Criticality, adaptability and early-warning signals in time series in a discrete quasispecies model
Complex systems from different fields of knowledge often do not allow a mathematical description or modeling, because of their intricate structure composed of numerous interacting components. As an alternative approach, it is possible to study the way in which observables associated with the system fluctuate in time. These time series may provide valuable information about the underlying dynamics. It has been suggested that complex dynamic systems, ranging from ecosystems to financial markets and the climate, produce generic early-warning signals at the “tipping points,” where they announce a sudden shift toward a different dynamical regime, such as a population extinction, a systemic market crash, or abrupt shifts in the weather. On the other hand, the framework of Self-Organized Criticality (SOC), suggests that some complex systems, such as life itself, may spontaneously converge toward a critical point. As a particular example, the quasispecies model suggests that RNA viruses self-organize their mutation rate near the error-catastrophe threshold, where robustness and evolvability are balanced in such a way that survival is optimized. In this paper, we study the time series associated to a classical discrete quasispecies model for different mutation rates, and identify early-warning signals for critical mutation rates near the error-catastrophe threshold, such as irregularities in the kurtosis and a significant increase in the autocorrelation range, reminiscent of 1/f noise. In the present context, we find that the early-warning signals, rather than broadcasting the collapse of the system, are the fingerprint of survival optimization.
Keywordstime series complexity early-warning signals quasispecies 1/f noise optimization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bak P (1996). How Nature works: the science of self-organized criticality. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R, Cavagna A, Cisbani E, Giardina I, Lecomte V, Orlandi A, Parisi G, Procaccini A, Viale M, Zdravkovic V (2008). Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105(4): 1232–1237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bull J J, Meyers L A, Lachmann M (2005), Quasispecies made simple. Plos Comput Biol, 1:e61 (0450–0460).Google Scholar
- Doane D P, Seward L E (2011). Measuring skewness: A forgotten statistic? J Stat Educ, 19: 1–18Google Scholar
- Fossion R, Landa E, Stránský P, Velázquez V, López Vieyra J C, Garduño, García D, Frank A (2010). Scale invariance as a symmetry in physical and biological systems: Listening to photons, bubbles and heartbeats. In: Benet L, Hess P O, Torres J M, Wolf K B, editors, Symmetries in Nature: Symposium in Memoriam Marcos Moshinsky (Cuernavaca, Mexico, 7–14 august), New York: AIP Conf. Proc., volume 1323: 74–90Google Scholar
- Kauffman S (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Miramontes O (1995). Order-disorder transitions in the behavior of ant societies. Complexity, 1: 50–60Google Scholar
- Solé R V, Miramontes O, Goodwin B C (1993b) Emergent behaviour in insect societies: Global oscillations, chaos and computation. In: Haken H, Mikhailov A, editors, Interdisciplinary Approaches To Nonlinear Complex Systems, Springer Series in Synergetics. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, volume 62:pp, 77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wakeley J (2006). Coalescent theory: An introduction. Greenwood Village, Colorado: Roberts & CoGoogle Scholar
- Williams G P (1997). Chaos theory tamed. Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry PressGoogle Scholar