Abstract
With a view initiated by the positive psychology movement that research emphases should be directed to examining human positives and well-being rather than psychopathology and dysfunctioning, this study explored the growth mindset as a character strength affecting the well-being of adolescents. Specifically, this study investigated the domain-specificity of growth mindsets, with a focus on exploring the beneficial effects of different growth mindsets on adolescents’ positive psychological well-being, taking into consideration gender and age group differences. A sample of Hong Kong adolescents (N = 856) completed the Growth Mindset Rating Form that assesses respondents’ growth mindsets in the domains of intelligence, ability, personality and relationship, and the Chinese version of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale. Results from model-comparison using Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated that a four-factor model provided the best fit to the mindset data, supporting the domain-specificity of growth mindsets. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses results suggested that the four growth mindsets had differentiated effects on six dimensions of psychological well-being over and above the effects of gender and age group. Such domain-specific effects of growth mindsets on psychological well-being dimensions could be interpreted as largely applicable to boys and girls, and to younger and older age groups, based on regressions conducted with separate groups. These separate group analyses also identified some notable group differences for growth mindsets of ability and relationships. Implications for promoting the cultivation of different growth mindsets as character strengths for adolescent positive functioning are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Available.
References
Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x.
Bruner, J. S., & Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. In G. Lindsey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Burnette, J. L., Pollack, J. M., & Hoyt, C. L. (2010). Individual differences in implicit theories of leadership ability and self-efficacy: Predicting responses to stereotype threat. Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(4), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20138.
Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029531.
Chan, D. W. (2009). Lay conceptions of giftedness among the Chinese people. In T. Balchin, B. Hymer, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to gifted education (pp. 115–121). London: Routledge.
Chan, D. W., Chan, L. K., & Sun, X. (2019). Developing a brief version of Ryff’s scale to assess the psychological well-being of adolescents in Hong Kong. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(3), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000403.
Cheng, Z. J., & Hau, K. T. (2003). Are intelligence and personality changeable? Generality of Chinese students’ beliefs across various personal attributes and age groups. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00030-2.
Chiu, C. Y., Hong, Y. Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997a). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19–30. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Tong, J. Y. Y., & Fu, J. H. Y. (1997b). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 923–940.
Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608207113.
Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis/Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Dweck, C. S. (2011). Implicit theories. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 43–61). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1.
Franiuk, R., Cohen, D., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2002). Implicit theories of relationships: Implications for relationship satisfaction and longevity. Personal Relationships, 9(4), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.09401.
Hau, K. T., & Salili, F. (1996). Prediction of academic performance among Chinese students: Effort can compensate for lack of ability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0008.
Heger, I. (2016). The meaning and functions of the concept of Yuanfen 缘分 in contemporary China: A qualitative study with Students from East China Normal University. Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies, 7(1), 129–163. https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-19940.
Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1995). Implicit theories of intelligence. In Efficacy, Agency, and Self-esteem (pp. 197–216). Springer, Boston.
Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588–599. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588.
Howell, A. J. (2016). Implicit theories of personal and social attributes: Fundamental mindsets for a science of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(3), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i3.529.
Hsu, H. P., & Hwang, K. K. (2016). Serendipity in relationship: A tentative theory of the cognitive process of Yuanfen and its psychological constructs in Chinese cultural societies. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00282.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
Knox, M., Funk, J., Elliott, R., & Bush, E. G. (2000). Gender differences in adolescents’ possible selves. Youth & Society, 31(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X00031003002.
Kwan, Y. K. (2010). Life satisfaction and self-assessed health among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(3), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9146-5.
Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl013.
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Negative item bias in ratings scales for preadolescent children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 37–49. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0012-1649.22.1.37.
Martin, A. J. (2015). Implicit theories about intelligence and growth (personal best) goals: Exploring reciprocal relationships. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12038.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). Defensiveness versus remediation: Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(5), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312960.
Ommundsen, Y. (2003). Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies in physical education classes. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303224.
Ommundsen, Y., Haugen, R., & Lund, T. (2005). Academic self-concept, implicit theories of ability, and self-regulation strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500267838.
Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748.
Plaks, J. E. (2017). Implicit theories: Assumptions that shape social and moral cognition. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 259–310). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.003.
Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1(4), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860290106805.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.
Schroder, H. S., Dawood, S., Yalch, M. M., Donnellan, M. B., & Moser, J. S. (2015). The role of implicit theories in mental health symptoms, emotion regulation, and hypothetical treatment choices in college students. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(2), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9652-6.
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.
Shi, J. (2004). Diligence makes people smart. In R. L. Sternberg (Ed.), International handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tamir, M., John, O. P., Srivastava, S., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Implicit theories of emotion: Affective and social outcomes across a major life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 731–744. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.731.
Tarrant, M. (2002). Adolescent peer groups and social identity. Social Development, 11(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00189.
Waters, L. (2011). A review of school-based positive psychology interventions. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 28(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1375/aedp.28.2.75.
Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., ... & Trott, J. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374–391. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000098.
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., ... & Paunesku, D. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y.
Yu, L., & Shek, D. T. L. (2018). Testing longitudinal relationships between internet addiction and well-being in Hong Kong adolescents: Cross-lagged analyses based on three waves of data. Child Indicators Research, 11(5), 1545–1562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02287.
Zhu, X. Q., & Shek, D. T. L. (2020). Impact of a positive youth development program on junior high school students in mainland China: A pioneer study. Children and Youth Services Review, 114, 105022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests
None.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chan, D.W., Sun, X. & Chan, L.K. Domain-Specific Growth Mindsets and Dimensions of Psychological Well-Being Among Adolescents in Hong Kong. Applied Research Quality Life 17, 1137–1156 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09899-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09899-y