Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Roll-over shape of a prosthetic foot: a finite element evaluation and experimental validation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prosthetic feet have generally been designed experimentally by adopting a trial-and-error technique. The objective of this research is to introduce a novel numerical approach for the a priori evaluation of the roll-over shape (ROS) of a prosthetic foot for application in its systematic design and development. The ROS was achieved numerically by employing a non-linear finite element model incorporating the augmented Lagrangian and multi-point constraint contact formulations, a hyperelastic material model and a higher-order strain definition. The Ottobock Solid Ankle Cushion Heel (SACH) foot was chosen to experimentally validate the numerical model. The geometry of the foot was evaluated from optical scans, and the material properties were obtained from uniaxial tensile, shear and volumetric compression tests. A new setup was designed for an improved experimental determination of the ROS, with the inclusion of an extended moment arm and variable loading. Error analysis of the radius of curvature of the ROS between the numerical and experimental results showed the percentage error to be 7.52%, thereby establishing the validity of the model. A numerical design model of this kind can be utilised to vary the input design parameters to arrive at a prosthetic foot with specified performance characteristics effectively and economically.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nolan L, Wit A, Dudziñski K, Lees A, Lake M, Wychowañski M (2003) Adjustments in gait symmetry with walking speed in trans-femoral and trans-tibial amputees. Gait Posture 17:142–151 

  2. Perry J, Boyd LA, Rao SS, Mulroy SJ (1997) Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 5:283–289

  3. Fey NP, Silverman AK, Neptune RR (2010) The influence of increasing steady-state walking speed on muscle activity in below-knee amputees. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 20:155–161 

  4. Isakov E, Keren O, Benjuya N (2000) Trans-tibial amputee gait: time-distance parameters and EMG activity. Prosthetics Orthot Int 24:216–220

  5. Knox EH (1996) The role of prosthetic feet in walking. PhD Thesis, Northwestern University

  6. Snyder RD, Powers CM, Fontaine C, Perry J (1995) The effect of five prosthetic feet on the gait and loading of the sound limb in dysvascular below-knee amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev 32:309–315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Jaarsveld HWL, Grootenboer HJ, Koopman HFJM, de Vries J (1990) Stiffness and hysteresis properties of some prosthetic feet. Prosthetics Orthot Int 14:117–124 

  8. Geil MD (2002) An iterative method for viscoelastic modeling of prosthetic feet. J Biomech 35:1405–1410

  9. Postema K, Hermens HJ, De Vries J et al (1997) Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 1: biomechanical analysis related to user benefits. Prosthetics Orthot Int 21:17–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann JF, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Dralle A, Questad K (1993) Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle ankle/lite foot versus SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:853–861 

  11. Toh SL, Goh JCH, Tan PH, Tay TE (1993) Fatigue testing of energy storing prosthetic feet. Prosthetics Orthot Int 17:180–188 

  12. Curtze C, Hof AL, van Keeken HG, Halbertsma JPK, Postema K, Otten B (2009) Comparative roll-over analysis of prosthetic feet. J Biomech 42:1746–1753 

  13. Perry J (1992) Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morawski J, Wojcieszak I (1978) Miniwalker – a resonant model of human locomotion. In: Proceedings of the 6th Int. Congress of Biomechanics. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 445–451

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ju M-S (1986) The modeling and simulation of constrained dynamical systems-with application to human gait. PhD Thesis, Case Western Reserve University

  16. Koopman HFJM (1989) The three-dimensional analysis and prediction of human walking. PhD Thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands

  17. Hansen AH, Childress DS, Knox EH (2004) Roll-over shapes of human locomotor systems: effects of walking speed. Clin Biomech 19:407–414 

  18. Hansen AH, Childress DS, Miff SC (2004) Roll-over characteristics of human walking on inclined surfaces. Hum Mov Sci 23:807–821 

  19. Hansen AH, Childress DS (2005) Effects of adding weight to the torso on roll-over characteristics of walking. J Rehabil Res Dev 42:381–390 

  20. Hansen AH, Childress DS (2004) Effects of shoe heel height on biologic rollover characteristics during walking. J Rehabil Res Dev 41:547–554 

  21. Hansen AH, Childress DS, Knox EH (2000) Prosthetic foot roll-over shapes with implications for alignment of trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthetics Orthot Int 24:205–215

  22. Stein JL, Hu S (1988) No title. In: DSC 7, ASME WAM. New York

  23. Saunders MM, Schwentker EP, Kay DB, Bennett G, Jacobs CR, Verstraete MC, Njus GO (2003) Finite element analysis as a tool for parametric prosthetic foot design and evaluation. Technique development in the solid ankle cushioned heel (SACH) foot. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 6:75–87

  24. Allard P, Trudeau F, Prince F, Dansereau J, Labelle H, Duhaime M (1995) Modelling and gait evaluation of asymmetrical-keel foot prosthesis. Med Biol Eng Comput 33:2–7 

  25. Bonnet X, Pillet H, Fodé P, et al (2012) Finite element modelling of an energy-storing prosthetic foot during the stance phase of transtibial amputee gait. In: proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, part H: journal of engineering in medicine. 70–5

  26. Omasta M, Paloušek D, Návrat T, Rosický J (2012) Finite element analysis for the evaluation of the structural behaviour, of a prosthesis for trans-tibial amputees. Med Eng Phys 34:38–45 

  27. Jang TS, Lee JJ, Lee DH, Yoon YS (2001) Systematic methodology for the design of a flexible keel for energy-storing prosthetic feet. Med Biol Eng Comput 39:56–64 

  28. Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Klodd E, Hansen A, Fatone S, Edwards M (2010) Effects of prosthetic foot forefoot flexibility on gait of unilateral transtibial prosthesis users. J Rehabil Res Dev 47:899–910 

  30. Wriggers P (2006) Computational contact mechanics. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Hansen AH, Sam M, Childress DS (2004) The effective foot length ratio: a potential tool for characterization and evaluation of prosthetic feet. J Prosthetics Orthot 16:41–45 

  32. Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T (2019) Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Comput Mater Contin 59:345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hansen AH (2002) Roll-over characteristics of human walking with applications for artificial limbs. PhD Thesis, Northwestern University

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TTK Center for Rehabilitation Research and Device Development (R2D2), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600036, India

    Thirunindravur Mannan Balaramakrishnan, Sundararajan Natarajan & Sujatha Srinivasan

Authors
  1. Thirunindravur Mannan Balaramakrishnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sundararajan Natarajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sujatha Srinivasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sundararajan Natarajan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balaramakrishnan, T.M., Natarajan, S. & Srinivasan, S. Roll-over shape of a prosthetic foot: a finite element evaluation and experimental validation. Med Biol Eng Comput 58, 2259–2270 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02214-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02214-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation