Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of head mass on temporo-parietal skull impact using finite element modeling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of head mass on its biomechanical response during lateral impact to the head is investigated in this computational study. The mass of the head of a state-of-the-art validated finite element head model is altered by ±10 % from the base value of 4.7 kg. Numerical simulations of lateral head impacts for 30 cases (representing 15 human cadaver experiments × 2 mass configurations) are performed using the LS-DYNA solver at different velocities ranging from 2.4 to 6.5 m/s and three impacting conditions representing different stiffness and shapes of the contact/impact surfaces. Results are compared with the original model using the baseline head mass, thus resulting in a total of 45 simulations. Present findings show that the head mass has greater influence for peak interaction forces and the force has a greater dependency on stiffness of contact surface than the shape. Mass variations have also influence on skull strain energy. Regardless of increase/decrease in skull strain energy influenced by head mass variations used in the computational study, the 50 % fracture tolerance limit was unaltered, which was 544 mJ. The present study gives a better understanding of the mechanism of temporo-parietal skull impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allsop DL, Perl TR, Warner CY (1991) Force/deflection and fracture characteristics of the temporo-parietal region of the human head. Society of Automotive Engineering. SAE Paper No. 912907

  2. Chatelin S, Deck C, Willinger R (2012) An anisotropic viscous hyperelastic constitutive law for brain material finite element modeling. J Biorheol. 1–12, ISSN 1867-0466. doi:10.1007/s12573-012-0055-6

  3. Chen H, Luo Y (2010) Parametric study of closed head injuries. Adv Theor Appl Mech 3(7):339–347

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deck C, Nicolle S,Willinger R (2004) Human head FE modelling: improvement of skull geometry and brain constitutive laws. In: Proceedings on the IRCOBI conference, Graz, pp 79–92

  5. Deck C, Willinger R (2008) Improved head injury criteria based on head FE model. Int J Crashworthiness 13(6):667–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deck C, Willinger R (2008b) Head injury prediction tool for predictive systems optimization. In: 7th European LS-DYNA conference

  7. Gennarelli T, Pintar F, Yoganandan N, Beuse N, Morgan R (2002) Head injuries to nearside occupants in lateral impacts: epidemiological and full-scale crash test analyses. In: Proceedings of the IRCOBI. Munich, Germany, pp 223–233

  8. Hardy WN, Foster CD, Mason MJ, Yang KH, King AI, Tashman S (2001) Investigation of head injury mechanisms using neutral density technology and high-speed biplanar X-ray. Stapp Car Crash J 45:337–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hardy WN, Mason MJ, Foster CD, Shah CS, Kopacz JM, Yang KH, King AI, Bishop J, Bey M, Anderst W, Tashman S (2007) A study of the response of the human cadaver head to impact. Stapp Car Crash J 51:17–80

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horgan TJ, Gilchrist MD (2003) The creation of three-dimensional finite element models for simulating head impact biomechanics. Int J Crashworthiness 8(4):353–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang HS, Willinger R, Diaw BM, Chinn B (1997) Validation of a 3D human head model and replication of head impact in motorcycle accident by finite element modeling. In: Proceeding of 41th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers, Lake Buena Vista, USA, pp 329–338

  12. Kleiven S, von Holst H (2002) Consequences of head size following trauma to the human head. J Biomech 35(2):153–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kleiven S (2003) Influence of impact direction to the human head in prediction of subdural hematoma. J Neurotrauma 20(4):365–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nahum A, Smith R, Ward C (1977) Intracranial pressure dynamics during head impact. In: Proceeding of 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No. 770922

  15. NHTSA (2002) Code of federal regulations, Title 49, Part 571. National highway traffic safety administration, federal motor vehicle safety standards, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pintar FA, Yoganandan N, Baisden J (2005) Characterizing occipital condyle loads under high-speed head rotation. Stapp Car Crash J 49:33–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pintar FA, Maiman DJ, Yoganandan N (2007) Injury patterns in side pole crashes. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 51:419–433

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Raymond D, Van Ee C, Crawford G, Bir C (2009) Tolerance of the skull to blunt ballistic temporo-parietal impact. J Biomech 42(15):2479–2485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruan JS, Khalil T, King AI (1993) Finite element modeling of direct head impact. In: Proceedings of 37th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No. 933114, San Antonio, TX

  20. Ruan J, Prasad P (2001) The effects of skull thickness variations on human head dynamic impact responses. Stapp Car Crash J 45:395–414

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahoo D, Deck C, Willinger R (2013) Development and validation of an advanced anisotropic visco-hyperelastic human brain FE model. JMBBM. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.022

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sahoo D, Deck C, Yoganandan N, Willinger R (2013) Anisotropic composite human skull model and skull fracture validation against temporo-parietal skull fracture. JMBBM 28:340–353

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sarron JC, Caillou JP, Da Cunha J, Allain JC, Tramecon A (2000) Consequences of nonpenetrating projectile impact on a protected head: study of rear effects of protections. J Trauma 49(5):923–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tagliaferri F, Compagnone C, Yoganandan N, Gennarelli TA (2009) Traumatic brain injury after frontal crashes: relationship with body mass index. J Trauma 66(3):727–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trosseille X, Tarriere C, Lavaste F, Guillon F, Domont A (1992) Development of a F.E.M. of the human head according to a specific test protocol. In: Proceedings of 36th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No. 922527

  26. Tsai SW, Wu EM (1971) A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Compos Mater 5:58–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Willinger R, Baumgartner D (2003) Human head tolerance limits to specific injury mechanisms. Int J Crashworthiness 8(6):605–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoganandan N, Pintar FA (2004) Biomechanics of temporo-parietal fracture. Clin Biomech 19:225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoganandan N, Gennarelli TA, Zhang J, Pintar FA, Takhounts E, Ridella SA (2009) Association of contact loading in diffuse axonal injuries from motor vehicle crashes. J Trauma 66:309–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoganandan N, Maiman DJ, Guan Y, Pintar F (2009) Importance of physical properties of the human head on head–neck injury metrics. Traffic Injury Prev 10:488–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Zhang J, Baisden JL (2009) Physical properties of the human head: mass, center of gravity and moment of inertia. J Biomech 42:1177–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoganandan N, Baisden JL, Maiman DJ, Gennarelli TA, Guan Y, Pintar FA, Laud P, Ridella SA (2010) Severe-to-fatal head injuries in motor vehicle impacts. Accid Anal Prev 42(4):1370–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoganandan N, Stemper BD, Pintar FA, Maiman DJ (2011) Use of postmortem human subjects to describe injury responses and tolerances. Clin Anat 24:282–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang J, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Gennarelli TA (2006) Brain strains in vehicle impact tests. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 50:1–12

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang J, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA (2009) Dynamic biomechanics of the human head in lateral impacts. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 53:249–256

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the ANR-12-EMMA-0026-0 (SUFEHM-13) and VA medical research for their research support to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Deck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahoo, D., Deck, C., Yoganandan, N. et al. Influence of head mass on temporo-parietal skull impact using finite element modeling. Med Biol Eng Comput 53, 869–878 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1295-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1295-6

Keywords

Navigation