New complexity measures reveal that topographic loops of human alpha phase potentials are more complex in drowsy than in wake

  • Aleksandar Kalauzi
  • Aleksandra Vuckovic
  • Tijana Bojić
Original Article
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

A number of measures, stemming from nonlinear dynamics, exist to estimate complexity of biomedical objects. In most cases they are appropriate, but sometimes unconventional measures, more suited for specific objects, are needed to perform the task. In our present work, we propose three new complexity measures to quantify complexity of topographic closed loops of alpha carrier frequency phase potentials (CFPP) of healthy humans in wake and drowsy states. EEG of ten adult individuals was recorded in both states, using a 14-channel montage. For each subject and each state, a topographic loop (circular directed graph) was constructed according to CFPP values. Circular complexity measure was obtained by summing angles which directed graph edges (arrows) form with the topographic center. Longitudinal complexity was defined as the sum of all arrow lengths, while intersecting complexity was introduced by counting the number of intersections of graph edges. Wilcoxon’s signed-ranks test was used on the sets of these three measures, as well as on fractal dimension values of some loop properties, to test differences between loops obtained in wake vs. drowsy. While fractal dimension values were not significantly different, longitudinal and intersecting complexities, as well as anticlockwise circularity, were significantly increased in drowsy.

Graphical abstract

An example of closed topographic carrier frequency phase potential (CFPP) loops, recorded in one of the subjects in the wake (A) and drowsy (C) states. Lengths of loop graph edges, r(c j, c j + 1), plotted against the series of EEG channels with decreasing CFPP values, c j , in the wake (B) and drowsy (D) states. Conventional fractal analysis did not reveal any difference between them; therefore, three new complexity measures were introduced.

Keywords

Alpha activity Phase potentials Wake and drowsy Circular graphs Complexity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the Institute for Mental Health, Belgrade, where part of this work was done, as well as to all participants in the experiments.

This work was financed by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (projects OI 173022 and III 41028).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Accardo A, Affinito M, Carrozzi M, Bouquet F (1997) Use of the fractal dimension for the analysis of electroencephalographic time series. Biol Cybern 77:339–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acharya RU, Faust O, Kannathal N, Chua T, Laxminarayan S (2005) Non-linear analysis of EEG signals at various sleep stages. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 80:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berwanger D, Grädel E (2005) Entanglement—a measure for the complexity of directed graphs with applications to logic and games. In: Baader F, Voronkov A (eds) Volume 3452 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp 209–223Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bojić T, Vuckovic A, Kalauzi A (2010) Modeling EEG fractal dimension changes in wake and drowsy states in humans—a preliminary study. J Theor Biol 262(2):214–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boly M, Phillips C, Tshibanda L, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schabus M, Dang-Vu TT, Moonen G, Hustinx R, Maquet P, Laureys S (2008) Intrinsic brain activity in altered states of consciousness: how conscious is the default mode of brain function? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1129(1):119–129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boostani R, Karimzadeh F, Torabi-Nami M (2017) A comparative review on sleep stage classification methods in patients and healthy individuals. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 140:77–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Esteller R, Vachtsevanos G, Echauz J, Litt B (2001) A comparison of waveform fractal dimension algorithms. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I: Fundam Theory Appl 48(2):177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME (2005) The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(27):9673–9678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Higuchi T (1988) Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory. Physica D 31:277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalauzi A, Bojić T, Rakić LJ (2009) Extracting complexity waveforms from one-dimensional signals. Nonlinear Biomed Phys 3:8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalauzi A, Spasic S, Culic M, Grbic G, Martac LJ (2005) Consecutive differences as a method of signal fractal analysis. Fractals 13(4):283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalauzi A, Vuckovic A, Bojić T (2012) EEG alpha phase shifts during transition from wakefulness to drowsiness. Int J Psychophysiol 86(3):195–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalauzi A, Vuckovic A, Bojić T (2015) Topographic distribution of EEG alpha attractor correlation dimension values in wake and drowsy states in humans. Int J Psychophysiol 95(3):278–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Katz M (1988) Fractals and the analysis of waveforms. Comput Biol Med 18(3):145–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klimesch W, Sauseng P, Hanslmayr S (2007) EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Res Rev 53:63–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koukkou M, Lehmann D, Wackermann J, Dvorak I, Henggeler B (1993) Dimensional complexity of EEG brain mechanisms in untreated schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 33(6):397–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8:194–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laufs H, Holt JL, Elfont R, Krams M, Paul JS, Krakow K, Kleinschmidt A (2006) Where the BOLD signal goes when alpha EEG leaves. NeuroImage 31(4):1408–1418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lehmann D (1971) Multichannel topography of human alpha EEG fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 31:439–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lehmann D, Ozaki H, Pal I (1987) EEG alpha map series: brain micro-states by space-oriented adaptive segmentation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 67:271–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lutzenberger W, Elbert T, Birbaumer N, Ray WJ, Schupp HT (1992) The scalp distribution of fractal dimension of the EEG and its variation with mental task. Brain Topogr 5:27–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ma Y, Shi W, Peng C-K, Yang AC (2017) Nonlinear dynamical analysis of sleep electroencephalography using fractal and entropy approaches. Sleep Med Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2017.01.003
  23. 23.
    Massimini M (2004) The sleep slow oscillation as a traveling wave. J Neurosci 24(31):6862–6870.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1318-04.2004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Natarajan K, Acharya R, Alias F, Tiboleng T, Puthusserypady SK (2004) Nonlinear analysis of EEG signals at different mental states. Biomed Eng Online 3(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L, Mari Z, Vorbach S, Hallett M (2004) Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2292–2307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nunez PL, Srinivasan R (2006) A theoretical basis for standing and traveling brain waves measured with human EEG with implications for an integrated consciousness. Clin Neurophysiol 117(11):2424–2435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.754 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Palva S, Palva JM (2007) New vistas for [alpha]-frequency band oscillations. Trends Neurosci 30:150–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Petrosian A (1995) Kolmogorov complexity of finite sequences and recognition of different preictal EEG patterns, In: Computer-based medical systems, Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE Symposium on; IEEE, pp 212–217Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pfurtscheller G, Cooper R (1975) Frequency dependence of the transmission of the EEG from cortex to scalp. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 38(1):93–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Preisl H, Lutzenberger W, Pulvermüller F, Birbaumer N (1997) Fractal dimension of short EEG time series in humans. Neurosci Lett 225:77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rezaei SSC (2013) Entropy and graphs, master thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.5632.pdf, Accessed 25 Aug 2017
  32. 32.
    Soteros CE, Sumners DW, Whittington SG (1992) Entanglement complexity of graphs in Z 3. Math Proc Camb 111(01):75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stam CJ, Nolte G, Daffertshofer A (2007) Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum Brain Mapp 28:1178–1193.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20346 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stinstra JG, Peters MJ (1998) The volume conductor may act as a temporal filter on the ECG and EEG. Med Biol Eng Comput 36:711–716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Šušmáková K, Krakovská A (2008) Discrimination ability of individual measures used in sleep stages classification. Artif Intell Med 44:261–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2008.07.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vinck M, Oostenveld R, van Wingerden M, Battaglia F, Pennartz CMA (2011) An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. NeuroImage 55:1548–1565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.055 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vuckovic A, Radivojevic V, Chen AC, Popovic D (2002) Automatic recognition of alertness and drowsiness from EEG by an artificial neural network. Med Eng Phys 24(5):349–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weiss B, Clemens Z, Bódizs R, Halász P (2011) Comparison of fractal and power spectral EEG features: effects of topography and sleep stages. Brain Res Bull 84:359–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.12.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weiss B, Clemens Z, Bódizs R, Vágó Z, Halász P (2009) Spatio-temporal analysis of monofractal and multifractal properties of the human sleep EEG. J Neurosci Methods 185:116–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.07.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksandar Kalauzi
    • 1
  • Aleksandra Vuckovic
    • 2
  • Tijana Bojić
    • 3
  1. 1.Department for Life Sciences, Institute for Multidisciplinary ResearchUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Center for Rehabilitation EngineeringUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  3. 3.Laboratory for Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics — Laboratory 080, Vinča Institute of Nuclear SciencesUniversity of BelgradeBelgrade p.fah 522Serbia

Personalised recommendations