Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictive and diagnosis models of stroke from hemodynamic signal monitoring

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work presents a novel and promising approach to the clinical management of acute stroke. Using machine learning techniques, our research has succeeded in developing accurate diagnosis and prediction real-time models from hemodynamic data. These models are able to diagnose stroke subtype with 30 min of monitoring, to predict the exitus during the first 3 h of monitoring, and to predict the stroke recurrence in just 15 min of monitoring. Patients with difficult access to a CT scan and all patients that arrive at the stroke unit of a specialized hospital will benefit from these positive results. The results obtained from the real-time developed models are the following: stroke diagnosis around 98% precision (97.8% sensitivity, 99.5% specificity), exitus prediction with 99.8% precision (99.8% Sens., 99.9% Spec.), and 98% precision predicting stroke recurrence (98% Sens., 99% Spec.).

Graphical abstract depicting the complete process since a patient is monitored until the data collected is used to generate models

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stevens E, McKevitt C, Emmett E, Wolfe C, Wang Y (2017) El impacto del ictus en Europa. King’s College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oh SL, Hagiwara Y, Raghavendra U, Yuvaraj R, Arunkumar N, Murugappan M, Acharya UR (2018) A deep learning approach for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis from EEG signals. Neural Comput Applic, pp 1–7

  3. Groselj C, Kukar M, Fettich J, Kononenko I (1997) Machine learning improves the accuracy of coronary artery disease diagnostic methods. In: Computers in cardiology 1997. IEEE, pp 57–60

  4. Khosla A, Cao Y, Lin CC-Y, Chiu HK, Hu J, Lee H (2010) An integrated machine learning approach to stroke prediction. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, pp 183–192

  5. Letham B, Rudin C, McCormick TH, Madigan D (2013) An interpretable stroke prediction model using rules and Bayesian analysis. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  6. Zhang H, Zhang L-Q (2005) ECG analysis based on PCA and support vector machines. In: 2005 International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain, vol 2. IEEE, pp 743–747

  7. Ozcan NO, Gurgen F (2010) Fuzzy support vector machines for ECG arrhythmia detection. In: 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, pp 2973–2976

  8. Garg R, Oh E, Naidech A, Kording K, Prabhakaran S (2019) Automating ischemic stroke subtype classification using machine learning and natural language processing. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 28 (7):2045–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aviv R, Shelef I, Malam S, Chakraborty S, Sahlas D, Tomlinson G, Symons S, Fox A (2007) Early stroke detection and extent: impact of experience and the role of computed tomography angiography source images. Clin Radiol 62(5):447–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee E-J, Kim Y-H, Kim N, Kang D-W (2017) Deep into the brain: artificial intelligence in stroke imaging. J Stroke 19(3):277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bentley P, Ganesalingam J, Jones ALC, Mahady K, Epton S, Rinne P, Sharma P, Halse O, Mehta A, Rueckert D (2014) Prediction of stroke thrombolysis outcome using CT brain machine learning. NeuroImage: Clin 4:635–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheon S, Kim J, Lim J (2019) The use of deep learning to predict stroke patient mortality. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(11):1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Asadi H, Dowling R, Yan B, Mitchell P (2014) Machine learning for outcome prediction of acute ischemic stroke post intra-arterial therapy. PloS one 9(2):e88225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Q, Xie Y, Ye P, Pang C (2013) Acute ischemic stroke prediction from physiological time series patterns. Austral Med J 6(5):280–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vrtková A, Procházka V (2019) Comparing the performance of regression models, random forests and neural networks for stroke patients’ outcome prediction. In: 2019 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT). IEEE, pp 543–550

  16. Shokoohi-Yekta M, Hu B, Jin H, Wang J, Keogh E (2017) Generalizing DWT to the multi-dimensional case requires an adaptive approach. Data Mining Knowl Discov 31(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. García-Terriza L, Risco-Martín JL, Ayala JL, Roselló GR, Camarasaltas JM (2019) Comparison of different machine learning approaches to model stroke subtype classification and risk prediction. In: Proceedings of the Modeling and Simulation in Medicine Symposium, Society for Computer Simulation International, p 6

  18. Zitzler E (1999) Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications. Ph.D. thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH)

  19. Hatib F, Jian Z, Buddi S, Lee C, Settels J, Sibert K, Rinehart J, Cannesson M (2018) Machine-learning algorithm to predict hypotension based on high-fidelity arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesthesiol J Amer Soc Anesthesiol 129(4):663– 674

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kendale S, Kulkarni P, Rosenberg AD, Wang J (2018) Supervised machine-learning predictive analytics for prediction of postinduction hypotension. Anesthesiol J Amer Soc Anesthesiol 129(4):675–688

    Google Scholar 

  21. Convertino VA, Moulton SL, Grudic GZ, Rickards CA, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Gerhardt RT, Blackbourne LH, Ryan KL (2011) Use of advanced machine-learning techniques for noninvasive monitoring of hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 71(1):S25–S32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Lu K, Chien L-C, Bayard DS, Belzberg H, Demetriades D, Jelliffe RW (2006) Outcome prediction by a mathematical model based on noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 60(1):82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prasad V, Guerrisi M, Dauri M, Coniglione F, Tisone G, De Carolis E, Cillis A, Canichella A, Toschi N, Heldt T (2017) Prediction of postoperative outcomes using intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring data. Scient Rep 7(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee H, Lee E-J, Ham S, Lee H-B, Lee JS, Kwon S, Kim J, Kim N, Kang D-W Machine learning approach to identify stroke within 4.5 hours, Stroke 51. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027611

Download references

Funding

We acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under project PID2019-110866RB-I00.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis García-Terriza.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Terriza, L., Risco-Martín, J.L., Roselló, G.R. et al. Predictive and diagnosis models of stroke from hemodynamic signal monitoring. Med Biol Eng Comput 59, 1325–1337 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02354-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02354-6

Keywords

Navigation