Frontiers of Education in China

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 233–260 | Cite as

The World-Class Multiversity: Global commonalities and national characteristics

Research Article

Abstract

World-Class Universities (WCUs) are nationally embedded comprehensive higher education institutions (HEIs) that are closely engaged in the global knowledge system. The article reviews the conditions of possibility and evolution of WCUs. Three interpretations are used to explain worldwide higher education: neoliberal theory, institutional theory, and critical political economy, which give greater recognition than the other theories to the role of the state and variations between states. World higher education is evolving under conditions of globalization, organizational modernization (the New Public Management), and in some countries, marketization. These larger conditions have become manifest in higher education in three widespread tendencies: massification, the WCU movement, and organizational expansion. The last includes the strengthening of the role of the large multi-disciplinary multi-purpose HEIs (“multiversities”), in the form of both research-intensive WCUs with significant global presence, and other HEIs. The role of binary sector and specialist HEIs has declined. Elite WCUs gain status and strategic advantage in both quantity and quality: through growth and the expansion of scope, and through selectivity and research concentration. The balance between quantity and quality is now resolved at larger average size and broader scope than before. The final section of the article reviews WCUs in China and considers whether they might constitute a distinctive university model.

Keywords

comparative education globalisation World-Class University university ranking research New Public Management massification China institutional theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). (2017). Shanghai Jiao Tong University Graduate School of Education. Retrieved May 25, 2017, from http://www.shanghairanking.com/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayly, C. A. (2004). The birth of the modern world 1780–1914: Global connections and comparisons. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In I. Berlin, Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. California Institute of Technology. (2016). Caltech at a glance. Retrieved May 25, 2017, from https://www.caltech.edu/content/caltech-glanceGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantwell, B., Marginson, S., & Smolentseva, A. (Eds.). (in press). High participation systems of higher education.Google Scholar
  6. Carnoy, M. (2014). The state and political theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carnoy, M., Froumin, I., Leshukov, O., & Marginson, S. (Eds.). (in press). Federalism in higher education: A comparative study.Google Scholar
  8. Carnoy, M., Loyalka, P., Dobryakova, M., Dossani, R., Froumin, I., Kuhns, K., Tilak, J. B., & Wang, R. (2013). University expansion in a changing global economy: Triumph of the BRICs? Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(2), 251–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1997.tb00161.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng, K.M., & Yang, R. (2016). A cultural value in crisis: Education as a public good in China. In O. Filippakou & G. Williams (Eds.), Higher education as a public good: Critical perspectives on theory, policy and practice (pp. 127–139). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Chirikov, I., Watanabe, S., & Postiglione, G. (in press). Rethinking the role of the state in global competition in higher education: The implementation of global excellence initiatives in China, Japan and Russia. Higher Education.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford, England: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  13. Cuncliffe, B. (2015). By steppe, desert, and ocean: The birth of Eurasia. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dearden, L. (2017, March). Creating competition in higher education: Economic myths and realities. Paper presented at Centre for Global Higher Education, London, England. Retrieved May 24, 2017, from http://www.researchcghe.org/perch/resources/lorrainedearden-1.pdfGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1927/2016). The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Drori, G., Meyer, J., & Hwang, H. (Eds.). (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford. England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds.). (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frankopan, P. (2015). The silk roads: A new history of the world. London, England: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  19. Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest, 16, 3–18.Google Scholar
  20. Goedegbuure, L., Kaiser, F., Maassen, P., Meek, L., van Vught, F., & de Weert, E. (Eds.). (2014). Higher education policy: An international comparative perspective. Oxford, England: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  21. Goedegebuure, L., & van Vught, F. (Eds.). (1994). Comparative policy studies in higher education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.Google Scholar
  22. Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2016, June). Global trends and their impact on Latin America: The role of the state and the private sector in the provision of higher education (Working Paper 4). Retrieved May 24, 2017, from http://www.researchcghe.org/perch/resources/publications/ wp4.pdfGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayhoe, R., Li, J., Lin, J., & Zha, Q. (Eds.). (2011). Portraits of 21st century Chinese universities: In the move to mass higher educations. Hong Kong, China: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnstone, B. (2010). Higher educational diversification in the United States. In Research Institute for Higher Education (RIHE) (Ed.), Diversifying higher education systems in the international and comparative perspectives (pp. 1–21). Hiroshima, Japan: RIHE.Google Scholar
  26. Kerr, C. (2001). The uses of the university (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. King, R., Marginson, S., & Naidoo, R. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of globalization and higher education. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kwiek, M. (2016). De-privatisation in higher education: A conceptual approach. Higher Education, 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0047-3Google Scholar
  29. Leiden University. (2016). CWTS Leiden ranking 2016: Moving beyond just ranking. Retrieved May 12, 2017, from http://www.leidenranking.com/Google Scholar
  30. Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-7649-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marginson, S. (2010). Space, mobility and synchrony in the knowledge economy. In S. Marginson, P. Murphy, & M. A. Peters, Global creation: Space, mobility and synchrony in the age of the knowledge economy (pp. 117–149). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  32. Marginson, S. (2013). Emerging higher education in the post-Confucian heritage zone. In D. Araya & P. Marber (Eds.), Higher education in the global age: Policy, practice and promise in emerging societies (pp. 89–112). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Marginson, S. (2014). University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 45–59. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marginson, S. (2016a). Higher education and the common good. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Marginson, S. (2016b). High-participation systems of higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 87(2), 243–270. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2016.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marginson, S. (2016c). The dream is over:The crisis of Clark Kerr’s California idea of higher education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marginson, S. (2016d). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–435. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0016-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marginson, S. (2017). Global trends in higher education financing: The United Kingdom. International Journal for Educational Development. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.008Google Scholar
  39. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 281–309. doi: 10.1023/A:1014699605875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McMahon, W. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mettler, S. (2014). Degrees of inequality: How the politics of higher education sabotaged the American dream. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  43. Mohrman, K., Ma, W. H., & Baker, D. (2008). The research university in transition: The emerging global mode. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 5–27. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Musselin, C. (2005). European academic labour markets in transition. Higher Education, 49(1), 135–154. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-2918-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Naidoo, R. (2004). Fields and institutional strategy: Bourdieu on the relationship between higher education, inequality and society. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 457–471. doi: 10.1080/0142569042000236952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Retrieved May 24, 2017, from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/Google Scholar
  47. Newman, J. H. (1852/1996). The idea of a university. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Ordorika, I. (2003). Power and politics in university governance: Organization and change at the Universidad NacionalAutonoma de Mexico. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2015). Education at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  50. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016). Perspectives on global development 2017: International migration in a shifting world. Retrieved May 24, 2017, from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/development/ perspectives-on-global-development-2017_persp_glob_dev-2017-en#page1Google Scholar
  51. Pinheiro, R. (in press). HPS and diversity: The case of Norway. In B. Cantwell, S. Marginson & A. Smolentseva (Eds.), High participation systems of higher education.Google Scholar
  52. Pinheiro, R., Charles, D., & Jones, G. A. (2015). Equity, institutional diversity and regional development: A cross-country comparison. Higher Education, 72(3), 307–322. doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9958-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Quacquarelli Symonds (QS). (2017). QS world university rankings. Retrieved May 16, 2017, from www.topuniversities.com/university-rankingsGoogle Scholar
  54. Robertson, S., Olds, K., Dale, R., & Dang, Q. A. (Eds.). (2016). Global regionalisms and higher education: Projects, processes, politics. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. (2005). The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920. doi: 10.1177/ 000312240507000602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shahjahan, R., & Kezar, A. (2013). Beyond the “national container”: Addressing methodological nationalism in higher education research. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, NJ: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Smolentseva, A. (2017). Universal higher education and positional advantage: Soviet legacies and neoliberal transformations in Russia. Higher Education, 73(2), 209–226. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0009-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Teichler, U. (2008). Diversification? Trends and explanations of the shape and size of higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 349–379. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9122-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trow, M. (1973). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Berkeley, CA: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.Google Scholar
  62. U-Multirank. (2017). U-Multirank 2017 edition. Retrieved May 16, 2017, from http://www.umultirank.org/#!/home?name=null&trackType=homeGoogle Scholar
  63. UNESCO. (2015). UNESCO science report 2015. Paris, France: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  64. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2017). Education. Retrieved May 24, 2017, from http://data.uis.unesco.org/Google Scholar
  65. University of Toronto. (2016). Quick facts. Retrieved May 25, 2017, from https://www.utoronto.ca/about-u-of-t/quick-factsGoogle Scholar
  66. Välimaa, J. (2011). The corporatization of national universities in Finland. In B. Pusser, K. Kempner, S. Marginson, & I. Ordorika (Eds.), Universities and the public sphere: Knowledge creation and state building in the era of globalization (pp. 101–119). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Välimaa, J., & Nokkala, T. (2014). The dimensions of “social dynamics” in comparative studies on higher education. Higher Education, 67(4), 423–437. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9684-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. van Vught, F. (2008). Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 151–174. doi: 10.1057/hep.2008.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wimmer, A., & Schiller, M. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334. doi: 10.1111/1471-0374.00043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. World university rankings. (2016). Times Higher Education. Retrieved May 16, 2017, from www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankingsGoogle Scholar
  71. Yang, R. (2014). China’s strategy for the internationalisation of education: An overview. Frontiers of Education in China, 9(2), 151–162. doi: 10.3868/s110-003-014-0014-xGoogle Scholar
  72. Zha, Q. (2011). Is there an emerging Chinese model of the university? In R. Hayhoe, J. Li, J. Lin, & Q. Zha (Eds), Portraits of 21st century Chinese universities: In the move to mass higher education (pp. 451–471). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations