Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of Walking Among Employed, Urban Canadians: Variations by Commuting Mode, Time of Day, and Days of the Week

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper illustrates the facility of time-use files to enhance the understanding of behavioral components of commuting. It draws on data from Statistics Canada’s most recent national General Social Survey (2010) to substantiate prior research on the extent that use of public transit for commuting to work is accompanied in people’s days by a greater amount of walking. By verifying alternative explanations for this relationship, the paper explores more thoroughly how walking fits into the daily lives of employed persons in large urban areas. Results show that travel by car comprises upwards of 80 per cent of trips regardless of the hour of the day, while public transportation is used mostly to get to and from paid work. Although walking generally accompanies such transit commutes and is shown to fit sequentially into transit’s temporal patterns, walking spreads out more evenly across the day than transit use and helps complete other trip purposes. The weekday walking pattern extends to weekend days to a surprisingly similar extent, confirming that transit is but one of numerous generators of walking trips. Statistically significant relationships link minutes walked to household income, access to a car, and main mode used for commuting. However, the pre-eminence of commuting by car raises questions about the effective priorities and constraints underlying choice of main commuting mode. More detailed characterization of transit access and subjective questions in time-use surveys could facilitate greater insight into the rationales of the subgroup choosing public transit and walking more frequently and for longer duration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Ugo Lachapelle, Public transit related walking in the 2005 Canadian General Social Survey: Findings and observations on data quality, Unpublished paper presented to the 37th IATUR Conference on Time Use, July 30-August 1, 2014, Turku, Finland.

  2. Another question elicits answers to the question “Thinking of a typical week, what kind of transportation do you use the most?” Answers to the two questions are largely similar but not exactly so. In this paper, we have utilized only the question on last week’s commuting mode, to be consistent and because it is a more exact question.

  3. We are grateful to the Data Library at the University of Toronto for creating and maintaining the merged files in their archives, as well as for their provision of invaluable access and analysis capabilities.

  4. We also examined educational level in this context. Duration in the day of walking varied significantly between the categories of education level, but this variation followed no pattern regarding more or less education, making the variable of little utility in the current analysis.

  5. The general status of subjective information in time-use surveys was summarized in a presentation by William Michelson, “Affect in Time-use Surveys”, to the conference on Developments in the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) and Related Methods: Review and New Directions, January 8–9, 2015, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

References

  • Abraham, K., Maitland, A., & Bianchi, S. (2006). Non-response in the American time use survey: Who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Besser, L., & Dannenberg, A. (2005). Walking to public transit: steps to help meet physical activity recommendations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(4), 273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Werner, C. (2007). A new rail stop: tracking moderate physical activity bouts and ridership. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 4, 306–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) (2012). Canadian physical activity guidelines and Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines: Your plan to get active every day. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP), 29. CSEP_Guidelines_Handbook.pdf. Accessed 4 October 2015.

  • Christian, T. (2012). Trade-offs between commuting time and health-related activities. Journal of Urban Health, 89(5), 746–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutt, C., Knuiman, M., & Giles-Corti, B. (2008). Does getting a dog increase recreational walking? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 5(17). doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-17

  • Fisher, K., Shabazian, R., & Sepahvand, M. (2012). Environmental policies and daily behaviours in the USA: how time diaries inform sustainability debates. In CTUR technical paper 2012–02, Oxford, UK: Centre for time use research. Oxford: University of.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, A., Banerjee, S., Dannenberg, A., & Wendel, A. (2013). Walking associated with public transit: moving toward increased physical activity in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 103(3), 536–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T., Owen, C., Victor, C., Adams, R., Ekelund, U., & Cook, C. (2009). A comparison of questionnaire, accelerometer, and pedometer: measures in older people. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41(7), 1392–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisz, A., & Schellenberg, G. (2004). Public transit use among immigrants. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 13(1), 170–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle, U. (2009). Reconciling the construct of walking in physical activity and transportation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(4), 372–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle, U., & Frank, L. (2009). Transit and health: mode of transport, employer-sponsored public transit pass programs, and physical activity. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30, S73–S94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle, U., & Noland, R. (2012). Does the commute mode affect the frequency of walking behavior? The public transit link. Transport Policy, 21(C), 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle, U., Frank, L., Saelens, B., Sallis, J., & Conway, T. (2011). Commuting by public transit and physical activity: where you live, where you work, and how you get there. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 8, S72–S82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J., Stokes, R., Cohen, D., Kofner, A., & Ridgeway, G. (2010). The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(2), 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, W. (2005). Time use: expanding explanation in the social sciences. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, W. (2009). Variations in the rational use of time – the travel pulse of commutes between home and job. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 6(2), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming Wen, L., & Rissel, C. (2008). Inverse associations between cycling to work, public transport, and overweight and obesity: findings from a population based study in Australia. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morabia, A., & Costanza, M. (2010). It takes a train to knock down global warming and obesity. Preventive Medicine, 51(6), 449–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morency, C., Trépanier, M., & Demers, M. (2011). Walking to transit: an unexpected source of physical activity. Transport Policy, 18(6), 800–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M., & Küller, R. (2000). Travel behaviour and environmental concern. Transportation Research, Oxford: Pergamon Press, Part, D5, 211–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, M., Mitchell, J., & Doyle-Baker, P. (2014). Validity of the apple iPhone®/iPod touch® as an accelerometer- based physical activity monitor: a proof-of-concept study. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 11(4), 759–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saelens, B., Moudon, V., Kang, B., Hurvitz, P., & Zhou, C. (2014). Relation between higher physical activity and public transit use. American Journal of Public Health, 104(5), 854–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinney, J., Millward, H., & Scott, D. (2012). Walking for transport versus recreation: a comparison of participants, timing, and locations. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9, 153–162.

  • Statistics Canada (2010). General Social Survey, Cycle 24: Time Stress and Well-Being, 2010: Public Use Microdata Files (12M0024X). http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/olc-cel/olc.action?objId=12M0024X&objType=2&lang=en&limit=0

  • Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress, http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.

  • Turcotte, M. (2006). Like commuting? Workers’ perceptions of their daily commute. Canadian Social Trends - Statistics Canada. Catalogue No. 11-008, 33–39.

  • Van Cauwenberg, J., Van Holle, V., Simons, D., Deridder, R., Clarys, P., Goubert, L., Nasar, J., Salmon, J., DeBourdeauhuij, I., & Deforhe, B. (2012). Environmental factors influencing older adults' walking for transportation: A study using walk-along interviews. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 9(85). doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-85.

  • Van Eck, J., Burghouwt, G., & Dijst, M. (2005). Lifestyles, spatial configurations and quality of life in daily travel: an explorative simulation study. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(2), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva, K., Giles-Corti, B., & McCormack, G. (2008). Achieving 10,000 steps: a comparison of public transport users and drivers in a university setting. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 338–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, D., Nicol, C., & Bredin, S. (2006). Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(6), 801–809.

  • Wasfi, R., Ross, N., & El-Geneidy, A. (2013). Achieving recommended daily physical activity levels through commuting by public transportation: Unpacking individual and contextual influences. Health & Place, 23, 18–25. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yabroff, K., Troiano, R., & Berrigan, D. (2008). Walking the dog: is pet ownership associated with physical activity in California? Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5(2), 216–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the Social Science and Humanities Research Council and the Fonds québécois de recherche sur la société et la culture for funding the second author’s research project on time use and travel. The Data Library at the University of Toronto is also acknowledged for creating and maintaining the merged time use files in their archives.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Michelson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michelson, W., Lachapelle, U. Patterns of Walking Among Employed, Urban Canadians: Variations by Commuting Mode, Time of Day, and Days of the Week. Applied Research Quality Life 11, 1321–1340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9439-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9439-2

Keywords

Navigation