Earth’s per capita energy use continues to grow, despite technological advances and widespread calls for reduction in energy consumption. The negative environmental consequences are well known: resource depletion, pollution, and global warming. However many remain reluctant to cut energy consumption because of the widespread, although, implicit, belief that a nation’s well being depends on its energy consumption. This article systematically examines the evidential support for the relationship between energy use and subjective well-being at the societal level, by integrating data from multiple sources, collected at multiple levels of government, and spanning four decades. This analysis reveals, surprisingly, that the most common measure of subjective well-being, life satisfaction, is unrelated to energy use -- whether measured at the national, state or county level. The nil relationship between happiness and energy use is reminiscent of the well-known Easterlin Paradox, however the causal mechanisms responsible to each remain in question. We discuss the possible causes for the Happiness-Energy paradox and potential policy implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The concept of subjective well being (SWB) has been well-studied, for recent reviews see Diener (2009) and Diener et al. (2013). It is now widely recognized in this field of study that SWB is a broad multidimensional concept that unifies such popular concepts as (affective) happiness, and life satisfaction. Because it is a multidimensional concept, a complete measurement of all aspects of SWB requires collecting a large set of measures from each subject. Most broad-scale research in this field aims to measure the cognitive dimension of SWB, i.e., life satisfaction, because of its general domain (necessary for cross-comparisons), and established validity and reliability (see, Diener et al. 2013). We follow the standard practice in this area, and make use only empirical data and use life-satisfaction as our measure of SWB.
As argued later, only developing nations could improve SWB through greater energy consumption, but across the developed world, the relationship between energy consumption and SWB is nil.
This is known as saturation, first mentioned with respect to human development by Martinez and Ebenhack (2008).
The series code is TERPB, and further information is available at https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/sep_use/notes/use_technotes.pdf
Total residential electricity consumption has two components: (A) validated Quarterly Fuel and Energy Report (QFER) retail sales/delivery data and (B) self-generation. Electricity Consumption = retail sales + self-generation. Retail sales: electricity amounts delivered from the grid and consumed by the customer. Self-generation: electricity produced and consumed on-site by the customer (for example, parking lot roofs covered with PV panels). Self-generation only contributes to total consumption and not to total sales.
Parts of California, notably Los Angeles, are often argued as examples of wasteful suburbanization, yet Los Angeles new homes are much smaller than average (https://www.laweekly.com/news/how-the-size-of-the-typical-la-home-has-grown-over-the-years-7364336).
Notably, Central and Eastern Europe have been suburbanizing recently (Stanilov and Sýkora 2014).
While we believe the the behavioral explanations are pivotal, there are other potential explanations. For instance, access to technology may affect the threshold energy level needed to meet core human needs.
Primary energy use (before transformation to other end-use fuels) in kilograms of oil equivalent, per capita from World Development Indicators accessed through https://www.google.com/publicdata. SWB data come from Frey and Stutzer (2002) and Easterlin et al. (2012)--note that Chinese SWB slightly increased in last several years. Also note that in the US both energy use per capita and SWB remain flat over past four decades (using GSS data and above measure of energy use). We provide additional analyses in supplementary material.
Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Heal, G., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Schneider, S., Starrett, D., et al. (2004). Are we consuming too much? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 147–172.
Asensio, O. I., & Delmas, M. A. (2015). Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, E510–E515.
Ashkanasy, N. M. (2011). International happiness: A multilevel perspective. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 23–29.
Attari, S. Z., DeKay, M. L., Davidson, C. I., & De Bruin, W. B. (2010). Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16054–16059.
BEA. (2014). Table 2.8.5. Personal consumption expenditures by major type of product, monthly. Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2011). International happiness: A new view on the measure of performance. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 6–22.
Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Buman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927.
Carter, J. (1977). Proposed energy policy. Public Broadcasting Service.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). If we are so rich, why aren’t we happy? American Psychologist, 54, 821–827.
Diener, E. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (Eds.). (2003). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497–527.
Dietz, T. (2014). Understanding environmentally significant consumption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 5067–5068.
Dietz, T. (2015). Altruism, self-interest, and energy consumption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 1654–1655.
Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A., & York, R. (2009). Environmentally efficient well-being: Rethinking sustainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts. Human Ecology Review, 16, 114–123.
Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2001). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. Macmillan.
Dumas, L. J. (1987). The overburdened economy: Uncovering the causes of chronic unemployment, inflation, and national decline. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974): “Does economic growth improve the human lot?” in Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz, ed. by P. A. David and M. W. Reder, New York: Academic Press, Inc., vol. 89, 98–125.
Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22463–22468.
Easterlin, R. A., Morgan, R., Switek, M., & Wang, F. (2012). China’s life satisfaction, 1990–2010. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 9775–9780.
Energy Information Administration. (2008). Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
Ferreira, S., Akay, A., Brereton, F., Cuñado, J., Martinsson, P., Moro, M., & Ningal, T. F. (2013). Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe. Ecological Economics, 88, 1–10.
Frank, R. H. (2004). How not to buy happiness. Daedalus, 133, 69–79.
Frank, R. H. (2005): “Does Absolute Income Matter,” in Economics and Happiness, ed. by L. Bruni and P. L. Porta, Oxford University Press, New York.
Frank, R. (2012). The Darwin economy: Liberty, competition, and the common good. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.
Gandelman, N., Piani, G., & Ferre, Z. (2012). Neighborhood determinants of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 547–563.
Giannetti, B. F., Agostinho, F., Almeida, C. M., & Huisingh, D. (2015). A review of limitations of GDP and alternative indices to monitor human well-being and to manage eco-system functionality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 11–25.
Hopkins JS (2017). A small town in Pennsylvania has been ripped apart by a new gas plant. There are lessons to be learned from what’s happened in Jessup. City Lab, Nov 20.
Inman, M. (2014). The fracking fallacy. Nature, 516(7529), 28–30.
Jorgenson, A. K. (2014): “Economic development and the carbon intensity of human well-being,” Nature Climate Change.
Jorgenson, A. K., & Givens, J. (2015). The changing effect of economic development on the consumption-based carbon intensity of well-being, 1990–2008. PLoS One, 10, e0123920.
Jorgenson, A. K., Alekseyko, A., & Giedraitis, V. (2014). Energy consumption, human well-being and economic development in central and eastern European nations: A cautionary tale of sustainability. Energy Policy, 66, 419–427.
Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16489–16493.
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375–405.
Kallis, G. (2011). In defence of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70, 873–880.
Kallis, G., Kerschner, C., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2012). The economics of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 84, 172–180.
Kasser, T. (2003). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Knight, K. W., & Rosa, E. A. (2011). The environmental efficiency of well-being: A cross-national analysis. Social Science Research, 40, 931–949.
Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2017). Human well-being and climate change mitigation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(6), e485.
Li, Y., Guan, D., Tao, S., Wang, X., & He, K. (2018 May 20). A review of air pollution impact on subjective well-being: Survey versus visual psychophysics. Journal of Cleaner Production., 184, 959–968.
MacKay, D. (2008) Sustainable energy-without the hot air, UIT Cambridge.
MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2009). Life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecological Economics, 68, 1441–1453.
Martinez, D. M., & Ebenhack, B. W. (2008). Understanding the role of energy consumption in human development through the use of saturation phenomena. Energy Policy, 36(4), 1430–1435.
Mazur, A. (2011). Does increasing energy or electricity consumption improve quality of life in industrial nations? Energy Policy, 39, 2568–2572.
Mazur, A. (2013). Energy and electricity in industrial nations: The sociology and technology of energy. New York: Routledge.
Mazur, A. and E. Rosa (1974): “Energy and life-style.” Science (New York, NY), 186, 607.
Meyer, W. B. (2013). The environmental advantages of cities: Countering commonsense antiurbanism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), 88.
Oswald, A. (2014): “Keynote II,” 2014 well-being and Public Policy Conference at Hamilton College.
Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2009). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327, 576–579.
Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., ... & Dubash, N. K. (2014). Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 151). IPCC.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Pretty, J. (2013). The consumption of a finite planet: Well-being, convergence, divergence and the nascent green economy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 55, 475–499.
Smil, V. (2005) Creating the twentieth century: Technical innovations of 1867–1914 and their lasting impact. OUP Catalogue.
Soytas, U., Sari, R., & Ewing, B. T. (2007). Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics, 62, 482–489.
Stanilov, K., & Sýkora, L. (2014). Confronting suburbanization: Urban decentralization in postsocialist central and Eastern Europe. John Wiley & Sons.
Steinberger, J. K., & Roberts, J. T. (2010). From constraint to sufficiency: The decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 425–433.
Stern, D. I. (2011 Feb 1). The role of energy in economic growth. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences., 1219(1), 26–51.
Stern, D. I., & Kander, A. (2012 Jan). The role of energy in the industrial revolution and modern economic growth. The Energy Journal., 1, 125–152.
Stern, N., Peters, S., Bakhshi, V., Bowen, A., Cameron, C., Catovsky, S., Crane, D., Cruickshank, S., Dietz, S., & Edmonson, N. (2006). Stern review: The economics of climate change. London: HM treasury.
Stiglitz, J., A. Sen, and J. Fitoussi (2009) Report by the Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Available at www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.
Veblen, T. (2005a): Conspicuous consumption, vol. 38, ePenguin, New York.
Veblen, T. (2005b). The theory of the leisure class; an economic study of institutions. New York: Aakar Books.
Veenhoven, R. (2014). Livability theory. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 3645–3647.
Winfrey, E. M. V. (2013) Is more always better? The nonlinear relationship between energy consumption and well-being. Ph.D. thesis, Georgetown University.
We thank anonymous reviewer for pointing out that the relation between energy use and SWB is very similar to the relation between economic growth and SWB (i.e., the Happiness Paradox).
This material has not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication in another journal; all authors have been personally and actively involved in substantive work leading to the manuscript, and will hold themselves jointly and individually responsible for its content.
Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest declared.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., Altman, M. The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being. Applied Research Quality Life 15, 1055–1067 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09719-y
- Energy use
- Energy consumption
- Energy intensity of economy
- Life satisfaction
- Subjective well-being (SWB)