging Neurosci 12:550514–550514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rajan KB et al (2015) Cognitive impairment 18 years before clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease dementia. Neurology 85(10):898–904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Benussi A et al (2017) Transcranial magnetic stimulation distinguishes Alzheimer disease from frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 89. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004232

  25. Benussi A et al (2021) Classification accuracy of TMS for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Brain Stimul 14(2):241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lithgow BJ et al (2021) Physiological separation of Alzheimer’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease with significant levels of cerebrovascular symptomology and healthy controls. Med Biol Eng Comput 59(7–8):1597–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ranjbar Pouya O, Moussavi Z (2018) Practice effect in spatial updating: a longitudinal study using virtual reality navigation, in Int. Conf on Spatial Cognition (ICSC). Cognitive Processing, Rome, Italy, pp S49–S50

  28. Liu I et al (2011) Age and gender differences in various topographical orientation strategies. Brain Res 1410:112–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ranjbar-Pouya O et al (2017) Introducing a new age-and-cognition-sensitive measurement or assessing spatial orientation using a landmark-less virtual reality navigational task. Q J Exp Psychol 70(7):1406–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. White PJF, Moussavi Z (2016) Neurocognitive treatment for a patient with Alzheimer’s disease using a virtual reality navigational environment. J Exp Neurosci 10:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada (950–21162, 2009–05-01).

The authors declare no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomedical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T5V6, Canada

    Zahra Moussavi, Kazushige Kimura & Brian Lithgow

Authors
  1. Zahra Moussavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kazushige Kimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brian Lithgow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Moussavi.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moussavi, Z., Kimura, K. & Lithgow, B. Egocentric spatial orientation differences between Alzheimer’s disease at early stages and mild cognitive impairment: a diagnostic aid. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 501–509 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02478-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02478-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation