Subjective well-being (SWB) is a desirable goal for the society as a whole and in particular for young adults (i.e., those aged 18–34) who are a crucial segment of a population. Their importance emerges not only as citizens of contemporary society, but also as citizens of the future society both as participants in democracies and as constituents of the economic labour force. At the same time, young adults are a very vulnerable group that has been particularly affected by the economic downturn. Therefore, young adults’ well-being is increasingly drawing the attention of European policymakers. This paper explores the determinants of SWB of young adults in Europe and examines especially the impact of institutional trust on the overall life satisfaction. Structural equation modelling was used to test main research hypotheses concerning the presence of a positive relation between level of trust and overall life satisfaction once psychological traits, evaluative indicators of specific aspects of life and the other individual characteristics are controlled for. Findings reveal interesting cross-country differences, providing useful policy implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
For each indicator variable, high scores relate to high levels of satisfaction or well-being. In order to make scores uniform, some original indicator variables were recoded. In particular, scores of variables pw070 (“feeling calm and peaceful”), pw090 (“Being happy”), and pw220 (“physical security”) were reversed.
Multivariate imputation with chained equations was used (MICE, Raghunathan et al. 2001; Van Buuren 2007). An evaluation of the method was performed, and a single imputed value was used for each indicator. Single imputation was chosen and validated with an ANOVA across imputations to test whether the variance within imputations was greater than the variance between imputations for a certain variable. Details of the imputation procedure can be provided upon request.
The complete assessment and testing of the latent factor structure can be provided upon request. Hereafter, only selected results are presented.
Among the exceptions, we observe that in some countries (usually Nordic or Central Europe countries), the pw160 and/or pw120 indicators (measuring the satisfaction with personal relationships and with time use, respectively) have their highest loadings on a different latent factor than the other indicators that describe the satisfaction with macro-social life domains.
For sake of simplicity we just comment the results. The details of the analysis are available upon request.
The modification index reflects an approximation of how much the overall model χ2 will decrease if the fixed or constrained parameter is freely estimated. Because the modification index can be conceptualised as a χ2 statistic with 1 degree of freedom, indices of 3.84 or greater (i.e., the critical value of χ2 at p < .05, df = 1) suggest that the overall fit of the model could be significantly improved if the fixed or constrained parameter were freely estimated. Although standardised residuals and modification indices provide specific information for how the fit of the model can be improved, such revisions should only be pursued if they can be justified on empirical or conceptual grounds.
Arrindell, W. A., Meeuwesen, L., & Huyse, F. J. (1991). The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): psychometric properties in a non-psychiatric medical outpatients sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 117–123.
Bjørnskov, C. (2008a). Social trust and fractionalization: a possible reinterpretation. European Sociological Review, 24(3), 271–283.
Bjørnskov, C. (2008b). Social capital and happiness in the United States. Applied Research Quality Life, 3(2008), 43.
Böhnke, P. (2005). First European quality of life survey: life satisfaction, happiness and sense of belonging. European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Böhnke, P. (2008). Does society matter? Life satisfaction in the enlarged Europe. Social Indicators Research, 87, 189–210.
Bouazzaoui, B., & Mullet, E. (2002). Employment and family as determinants of anticipated life satisfaction: contrasting young adults’ and elderly people’s viewpoints. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 129–152.
Bradford, W. D., & Dolan, P. (2010). Getting used to it: the adaptive global utility model. Journal of Health Economics, 29(6), 811–820.
Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (2007). Handbook on the economics of happiness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Cerar, M. (2009). The relationship between law and politics. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 15(1), 19–23.
Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659.
Conceição P. & Bandura, R. (2008). Measuring subjective wellbeing: a summary review of the literature. United nations development programme (UNDP) development studies, working paper. New York.
Continuing Psychology Education. (2005). Subjective well-being. Retrieved April 9, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.texcpe.com/cpe/PDF/ca-happiness.pdf.
de Cuyper, N., & de Witte, H. (2006). Autonomy and workload among temporary workers: their effect on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, life satisfaction, and self-rated performance. International Journal of Stress Management, 13(4), 441–459.
De Smedt, M. (2013). Measuring subjective issues of well-being and quality of life in the European statistical system. Social Indicators Research, 114(1), 153–167.
Deacon, B. (1993). Developments in East European social policy. In C. Jones (Ed.), New perspective on the welfare state in Europe (pp. 177–198). London: Routledge.
Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2016). Happier together. Social cohesion and subjective well-being in Europe. International Journal of Psychology, 51(3), 163–176.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.
Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 419–436.
Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 71–85.
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. P. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Eurostat. (2013). EU-SILC description of target variables: cross-sectional and longitudinal. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Eurostat. (2014). Living conditions in Europe. Eurostat statistical books. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Eurostat. (2016). Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
Fors, F., & Kulin, J. (2016). Bringing affect back in: measuring and comparing subjective well-being across countries. Social Indicators Research, 127(1), 323–339.
Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: an international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75, 169–216.
Harper, S. (2006). Ageing societies: myths, challenges and opportunities. London: Hodder Arnold.
Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: what's new? The Economic Journal, 116(510), C34–C45 Conference Papers (Mar 2006).
Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1435–1446.
Hemker, B. T., Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Selection of unidimensional scales from a multidimensional item bank in the polytomous Mokken IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(4), 337–352.
Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Handbook of structural equation modelling. New York: The Guilford Press.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Hyer, L., Gouveia, I., Harrison, W. R., Warsaw, J., & Coutsouridis, D. (1987). Depression, anxiety, paranoid reactions, hypochrondriasis, and cognitive decline in later-life inpatients. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 92–94.
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwartz, N. (2003). Well-being: the foundation of hedonic psychology. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Kim, J. O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: what it is and how to do it? Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Krekel, C., Kolbe, J., & Wüstemann, H. (2016). The greener, the happier? The effects of urban land use on residential well-being. Ecological Economics, 121, 117–127.
Light, H. K., Hertsgaard, D., & Martin, R. E. (1985). Education and income: significant factors in life satisfaction of farm men and women. Research in Rural Education, 3(1), 7–12.
Mironova, A. A. (2015). Trust, social capital, and subjective individual well-being. Sociological Research, 54(2), 121–133.
Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: findings from the veterans affairs normative aging study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 189–202.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
OECD. (2012). OECD better life index. Retrieved from World Wide Web: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/.
Pittau, M. G., Zelli, R., & Gelman, A. (2009). Economic disparities and life satisfaction in European Regions. Social Indicators Research, 96(2), 339–361.
Raghunathan, T. E., Lepkowski, J. M., Van Hoewyk, J., & Solenberger, P. (2001). A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology, 27, 85–95.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & von Berlepsch, V. (2014). Social Capital and Individual Happiness in Europe. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 357–386.
Rojas, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2013). Contentment and affect in the estimation of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 415–431.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.
Scherer, S. (2009). The social consequences of insecure jobs. Social Indicators Research, 93, 527–547.
Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: a facet-level analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1062–1075.
Schyns, P. (2002). Wealth of nations, individual income and life satisfaction in 42 countries: a multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research, 60, 5–40.
Seghieri, C., Desantis, G., & Tanturri, M. L. (2006). The richer, the happier? An empirical investigation in selected European countries. Social Indicators Research, 79, 455–476.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, A., & Keyes, C. L. (2008). Marital status and social well-being: are the married always better off? Social Indicators Research, 88, 529–546.
Sirgy, M. J. (2012). The psychology of quality of life. Hedonic well-being, life satisfaction, and eudaimonia (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Soukiazis, E., & Ramos, S. (2016). The structure of subjective well-being and its determinants: a micro-data study for Portugal. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 1375–1399.
StataCorp. (2015). Structural equation modeling reference manual - release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP.
Steiger, J. H. (1998). A note on multiple sample extensions of the RMSEA fit index. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(4), 411–419.
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J.P. (2009). Report of the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Available online from the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress: http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm.
Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Ulloa, B.F.L., Møller, V. & Sousa-Poza, A. (2013). How does subjective well-being evolve with age? A literature review. IZA DP No. 7328. Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=2250327.
Van Buuren, S. (2007). Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16, 219–242.
Van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 29–49.
Veenhoven, R. (2009). Well-being in nations and well-being of nations. Is there a conflict between individual and society? Social Indicators Research, 91(1), 5–21.
Veenhoven, R. (2016). Measures of happiness. World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Assessed on 01/12/2016 at: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_quer/hqi_fp.htm.
Wills-Herrera, E., Islam, G., & Hamilton, M. (2009). Subjective well-being in Cities: a multidimensional concept of individual, social and cultural variables. Applied Research Quality Life, 4, 201.
Zuzanek, J., & Zuzanek, T. (2015). Of happiness and of despair, is there a measure? Time use and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(4), 839–856.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
D’Agostino, A., Grilli, G. & Regoli, A. The Determinants of Subjective Well-Being of Young Adults in Europe. Applied Research Quality Life 14, 85–112 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9582-z
- Subjective well-being
- Quality of life
- Institutional trust
- Young adults
- Structural equation modelling