Introduction

From 2014 to 2017, the member states of the European Union (EU) were experiencing an increased number of asylum applications. In 2014, the number of asylum and first time asylum seekers in the EU was 626,960. In the following two years, the number of applicants increased to 1,322,845 and 1,260,910. After 2016, the number of applicants decreased again to 712,235 (Eurostat 2019). Germany, together with Sweden, has played a key role during the so-called European migrant and refugee crisis (UNHCR 2016). This key role is emphasized by the percentage of persons who applied for international protection in Germany, which increased from already high 31% of all applicants in the EU in the year 2014 to even 59% in the year 2016 (Eurostat 2019).

Before and during their flight, asylum seekers are confronted with harsh conditions implying physical and psychological stress (Jesuthasan et al. 2018). The health consequences of the flight include nutritional deficiencies, bodily injuries, infections, respiratory diseases, dental diseases, skin diseases, gastrointestinal disorders and mental disorders (Jesuthasan et al. 2018, Bischoff et al. 2009, Goodman et al. 2018, Laukamp et al. 2019, Marquardt et al. 2016, van Berlaer et al. 2016, Richter et al. 2018, Theuring et al. 2016, Bauhoff and Gopffarth 2018). Within the first three months after arrival, asylum seekers are often diagnosed with infections and respiratory diseases due to poor hygienic conditions and bad housing conditions (Goodman et al. 2018, Laukamp et al. 2019). Furthermore, after their arrival in the receiving country in Europe, asylum seekers and refugees have a high burden of disease and are at high risk of mental health disorders, predominantly trauma, stress-related disorders, schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders, and affective disorders (Richter et al. 2018, Bauhoff and Gopffarth 2018, Winkler et al. 2019, Biddle et al. 2019, Nesterko et al. 2019, Nesterko et al. 2020a, Nesterko et al. 2020b).

A theoretical model of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) showed a complex relationship between migration and health (International Organization for Migration 2020). Health of migrants is influenced by social determinants, such as socio-economic, individual and legal factors. Especially asylum seekers and refugees are at risk of health-related vulnerabilities due to unmet needs in health services utilization, poor hygienic and bad housing conditions. A German cohort study analyzed the healthcare utilization behavior of asylum seekers that arrived during the European migrant and refugee crisis. It was emphasized that during the stay at the reception center nearly half of the refugees had utilized primary healthcare with a mean of 3.1 visits per patient during on average 41 days of camp inhabitation (Wetzke et al. 2018). Furthermore, an analysis of claims data reported that asylum seekers utilized inpatient care and emergency department care twice as often compared with regularly insured persons (Bauhoff and Gopffarth 2018). However, it remains unclear, whether such issues in health care provision and also the unmet needs in health services utilization (Biddle et al. 2019) have an influence on health and (health-related) quality of life.

To date, only few studies have investigated (health-related) quality of life of asylum seekers and refugees that arrived in Germany during the European migrant and refugee crisis. Five studies described health and quality of life among asylum seekers and refugees in Sweden, Italy and Germany (Jesuthasan et al. 2018, Gottvall et al. 2019, Leiler et al. 2019, Nante et al. 2016, Adedeji and Bullinger 2019). Quality of life of female refugees that arrived in Germany was lower in all domains of the EUROHIS-QOL questionnaire compared with persons from the EU region and was associated with age and education (Jesuthasan et al. 2018, Schmidt et al. 2006). In another study, quality of life of asylum seekers and refugees from Sub-Saharan African that were staying in Germany was also lower in all domains of the WHOQOL-BREF measure (Adedeji and Bullinger 2019).

Concerning health and quality of life of asylum seekers and refugees that arrived in Germany, Liebau (2016) has annotated the analysis potential of data of the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). The SOEP is a large, nationally representative, annual, population based study in Germany with specific migration and refugee samples that routinely measures HrQoL and is therefore of great importance for quality of life research (Goebel et al. 2019). Earlier studies based on data of the SOEP focused on the healthy-migrant-effect, the health of migrant workers as well as health and quality of life in general (e.g. Angelini et al. (2012), Igel et al. (2010), Nesterko et al. (2013), Razum and Rohrmann (2002)). However, HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees that recently arrived in Germany has not yet been reported, just as whether particular sociodemographic characteristics, such as the nationality, are associated with HrQoL. It is hypothesized that the HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees that recently arrived in Germany might be low, as a result of a high burden of disease and a high risk of mental health disorders accompanied by unmet needs of health care. Furthermore, the extent of the influence between social determinants and the HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees is not known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees that arrived during the European migrant and refugee crisis in Germany between 2014 and 2017 based on the SOEP.

Material and Methods

Sample

The sample of this study was based on cross-sectional data of the SOEP, located at the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin). The SOEP is a representative German household panel that interviewed over 20,000 participants annually since 1984. In order to ensure that the recent immigration of asylum seekers and refugees from the Middle East, in particular Syria, to Germany is represented in the SOEP, additional refugee samples were integrated into the SOEP in 2016 and 2017 (Goebel et al. 2019). The refugee samples were drawn from the German Central Register of Foreigners and sampled using a two-stage clustered disproportional stratified sampling design (Kühne et al. 2019, Kroh et al. 2017). The primary sampling units were regional clusters of immigration offices stratified by federal states and differentiated by county type. Within these sampling units, persons were selected based on a disproportional sampling scheme and were added to the sample, including each household member 17 years or older (Kühne et al. 2019). Interview materials were provided in the languages German, English, Arabic, Farsi, Pashto, Urdu and Kurjmanji (Kühne et al. 2019).

Out of those refugee samples, persons with proof of arrival in Germany issued between 2014 and 2017 were included to the study sample in order to cover those asylum seekers and refugees that arrived during the European migrant and refugee crisis (68.2%, n = 6858). The net sample was further restricted to only first-time participants of the SOEP (67.8%, n = 6821). The net sample was not further restricted according to sociodemographic characteristics. Refugees were defined according to the UNHCR as “people who cannot return to their country of origin because of a well-founded fear of persecution, conflict, violence, or other circumstances that have seriously disturbed public order, and who, as a result, require international protection” (UNHCR 2020). On the basis of the outcome of the asylum application, asylum seekers and refugees were categorized as entitled to protection (recognized refugee, recognized asylum seeker, recognized other protection status), with temporary suspension of deportation, with request to leave the country, and with pending decision of asylum application. All persons from the net sample had a direct migration background (i.e. both parents were not born in Germany).

Measures

A modified version of the SF-12v2 questionnaire was used to measure HrQoL in the SOEP (Andersen et al. 2007, Schupp et al. 2007). The SF-12 is a standardized questionnaire consisting of 12 items within the eight subscales: physical functioning, physical role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations and mental health (Ware et al. 1996). The SF-12 questionnaire in the SOEP contains one additional question from the SF-36 about ‘severe physical pain’, whereas the question about ‘work interference due to pain’ is missing. Furthermore, the SF-12 questionnaire in the SOEP deviates to some extent in the layout, and the form and order of questions (Schupp et al. 2007). However, in order to do justice to those differences to the original version, instead of the US normative sample, a German normative sample based on SOEP data has been used for computation of the SF-12 summary scores (Schupp et al. 2007).

The SF-12 subscales were Z-transformed by norm-based scoring using the average values and standard deviations of the German normative sample (Andersen et al. 2007, Nübling et al. 2006). The items of the dimensions physical functioning, role limitations, social functioning and pain were combined to a physical component summary (PCS) score, and the dimensions social functioning, emotional role limitations and mental health were combined to a mental component summary (MCS) score, respectively. Thus, physical and mental HrQoL is represented by the SF-12 subscales as well as the PCS and the MCS score. Because of the Z-transformation, all scales ranged from 0 to 100 (with higher scores representing better health).

The self-reported sociodemographic variables sex, age, marital status (never married/single, married/in partnership, separated/divorced and widowed), employment status (employed, unemployed and apprenticeship), nationality and religious affiliation were used to describe the sample. Age of persons was categorized into the groups of 18–24, 25–34, 35–44 and ≥ 45 years. Nationality was categorized into Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Eritrea, other African countries (without Eritrea), other Asian countries (without Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq), European countries and ethnic minorities/stateless persons. Religious affiliation was categorized into Muslim, Christian, other faith and non-denominational. Furthermore, years since proof of arrival in Germany (survey year minus year of proof of arrival in Germany) and outcome of asylum application (entitlement to protection, suspension of deportation, request to leave the country, decision pending) were used to describe the sample.

Statistical Analysis

As the rate of missing information was low (1.42%), missing values were not imputed. Observations with missing information were removed from the analyses by listwise deletion.

Descriptive statistics of sociodemographic variables were calculated for the total sample. PCS and MCS scores for the total sample were calculated by sociodemographic characteristics. PCS and MCS were not normally distributed and comparison groups were assumed to be unrelated. Therefore, differences in PCS and MCS scores by sociodemographic characteristics were tested using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test.

Associations between PCS and MCS scores and sociodemographic variables were examined using linear regressions with bootstrapped confidence intervals. According to the Shapiro-Francia W′ test for normality and the Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity, both, residuals of the regressions of PCS and MCS, were not normally distributed and variances of the dependent variables were not homogenous, respectively. Linearity of PCS and MCS and dependent variables was assumed and no multicollinearity of dependent variables was detected using the variance inflation factor. Two models with PCS and MCS scores as dependent variables examined the associations with the independent variables sex, age, employment, marital status, nationality, years since proof of arrival in Germany and outcome of asylum application.

All analyses were performed using Stata/SE 15.1 (StataCorp, TX, USA). All applied statistics were two-sided. In total, 51 tests for statistical significance of group differences in sociodemographic characteristics and mean PCS/MCS scores were conducted. Therefore, the level of significance was set at α = 0.001 (0.05/51) to correct for multiple significance tests to avoid a type I error (Dickhaus 2014).

Results

The characteristics of the sample (n = 6821) are shown in Table 1. The majority of the sample was male (61.1%; n = 4168) and the mean age was 32.9 years, with females being older than males (33.6 vs 32.5 years; p < 0.001; data not shown). Of the total sample, 54.9% (n = 3619) were married or in a partnership, 32.0% (n = 2111) have never been married or were single, and 11.2% (n = 735) were separated or divorced. Almost all persons of the sample were unemployed (89.9%; n = 6134). The majority of the sample was Syrian (50.0%; n = 3407) and indicated to belong to the Muslim religion (72.9%; n = 4881). Furthermore, the majority of the persons of the sample arrived in Germany one to two years before the first panel survey participation (85.5%; n = 5833) and was entitled to protection in Germany (64.5%; n = 4308).

Table 1 Characteristics of the sample

The mean PCS and MCS scores in the total sample were 53.4 and 47.9, respectively. Both, the mean PCS (51.0 vs. 55.0; p < 0.001) and MCS (46.1 vs. 49.1; p < 0.001) scores were statistically significantly lower in females than in men (Figs. 1 and 2). In addition, the mean PCS and MCS scores differed statistically significantly between different age categories (p < 0.001). Younger persons aged 18 to 24 years had the highest mean PCS and MCS scores (57.5 and 48.8), whereas persons aged 45 years and older had the lowest mean PCS and MCS scores (46.0 and 46.5). Both, the PCS and MCS scores differed statistically significantly by marital status, employment status and nationality (all with p < 0.001). Persons that have never been married or were single had the highest mean PCS and MCS scores (57.3 and 48.7), whereas widowed persons had the lowest mean PCS and MCS scores (43.5 and 43.7). Persons that were employed had higher mean PCS and MCS scores than unemployed persons (56.0 and 50.8 vs. 53.1 and 47.6). Furthermore, mean MCS scores differed statistically significantly by outcome of asylum application (p < 0.001). The mean PCS and MCS scores by sociodemographic characteristics are reported in the Online Resource 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mean PCS scores by age groups, marital status, employment and country of origin by sex (all comparisons with p ≤ 0.001). PCS: Physical Component Summary; comparisons of mean PCS scores by categorical characteristics were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test. Country of origin: without ethnic minorities/stateless persons. Other Africa: without Eritrea. Other Asia: without Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mean MCS scores by age groups, marital status, employment and country of origin by sex (all comparisons with p ≤ 0.001). MCS: Mental Component Summary; comparisons of mean MCS scores by categorical characteristics were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test. Country of origin: without ethnic minorities/stateless persons. Other Africa: without Eritrea. Other Asia: without Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq

The mean scores of the SF-12 subscales varied from 46.9 in the role emotional scale to 55.4 in the general health scale (Fig. 3). Over all SF-12 subscales, mean scores of males were statistically significantly higher than mean scores of females (all with p < 0.001). All mean scores of the SF-12 subscales differed statistically significantly between different age categories (all with p < 0.001). Younger persons aged 18 to 24 years had the highest mean scores over all SF-12 subscales, varying from 48.8 in the role emotional scale to 59.5 in the general health scale. Persons aged 45 years and older had the lowest mean scores, varying from 42.8 in the bodily pain scale to 50.0 in the vitality scale. All mean scores of the SF-12 subscales differed statistically significantly by marital status, employment status and nationality (all with p < 0.001). Furthermore, the scales general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health differed statistically significantly between persons with different outcomes of asylum application (all with p < 0.001). The mean scores of the SF-12 subscales by sociodemographic characteristics are reported in the Online Resource 2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mean SF-12 subscale scores by sex, age groups, country of origin and outcome of asylum application (all significant comparisons with p ≤ 0.001). n.s.: not significant, p > 0.001

In the model with PCS as dependent variable, female sex was statistically significantly associated with a lower PCS score (−3.2, p < 0.001; Table 2). Compared with being aged 18 to 24 years, older age was statistically significantly associated with lower PCS scores (−1.8 to −10.1, all with p < 0.001). Unemployed persons had statistically significantly lower PCS scores than employed persons (−1.6, p < 0.001). Furthermore, persons that were never married or single had a statistically significantly higher PCS score than persons being married or living in partnership (+1.3, p < 0.001). In the model with MCS as dependent variable, female sex was statistically significantly associated with a lower MCS score (−2.9, p < 0.001). Compared with being aged 18 to 24 years, being aged 45 and older was statistically significantly associated with a lower MCS score (−2.3, p < 0.001). Unemployed persons had statistically significantly lower MCS scores than employed persons (−2.9, p < 0.001). Persons being never married or single and separated or divorced had statistically significantly lower MCS scores than persons being married or living in partnership (−1.5, p = 0.001 and − 3.6, p < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, MCS scores were statistically significantly lower for persons from Afghanistan (−2.5, p < 0.001) and higher for persons from Eritrea (3.6; p < 0.001) compared with persons from Syria. A temporary suspension from deportation and a pending decision of asylum application were statistically significantly associated with lower MCS scores compared with an entitlement to protection as outcome of asylum application (−2.4, p = 0.001 and − 1.5, p < 0.001).

Table 2 Linear regression models of MCS and PCS scores and selected sociodemographic characteristics with bootstrapped standard errors (n = 5930)

Discussion

The aim of this study was to estimate the HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees that arrived during the European migrant and refugee crisis in Germany between 2014 and 2017. Overall, physical HrQoL of the asylum seekers and refugees was higher than of the German normative sample used for computation of the SF-12 summary scores (53.4 vs. 50.0) (Schupp et al. 2007). However, this difference may be explained by the younger age of the current sample (33 vs. 48 years). Mental HrQoL of the asylum seekers and refugees was lower (47.9 vs. 50.0). A reduced HrQoL was associated with female sex, older age, unemployment, and having never been married, being single, separated or divorced. Compared with the HrQoL of Syrian asylum seekers and refugees, the HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees from Afghanistan was lower, whereas the HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees from Eritrea was higher. To our knowledge, no study has been published that estimated HrQoL of Syrians, Afghans, Iraqis or Eritreans based on a representative sample. Nevertheless, the results of the current study were in correspondence with those of a systematic review that reported varying risks of poor self-perceived health across migrants and ethnic minority groups (Nielsen and Krasnik 2010). Furthermore, it was reported that a reduced HrQoL was associated with older age in a sample of asylum seekers and refugees in Italy, yet no association between HrQoL and sex was found (Nante et al. 2016). To our knowledge, the association between being separated or divorced and a reduced mental HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees, has not been found before in any study. However, it is of note that the IOM determined the unification of the family and partner as factor positively influencing health of migrants at the arrival and integration phase, and therefore being in a partnership might have a protective effect (International Organization for Migration 2020).

The associations of female sex, older age and reduced HrQoL found in the current study have also been found by studies with representative samples of the German total population regarding associations of HrQoL and sociodemographic characteristics (Ellert and Kurth 2013, Grochtdreis et al. 2019). Sex and age were described already as social determinants of health of migrants by the IOM in a theoretical model (International Organization for Migration 2020). For asylum seekers and refugees that arrived in Germany, sex and age may be confirmed as social determinants of HrQoL. It remains open, whether other socioeconomic, cultural and environmental factors as well as individual factors, such as lifestyle and behavioral factors modify those associations between sex, age and HrQoL. Furthermore, in the current study, it was not possible to analyze associations between other factors that might influence HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees, such as social exclusion, cultural values and separation from loved ones (International Organization for Migration 2020).

According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017, healthy life expectancy of populations from Syria, Afghanistan, and Eritrea was reduced compared with the German population (53 to 60 vs. 70 years), whereas healthy life expectancy of the Iraqi population was relatively high (64 years) (Global Burden of Disease DALYs and HALE Collaborators 2018). Furthermore, the mortality ratio of populations from Syria, Afghanistan, and Eritrea was increased compared with the German population (1833 to 1282 vs. 632 per 100,000 population), whereas again, the mortality ratio of the Iraqi population was only slightly different (659 per 100,000 population) (Global Burden of Disease 2017 Mortality Collaborators 2018). In Afghanistan and Eritrea, the leading cause of age-standardized years lived with disabilities was conflict and terrorism in 2017 (Global Burden of Disease 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators 2018). On the Human Development Index, a summary measure of achievements in living a long and healthy life, having access to knowledge and a decent standard of living, the countries Syria, Afghanistan, and Eritrea ranked in the rear third (ranks 154 to 182), whereas the rank of Iraq was 120 of all 189 countries in 2017 (United Nations Development Programme 2018). These indicators give some information about the overall health and quality of life of the populations of the countries of origin of the asylum seekers and refugees that arrived during the European migrant and refugee crisis in Germany between 2014 and 2017. In the current study, the mental HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees from Afghanistan was statistically significantly lower than of asylum seekers and refugees from other countries. Consequently, it is also necessary to identify and address the health care systems’ problems in the asylum seekers’ and refugees’ countries of origin. Among certainly many other economic and political problems, the health care systems in those countries need to be developed to be accessible and effective. Furthermore, the local problems that are susceptible of change, such as difficulties in trusting, understanding, accessing and navigating the health care system, need to be addressed (Giacco et al. 2018).

The mean PCS score of asylum seekers and refugees was within the range compared with the mean PCS scores of representative samples of the total German population (53.4 vs. 51.4 and 61.0), whereas the mean MCS score of asylum seekers and refugees was lower (47.9 vs. 49.3 and 62.0) (Ellert and Kurth 2013, Wirtz et al. 2018). However, comparability of PCS and MCS scores of the asylum seeker and refugee population in the current study and those of the representative German population samples is limited. The PCS and MCS scores of the one German population sample were calculated based on the SF-36, whereas the PCS and MCS scores in the current study were calculated based on its short version, the SF-12 (Ellert and Kurth 2013). Yet, validation studies were able to reproduce more than 90% of the variance in PCS-36 and MCS-36 scores based on PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores (Ware et al. 1996, Gandek et al. 1998). Furthermore, comparability is limited, as the general German population was older (49 vs. 33 years) and less persons were male (49% vs. 61%) compared with persons of the current study (Statistisches Bundesamt 2019a). In general, comparison of HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees that arrived in Germany may not be comparable to other migrant groups or asylum seekers and refugees that arrived in other European countries.

The refugee samples of the SOEP were subject to possible restricted representativeness of the target population of incoming asylum seekers and refugees. This may be due to identification difficulties by responsible authorities during the times of highest influx in 2015, difficulties in keeping track of persons of the sample due the high residential mobility and the possibility that persons of the sample might have had insufficient language skills (Kühne et al. 2019). However, to overcome these potential problems, a two-stage clustered disproportional stratified design was used for sampling, and persons were added at later points who were otherwise not covered. Furthermore, all interview materials have been translated to seven languages, besides German (Kühne et al. 2019). Finally, limitations of the SOEP survey in general, relating to interview materials, the interviewers, the underrepresentation of ethnic minorities and the overrepresentation of well-educated and well-integrated persons as well as nonresponse or selection bias apply to the current study.

Persons with different nationalities might not have the same probability of answering items of HrQoL-instruments in the same way and therefore, comparison of PCS and MCS scores between different populations should be interpreted with caution (Benítez-Borrego et al. 2016, Gibbons et al. 2018). To our knowledge, the SF-12v2 has not yet been validated in the languages Pashto, Urdu and Kurjmanji. It may be possible that the SF-12v2 performed in different ways for persons with different nationalities and therefore differential item functioning may be present (Gibbons et al. 2018, Langer et al. 2008). Furthermore, it is unknown whether causes of flight and harsh conditions during the flight have an influence on the current HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees (Jesuthasan et al. 2018). In the current study, the outcome of asylum application had a statistically significant effect on the MCS score, whereas years since arrival in the receiving country was not associated with HrQoL. This was in accordance with a study that assessed the associations of the outcome of asylum application on mental health and quality of life (Winkler et al. 2019).

The sample of this study might be representative for asylum seekers and refugees in Germany to some extent, at least with respect to the distribution of outcomes of asylum applications and the distribution of Afghan and Iraqi nationalities. The protection status of the sample of this study was distributed comparably to all asylum seekers in the German population in 2017 (Statistisches Bundesamt 2019b). The distribution of Afghan and Iraqi nationalities in the sample of the current study was similar to the distribution of nationalities in the German population (13% and 14% vs. 12% and 11%), however, in the sample of the current study, a greater proportion was with Syrian nationality (50% vs. 31%) (Statistisches Bundesamt 2019b). The persons of the sample of the current study were slightly older (33 vs. 29 years) and a comparable amount of persons was female (39% vs. 36%) compared with all asylum seekers in the German population at their initial entry (Statistisches Bundesamt 2019b).

Strengths and Limitations

To our knowledge, this was the first study of HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees that arrived during the European migrant and refugee crisis in Germany between 2014 and 2017. The current study profited from cross-sectional data based on a large representative German household panel. Furthermore, this study was able to examine associations between HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees, selected sociodemographic factors. However, some further limitations not discussed above have to be mentioned. First, as persons of the current sample were older and were more often with Syrian nationality, compared with all asylum seekers in the German population, generalizability might be limited to asylum seekers and refugees that arrived during the European migrant and refugee crisis in Germany. Second, the analyses of this study were based on cross-sectional data and therefore no conclusions on causality can be drawn.

Conclusion

Asylum seekers and refugees that arrived during the European migrant and refugee crisis in Germany between 2014 and 2017 have a higher physical and a lower mental HrQoL than the German norm. Female sex, older age, unemployment and having never been married, separated or divorced was associated with lower HrQoL. Of the largest ethnical groups of asylum seekers and refugees, the three groups of Syrians, Afghans and Eritreans, differ inherently in their mental HrQoL. Policy makers and health care providers should focus on those factors that influence health of asylum seekers and refugees that can be influenced on the one hand and that were significantly associated with reduced HrQoL in the current study. One measure could be the access to the labor market, as unemployment was significantly associated with lower PCS and MCS scores. Furthermore, health care needs to give special attention to of asylum seekers and refugees with significantly reduced mental HrQoL, such as asylum seekers and refugees from Afghanistan. Further research is needed in order to analyze HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees in Germany longitudinally, to compare the HrQoL of refugees with the HrQoL of the German population and to analyze the effect of ethnicity on HrQoL in asylum seekers and refugees more extensively. More research is also needed on the influence of those factors that influence HrQoL of asylum seekers and refugees that become relevant after arrival Germany, such as social exclusion, cultural values and separation from loved ones.