Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 671–689 | Cite as

Efficacy of an adaptation of the Best Possible Self intervention implemented through positive technology: a randomized control trial

  • Ángel EnriqueEmail author
  • Juana Bretón-López
  • Guadalupe Molinari
  • Rosa M. Baños
  • Cristina Botella


Best possible Self (BPS) is a positive psychological intervention based on positive future thinking. It has been shown to be effective in improving well-being and depressive symptoms over short periods of time. Positive technology is a scientific approach designed to increase well-being through Information and Communication Technologies. To assess the efficacy of the BPS implemented through a positive technology application in improving optimistic thinking, affect and depressive symptoms, during a one-month period, with two follow-ups one and three months later. Randomized, single-blind control trial. Central randomization was performed by an independent researcher using computer software to generate lists allocating participants to treatments. Recruitment was carried out through advertisements at two universities. Randomized participants were 78 young adults who were assigned to the e-BPS condition (n = 38) or to a control group (n = 40). Participants were asked to visualize their BPS each day using a Positive Technology Application. The Control condition consisted of thinking and writing about daily activities, also through technologies. Affect, future expectations, and depressive symptoms were measured in different time frames. 78 participants were analyzed using intention-to-treat analyses. Results showed that BPS was effective in improving future expectations measures and reducing depressive symptoms until the post-training. However, these effects were not maintained in the three-month follow-up period. This study indicates that BPS can be effectively adapted for implementation through positive technologies. Factors such as the variety of exercises and the instructions can play a role in maintaining the changes in the long term.

Trial registration Identifier: NCT02321605.


Best Possible Self future thinking Positive Psychological Intervention Positive Technology Optimism well-being 


Compliance with ethical standards


Jaume I University grant PREDOC/2012/51.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Andersson, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2009). Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(4), 196–205. doi: 10.1080/16506070903318960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage, C. J. (2005). Can the theory of planned behavior predict the maintenance of physical activity? Health Psychology, 24(3), 235. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baños, R. M., Espinoza, M., García-Palacios, A., Cervera, J. M., Esquerdo, G., Barrajón, E., & Botella, C. (2013). A positive psychological intervention using virtual reality for patients with advanced cancer in a hospital setting: a pilot study to assess feasibility. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(1), 263–270. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1520-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baños, R. M., Etchemendy, E., Farfallini, L., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S., & Botella, C. (2014). EARTH of Well-Being System: A pilot study of an Information and Communication Technology-based positive psychology intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(6), 482–488. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.927906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., & Haigh, E. A. (2014). Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The generic cognitive model*. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 1–24. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). BDI-II manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Boehm, J. K., Lyubomirsky, S., & Sheldon, K. M. (2011). A longitudinal experimental study comparing the effectiveness of happiness-enhancing strategies in Anglo Americans and Asian Americans. Cognition & Emotion, 25(7), 1263–1272. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.541227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Botella, J., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2015). Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
  10. Botella, C., Riva, G., Gaggioli, A., Wiederhold, B. K., Alcaniz, M., & Baños, R. M. (2012). The present and future of positive technologies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 78–84. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Botella, C., Baños, R. M., Etchemendy, E., García-Palacios, A., & Alcañiz, M. (2016). Psychological countermeasures in manned space missions:“EARTH” system for the Mars-500 project. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 898–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.61.4.305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durlak, J. A. (2009). How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 917–928. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Enrique, A., Molinari, G., Llorca, G., & Botella, C. (2016). “Mi Mejor Yo”: Diseño de una intervención positiva aplicada en formato grupal y apoyada en las TICs. Agora de Salut, 3, 121–129. doi: 10.6035/agorasalut.2016.3.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta, S. K. (2011). Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 2(3), 109. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.83221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). River: Pearson-Prentice Hall. International Edition.Google Scholar
  18. King, L. A. (2001). The health benefits of writing about life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 798–807. doi: 10.1177/0146167201277003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. King, L. A., & Raspin, C. (2004). Lost and Found Possible Selves, Subjective Well-Being, and Ego Development in Divorced Women. Journal of Personality, 72(3), 603–632. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00274.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). What is the optimal way to deliver a positive activity intervention? The case of writing about one’s best possible selves. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 635–654. doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9346-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liau, A. K., Neihart, M. F., Teo, C. T., & Lo, C. H. (2016). Effects of the best possible self activity on subjective well-being and depressive symptoms. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(3), 473–481. doi: 10.1007/s40299-015-0272-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Little, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (1990). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–62. doi: 10.1177/0963721412469809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyubomirsky, S., Dickerhoof, R., Boehm, J. K., & Sheldon, K. M. (2011). Becoming happier takes both a will and a proper way: an experimental longitudinal intervention to boost well-being. Emotion, 11(2), 391. doi: 10.1037/a0022575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MacLeod, A. K. (1996). Affect, emotional disorder, and future-directed thinking. Cognition & Emotion, 10, 69–86. doi: 10.1080/026999396380394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meevissen, Y. M., Peters, M. L., & Alberts, H. J. (2011). Become more optimistic by imagining a best possible self: Effects of a two week intervention. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(3), 371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Molinari, G., Dragomir-Davis, A. M., Enrique, A., García-Palacios, A., Baños, R. M., & Botella, C. (2016). The contribution of future-directed thinking to affect dimensions: differences in general and clinical populations. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  28. Opris, D., Pintea, S., García-Palacios, A., Botella, C., Szamosközi, S., & David, D. (2012). Virtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: A quantitative meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 29(2), 85–93. doi: 10.1002/da.20910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Otero, J. M., Luengo, A., Romero, E., Gómez, J. A., & Castro, C. (1998). Psicología de personalidad. Manual de prácticas. Barcelona: Ariel Practicum.Google Scholar
  30. Pennebaker, J. W. (1993). Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31(6), 539–548. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90105-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peters, M. L., Flink, I. K., Boersma, K., & Linton, S. J. (2010). Manipulating optimism: Can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(3), 204–211. doi: 10.1080/17439761003790963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peters, M. L., Meevissen, Y. M., & Hanssen, M. M. (2013). Specificity of the Best Possible Self intervention for increasing optimism: Comparison with a gratitude intervention. Terapia Psicologica, 31(1), 93–100. doi: 10.4067/s0718-48082013000100009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pietrowsky, R., & Mikutta, J. (2012). Effects of positive psychology interventions in depressive patients—A randomized control study. Psychology, 3(12), 1067. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.312158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quero, S., Molés, M., Pérez-Ara, M., Botella, A., & Baños, R. M. (2012). An Online Emotional Regulation System to deliver homework assignments for treating Adjustment Disorders. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine: Advanced Technologies in the Behavioral, Social and Neurosciences, 181, 273–278.Google Scholar
  35. Renner, F., Schwarz, P., Peters, M. L., & Huibers, M. J. (2014). Effects of a best-possible-self mental imagery exercise on mood and dysfunctional attitudes. Psychiatry Research, 215(1), 105–110. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rief, W., Glombiewski, J. A., Gollwitzer, M., Schubö, A., Schwarting, R., & Thorwart, A. (2015). Expectancies as core features of mental disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28(5), 378–385. doi: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Riva, G., Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Wiederhold, B. K., & Gaggioli, A. (2012). Positive technology: using interactive technologies to promote positive functioning. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 69–77. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rothwell, P. M. (2006). Factors that can affect the external validity of randomised controlled trials. PLoS Clinical Trials, 1(1), e9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., Joiner, T., Santed, M., & Valiente, R. M. (1999). Escala PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: Validación factorial y convergencia transcultural. Psicothema, 11, 37–51.Google Scholar
  41. Sanz, J., García-Vera, M. P., Espinosa, R., Fortún, M., & Vázquez, C. (2005). Adaptación española del Inventario para la Depresión de Beck-II (BDI-II): 3. Propiedades psicométricas en pacientes con trastornos psicológicos. Clínica y salud, 16, 121–142.Google Scholar
  42. Scheier, M., Carver, C., & Bridges, M. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine, 8(1), 1. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sergeant, S., & Mongrain, M. (2014). An online optimism intervention reduces depression in pessimistic individuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(2), 263. doi: 10.1037/a0035536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 73–82. doi: 10.1080/17439760500510676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467–487. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2009). Using experience sampling methods/ecological momentary assessment (ESM/EMA) in clinical assessment and clinical research: introduction to the special section. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 457–462. doi: 10.1037/a0017653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1.063–1.070. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Basic Psychology, Clinic and PsychobiologyUniversitat Jaume ICastellónSpain
  2. 2.CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn)Instituto Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological TreatmentValencia UniversityValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations