Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 481–505 | Cite as

Everyday Understandings of Happiness, Good Life, and Satisfaction: Three Different Facets of Well-being

  • Erik CarlquistEmail author
  • Pål Ulleberg
  • Antonella Delle Fave
  • Hilde E. Nafstad
  • Rolv M. Blakar


The need for increasing conceptual clarity within well-being research has been stressed by social scientists as well as policymakers and international organizations. The present study aimed to identify and compare conceptual structures of the everyday terms happiness, a good life, and satisfaction, based on a semi-stratified sample of Norwegian adults. Findings indicate that these terms share certain conceptual similarities, as used in everyday Norwegian language. For each term, it was possible to identify an underlying structure of conceptual configuration, articulated into external life domain components and internal, psychological dimensions. Relationship themes were prominent among the external domains for all three terms. Findings indicated that in Norwegian participants’ understanding, happiness and good life were highly inclusive of external life domains, whereas satisfaction primarily evoked associations to internal, psychological states and experiences. Latent class analyses highlighted differences among socio-demographic groups as concerns the degree to which different conceptualizations of the three terms were endorsed. Findings raise questions about the practice, relatively common in the applied social sciences, of treating happiness, good life and satisfaction as highly similar concepts, and the assumption that each term carries the same meaning for everyone.


Well-being Happiness Good life Satisfaction Everyday understandings Language 



We would like to thank Hilde Breck, Andre de Brisis and Agnete Falck Revdal for their invaluable help and thoughtfulness in collecting, registering and analyzing data.


  1. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International.Google Scholar
  2. Algoe, S. B., Frederickson, B. L., & Chow, S.-M. (2011). The future of emotions research within positive psychology. In K. M. Sheldon, T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 115–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Aspinal, F., Addington-Hall, J., Hughes, R., & Higginson, I. J. (2003). Using satisfaction to measure the quality of palliative care: a review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(4), 324–339. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02624.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505–516. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.830764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billig, M. (2011). Writing social psychology: Fictional things and unpopulated texts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 4–20. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02003.x.
  7. Bonn, G., & Tafarodi, R. (2013). Visualizing the good life: a cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(6), 1839–1856. doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9412-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bray, B. C., Lanza, S. T., & Tan, X. (2015). Eliminating bias in classify-analyze approaches for latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.935265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brülde, B. (2007). Happiness and the good life. Introduction and conceptual framework. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9002-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Camfield, L., & Skevington, S. M. (2008). On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(6), 764–775. doi: 10.1177/1359105308093860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charlemagne-Badal, S. J., Lee, J. W., Butler, T. L., & Fraser, G. E. (2015). Conceptual domains included in wellbeing and life satisfaction instruments: A review. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 10(2), 305–328. doi: 10.1007/s11482-014-9306-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, S. L., & Muthén, B. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Available via Accessed 15 Oct 2015.
  14. Collins, K., & Nicolson, P. (2002). The meaning of ‘satisfaction’ for people with dermatological problems: reassessing approaches to qualitative health psychology research. Journal of Health Psychology, 7(5), 615–629. doi: 10.1177/1359105302007005681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: an interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55–72. doi: 10.1023/a:1007027822521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, W. (1981). A theory of happiness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 18(2), 111–120.Google Scholar
  17. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., Wissing, M. P. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185–207. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9632-5.
  18. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Wissing, M. P., Vella-Brodrick, D. (2013a). Sources and motives for personal meaning in adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 517–529. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.830761.
  19. Delle Fave, A., Wissing, M., Brdar, I., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Freire, T. (2013b). Cross-cultural perceptions of meaning and goals in adulthood: Their roots and relations with happiness. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 227–247). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Wissing, M. P., Araujo, U., Castro Solano, A., Freire, T., et al. (2016). Lay definitions of happiness across nations: The primacy of inner harmony and relational connectedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(30), doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00030.
  21. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61. doi: 10.1037/a0018066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dörner, J., Mickler, C., & Staudinger, U. M. (2005). Self-development at midlife. In S. L. Willis & M. Martin (Eds.), Middle adulthood: A lifespan perspective (pp. 277–317). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11176–11183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1633144100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ehrenberg, A. (2010). The weariness of the self: Diagnosing the history of depression in the contemporary age. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Eid, M., Langeheine, R., & Diener, E. (2003). Comparing typological structures across cultures by multigroup latent class analysis: a primer. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 195–210. doi: 10.1177/0022022102250427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (2010). Quality of life in old age: problematic issues. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(1), 21–40. doi: 10.1007/s11482-010-9110-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frey, B. (2008). Happiness. A revolution in economics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Galati, D., Sotgiu, I., & Iovino, V. (2006). What makes us happy? A study on the subjective representation of happiness components. In A. Delle Fave (Ed.), Dimensions of well-being: Research and intervention (pp. 60–74). Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  30. Gasper, D. (2010). Understanding the diversity of conceptions of well-being and quality of life. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(3), 351–360. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Goodman, L. A. (2002). Latent class analysis: The empirical study of latent types, latent variables, and latent structures. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 3–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: an international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 169–216. doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-6297-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haybron, D. M. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Healy, D. (2004). Shaping the intimate: influences on the experience of everyday nerves. Social Studies of Science, 34(2), 219–245. doi: 10.1177/0306312704042620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  37. Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Kashdan, T. B., & Steger, M. F. (2011). Challenges, pitfalls, and aspirations for positive psychology. In K. M. Sheldon, T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 9–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim, M. S., Kim, H. W., Cha, K. H., & Lim, J. (2007). What makes Koreans happy? Exploration on the structure of happy life among Korean adults. Social Indicators Research, 82(2), 265–286. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9033-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. King, L. A., & Napa, C. K. (1998). What makes a life good? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 156–165. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kjell, O. N. E., Daukantaitė, D., Hefferon, K., Sikström, S. (2016). The Harmony in Life Scale complements the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Expanding the conceptualization of the cognitive component of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 126(2), 893–919. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0903-z.
  43. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lanza, S., & Rhoades, B. (2013). Latent class analysis: an alternative perspective on subgroup analysis in prevention and treatment. Prevention Science, 14(2), 157–168. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0201-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lawrence, V., Murray, J., Banerjee, S., Turner, S., Sangha, K., Byng, R., et al. (2006). Concepts and causation of depression: a cross-cultural study of the beliefs of older adults. The Gerontologist, 46(1), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture and conceptions of happiness: individual oriented and social oriented SWB. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(3), 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maltby, J., Day, L., & Barber, L. (2005). Forgiveness and happiness: the differing contexts of forgiveness using the distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10902-004-0924-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2012). Age-related differences in lay conceptions of well-being and experienced well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Michalos, A. C. (2008). Education, happiness and wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 347–366. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9144-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mogilner, C., Kamvar, S. D., & Aaker, J. (2011). The shifting meaning of happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(4), 395–402. doi: 10.1177/1948550610393987.
  51. Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2010). Mplus (Version 6). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  52. Nafstad, H. E., Blakar, R. M., Carlquist, E., Phelps, J. M., & Rand-Hendriksen, K. (2007). Ideology and power: the influence of current neo-liberalism in society. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 313–327. doi: 10.1002/casp.931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. doi: 10.1080/10705510701575396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oishi, S., Graham, J., Kesebir, S., & Galinha, I. C. (2013). Concepts of happiness across time and cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(5), 559–577. doi: 10.1177/0146167213480042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152. doi: 10.1080/17439760701756946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pflug, J. (2009). Folk theories of happiness: a cross-cultural comparison of conceptions of happiness in Germany and South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 551–563. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9306-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rojas, M. (2005). A conceptual-referent theory of happiness: heterogeneity and its consequences. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 261–294. doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-4643-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rommetveit, R. (2003). On the role of “a psychology of the second person” in studies of meaning, language, and mind. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(3), 205–218. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1003_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ryff, C. D. (1989). In the eye of the beholder: views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4(2), 195–210. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.4.2.195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sastre, M. T. M. (1999). Lay conceptions of well-being and rules used in well-being judgments among young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 47(2), 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scollon, C. N., & King, L. A. (2004). Is the good life the easy life? Social Indicators Research, 68(2), 127–162. doi: 10.1023/B:SOCI.0000025590.44950.d1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scollon, C. N., & King, L. A. (2011). What people really want in life and why it matters: contributions from research on folk theories of the good life. In R. Biswas-Diener (Ed.), Positive psychology as social change (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Scollon, C. N., & Wirtz, D. (2014). Money, materialism, and the good life: Cultural perspectives. In M. Tatzel (Ed.), Consumption and well-being in the material world (pp. 109–125). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shaw, I. (2002). How lay are lay beliefs? Health, 6(3), 287–299. doi: 10.1177/136345930200600302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Skevington, S. M., O’Connell, K. A., & WHOQOL Group. (2004). Can we identify the poorest quality of life? Assessing the importance of quality of life using the WHOQOL-100. Quality of Life Research, 13, 23–34. doi: 10.1023/ Scholar
  68. Smedslund, J. (2009). The mismatch between current research methods and the nature of psychological phenomena: what researchers must learn from practitioners. Theory & Psychology, 19(6), 778–794. doi: 10.1177/0959354309345648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness and ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Tafarodi, R. W., Bonn, G., Liang, H., Takai, J., Moriizumi, S., Belhekar, V., et al. (2012). What makes for a good life? A four-nation study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(5), 783–800. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9290-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tiberius, V. (2013). Recipes for a good life: Eudaimonism and the contribution of philopsophy. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 19–38). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Twenge, J. M., & King, L. A. (2005). A good life is a personal life: relationship fulfillment and work fulfillment in judgments of life quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(3), 336–353. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Uchida, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: themes and variations. Emotion, 9(4), 441–456. doi: 10.1037/a0015634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: theory and emprical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(3), 223–239. doi: 10.1007/s10902-004-8785-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Veenhoven, R. (2011). Greater happiness for a greater number. In K. M. Sheldon, T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing Positive Psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 396–409). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Veenhoven, R. (2012). Cross-national differences in happiness: cultural measurement bias or effect of culture? International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(4), 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vittersø, J., Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2005). The divergent meanings of life satisfaction: item response modeling of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Greenland and Norway. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 327–348. doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-4644-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wagner, W. (2007). Vernacular science knowledge: its role in everyday life communication. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 7–22. doi: 10.1177/0963662506071785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: a eudaimonist’s perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 234–252. doi: 10.1080/17439760802303002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Westerhof, G. J., Dittmann-Kohli, F., & Thissen, T. (2001). Beyond life satisfaction: lay conceptions of well-being among middle-aged and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 56(2), 179–203. doi: 10.1023/A:1012455124295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. WHOQOL Group. (1994). Development of the WHOQOL: rationale and current status. International Journal of Mental Health, 23, 24–56. doi: 10.1080/00207411.1994.11449286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. WHOQOL Group. (1998). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science & Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wierzbicka, A. (2009). Language and metalanguage: key issues in emotion research. Emotion Review, 1(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1177/1754073908097175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. World Health Organization. (2013). The European Health Report 2012: Charting the way to well-being. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Carlquist
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pål Ulleberg
    • 1
  • Antonella Delle Fave
    • 2
  • Hilde E. Nafstad
    • 1
  • Rolv M. Blakar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OsloBlindernNorway
  2. 2.Department of Pathophysiology and TransplantationUniversity of MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations