Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Sustainability in the Quality of Life in Spain

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental sustainability can positively affect quality of life by reducing environmental degradation and increasing access to natural resources, while economic sustainability initiatives can have both positive and negative impacts on quality of life, depending on the context. Social sustainability initiatives can also have both positive and negative impacts on quality of life, particularly for marginalized communities and low-income populations. The investigation draws on a comprehensive national survey in Spain encompassing 2,270 responses, ensuring representative profiles in terms of gender, residence, income, age, and economic sector. Considering the aforementioned factors, this research aims to underscore the necessity of recognizing the interconnections between sustainability and quality of life in policy and decision-making processes towards social happiness. To achieve this, an analysis of variance is presented, enabling the examination of significant differences in the sociodemographic characteristics of Spanish citizens across the three dimensions defining sustainability. Specifically, income, age and population size are key in determining the relationship between sustainability and social happiness. Furthermore, an econometric analysis has demonstrated a positive relationship between sustainability and quality of life in Spain. The key factors are safety, trust, income, and accessibility. The findings of this study can provide valuable insights to inform policy decisions aimed at promoting sustainability and enhancing the overall quality of life. The interlinked integration of smart cities and smart rural areas constitutes the quality of life zone that influences sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data will be available upon request.

References

  • Baum, S., Arthurson, K., & Rickson, K. (2010). Happy people in mixed-up places: The association between the degree and type of local socioeconomic mix and expressions of neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban Studies, 47(3), 467–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro-Santos, L., Garcia, G. P., Simões, T., & Estanqueiro, A. (2019). Planning of the installation of offshore renewable energies: A GIS approach of the Portuguese roadmap. Renewable Energy, 132, 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. W. (2022). From smart cities to a happy and sustainable society: Urban happiness as a critical pathway toward sustainability transitions. Local Environment, 27(12), 1536–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. W. (2023). Can smart cities bring happiness to promote sustainable development? Contexts and clues of subjective well-being and urban livability. Developments in the Built Environment, 13,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durán-Sánchez, A., de la Cruz del Río-Rama, M., Sereno-Ramírez, A., & Bredis, K. (2017). Sustainability and Quality of Life in Smart Cities: Analysis of Scientific Production. In M. Peris-Ortiz, D. Bennett, & D. Pérez-Bustamante Yábar (Eds.), Sustainable Smart Cities. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management (pp. 159–181). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40895-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, O., Russell, P., & Scott, M. (2019). Positive perceptions of green and open space as predictors of neighbourhood quality of life: Implications for urban planning across the city region. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(4), 626–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., Mellander, C., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2013). The happiness of cities. Regional Studies, 47, 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. S., & Germann, S. (2022). Conceptual and normative approaches to AI governance for a global digital ecosystem supportive of the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs). AI and Ethics, 2(2), 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grum, B., & Kobal Grum, D. (2020). Concepts of social sustainability based on social infrastructure and quality of life. Facilities, 38(11/12), 783–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, K. (2023). Public perceptions about smart cities: Governance and quality-of-life in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 166(3), 731–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeswani, H. K., & Azapagic, A. (2020). Environmental impacts of healthcare and pharmaceutical products: Influence of product design and consumer behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2019). Positive associations of optimism–pessimism orientation with pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study on quality of life and everyday behavior. Quality of Life Research, 28, 3323–3332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, R., & Luttropp, C. (2006). EcoDesign: What’s happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15–16), 1291–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Aswad, E. (2019). The Quality of Life and Policy Issues among the Middle East and North African Countries. Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, USA: Springer Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Toger, M. (2023). Sustainable Cities, Quality of Life, and Mobility-Related Happiness. In E. Vaz (Ed.), Geography of Happiness. Contributions to Regional Science (pp. 103–120). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19871-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, S., Kundu, R., & Chettri, K. B. (2024). Asymmetric effects of democracy and macroeconomic factors on happiness under high and low per capita incomes: A threshold panel analysis. Ecological Economics, 216,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Ruiz, V. R., Alfaro-Navarro, J. L., & Nevado-Pena, D. (2019). An intellectual capital approach to citizens’ quality of life in sustainable cities: A focus on Europe. Sustainability, 11(21), 6025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Ruiz, V. R., Alfaro-Navarro, J. L., Huete-Alcocer, N., & Nevado-Pena, D. (2022). Psychological and social vulnerability in spaniards’ quality of life in the Face of COVID-19: Age and gender results. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 10269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macke, J., Casagrande, R. M., Sarate, J. A. R., & Silva, K. A. (2018). Smart city and quality of life: Citizens’ perception in a Brazilian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, M., & Meyer, C. (2018). Monitoring of transboundary water cooperation: Review of sustainable development goal Indicator 6.5. 2 methodology. Journal of Hydrology, 563, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei, S., & Zangiabadi, A. (2021). Studying and complying dimensions, indicators and variables related to a happy city. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 9(2), 94–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghnie, L., & Kazarian, S. S. (2011). Subjective happiness of Lebanese college youth in Lebanon: Factorial structure and invariance of the arabic subjective happiness scale. Social Indicators Research, 109, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldan, B., Janoušková, S., & Hák, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, G. (2009). Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person–environment congruity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevado-Peña, D., López-Ruiz, V. R., & Alfaro-Navarro, J. L. (2019). Improving quality of life perception with ICT use and technological capacity in Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okafor-Yarwood, I. (2019). Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and the complexities of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) for countries in the Gulf of Guinea. Marine Policy, 99, 414–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitarch-Garrido, M. D. (2018). Social sustainability in metropolitan areas: Accessibility and equity in the case of the metropolitan area of Valencia (Spain). Sustainability, 10(2), 371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollesch, N. L., & Dale, V. H. (2016). Normalization in sustainability assessment: Methods and implications. Ecological Economics, 130, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2012). Sustainable cities: Do political factors determine the quality of life? Journal of Cleaner Production, 21(1), 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M., Anastasi, C., Greeuw, S., Mellors, J., Peters, S., ..., Rijkens, N. (2000). Visions for a sustainable Europe. Futures, 32(9–10), 809–831.

  • Schäfer, M., Nölting, B., & Illge, L. (2004). Bringing Together the Concepts of Quality of Life and Sustainability. In W. Glatzer, S. Von Below, & M. Stoffregen (Eds.), Quality of Life in the Contemporary World. Social Indicators Research Series (Vol. 24, pp. 33–43). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2903-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, P., Bengtsson, M., Cohen, M., Dewick, P., Hofstetter, J., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Degrowth within–aligning circular economy and strong sustainability narratives. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 146, 190–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. H. (2013). The natural advantage of nations: Business opportunities, innovations and governance in the 21st century. Earthscan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigsdotter, U. K., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Toftager, M., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., & Randrup, T. B. (2010). Health promoting outdoor environments-associations between green space, and health, health-related quality of life and stress based on a Danish national representative survey. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(4), 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrapon-Pfaff, J., Dienst, C., König, J., & Ortiz, W. (2014). A cross-sectional review: Impacts and sustainability of small-scale renewable energy projects in developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzell, D., & Moser, G. (2006). Environment and quality of life. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaz, E. (2023). A Spatial Analysis of the Instagram Hashtag #happy: An Assessment of Toronto. In E. Vaz (Ed.), Geography of Happiness. Contributions to Regional Science (pp. 11–32). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19871-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, H. (2006). Environment and happiness: Valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecological Economics, 58(4), 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our common future, 17(1), 1–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, H., Wen, J., & Choi, Y. (2021). How the SDGs are implemented in China——A comparative study based on the perspective of policy instruments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This paper has partially been funded by the UNIVERSIDAD DE CASTILLA-LA MANCHA, INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL GROUP (grant number 2022-GRIN-34240) and the Chair of Gender Equality and Diversity “Clara Campoamor”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuria Huete-Alcocer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huete-Alcocer, N., López-Ruiz, V.R., Alfaro-Navarro, J.L. et al. The Role of Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Sustainability in the Quality of Life in Spain. Applied Research Quality Life (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-024-10317-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-024-10317-w

Keywords

Navigation