Abstract
Environmental sustainability can positively affect quality of life by reducing environmental degradation and increasing access to natural resources, while economic sustainability initiatives can have both positive and negative impacts on quality of life, depending on the context. Social sustainability initiatives can also have both positive and negative impacts on quality of life, particularly for marginalized communities and low-income populations. The investigation draws on a comprehensive national survey in Spain encompassing 2,270 responses, ensuring representative profiles in terms of gender, residence, income, age, and economic sector. Considering the aforementioned factors, this research aims to underscore the necessity of recognizing the interconnections between sustainability and quality of life in policy and decision-making processes towards social happiness. To achieve this, an analysis of variance is presented, enabling the examination of significant differences in the sociodemographic characteristics of Spanish citizens across the three dimensions defining sustainability. Specifically, income, age and population size are key in determining the relationship between sustainability and social happiness. Furthermore, an econometric analysis has demonstrated a positive relationship between sustainability and quality of life in Spain. The key factors are safety, trust, income, and accessibility. The findings of this study can provide valuable insights to inform policy decisions aimed at promoting sustainability and enhancing the overall quality of life. The interlinked integration of smart cities and smart rural areas constitutes the quality of life zone that influences sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data will be available upon request.
References
Baum, S., Arthurson, K., & Rickson, K. (2010). Happy people in mixed-up places: The association between the degree and type of local socioeconomic mix and expressions of neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban Studies, 47(3), 467–485.
Castro-Santos, L., Garcia, G. P., Simões, T., & Estanqueiro, A. (2019). Planning of the installation of offshore renewable energies: A GIS approach of the Portuguese roadmap. Renewable Energy, 132, 1251–1262.
Chen, C. W. (2022). From smart cities to a happy and sustainable society: Urban happiness as a critical pathway toward sustainability transitions. Local Environment, 27(12), 1536–1545.
Chen, C. W. (2023). Can smart cities bring happiness to promote sustainable development? Contexts and clues of subjective well-being and urban livability. Developments in the Built Environment, 13,
Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.
Durán-Sánchez, A., de la Cruz del Río-Rama, M., Sereno-Ramírez, A., & Bredis, K. (2017). Sustainability and Quality of Life in Smart Cities: Analysis of Scientific Production. In M. Peris-Ortiz, D. Bennett, & D. Pérez-Bustamante Yábar (Eds.), Sustainable Smart Cities. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management (pp. 159–181). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40895-8_12
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.
Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497–527.
Douglas, O., Russell, P., & Scott, M. (2019). Positive perceptions of green and open space as predictors of neighbourhood quality of life: Implications for urban planning across the city region. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(4), 626–646.
Florida, R., Mellander, C., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2013). The happiness of cities. Regional Studies, 47, 613–627.
Gill, A. S., & Germann, S. (2022). Conceptual and normative approaches to AI governance for a global digital ecosystem supportive of the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs). AI and Ethics, 2(2), 293–301.
Grum, B., & Kobal Grum, D. (2020). Concepts of social sustainability based on social infrastructure and quality of life. Facilities, 38(11/12), 783–800.
Hartley, K. (2023). Public perceptions about smart cities: Governance and quality-of-life in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 166(3), 731–753.
Jeswani, H. K., & Azapagic, A. (2020). Environmental impacts of healthcare and pharmaceutical products: Influence of product design and consumer behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253,
Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2019). Positive associations of optimism–pessimism orientation with pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study on quality of life and everyday behavior. Quality of Life Research, 28, 3323–3332.
Karlsson, R., & Luttropp, C. (2006). EcoDesign: What’s happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15–16), 1291–1298.
El-Aswad, E. (2019). The Quality of Life and Policy Issues among the Middle East and North African Countries. Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, USA: Springer Publishers.
Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Toger, M. (2023). Sustainable Cities, Quality of Life, and Mobility-Related Happiness. In E. Vaz (Ed.), Geography of Happiness. Contributions to Regional Science (pp. 103–120). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19871-7_6
Kundu, S., Kundu, R., & Chettri, K. B. (2024). Asymmetric effects of democracy and macroeconomic factors on happiness under high and low per capita incomes: A threshold panel analysis. Ecological Economics, 216,
Lopez-Ruiz, V. R., Alfaro-Navarro, J. L., & Nevado-Pena, D. (2019). An intellectual capital approach to citizens’ quality of life in sustainable cities: A focus on Europe. Sustainability, 11(21), 6025.
Lopez-Ruiz, V. R., Alfaro-Navarro, J. L., Huete-Alcocer, N., & Nevado-Pena, D. (2022). Psychological and social vulnerability in spaniards’ quality of life in the Face of COVID-19: Age and gender results. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 10269.
Macke, J., Casagrande, R. M., Sarate, J. A. R., & Silva, K. A. (2018). Smart city and quality of life: Citizens’ perception in a Brazilian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 717–726.
McCracken, M., & Meyer, C. (2018). Monitoring of transboundary water cooperation: Review of sustainable development goal Indicator 6.5. 2 methodology. Journal of Hydrology, 563, 1–12.
Mirzaei, S., & Zangiabadi, A. (2021). Studying and complying dimensions, indicators and variables related to a happy city. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 9(2), 94–111.
Moghnie, L., & Kazarian, S. S. (2011). Subjective happiness of Lebanese college youth in Lebanon: Factorial structure and invariance of the arabic subjective happiness scale. Social Indicators Research, 109, 203–210.
Moldan, B., Janoušková, S., & Hák, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4–13.
Moser, G. (2009). Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person–environment congruity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 351–357.
Nevado-Peña, D., López-Ruiz, V. R., & Alfaro-Navarro, J. L. (2019). Improving quality of life perception with ICT use and technological capacity in Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119734.
Okafor-Yarwood, I. (2019). Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and the complexities of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) for countries in the Gulf of Guinea. Marine Policy, 99, 414–422.
Pitarch-Garrido, M. D. (2018). Social sustainability in metropolitan areas: Accessibility and equity in the case of the metropolitan area of Valencia (Spain). Sustainability, 10(2), 371.
Pollesch, N. L., & Dale, V. H. (2016). Normalization in sustainability assessment: Methods and implications. Ecological Economics, 130, 195–208.
Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2012). Sustainable cities: Do political factors determine the quality of life? Journal of Cleaner Production, 21(1), 34–44.
Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M., Anastasi, C., Greeuw, S., Mellors, J., Peters, S., ..., Rijkens, N. (2000). Visions for a sustainable Europe. Futures, 32(9–10), 809–831.
Schäfer, M., Nölting, B., & Illge, L. (2004). Bringing Together the Concepts of Quality of Life and Sustainability. In W. Glatzer, S. Von Below, & M. Stoffregen (Eds.), Quality of Life in the Contemporary World. Social Indicators Research Series (Vol. 24, pp. 33–43). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2903-5_3
Schröder, P., Bengtsson, M., Cohen, M., Dewick, P., Hofstetter, J., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Degrowth within–aligning circular economy and strong sustainability narratives. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 146, 190–191.
Smith, M. H. (2013). The natural advantage of nations: Business opportunities, innovations and governance in the 21st century. Earthscan.
Steg, L., & Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59–69.
Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
Stigsdotter, U. K., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Toftager, M., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., & Randrup, T. B. (2010). Health promoting outdoor environments-associations between green space, and health, health-related quality of life and stress based on a Danish national representative survey. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(4), 411–417.
Terrapon-Pfaff, J., Dienst, C., König, J., & Ortiz, W. (2014). A cross-sectional review: Impacts and sustainability of small-scale renewable energy projects in developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 1–10.
Uzzell, D., & Moser, G. (2006). Environment and quality of life. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56(1), 1–4.
Vaz, E. (2023). A Spatial Analysis of the Instagram Hashtag #happy: An Assessment of Toronto. In E. Vaz (Ed.), Geography of Happiness. Contributions to Regional Science (pp. 11–32). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19871-7_2
Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311–330.
Welsch, H. (2006). Environment and happiness: Valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecological Economics, 58(4), 801–813.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our common future, 17(1), 1–91.
Xie, H., Wen, J., & Choi, Y. (2021). How the SDGs are implemented in China——A comparative study based on the perspective of policy instruments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125937.
Funding
This paper has partially been funded by the UNIVERSIDAD DE CASTILLA-LA MANCHA, INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL GROUP (grant number 2022-GRIN-34240) and the Chair of Gender Equality and Diversity “Clara Campoamor”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Huete-Alcocer, N., López-Ruiz, V.R., Alfaro-Navarro, J.L. et al. The Role of Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Sustainability in the Quality of Life in Spain. Applied Research Quality Life (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-024-10317-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-024-10317-w