Parameter estimation of the copernicus decompression model with venous gas emboli in human divers

  • Christian R. GutvikEmail author
  • Richard G. Dunford
  • Zeljko Dujic
  • Alf O. Brubakk
Original Article


Decompression Sickness (DCS) may occur when divers decompress from a hyperbaric environment. To prevent this, decompression procedures are used to get safely back to the surface. The models whose procedures are calculated from, are traditionally validated using clinical symptoms as an endpoint. However, DCS is an uncommon phenomenon and the wide variation in individual response to decompression stress is poorly understood. And generally, using clinical examination alone for validation is disadvantageous from a modeling perspective. Currently, the only objective and quantitative measure of decompression stress is Venous Gas Emboli (VGE), measured by either ultrasonic imaging or Doppler. VGE has been shown to be statistically correlated with DCS, and is now widely used in science to evaluate decompression stress from a dive. Until recently no mathematical model has existed to predict VGE from a dive, which motivated the development of the Copernicus model. The present article compiles a selection experimental dives and field data containing computer recorded depth profiles associated with ultrasound measurements of VGE. It describes a parameter estimation problem to fit the model with these data. A total of 185 square bounce dives from DCIEM, Canada, 188 recreational dives with a mix of single, repetitive and multi-day exposures from DAN USA and 84 experimentally designed decompression dives from Split Croatia were used, giving a total of 457 dives. Five selected parameters in the Copernicus bubble model were assigned for estimation and a non-linear optimization problem was formalized with a weighted least square cost function. A bias factor to the DCIEM chamber dives was also included. A Quasi-Newton algorithm (BFGS) from the TOMLAB numerical package solved the problem which was proved to be convex. With the parameter set presented in this article, Copernicus can be implemented in any programming language to estimate VGE from an air dive.


Diving Vascular bubbles Nonlinear optimization Ultrasound Decompression sickness 



This study has been supported by UWATEC AG, Switzerland and by the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Norsk Hydro, Esso Norge and Statoil under the “dive contingency contract” (no 4600002328) with Norwegian Underwater Intervention (NUI). Thanks to R. Y. Nishi for providing the data set from DCIEM on the square profile dives.


  1. 1.
    Bakovic D, Glavas D, Palada I, Breskovic T, Fabijanic D, Obad A, Valic Z, Brubakk AO, Dujic Z (2008) High-grade bubbles in left and right heart in an asymptomatic diver at rest after surfacing. Aviat Space Environ Med 79(6):626–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brubakk AO, Eftedal OS (1999) Evaluation of reverse dive profiles. In: Lang MA, Lehner CE (eds) Reverse dive profiles workshop. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, pp 111–121Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bühlmann AA (1984) Decompression–decompression sickness. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carturan D, Boussuges A, Burnet H, Fondarai J, Vanuxem P, Gardette B (1999) Circulating venous bubbles in recreational diving: relationships with age, weight, maximal oxygen uptake and body fat percentage. Int J Sports Med 20(6):410–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conkin J, Powell MR, Foster PP, Waligora JM (1998) Information about venous gas emboli improves prediction of hypobaric decompression sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 69(1):8–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Doolette DJ, Upton RN, Grant C (2005) Countercurrent compartmental models describe hind limb skeletal muscle helium kinetics at resting and low blood flows in sheep. Acta Physiol Scand 185(2):109–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dujic Z, Palada I, Valic Z, Duplancic D, Obad A, U UW, Brubakk AO (2006) Exogenous nitric oxide and bubble formation in divers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(8):1432–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eftedal O, Brubakk AO (1991) A method for detecting intravascular gas bubbles using 2d ultrasonic scanning and computer-based image processing. In: Michalodimitrakis E (ed) Proceedings of the XVII annual meeting EUBS. EUBS, Heraklion, Crete, pp. 311–316Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eftedal O, Brubakk AO (1997) Agreement between trained and untrained observers in grading intravascular bubble signals in ultrasonic images. Undersea Hyperb Med 24(4):293–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eftedal OS, Lydersen S, Brubakk AO (2007a) The relationship between venous gas bubbles and adverse effects of decompression after air dives. Undersea Hyperb Med 34(2):99–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eftedal OS, Tjelmeland H, Brubakk AO (2007b) Validation of decompression procedures based on detection of venous gas bubbles: a bayesian approach. Aviat Space Environ Med 78(2):94–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engel GL (1977) The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 196:129–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gernhardt ML (1991) Developement and evaluation of a decompression stress index based on tissue bubble dynamics. Ph.D. thesis, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gürmen NM (2001) Simulation of dynamic bubble spectra in tissues. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48(2):185–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gutvik CR, Brubakk AO (2009) Copernicus—a dynamic 2-phase model for vascular bubble formation during decompression of divers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(3):884–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gutvik CR, Møllerløkken A, Brubakk AO (2007) Difference in bubble formation using deep stops is depend on bottom time. Eur J Underw Hyperb Med 8(3):42Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hemingway R, Baker EC (1984) V-planner, V3.81.
  18. 18.
    Hofwegen K, Fjelsten P (2007) GAP-software, V2.3.
  19. 19.
    Holmström K (1999) The TOMLAB optimization environment in Matlab. Adv Model Optim 1(1):47–69Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hrncir E, Rosina J (1997) Surface tension of blood. Physiol Res 46(4):319–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kisman KE, Masurel G, LaGrue D (1978) Evaluation de la qualite d’une decompression basee sur la detection ultrasonore de bulles. Med Aéro Spat Med Sub Hyp XVII:293–97Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Langø T, Mørland T, Brubakk AO (1996) Diffusion coefficients and solubility coefficients for gases in biological fluids and tissues: a review. Undersea Hyperb Med 23(4):247–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lundin G (1960) Nitrogen elimination from the tissues during oxygen breathing and its relationship to the fat: muscle ratio and the localization of bends. J Physiol 152:167–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maton A, Hopkins J, McLaughlin CW, Johnson S, Warner MQ, LaHart D, Wright JD (1993) Human biology and health. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL (2000) Essentials of exercise physiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Naval Sea Systems Command (2007) U.S. navy diving manual, 5th edn. AquaPress Publishing, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nishi RY, Brubakk AO, Eftedal O (2003) Bubble detection. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS (eds) Bennett and Elliot‘s physiology and medicine of diving, 5th edn., Chap. 10.3. Saunders, London, pp 501–529Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sawatzky KD (1991) The relationship between intravascular doppler-detected gas bubbles and decompression sickness after bounce diving in humans. Master’s thesis, York University, Toronto, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spencer MP (1976) Decompression limits for compressed air determined by ultrasonically detected blood bubbles. J Appl Physiol 40(2):229–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tikuisis P, Ward CA, Venter RD (1983) Bubble evolution in a stirred volume of liquid closed to mass transport. J Appl Physiol 54:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weathersby PK, Survanshi SS, Nishi RY (1990) Relative decompression risk of dry and wet chamber air dives. Undersea Biomed Res 17(4):333–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yount DE, Hoffmann DC (1986) On the use of a bubble formation model to calculate diving tables. Aviat Space Environ Med 57:149–156PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian R. Gutvik
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard G. Dunford
    • 2
  • Zeljko Dujic
    • 3
  • Alf O. Brubakk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Circulation and Medical ImagingNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Divers Alert NetworkDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of Split School of MedicineSplitCroatia

Personalised recommendations