Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Towards the limit of quantifying low-amplitude strains on bone and in coagulum around immediately loaded oral implants in extraction sockets

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify strains in coagulum around immediately loaded oral implants in extraction sockets at the ex vivo level. Bilateral maxillary premolar teeth of two fresh human cadavers were extracted and Ø 4.1 ×12 mm Straumann TE® implants were placed in the sockets of first and second premolars by utilizing mesio-distal and palatal anchorage, respectively. Installation torque value (ITV) of each implant was measured by a custom-made torque wrench and resonance frequency analyses (RFAs) were undertaken to determine intraosseous stability. Upon abutment connection, a gold coping allowing the placement of a miniature load cell to contact the underlying solid abutment was fabricated. A linear strain gauge was connected to the coping at a distance for strain measurements in coagulum around the implant neck in the extraction socket. Linear strain gauges were also bonded on the labial marginal bone of each extraction socket. Strain measurements were performed at a sample rate of 10 kHz simultaneously monitored from a computer connected to data acquisition system and under a maximum load of 100 N on each implant with or without human coagulum in the extraction socket. Low-amplitude strains were measured around immediate implants. The increase in load increased strains on labial marginal cortical bone around implants (P<0.05). Bone strains were higher on the implant loaded, when coagulum was present in the bone defects (P<0.05). Strains within coagulum around mesiodistally anchored implants were higher than palatally anchored implants (P<0.05). The type of implant on anchorage and presence of coagulum has an impact mechanotransduction to buccal marginal bone around immediate implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akkocaoglu M, Uysal S, Tekdemir I, Akca K, Cehreli MC (2005) Implant design and intraosseous stability of immediately placed implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res 16:202–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asundi A, Kishen A (2000) A strain gauge and photoelastic analysis of in vivo strain and in vitro stress distribution in human dental supporting structures. Arch Oral Biol 45:543–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayukawa Y, Takeshita F, Inoue T, Yoshinara M, Shimono M, Suetsugu T, Tanaka T (1998) An immunoelectron microscopic localization of noncollagenous bone proteins (osteocalcin and osteopontin) at the bone implant interface of rat tibiae. J Biomed Mater Res 41:111–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, (2002) Immediate placement and implant loading for expedited patient care: a patient report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:587–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J (2003) De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:251–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bontheekul T, Mooney DJ (2004) Protein-based signaling systems in tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:559–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burghardt WR, Goldstick TK, Leneschmidt J, Kempka K (1995) Nonlinear viscoelasticity and the thrombelastograph: 1. Studies on bovine plasma clots. Biorheology 32:621–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carr Jr ME (2003) Development of platelet contractile force as a research and clinical measure of platelet function. Cell Biochem Biophys 38:55–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carter DR (1987) Mechanical history and skeletal biology. J Biomech 20:1095–1109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carter DR, Orr TE, Fyhrie DP, Schurman DJ (1987) Influences of mechanical stress on prenatal and postnatal skeletal development. Clin Orthop 238:237–250

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cehreli MC, Akkocaoglu M, Comert A, Tekdemir I, Akca K. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around natural teeth versus immediate oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res (in press)

  12. Cehreli MC, Akca K (2005) Mechanobiology of bone and mechanocoupling of endosseous titanium oral implants. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 15:139–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Claes LE, Heigele CA, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Kaspar D, Seidl W, Margevicius KJ, Augat P (1998) Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process. Clin Orthop 355S:S132–S147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark PA, Rodriguez A, Summer DR, Hussain MA, Mao JJ (2005) Modulation of bone ingrowth of rabbit femur titanium implants by in vivo axial micromechanical loading. J Appl Physiol 98:1922–1929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper LF, Rahman A, Moriarty J, Chaffee N, Sacco D (2002) Immediate mandibular rehabilitation with endosseous implants: simultaneous extraction, implant placement, and loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:517–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davies JE (2005) Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 67:932–949

    Google Scholar 

  17. Duncan RL, Turner CH (1995) Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcif Tissue Int 57:344–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Esposito M, Worthington HV, Thomsen P, Coulthard P (2004) Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003878

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frost HM (1990) Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff-s law: the bone modelling problem. Anat Rec 226:403–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gapski R, Wang HL, Mascarenhas P, Lang NP (2003) Critical review of immediate implant loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:515–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang HM, Pan L, Lee SY, Chiu CL, Fan KH, Ho KN (2000) Assesing the implant/bone interface by using natural frequency analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 90:285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang HM, Yeh CY, Lee SY, Wang MS, Pan LC, Chen CC (2001) Factors influencing the dynamic behaviour of human teeth. Med Biol Eng Comput 39:176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kakisis JD, Liapis CD, Sumpio BE (2004) Effects of cyclic strain on vascular cells. Endothelium 11:17–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kienapfel H, Sprey C, Wilke A, Griss P (1999) Implant fixation by bone ingrowth. J Arthroplasty 14:355–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meyer U, Joos U, Mythili J, Stamm T, Hohoff A, Fillies T, Stratmann U, Wiesmann HP (2004) Ultrastructural characterization of the implant/bone interface of immediately loaded dental implants. Biomaterials 25:1959–1967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P (1996) Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant–tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 7:261–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L (1997) Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 8:226–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Moses O, Gelernter I (2002) Healing of marginal defects at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets or after 4–6 weeks of healing. A comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:410–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nkenke E, Lehner B, Weinzierl K, Thams U, Neugebauer J, Steveling H, Radespiel- Troger M, Neukam FW (2003) Bone contact, growth, and density around immediately loaded implants in the mandible of mini pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:312–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Osborn JF, Newesely H (1980) Dynamic aspects of the implant bone interface. In: Heimke G (ed) Dental implants: materials and systems, Carl Hanser Verlag, München, pp 111–123

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rabkin BA, Szivek JA, Schonfeld JE, Halloran BP (2001) Long-term measurement of bone strain in vivo: the rat tibia. J Biomed Mater Res 58(B):277–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Riha P, Wang X, Liao R, Stoltz JF (1999) Elasticity and fracture strain of whole blood clots. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 21:45–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rubin C, Turner AS, Bain S, Mallinckrodt C, McLeod K (2001) Anabolism. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones. Nature 412:603–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, Pearcy MJ (2005) Mediation of biomaterial–cell interactions by absorbed proteins: a review. Tissue Eng 11:1–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Cavit Cehreli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cehreli, M.C., Comert, A., Akkocaoglu, M. et al. Towards the limit of quantifying low-amplitude strains on bone and in coagulum around immediately loaded oral implants in extraction sockets. Med Bio Eng Comput 44, 86–94 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-005-0010-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-005-0010-4

Keywords

Navigation