Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A metric for the stiffness of calcified aortic valves using a combined computational and experimental approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calcific aortic valve disease is the most common heart valve disease. It is associated with a significant increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and independently increases the cardiovascular risk. It is then important to develop parameters that can estimate the stiffness of the valve. Such parameters may contribute to early detection of the disease or track its progression and optimize the timing for therapy. In this study, we introduce a metric representing the stiffness of the native aortic calcified valve over a wide range of stenosis severities. Our approach is based on three-dimensional structural finite-element simulations and in vitro measurements. The proposed method is developed first in a pulse duplicator; its clinical applicability is then evaluated in three patients with severe aortic stenosis. Our results indicate that the value of the proposed metric varies considerably between healthy valves and valves with very severe aortic stenosis, from 0.001 to 7.38 MPa, respectively. The method introduced in this study could give useful information regarding the stiffness of the valve leaflets with potential application to the evaluation of aortic sclerosis and aortic stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blais C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, Dumesnil JG, Loho N, Rader F, Baumgartner H, Beanlands RS, Chayer B, Kadem L, Garcia D, Durand LG, Pibarot P (2006) The projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation 113:711–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al (2008) Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 118(15):e523–e661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burriesci G, Howard I, Patterson E (1999) Influence of anisotropy on the mechanical behaviour of bioprosthetic heart valves. J Med Eng Technol 23(6):203–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia D, Pibarot P, Landry C, Allard A, Chayer B, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG (2004) Estimation of aortic valve effective orifice area by Doppler echocardiography: effects of valve inflow shape and flow rate. J Am Soc Echocardiog 17(7):756–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia D, Barenbrug PJC, Pibarot P, Dekker ALAJ, van der Veen AH, Maessen JG, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG (2005) A ventricular-vascular coupling model in presence of aortic stenosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H1874–H1884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guccione JM, McCulloh AD, Waldman LK (1991) Passive material properties of intact ventricular myocardium determined from a cylindrical model. J Biomech Eng 113(1):42–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guccione JM, Costat KD, McCulloh AD (1995) Finite element stress analysis of left ventricular mechanics in the beating dog heart. J Biomech 28(10):1117–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Labrosse MR, Lobo K, Beller C (2010) Structural analysis of the natural aortic valve in dynamics: from unpressurized to physiologically loaded. J Biomech 43(10):1916–1922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JC, Zhao XQ, Otto CM (2005) Aortic valve sclerosis. J Echocardiogr 3(2):51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li J, Luo XY, Kuang ZB (2001) A nonlinear anisotropic model for porcine aortic heart valves. J Biomech 34:1279–1289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Messika-Zeitoun D, Aubry MC, Detaint D, Bielak LF, Peyser PA, Sheedy PF, Turner ST, Breen JF, Scott C, Tajik J, Enriquez-Sarano M (2004) Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation 110:356–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Novo G, Fazio G, Visconti C, Carita P, Maira E, Fattouch K, Novo S (2011) Atherosclerosis, degenerative aortic stenosis and statins. Curr Drug Targets 12(1):115–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Omens JH, Usyk TP, Li Z, Mcculloch DA (2002) Muscle LIM protein deficiency leads to alterations in passive ventricular mechanics. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282:H680–H687

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Otto CM (2000) Timing of aortic valve surgery. Heart 84(2):211–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sahasakul Y, Edwards WD, Naessens JM, Tajik AJ (1988) Age-related changes in aortic and mitral valve thickness: implications for two-dimensional echocardiography based on an autopsy study of 200 normal human hearts. Am J Cardiol 62:424–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saleeb AF, Kumar A, Thomas VS (2013) The important roles of tissue anisotropy and tissue-to-tissue contact on the dynamical behavior of a symmetric tri-leaflet valve during multiple cardiac pressure cycles. Med Eng Phys 35(1):23–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun W, Abad A, Sacks MS (2005) Simulated bioprosthetic heart valve deformation under quasi-static loading. J Biomech Eng 127(6):905–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Loon R (2010) Towards computational modeling of aortic stenosis. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 26:405–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weinberg EJ, Schoen FJ, Mofrad MRK (2009) A computational model of aging and calcification in the aortic heart valve. PLoS ONE 4:e5960

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel R. Labrosse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maleki, H., Shahriari, S., Durand, L.G. et al. A metric for the stiffness of calcified aortic valves using a combined computational and experimental approach. Med Biol Eng Comput 52, 1–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1113-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1113-y

Keywords

Navigation