Social Capital, Happiness, and the Unmarried: a Multilevel Analysis of 32 European Countries

  • Elyakim KislevEmail author


Vast changes to the status of marriage in modern society have impacted the demographic makeup of many countries. Particularly in the Western world, a growing portion of the population comprises of singles that may be separated, divorced, widowed, or never married. Faced with this change, it is crucial for researchers and policymakers to understand the mechanisms behind the well-being of the unmarried. This paper explores the relationship between social capital and happiness for different types of marital groups. By performing a multilevel analysis on data from 32 countries, this research demonstrates not only that singles present higher social capital which is positively correlated with higher happiness, but also derive greater happiness from equal levels of social capital. Furthermore, this paper explores potential consequences for further research in social capital, happiness, and marital status.


Marriage Singles Cohabitation Social capital Happiness 



  1. Allik, J., & Realo, A. (2004). Individualism-collectivism and social capital. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beilmann, M., & Realo, A. (2012). Individualism-collectivism and social capital at the individual level. Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 16, 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beilmann, M., Mayer, B., Kasearu, K., & Realo, A. (2014). The relationship between adolescents’ social capital and individualism-collectivism in Estonia, Germany, and Russia. Child Indicators Research, 7, 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellotti, E. (2008). What are friends for? Elective communities of single people. Social Networks, 30, 318–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjørnskov, C. (2008). Social capital and happiness in the United States. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), The handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 46–58). Nice and New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  9. Bramlett, M. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States. Vital and Health Statistics, 23, 1–32.Google Scholar
  10. Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Apley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burt, S., Donnellan, M., Humbad, M. N., Hicks, B. M., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2010). Does marriage inhibit antisocial behavior?: An examination of selection vs causation via a longitudinal twin design. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 1309–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calvo, R., Zheng, Y., Kumar, S., Olgiati, A., & Berkman, L. (2012). Well-being and social capital on planet earth: Cross-national evidence from 142 countries. PLoS One, 7, e42793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carr, D., & Springer, K. W. (2010). Advances in families and health research in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 743–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chiang, S. (1996). The philosophy of happiness: A history of Chinese life philosophy. Taipei: Hong Yie Publication Co..Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coombs, R. H. (1991). Marital status and personal well-being: A literature review. Family Relations, 40, 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Copen, C. E., Daniels, K., Vespa, J. & Mosher, W. D. (2012) First marriages in the United States; data from the 2006–2010 National Survey of family growth. Division of Vital Statistics.Google Scholar
  19. DePaulo, B. M. (2007). Singled out: How singles are stereotyped, stigmatized, and ignored, and still live happily ever after: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. DePaulo, B. (2014). Single in a society preoccupied with couples. Handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone, 302-316.Google Scholar
  21. DePaulo, B. (2015). How We Live Now: Redefining Home and Family in the 21st Century: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2006). The unrecognized stereotyping and discrimination against singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Djomba, J. K., & Zaletel-Kragelj, L. (2016). A methodological approach to the analysis of egocentric social networks in public health research: A practical example. Slovenian Journal of Public Health, 55, 256–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duncan, G. (2005). What do we mean by" happiness"? The relevance of subjective wellbeing to social policy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 25, 16–31.Google Scholar
  25. Engelberg, A. (2016). Religious Zionist singles: Caught between “family values” and “young adulthood”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Esteve, A., Lesthaeghe, R., & López-Gay, A. (2012). The Latin American cohabitation boom, 1970–2007. Population and Development Review, 38, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Euromonitor (2013). Downsizing Globally: The Impact of Changing Household Structure on Global Consumer Markets.Google Scholar
  28. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fileborn, B., Thorpe, R., Hawkes, G., Minichiello, V., & Pitts, M. (2015). Sex and the (older) single girl: Experiences of sex and dating in later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 33, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Fischer, C. S. (2005). Bowling alone: What's the score? Social Networks, 27, 144–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gerstel, N., & Sarkisian, N. (2006). Marriage: The good, the bad, and the greedy. Contexts, 5, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ha, J.-H., & Carr, D. (2005). The effect of parent-child geographic proximity on widowed parents’ psychological adjustment and social integration. Research on Aging, 27, 578–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Han, S., Kim, H., Lee, E.-S., & Lee, H.-S. (2013). The contextual and compositional associations of social capital and subjective happiness: A multilevel analysis from Seoul, South Korea. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1183–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayo, B., & Seifert, W. (2003). Subjective economic well-being in Eastern Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heaton, T. B., & Forste, R. (2007). Informal unions in Mexico and the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 38, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hegel, G. W. F. & Brown, R. F. (2006). Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Greek philosophy: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How's life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20, 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Helliwell, J. F., & Barrington-Leigh, C. P. (2010). How much is social capital worth? In J. Jetten, C. Haslam, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social cure (pp. 55–71). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  40. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359, 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Helliwell, J. F., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Harris, A., & Huang, H. (2010). International evidence on the social context of well-being. In E. Diener, J. F. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A. C., & Poortman, A.-R. (2014). Understanding diversity in the meaning of cohabitation across Europe. European Journal of Population, 30, 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kant, I. (1999). Metaphysical elements of justice: Part 1 of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Kislev, E. (2018). Happiness, post-materialist values, and the unmarried. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 2243–2265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kislev, E. (2019a). Does marriage really improve sexual satisfaction? Evidence From the Pairfam Data Set. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–12.Google Scholar
  46. Kislev, E. (2019b). Happy singlehood: The rising acceptance and Celebration of solo living. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klinenberg, E. (2012). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone: Penguin.Google Scholar
  48. Lelkes, O. (2006). Knowing what is good for you: Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the “objective good”. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 18112–18115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leung, A., Kier, C., Fung, T., Fung, L., & Sproule, R. (2011). Searching for happiness: The importance of social capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lewis, J. (2001). The end of marriage? Books.Google Scholar
  52. Lu, L. (2001). Understanding happiness: A look into the Chinese folk psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 592–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lukes, S. (1971). The meanings of "individualism". Journal of the History of Ideas, 32, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Martin, T. C. (2002). Consensual unions in Latin America: Persistence of a dual nuptiality system. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33, 35–55.Google Scholar
  56. Mastekaasa, A. (1992). Marriage and psychological well-being: Some evidence on selection into marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 901–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McDermott, R., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2013). Breaking up is hard to do, unless everyone else is doing it too: Social network effects on divorce in a longitudinal sample. Social Forces, 92, 491–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McEwen, R., & Wellman, B. (2013). Relationships, community, and networked individuals. In R. Teigland & D. Power (Eds.), The immersive internet: Reflections on the entangling of the virtual with society, politics and the economy (pp. 168–179). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McMahon, D. M. (2004). From the happiness of virtue to the virtue of happiness: 400 BC–AD 1780. Daedalus, 133, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mencarini, L., & Sironi, M. (2012). Happiness, housework and gender inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review, 28, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mogilner, C., Kamvar, S. D. & Aaker, J. (2010). The shifting meaning of happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science.Google Scholar
  62. Moore, J. A., & Radtke, H. L. (2015). Starting “real” life women negotiating a successful midlife single identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morgan, P. M. (2000). Marriage-lite: The rise of cohabitation and its consequences. London: Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society.Google Scholar
  64. Oishi, S., Graham, J., Kesebir, S., & Galinha, I. C. (2013). Concepts of happiness across time and cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 559–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. ONS. (2016). Measuring national well-being in the UK. UK: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  66. Perelli-Harris, B., Mynarska, M., Berghammer, C., Berrington, A., Evans, A., Isupova, O., Keizer, R., Klärner, A., Lappegard, T., & Vignoli, D. (2014). Towards a deeper understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research, 31, 1043–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pichler, F. (2006). Subjective quality of life of young Europeans. Feeling happy but who knows why? Social Indicators Research, 75, 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Powdthavee, N. (2008). Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1459–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  70. Quiroz, P. A. (2013). From finding the perfect love online to satellite dating and 'Loving-the-one-You're Near': A look at Grindr, Skout, plenty of fish, meet Moi, Zoosk and assisted serendipity. Humanity and Society, 37, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ram, R. (2010). Social capital and happiness: Additional cross-country evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rodrik, D. (1999). Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict, and growth collapses. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Santos, C., & Weiss, D. (2016). “Why not settle down already?” a quantitative analysis of the delay in marriage. International Economic Review, 57, 425–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stack, S., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stein, P. J. (1975). Singlehood: An alternative to marriage. Family Coordinator, 24, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stets, J. E. (1991). Cohabiting and marital aggression: The role of social isolation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 669–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006). Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 326–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sweet, J. A. & Bumpass, L. L. (1990). Young adults views of marriage cohabitation and family.Google Scholar
  79. Tatarkiewicz, W. (1977). Analysis of happiness.Google Scholar
  80. Triandis, H. C. (2000). Cultural syndromes and subjective well-being. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 13–36). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  81. Trimberger, E. K. (2006). The new single woman. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  82. Van de Kaa, D. J. (2003). Second demographic transition. Encyclopedia of population, 2, 872–875.Google Scholar
  83. Veenhoven, R. (1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20, 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Walsh, F. (1996). The concept of family resilience: Crisis and challenge. Family Process, 35, 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wang, W., & Parker, K. C. (2014). Record share of Americans have never married: As values, economics and gender patterns change. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  86. Wellman, B. (2007). The network is personal: Introduction to a special issue of social networks. Social Networks, 29, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wellman, B. (2008). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 37, 221–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Westen, D. (1985). Self and society: Narcissism, collectivism, and the development of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Winkelmann, R. (2009). Unemployment, social capital, and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Winner, L. F. (2015). Real sex: The naked truth about chastity. Michigen: Brazos Press.Google Scholar
  92. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Yee, C. D. (2013) Re-urbanizing downtown Los Angeles: Micro housing densifying the City’s Core. University of Washington.Google Scholar
  94. Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zimmermann, A. C., & Easterlin, R. A. (2006). Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and happiness in Germany. Population and Development Review, 32, 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Federmann School of Public Policy and GovernmentThe Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations