Efficacy of an adaptation of the Best Possible Self intervention implemented through positive technology: a randomized control trial
- 439 Downloads
Best possible Self (BPS) is a positive psychological intervention based on positive future thinking. It has been shown to be effective in improving well-being and depressive symptoms over short periods of time. Positive technology is a scientific approach designed to increase well-being through Information and Communication Technologies. To assess the efficacy of the BPS implemented through a positive technology application in improving optimistic thinking, affect and depressive symptoms, during a one-month period, with two follow-ups one and three months later. Randomized, single-blind control trial. Central randomization was performed by an independent researcher using computer software to generate lists allocating participants to treatments. Recruitment was carried out through advertisements at two universities. Randomized participants were 78 young adults who were assigned to the e-BPS condition (n = 38) or to a control group (n = 40). Participants were asked to visualize their BPS each day using a Positive Technology Application. The Control condition consisted of thinking and writing about daily activities, also through technologies. Affect, future expectations, and depressive symptoms were measured in different time frames. 78 participants were analyzed using intention-to-treat analyses. Results showed that BPS was effective in improving future expectations measures and reducing depressive symptoms until the post-training. However, these effects were not maintained in the three-month follow-up period. This study indicates that BPS can be effectively adapted for implementation through positive technologies. Factors such as the variety of exercises and the instructions can play a role in maintaining the changes in the long term.
Trial registration clinicaltrails.gov Identifier: NCT02321605.
KeywordsBest Possible Self future thinking Positive Psychological Intervention Positive Technology Optimism well-being
Compliance with ethical standards
Jaume I University grant PREDOC/2012/51.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Baños, R. M., Espinoza, M., García-Palacios, A., Cervera, J. M., Esquerdo, G., Barrajón, E., & Botella, C. (2013). A positive psychological intervention using virtual reality for patients with advanced cancer in a hospital setting: a pilot study to assess feasibility. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(1), 263–270. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1520-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baños, R. M., Etchemendy, E., Farfallini, L., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S., & Botella, C. (2014). EARTH of Well-Being System: A pilot study of an Information and Communication Technology-based positive psychology intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(6), 482–488. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.927906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). BDI-II manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Botella, J., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2015). Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). River: Pearson-Prentice Hall. International Edition.Google Scholar
- Little, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (1990). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Molinari, G., Dragomir-Davis, A. M., Enrique, A., García-Palacios, A., Baños, R. M., & Botella, C. (2016). The contribution of future-directed thinking to affect dimensions: differences in general and clinical populations. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Otero, J. M., Luengo, A., Romero, E., Gómez, J. A., & Castro, C. (1998). Psicología de personalidad. Manual de prácticas. Barcelona: Ariel Practicum.Google Scholar
- Quero, S., Molés, M., Pérez-Ara, M., Botella, A., & Baños, R. M. (2012). An Online Emotional Regulation System to deliver homework assignments for treating Adjustment Disorders. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine: Advanced Technologies in the Behavioral, Social and Neurosciences, 181, 273–278.Google Scholar
- Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., Joiner, T., Santed, M., & Valiente, R. M. (1999). Escala PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: Validación factorial y convergencia transcultural. Psicothema, 11, 37–51.Google Scholar
- Sanz, J., García-Vera, M. P., Espinosa, R., Fortún, M., & Vázquez, C. (2005). Adaptación española del Inventario para la Depresión de Beck-II (BDI-II): 3. Propiedades psicométricas en pacientes con trastornos psicológicos. Clínica y salud, 16, 121–142.Google Scholar
- Scheier, M., Carver, C., & Bridges, M. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078. doi: 10.1037//0022-35184.108.40.2063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar