Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Family, Collectivism, and Loneliness from a Cross-Country Perspective

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research shows that marriage and family support are associated with less loneliness, but evidence is largely from developed countries in the West. We focus on the association between country-level collectivism and loneliness, and whether collectivism moderates the well-known effects of marriage and family on loneliness. Our analysis of data from 29 countries in the International Social Survey Programme’s 2017 Social Networks and Social Resources module shows that individuals who live in a more collectivist country are less likely to report feeling lonely. Our analysis further suggests that the negative association between marriage and loneliness is attenuated for those living in more collectivistic countries, especially among men. We also find a negative association of expectation of emotional support from family in times of need with loneliness, and this relationship is weaker for residents of more collectivistic countries. We discuss implications of our findings for future research on loneliness across diverse societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39, 1490–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. (1999). Comparing Logit and Probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods and Research, 28, 186–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. A. (1999). Attributional style, depression, and loneliness: A cross-cultural comparison of American and Chinese students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 482–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonucci, T. C. (1994). A life-span view of women’s social relations. In B. F. Turner & L. Troll (Eds.), Women Growing older: Psychological Perspectives (pp. 239–269). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, M., Victor, C., Hammond, C., Eccles, A., Richins, M. T., & Qualter, P. (2021). Loneliness around the world: Age, gender, and cultural differences in loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H., & Lee, R. P. L. (1995). Hong Kong families: At the crossroads of modernism and traditionalism. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 26, 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2007). Emotion regulation and aging. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation (pp. 307–327). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. (2014). First union patterns around the world: Introduction to the special issue. Population Research and Policy Review, 33, 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59, 676–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corona, K., Campos, B., & Chen, C. (2017). Familism Is associated with psychological well-being and physical health: Main effects and stress-buffering effects. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 39, 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. M., & Barry, J. E. (1999). Conceptualizations and measures of loneliness: A comparison of subscales. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, L., & McKee, K. J. (2014). Correlates of social and emotional loneliness in older people: Evidence from an English community study. Aging & Mental Health, 18, 504–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, K. (2004). “Why can’t a man be more like a woman?”: Marital status and social networking of older men. Journal of Men’s Studies, 13, 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong Gierveld, J., & Dykstra, P. A. (2008). Virtue is its own reward? Support-giving in the family and loneliness in middle and old age. Ageing & Society, 28, 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong Gierveld, J., & Tesch-Römer, C. (2012). Loneliness in old age in Eastern and Western European societies: Theoretical perspectives. European Journal of Aging, 9, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong Gierveld, J., van Groenou, M. B., Hoogendoorn, A. W., & Smit, J. H. (2009). Quality of marriages in later life and emotional and social loneliness. Journal of Gerontology, 64B, 497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong Gierveld, J., Keating, N., & Fast, J. E. (2014). Determinants of loneliness among older adults in Canada. Canadian Journal on Aging, 34, 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, K. (2002). Who gets the best deal from marriage: Women or men? Journal of Sociology, 38, 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiTommaso, E., & Spinner, B. (1997). Social and emotional loneliness a reexamination of Weiss| typology of loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, P. A., & de Jong Gierveld, J. (2004). Gender and marital history differences in emotional and social loneliness among Dutch older adults. Canadian Journal on Aging, 23, 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, P. A., & Fokkema, T. (2007). Social and emotional loneliness among divorced and married men and women: Comparing the deficit and cognitive perspectives. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fokkema, T., de Jong Gierveld, J., & Dykstra, P. A. (2012). Cross-national differences in older adult loneliness. The Journal of Psychology, 146, 201–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstel, N., & Sarkisian, N. (2006). Marriage: The good, the bad, and the greedy. Contexts, 5, 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia, V. V., & Ros, M. (2000). Hofstede and Schwartz’s models for classifying individualism at the cultural level: their relation to macro-social and macro-economic variables. Psicothema, 12(Supl.), 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. R., Richardson, D. S., Lago, T., & Schatten-Jones, E. C. (2001). Network correlates of social and emotional loneliness in young and older adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T., Slagsvold, B., & Moum (2009). Childlessness and psychological well-being in midlife and old age: An examination of parental status effects across a range of outcomes. Social Indicators Research, 94, 343-362.

  • Hashimoto, A., & Ikels, C. (2005). Filial piety in changing Asian societies. In M. L. Johnson, V. L. Bengtson, P. G. Coleman, & T. B. L. Kirkwood (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing (pp. 437–442). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkley, L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). Aging and loneliness: Downhill quickly? CurrentDirections in Psychological Science, 16, 187–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkley, L. C., Thisted, R. A., Masi, C. M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness predicts increased blood pressure: 5-year cross-lagged analyses in middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25, 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heu, L. C., van Zomeren, M., & Hansen, N. (2019). Lonely alone or lonely together? A cultural-psychological examination of individualism–collectivism and loneliness in five European countries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 780–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heylen, L. (2010). The older, the lonelier? Risk factors for social loneliness in old age. Aging & Society, 30, 1177–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. (1961). Social Behavior. Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research in Aging, 26, 655–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imamoglu, E. O., Küller, R., Imamoglu, V., & Küller, M. (1993). The social psychological worlds of Swedes and Turks in and around retirement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joye, D., Sapin, M., & Wolf, C. (2019). Measuring social networks and social resources: An exploratory ISSP Survey around the World. (GESIS-Schriftenreihe, 22). Köln: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.62256.

  • Jylhä, M. (2004). Old age and loneliness: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses in the Tampere longitudinal study on aging. Canadian Journal on Aging, 23, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. S. (2009). Multilevel analysis: An overview and some contemporary issues. In R. E. Millsap & O. A. Maydeu (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology (pp. 337–361). SAGE.

  • Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, S. R., & Yodanis, C. (2011). Individualized marriage and the integration of resources. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 669–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R., Sato, S., & Verma, J. (1995). Love and marriage in eleven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykes, V. A., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2014). What predicts loneliness? Cultural difference between individualistic and collectivistic societies in Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 468–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monin, J. K., & Clark, M. S. (2011). Why do men benefit more from marriage than do women? Thinking more broadly about interpersonal processes that occur within and outside of marriage. Sex Roles, 65, 320–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penning, M. J., Liu, G., & Chou, P. H. B. (2014). Measuring loneliness among middle-aged and older adults: The UCLA and de Jong Gierveld loneliness scales. Social Indicators Research, 118, 1147–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, D. (2004). European and Canadian studies of loneliness among seniors. Canadian Journal on Aging, 23, 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships 3: Personal relationships in disorder (pp. 31–43). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinquart, M. (2003). Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced, and never-married older adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokach, A. (2007). The effect of age and culture on the causes of loneliness. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokach, A. (2008). Coping with loneliness in North America and Spain. Psychology Journal, 5, 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokach, A., & Neto, F. (2005). Age, culture, and the antecedents of loneliness. Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokach, A., Orzeck, T., Moya, M. C., & Exposito, F. (2002). Causes of loneliness in North America and Spain. European Psychologist, 7, 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. (2017). Loneliness might be a killer, but what’s the best way to protect against it? The Journal of the American Medical Association, 318, 1853–1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N., & Sermat, V. (1983). Measuring loneliness in different relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1038–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. J., Weisskirch, R. S., Hurley, E. A., Zamboanga, B. L., Park, I. J. K., Kim, S. Y., Umaña-Taylor, A., Castillo, L. G., Brown, E., & Greene, D. (2010). Communalism, familism, and filial piety: Are they birds of a collectivist feather? Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, A., McMunn, A., Banks, J., & Steptoe, A. (2011). Loneliness, social isolation, and behavioral and biological health indicators in older adults. Health Psychology, 30, 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C., & Shipman, B. (2004). Visions in monochrome: Families, marriage and the individualization thesis. The British Journal of Sociology, 55, 491–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. J., & Victor, C. (2019). Typologies of loneliness, living alone and social isolation, and their associations with physical and mental health. Ageing & Society, 39, 1709–1730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. (1998). Marriage, family and loneliness: A cross-national study. Sociological Perspectives, 41, 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström, G., Fransson, E., Malmberg, B., & Davey, A. (2009). Loneliness among older Europeans. European Journal of Ageing, 6, 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swader, C. S. (2019). Loneliness in Europe: Personal and societal individualism-collectivism and their connection to social isolation. Social Forces, 97, 1307–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2019). Human Development Report 2019. United Nations Development Programme.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Tilburg, T. G., & Fokkema, T. (2020). Stronger feelings of loneliness among Moroccan and Turkish older adults in the Netherlands: In search for an explanation. European Journal of Aging. Online first https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00562-x.

  • Victor, C. R., Scambler, S. J., Bowling, A., & Bond, J. (2005). The prevalence of, and risk factors for, loneliness in later life: A survey of older people in Great Britain. Ageing & Society, 25, 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vozikaki, M., Papadaki, A., Linardakis, M., & Philalithis, A. (2018). Loneliness among older European adults: Results from the survey of health, aging and retirement in Europe. Journal of Public Health, 26, 613–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2009). Using heterogeneous choice models to compare logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods and Research, 37, 531–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. R., & Brown, S. L. (2017). Psychological well-being among older adults: The role of partnership status. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 833–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap, S. C. Y., Anusic, I., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Evidence from the British Household Panel Study. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 477–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA

    Hiromi Taniguchi

  2. Department of Sociology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, 28035, USA

    Gayle Kaufman

Authors
  1. Hiromi Taniguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gayle Kaufman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiromi Taniguchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Countries included in the analysis
Full size table
Table 5 Pearson correlations for men (above diagonal/shaded) and women (below diagonal)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taniguchi, H., Kaufman, G. Family, Collectivism, and Loneliness from a Cross-Country Perspective. Applied Research Quality Life 17, 1555–1581 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-09978-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-09978-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation