Advertisement

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 709–720 | Cite as

Clinical application of modified bag-of-features coupled with hybrid neural-based classifier in dengue fever classification using gene expression data

  • Sankhadeep ChatterjeeEmail author
  • Nilanjan Dey
  • Fuqian Shi
  • Amira S. Ashour
  • Simon James Fong
  • Soumya Sen
Original Article

Abstract

Dengue fever detection and classification have a vital role due to the recent outbreaks of different kinds of dengue fever. Recently, the advancement in the microarray technology can be employed for such classification process. Several studies have established that the gene selection phase takes a significant role in the classifier performance. Subsequently, the current study focused on detecting two different variations, namely, dengue fever (DF) and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). A modified bag-of-features method has been proposed to select the most promising genes in the classification process. Afterward, a modified cuckoo search optimization algorithm has been engaged to support the artificial neural (ANN-MCS) to classify the unknown subjects into three different classes namely, DF, DHF, and another class containing convalescent and normal cases. The proposed method has been compared with other three well-known classifiers, namely, multilayer perceptron feed-forward network (MLP-FFN), artificial neural network (ANN) trained with cuckoo search (ANN-CS), and ANN trained with PSO (ANN-PSO). Experiments have been carried out with different number of clusters for the initial bag-of-features-based feature selection phase. After obtaining the reduced dataset, the hybrid ANN-MCS model has been employed for the classification process. The results have been compared in terms of the confusion matrix-based performance measuring metrics. The experimental results indicated a highly statistically significant improvement with the proposed classifier over the traditional ANN-CS model.

Keywords

Dengue fever Bag-of-features Modified cuckoo search Artificial neural networks Gene expression data Incremental feature selection scheme 

References

  1. 1.
    Pomeroy SL, Tamayo P, Gaasenbeek M, Sturla LM, Angelo M, McLaughlin ME, Kim JY, Goumnerova LC, Black PM, Lau C, Allen JC, Zagzag D, Olson JM, Curran T, Wetmore C, Biegel JA, Poggio T, Mukherjee S, Rifkin R, Califano A, Stolovitzky G, Louis DN, Mesirov JP, Lander ES, Golub TR (2002) Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression. Nature 415:436–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, Levine PJ, Fusaro VA, Steinberg SM, Mills GB, Simone C, Fishman DA, Kohn EC, Liotta LA (2002) Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet 359:572–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shipp MA, Ross KN, Tamayo P, Weng AP, Kutok JL, Aguiar RC, Gaasenbeek M, Angelo M, Reich M, Pinkus GS, Ray TS, Koval MA, Last KW, Norton A, Lister TA, Mesirov J, Neuberg DS, Lander ES, Aster JC, Golub TR (2002) Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning. Nat Med 8:68–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    David W (2003) Galbraith: global analysis of cell type-specific gene expression. Comp Funct Genom 4:208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heller RA, Schena M, Chai A, Shalon D, Bedilion T, Gilmore J, Woolley DE, Davis RW (1997) Discovery and analysis of inflammatory disease related genes using cDNA microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:2150–2155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh D, Febbo PG, Ross K, Jackson DG, Manola J, Ladd C, Tamayo P, Renshaw AA, D'Amico AV, Richie JP, Lander ES, Loda M, Kantoff PW, Golub TR, Sellers WR (2002) Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior. Cancer Cell 1:203–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dai JJ, Lieu L, Rocke D (2006) Dimension reduction for classification with gene expression microarray data. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 5(1):1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang H, van der Laan MJ (2011) Dimension reduction with gene expression data using targeted variable importance measurement. BMC bioinformatics 12(1):312CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chao, S., & Lihui, C. (2004, December). High dimensional gene expression data dimension reduction. In Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, 2004 I.E. Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 451-455). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pamukçu, E., Bozdogan, H., & Çalık, S. (2015). A novel hybrid dimension reduction technique for undersized high dimensional gene expression data sets using information complexity criterion for cancer classification. Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2015Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kar S, Sharma KD, Maitra M (2015) Gene selection from microarray gene expression data for classification of cancer subgroups employing PSO and adaptive K-nearest neighborhood technique. Expert Syst Appl 42(1):612–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen H, Zhang Y, Gutman I (2016) A kernel-based clustering method for gene selection with gene expression data. J Biomed Inform 62:12–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    World Health Organization (2013) World health statistics 2013. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL et al (2013) The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496(7446):504–507CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Azad S, Lio P (2014) Emerging trends of malaria-dengue geographical coupling in the Southeast Asia region. J Vector Borne Dis 51(3):165–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    World Health Organization (2011). Comprehensive guideline for prevention and control of dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. Revised and expanded edition. New Delhi: World Health Organization. Regional Office for South-East Asia.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rodriguez-Roche R, Gould EA (2013) Understanding the dengue viruses and progress towards their control. Biomed Res Int 2013:690835CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simmons CP, Farrar JJ, Chau N van V, Wills B. Dengue: current concepts. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1423–1432Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao, J., Liu, N., Lawley, M., & Hu, X. (2017) An interpretable classification framework for information extraction from online healthcare forums, Journal of Healthcare Engineering Vol 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP et al (1999) Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286(5439):531–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alon U, Barkai N, Notterman DA, Gish K, Ybarra S, Mack D, Levine AJ (1999) Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(12):6745–6750CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dudoit S, Fridlyand J, Speed TP (2002) Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. J Am Stat Assoc 97(457):77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    West M, Blanchette C, Dressman H, Huang E, Ishida S, Spang R et al (2001) Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(20):11462–11467CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nguyen DV, Rocke DM (2002) Tumor classification by partial least squares using microarray gene expression data. Bioinformatics 18(1):39–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Antoniadis A, Lambert-Lacroix S, Leblanc F (2003) Effective dimension reduction methods for tumor classification using gene expression data. Bioinformatics 19(5):563–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khan J, Wei JS, Ringner M, Saal LH, Ladanyi M, Westermann F et al (2001) Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks. Nat Med 7(6):673–679CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    O'Neill MC, Song L (2003) Neural network analysis of lymphoma microarray data: prognosis and diagnosis near-perfect. BMC bioinformatics 4(1):13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu B, Cui Q, Jiang T, Ma S (2004) A combinational feature selection and ensemble neural network method for classification of gene expression data. BMC bioinformatics 5(1):136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhou Y, Li B, Zhang Y, Chen L, Kong X (2016) Feature classification and analysis of lung cancer related genes through gene ontology and KEGG pathways. Curr Bioinforma 11(1):40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Passalis N, Tefas A (2017) Neural bag-of-features learning. Pattern Recogn 64:277–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grzeszick R, Plinge A, Fink GA (2017) Bag-of-features methods for acoustic event detection and classification. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 25(6):1242–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chatterjee S, Sarkar S, Hore S, Dey N, Ashour AS, Balas VE (2016) Particle swarm optimization trained neural network for structural failure prediction of multistoried RC buildings. Neural Comput & Applic:1–12Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chatterjee S, Dey N, Ashour AS, Drugarin CVA (2017) Electrical energy output prediction using cuckoo search supported artificial neural network. World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WS4 2017) At London, Volume. Springer LNNS series, Berlin (In press)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sirshendu Hore, Sankhadeep Chatterjee, Sarbartha Sarkar, Nilanjan Dey, Amira S. Ashour, Dana Balas Timar, Valentina E Balas. Neural-based prediction of structural failure of multi storied RC buildings. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol 58, No 3, May, 2016, pp. 459–473Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Møller MF (1993) A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Netw 6(4):525–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sankhadeep Chatterjee, Sarbartha Sarkar, Nilanjan Dey, Soumya Sen, Takaaki Goto Narayan C Debnath, Water quality prediction: multi objective genetic algorithm coupled artificial neural network based approach. IEEE 15th International Conference of Industrial Informatics INDIN'2017, Emden, Germany, July 2017. (in press)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chakraborty S, Chatterjee S, Dey N, Ashour AS, Ashour A, Shi F, Mali K (May 2017) Modified cuckoo search algorithm in microscopic image segmentation of hippocampus. Wiley, Microscopy Research and TechniqueGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhao B, Zhong Y, Zhang L (2016) A spectral–structural bag-of-features scene classifier for very high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 116:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pérez DS, Bromberg F, Diaz CA (2017) Image classification for detection of winter grapevine buds in natural conditions using scale-invariant features transform, bag of features and support vector machines. Comput Electron Agric 135:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chatterjee, S., Ghosh, S., Dawn, S., Hore, S., & Dey, N. (2016). Forest type classification: a hybrid NN-GA model based approach. In: Information systems design and intelligent applications (pp. 227-236). Springer IndiaGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chatterjee S, Sarkar S, Hore S, Dey N, Ashour AS, Shi F, Le D-N (2017) Structural failure classification for reinforced concrete buildings using trained neural network based multi- objective genetic algorithm. Techno Press, Structural Engineering and Mechanics (in press)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sankhadeep Chatterjee, Sirshendu Hore, Nilanjan Dey, Sayan Chakraborty, Amira S. Ashour, Dengue fever classification using gene expression data: a PSO based artificial neural network approach. 5th International Conference on Frontiers in Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications; Springer, June 2016Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu, H. C., Yih, J. M., & Liu, S. W. (2007). Fuzzy c-mean algorithm based on Mahalanobis distances and better initial values. In: Information sciences 2007 (pp. 1398-1404)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang F, He X-S, Wang Y, Yang S-M (2012a) Markov model and convergence analysis based on cuckoo search algorithm. Jisuanji Gongcheng/Comput Eng 38(11):180–185Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wilcoxon F, Katti SK, Wilcox RA (1970) Critical values and probability levels for the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Selected tables in mathematical. Statistics 1:171–259Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sankhadeep Chatterjee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nilanjan Dey
    • 2
  • Fuqian Shi
    • 3
  • Amira S. Ashour
    • 4
  • Simon James Fong
    • 5
  • Soumya Sen
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science & EngineeringUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of Information TechnologyTechno India College of TechnologyKolkataIndia
  3. 3.College of Information and EngineeringWenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Department of Electronics and Electrical Communications Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringTanta UniversityTantaEgypt
  5. 5.Department of Computer and Information Science Data Analytics and Collaborative Computing LaboratoryUniversity of MacauMacauPeople’s Republic of China
  6. 6.A.K. Choudhury School of Information TechnologyUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations